14 күн бұрын
Ай бұрын
Ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@victorgraca9267 10 күн бұрын
Dwarf 3 has a better sensor than S30, wider field of view and EQ mode
@uazbuchanka2206 11 күн бұрын
Greetz from germany. I own and handle the S50 and it's realy worthy for this price, the results very impressiv. If a S30 will necessary,i dont know BUT i want the S30 next to my S50🎉 The DWARF3 on the market have his own group of Fans and user BUT If you have a SEESTAR you dont need a DWARF 😂
@Paulie1978100 11 күн бұрын
I have the s50 I'd get the dwarf 3 for eg mode alone.
@Mr_Glenn 11 күн бұрын
The Dwarf is better in most ways. The resolution is just a bit lower. The Dwarf is more light sensitive, has a wider field of view that it can use because of the higher resolution and has EQ mode, just to name a few things.
@aquilaa2 11 күн бұрын
If budget permit, Dwaft 3 is better than S30. The Dwaft 3 has wider field of view due to larger sensor size (Dwaft 3, 2.93x1.65, 1/1.8" sensor; S30, 1.18x2.14, 1/2.8"). The Dwaft 3 offers higher resolution (8.29MP vs 2.07MP). The Dwaft 3 also deliver more details (2.75 arcsec/pixel vs 3.99 arcsec/pixel). The Dwarf 3 has equatorial mode.
@victorgraca9267 10 күн бұрын
Dwarf 3 wins, with the EQ mode, wider field of view, better sensor. S30 wins on price, that's it. The S50 was competition to the dwarf 2.
@Paulie1978100 9 күн бұрын
@@victorgraca9267 Yep, well said
@rishabhsingh8269 21 күн бұрын
Do review you celestron 130 deluxe eq telescope
@edislatube 21 күн бұрын
We currently don’t have any plans for a that at this time.
@Nill757 21 күн бұрын
The electric field rips apart the air and creates the plasma, not the heat, an after effect of current passing through.
@gabesegun7966 22 күн бұрын
How was the water formed when there was no atmosphere at the beginning.
@edislatube 22 күн бұрын
Like Earth, early Mars likely got water from asteroid and comet impacts. However, due to Mars’ weaker gravity and lack of a strong magnetic field, its atmosphere couldn’t hold onto the water, causing it to evaporate into space or freeze. Evidence comes from studies of Martian meteorites, ancient riverbeds, and ice detected beneath the surface by orbiters like NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter and data from Curiosity and Perseverance rovers. Proof of water loss into space is supported by findings from MAVEN (Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution), which showed atmospheric stripping by solar winds over billions of years.
@wChris_ 22 күн бұрын
actually we do know. turns out it was a quasar.
@lobohez7222 22 күн бұрын
Bullshit mate,... why the magnets attract?.. Well we dont know, yet you tell me its all 13.8by old?
@john-mg2ip 22 күн бұрын
i told johnathon j johnathon about this and i didnt think he would go and make a video about it
@ka_shh 23 күн бұрын
Wow, one more reason to get tabletop telescope
@dhritiman24 23 күн бұрын
Shit philosophy, out of the larger reality of being we create ai and then reasoning from this thin slice of perspective and assume its the truth of the larger whole...flawed circular reasoning
@salasala667 24 күн бұрын
So sad I like our universe
@grlcowan 26 күн бұрын
It's not "a gravity-like effect", it's gravity.
@aaronennis2587 26 күн бұрын
God would have to save us from the scientists.
@telwood15 26 күн бұрын
I'm cancelling my holiday to Mars with our travel agent.
@T72_turret_space_programme 26 күн бұрын
stop with the alt accounts were not dumb
@novajuniorbeda113 27 күн бұрын
Disproved
@ka_shh 27 күн бұрын
Can the Dobsonian base be disassembled as well? In case I want to put the base in separate bag ?
@edislatube 27 күн бұрын
It’s not recommended and voids the warranty. Unscrewing the nuts may loosen the mount and won’t be covered if damaged. Instead, consider a cheap additional tripod; the Astra 100 has an easy-to-attach dovetail.
@ka_shh 27 күн бұрын
@@edislatube Ok, thank you for letting me know about this warranty policy rule, I was not aware of this.
@LabMonkey-k2j 27 күн бұрын
yet we dont know what 95% of the universe matter consists of............ so i call BS !
@aleksanderdaczewic1396 27 күн бұрын
Nidje veze jedino je istina da ces doc do tacke koja se zove nepovratna tacka sve ostalo je laz
@knowplay3258 27 күн бұрын
And Near-Light Speed gets us nowhere, just faster. Even traveling at light speed, it would take us over 4 years to get to our closest neighboring star. We have to find a way around and beyond the barrier of light speed. As it stands today, there is only one thing we have observed to have greater velocity(delta-v) that light: space itself. We must find a way to harness and envelop ourselves in space to break the barrier of the speed of light.
@GD_eek 28 күн бұрын
the universe is also bigger than it looks and the universe is also expanding faster than the speed of light this is not good
@gojo-n9n 28 күн бұрын
i heared that a universe is the 3rd smallest thing in space
@TheOutlier-c6o 29 күн бұрын
So the earth is flat after all...
@edislatube 27 күн бұрын
The only thing flat here is your understanding of physics.
@madtscientist8853 29 күн бұрын
A HOLOGRAM. sounds like something a FLAT EARTHER would come up with
@Moonlightomo 29 күн бұрын
Reality is an Illusion and the universe is a holgram, buy gold :D
@grahamcracker7958 29 күн бұрын
Wow! That's incredible😮
@Chili_dogs8 29 күн бұрын
First (ok I’m done)
@Chili_dogs8 29 күн бұрын
First again
@Chili_dogs8 29 күн бұрын
Also first
@Chili_dogs8 29 күн бұрын
First
@Dark-e1si Ай бұрын
Yes
@Axolotl_reallll Ай бұрын
It didn't take them all out the small dinos lived which are now birds
@YazEniid Ай бұрын
Yeah sure the exact same number of years till the sun dies. Fake! We dont know when the e collision happens.
@BroadMeadow-d9s Ай бұрын
We can easily move the earth. Just put a rocket on the planet, upside down, and light it up and it will push earth. A very, very, very, very, very, very tiny amount, of course. But it will move the planet a tiny bit in its orbit.
@edislatube Ай бұрын
Yes. It's a good point that we can theoretically move the Earth by applying a force like a rocket, but the effect would be incredibly tiny and practically negligible.
@Epiccowboy72 Ай бұрын
And now what if theres more universes very separated from others but eventually they’ll collide?
@manishamusaddi6279 Ай бұрын
First one there ??
@Aviaether773 Ай бұрын
Someone ought to push Saturn into jupiter
@tourettiespaghetti1967 Ай бұрын
It’s not the densest object in the universe, and it wouldn’t flatten you like a pancake, it would turn you into a microscopic ball.
@rokaskalendra1501 Ай бұрын
first coment!
@Bananaboi-e6t Ай бұрын
This guy deserves more likes ❤
@faustinonavarro7812 Ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂 did you hear the light years? 😂😂😂😂😂
@CodeNameZ_935 Ай бұрын
That's just called a wormhole...
@ajolleyduck2933 Ай бұрын
They are the other side of the black holes. My completley scientific assessment of it all haha
@rdavis5205 Ай бұрын
What if this is Gods science lesson for man. Could we maybe shield Venus's hot side from the sun, we know how to make metals that can resist melting. From that shielding we can make water from heat evaporation which will be protected by the shielding.. & just fix problems as they come On least hot planets we could plant seeds in protected pods that would drill themselves into the planets earth to create carbon dioxide to self creat atmosphere.. what did they call it on Aliens to teraform an atmosphere on a planet.. I think this is what God in his infinite power has given us... A chance to play around with science....its like what elons theory on how to make mars livable., we are like damp matches at the moment.. we know how things work but we never try stuff.
@Jam-u2 Ай бұрын
if jupiter and saturn collided then the whole solar system would be destroyed and some planets will be flung out of orbit because of the change in gravity everything in the solar system is like the way it is for a reason
@Trevor21230 Ай бұрын
Fun fact: Venus' runaway greenhouse effect was kick-started by a single-digit difference in global average temperatures compared to Earth. Okay maybe fun was the wrong word.
@bills5009 Ай бұрын
So in a few billion years the earth could be like Venus?
@edislatube Ай бұрын
Yes, Earth could potentially resemble Venus in a few billion years if current climate trends continue unchecked. Estimates suggest that in approximately 1 to 3 billion years, the Sun will increase in brightness by about 10% to 40%, which could lead to extreme greenhouse conditions similar to those on Venus today. Here's an interesting article on SciAm www.scientificamerican.com/article/earths-days-are-numbered/
@Trevor21230 Ай бұрын
@@bills5009 not as bad because there's still less heat from the sun for the greenhouse effect to trap, but it does show just how badly out of control it can get when it starts to become self-perpetuating.
@dardycinq Ай бұрын
I find this hard to believe; Where would the proof for a claim like this originate? Are you also claiming Venus was earth-like prior to its ‘run-off’?
@Trevor21230 Ай бұрын
@@dardycinq I mean there was liquid water. But not like Earth, no, just a lot closer to being like Earth than you'd expect for a planet on the surface of which lead is molten. Venus had a slightly higher starting surface temperature, and we know that based on its proximity to the Sun and a few other minor factors. But it also *receives* more energy from the Sun, so the Greenhouse Effect is more powerful on Venus than here on Earth. Still, it is a fact that Venus' incredibly high surface temperature is owed to a runaway Greenhouse Effect, in which greenhouse gases are released from water and rocks due to an increasing global temperature, which leads to a faster rise in temperature, which accelerates the release of greenhouse gases, etc. In conclusion, Venus was never "like Earth", but it was much closer than it is now after a runaway Greenhouse Effect took over. And while it's unlikely that Earth could ever end up like Venus due to being further from the Sun, the story of Venus does act as a powerful cautionary tale about the exponential nature of a runaway Greenhouse Effect.
@patsheppard2616 Ай бұрын
Does NASA have a published account of all these short time visitors to the moons orbit. The information appears to be scattered in various areas of publishing. You tube is one. If they could be put in one long video we could absorb it better.
@edislatube Ай бұрын
NASA does not currently have a single video or source documenting all short-term visitors to the Moon’s orbit. Information about these missions is scattered across various sources, including scientific papers, official reports, and platforms like KZbin. We will work on gathering and organizing this scattered data into a cohesive video for easier understanding. Thank you for your valuable feedback
@gigabyteape Ай бұрын
I don't even care that this might be ai, I would watch that as a movie
@Young.money.university Ай бұрын
Why the massive Covid
@shawns0762 Ай бұрын
Dark matter is dilated mass. Mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Dilation occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass. This includes the centers of very high mass stars and the overwhelming majority of galaxy centers. The mass at the center of our own galaxy is dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have no dark matter. In other words they have normal rotation rates. All planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates for the same reason.
@edislatube Ай бұрын
Your perspective on dark matter as “dilated mass” is an interesting take, but it’s essential to clarify that dark matter is defined by its gravitational effects rather than being smeared through spacetime. Current research shows that dark matter comprises a significant portion of the universe’s total mass-energy content and affects the motion of galaxies, which is evidenced by phenomena such as gravitational lensing and the rotation curves of spiral galaxies. Low-mass galaxies like NGC 1052-DF2 indeed exhibit normal rotation rates, leading to discussions about their dark matter content, suggesting that not all galaxies have the same composition
@shawns0762 Ай бұрын
@@edislatube Einstein explained dark matter in the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation. There is no concentration of mass in our galactic center, that would defy the known laws of physics. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Pauli, Feynman etc. for this reason.
@RickyEaton-f3m Ай бұрын
so.... stars are the hottest thing in the universe (so far)