revoluion is ok if nobody from outside the country finances it. then it is imperialism.

Great chat, thank you! Lots of food for thought in there.

Nature's Source Code ❤. Nature does NOT make jokes or mistakes ❤! Thats why we humans call it GOD ❤! I thank the universe for folks like Nick ❤. Eyes mind heart and soul wide open. NO FEAR ❤! Don't die, we are coming ❤.

In another commentary, Dr. Albert said he was asked to speak on this topic by Darwin College. When he told them he was an engineer who dealt in technology and not an archeologist, they still wanted him to do the topic. I think reactions would have been better if it were called something like "Tech Meets Archeology" or something.

I like listening to Gilchrist, but this time I feel he is missing an important part. He claims that the act of analysing the implicit "right hemishpere" is the downfall of our culture. Later research shows that the dualistic view of the brain is reductionistic in itself, and false. And there in is the kicker. Gilchrist is, as most of us, steeped in an underlying mental infrastructure based on Force and coercion. The dualistic/hierarchical thought pattern forms our understanding of ourselves when analysed based on utilitaristic and capitalistic frameworks, which is the case IMHO. It isn't the analysis in itself that destroys the magic and implicitness. It's the utilitarian idea that something must have an external and capitalistic value to be of worth, that is the problem. It is, to use the terminology of dr. David Hawkin, time to go from a consciousness based on Force to a consciousness based on Power. It is time to leave the Newtonian and dualist frame of mind where everything must be either-or, defined by its relationship to everything else. The reductionistic approach gives us a plethora of juxtapositions like good-bad, light-dark, god-satan, male-female etc etc ad nauseam. Reality isn't made up of pairs. It would behoov us to apply some sacred geometry instead, to use some Einsteinian logic of 'both-and'. One of my favourite examples is the term democracy. We believe we have democracy, because those in power-over us tell us it is so. But looking at politics, the dualistic scale of left-right is the only thought pattern used for comprehension of the situation. To begin with, the problem is that 'democracy' isn't one thing. It's at least three: the idea of democracy, democratic structure and democratic function. We only have democracy as form, as an idea, but retain the old dualistic and hierarchical structures and functions from the pre-democratic and feudal state. There is another "proof" that we don't have democracy yet. Politics is about left and right. The main idea that divides the two, is that the left want a strong state that controls the money, while the right want a weak state controlled by the money. Demos kraitos (and the latin translation Res Publica) means 'popular thing'. The people is the sole main thing in a democracy. Where on the scale of left-right, strong state-weak state, money controlled-money controling is The People? Exactly. Nowhere. We need at least a triangle to be able to define the one most important group of all in a democracy. The most forgotten and shunned of all groups. Gilchrist says the analysis killed beauty. I say that Utilitarianism killed beauty. There's no money in it in a world were The People and human beings don't count.

Arend & luxemburgo & kuhn = Robespiere

Acto de creacion

Nick Lane's contributions to science have been profound. But I like him as a science explainer and writer even more; he brings the biology of the evolution of eukaryotes from archaea and prokaryotes even the evolution of life itself in fascinating detail; incredibly compelling; incredible lecture!

Brilliant!

Let a philosopher class recruited from the red-green left joined by some Jordan Petersons rule the world… but of course, McGilchrist has something to say. And one should bloody well enjoy nature. But as for the ”divine”, I suppose us guys and girls with the roots in the working class will have a hard time doing that. Thats for the redgreens and Jordans.

🌚☄️❤️💫

I love to hear sean’s talks even though i don’t agree with his views

Addendum : Some more CRAZY question / points : 1) Electron is spinning! 2) Proton is vibrating! 3 ) Both make neutron/s chargeless! 4 )Electron keeps everything entangled as well as in order or in disorder (entropy)! 5) That means electron photon interaction... may help us to understand the theoretical points : a) The -e- is there, when we look at it...and not there, when not looking at it... right...!!!??? Therefore the above points may also suggest the ELECTRON being part of the classical science and photon being part of the quantum science...could lead us to the territory of GUT...!!! That means all the theories of all those famous Scientists are the contributors for the present TOE and GUT... in micro and macro levels... A BIT- BY - BIT...!!! THANKS AGAIN DR. SEAN CARROLL...!!!

I don't agree with you Prof Lane. You mentioned a lot about bacteria. Let me ask you, many bacteria has got over 2000 proteins. These are not just random proteins but highly interactive proteins. How did random mutations get there and how did natural selection select them. In human brain ypu get 100,000 chemical reactions every second via 50 neuropeptides. These interact with 500 components of the brain in varying combinations which humans even don't understand. How did random mutations and natural selection get there.? When take one step, our brain automatically co-ordinates 200 muscles. Our computer systems can not replicate them. How did the 2 mechanisms get there? DNA most complex code known to man. It took 2800 scientists 13 yrs to decode it. Was this code random and a chance occurrence?

A simply wonderful lecture. I cried.

Give lecture with wearing that... must be hard...

Arrrrggg

Take clown as name college...bullshit...full of crap...full of fantasy... wrong mindset....😂🤥🤣

Funny this Darwin wonder who give money to him...

Darwin sounds familiar this name....oh... maybe monkey thing...how stupid...his grandma & father is monkey.... shit... some west believe that...

Nice to meet you ...Darwin😂

Dr Iain McGilchrist has brought me to that very place fromwhere i know what to do ! Thanks !

An absolutely excellent. I learn more about language games.😊

Respected and Honble Sister Good day and Happy Friday From Arunava Dasgupta Mrs KasturiDasgupta Master Debarshree Dasgupta India 03.05.2024 Our family Biography realsed By Former Governor and present Vice President of India Respected And Honble Mr Jagdeep Dhankar on 20.03.2020 In the presence of My Wife Mrs KasturiDasgupta Mr Sanjay Sengupta and Mrs Chiroosree Sengupta I had nice discussion with Mr Jagdeep Dhankar We are blood realation of Desh BandhuChittaranjanDas Barrister from London and freedom fighter His newphew SR Das was Chief justice of India and Vice chancellor of viswa Bharati University Santiniketan West Bengal and closely associated with Rabindra nath Tagore received noble prize in literature Surname of Desh BandhuChittaranjanDas And SR Das are Dasgupta and I have evidence Global leader s voted in my Favour and My name is included in Indian Constitution Next president of India and take oath 2027 Economy Revulation one of the best Revulation How to start the Economy Revulation Find statics of the number of banks in the world and what is the total net worth of those banks Example Global net worth 19billion dollar Not enough for economy Revolution 98billion population in the world Per capitia income of the world population Minimum 500USD Then you can call it Economy Revulation M+918017666980 M+918017047666 India 03.05.2024

To the people commenting on cat diets may i suggest you take a look at the actual ingredients in commercially manufactured cat food. Only the very expensive cat food is high in animal protein the more popular Felix, Whiskas , Sheba etc contain much less and include vegetable protein to bulk it out. Felix ingredients Meat and Animal Derivatives* (14% of which Chicken 8%), Vegetable Protein Extracts, Fish and Fish Derivatives, Minerals, Various Sugars, *Chunks: 44% Meat and Animal Derivatives.

well they're certainly making peaceful dissent impossible, so...

Why not call it the Alfred Wallace series ?

Sums up the main problem with the medical industry and society at large for that matter... It's not about healing and prevention most times, the big picture, (right hemisphere dominant thinking) it's about fixing the individual symptoms, which create side effects which lead to dependence which leads to control... (left hemisphere dominant thinking) It's what happens to government, business, organized religion etc... It becomes divide and conquer because everything becomes scattered... an Empire mentality... It reminds us of the importance of applying balance, humility, consideration, reflection and wisdom in all that we do... 🤔

It seems to me, a perfectly good refutation of the Tractatus is the following: an extremely simple fact can by language be described in the most convoluted of ways.

Précis of Talk for Watchers: Sir Simon Schama follows a classical liberal interpretation of revolution. It begins with transhistorical claims drawn from facile etymological claims to the 'original' meaning of revolution. His contenders are directly English-speaking historians and Anglo historiography, such as Christopher Hill. These are the parameters and the theoretical space of investigation. To be sure, Schama rightly sees the limits of semantics and pedantic observations. To use a concept internal to his observations (which they seem to seldom go into analysis), which may be useful to characterise Schama's general posture toward revolutions- namely include, interpreting transhistorical revolutions in relation to "tactics of incrimination" and the "ritualized hunt of culprits" (~12:30). These heuristic pairs are both Schama's parameters of revolutions. This is a liberal interpretation in that it heavily relies on lamenting rather than clarifying; specifically, as it relates to empirical-historical conditions. Schama's expertise may be squarely in the English revolution. This is both its geographic delimitation as far as it can claim relevance to revolutions of the rest of the world, though the title attempts to fight above its weight-class. This is a talk of the 19th century of the English empire, nothing more - nothing less. It is conversational with the French revolution. This talk runs the risk of being a prolonged bemoaning on the part of Sir Simon Schama. His work is not a scholarly betrayal of conventional literature as Schama claims. It is tangential and derivative at its best (~24:00). His beef with Roger Chartier is entertaining. This talk would have been better if it engaged the ritual of violence (mentioned in 27:00). His self-reflection of the presence of English chauvinism and ironic condescension in the discipline of history is appreciated. It is mentioned in passing, neither theoretically nor epistemically confronted. This talk would have done well to draw on the intellectual history of the idea of oppression (as mentioned in ~32:25).

This is superb!

Extremely irrational comparisons.

There is supposed to be something profound about a person who gains awareness so starts overcompensating?

Peculiar how he always makes the result always be negative for each consideration of an occurrence. 28:05. What if you're a physicist and your office is in the basement because your family takes up the rest of the house?

This video is just another sign of our addiction to probabilities first, find the data later. Everyone is so motivated to think of what might be the next big thing just so they can have something with their name on it.

Great talk!

a damning critique of the left… hemisphere

So I've watched the whole series. The general impression i get from the other lectures is "how this type of risk awareness can be helpful when controlling those around you". This video is how risk awareness controls expectations of population density.

Bottom line he is saying don't worry about blame. The system has rules for that. This shares many interesting results from studies but he uses them in a way that suggests his desired audience is that of people who are interested in causing conflict and surviving the backlash. Rather than not creating the conflict.

Why would nature select?

12:20 the presenter does not point out this is when the super rich organizations started buying news reporting companies to "help with marketing".

10:35. I think the number of views for this series is a nice reflection of how the perceptions given in the series are to be understood : not worth seeing.

This guy seems to be applying the same sort of logic and understanding that resulted in brexit. 46:05 he says this with a smile on his face. Let that sink in.

Iain has just kicked another door wide open on my journey of self discovery and human understanding. Taking the time to comment after my second time listening to this Lecture. Thank you Iain.

21:15 she is using the same methods for the role she is describing. Yet, she claims to have awareness?

21:25. "... Is not the way things work." What you see in the lab will never reflect reality. 25:30. And it takes effort of half of the green lot to make the medication to save the reds, but only 3 use the medication.

So his example team scores being a metric for predicting probabilities is a straw man argument. if a team coach is looking at the same data but the coach's view is: the same plays result in the same score. then you are just echoing the methods used by the coach but assigning convoluted steps for the same process. Why would they use a play that didn't result in a goal?

who came here after the Spectator article ? :)

"Hemisphere hypothesis" is likely a more prudent choice.

Beauty goodness and truth did have a growth return spawned by scarcity of easy cheap material goods during the covid pandemic, we were becoming generous and appreciative of heirloom goods that were made to last rather than throw away goods . The tail of this trend is these expensive metal cups people are memetic to purchase