3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
4 жыл бұрын
5 жыл бұрын
5 жыл бұрын
6 жыл бұрын
7 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@gaobillson3333 8 күн бұрын
This video is 15 years old today: August 31, 2024. Congratulations Viren!
@gaobillson3333 8 күн бұрын
This guy is an OG KZbinr. 15 years ago, wow.
@Mark-ow4cm 11 күн бұрын
Where problem
@BehnoudMaleki-r6f 13 күн бұрын
i have doing this problem for almost 2hours and was fully confused but you help me lot LOVE you from iran
@mike40044004 19 күн бұрын
Amazing video, thank you brother!
@leraienemariyavinu1701 21 күн бұрын
Thankyouuuuuu. May God bless you sir
@franklyvulgar1 29 күн бұрын
I love videos that show this instead of just memorizing mindlessly the equations. bravo
@6k20king Ай бұрын
You sir, are an expert. Thank you very much.
@English-bit-s Ай бұрын
14 years ago🫡🫡
@Lexyvil Ай бұрын
Thanks! I wasn't sure if going against the battery was + or - for when using the KVL rule, but this cleared it up!
@pauldirac6243 Ай бұрын
Genius! 😀
@AhmedKhaleelAhmedAhmed Ай бұрын
thank you sir
@lilstanni6904 Ай бұрын
Omg ur the goat. I been wondering why the heck do we use MG SIN THEETA for the INCLINE. like no1 explains it, it was just a formula. But u demonstrated by trig why we use it.
@geminigaming9652 Ай бұрын
This video was much appreciated. It’s always interesting to see how high minded concepts in physics can often be simplified through logical and stepwise calculus processes
@Supersaiyantobi Ай бұрын
Why does my textbook say. X = Asin(wt) Instead of cos?
@lasseviren1 Ай бұрын
It depends on the initial conditions. If the object is at x=A when t=0 then you would use x = A cos(wt). If the object is at x = 0 when t = 0 then you would use x = A sin (wt). In fact, if the object is at x = -A when t=0 then you would use x = -Acost(wt). Take a look at the shape of the following four graphs and it might make more sense: x= Acost(wt), x=-Acos(wt), x=Asin(wt), and x=-Asin(wt).
@CenkUluk 2 ай бұрын
Went from theoretical physics to practical one
@zenon1177 2 ай бұрын
if only I knew when I was 3, 14 years ago that I would need to watch these videos going into AP Physics C next year
@user-tk8ek4ws4u 2 ай бұрын
Great explanation, many thanks for your hard work
@user-tk8ek4ws4u 2 ай бұрын
One of the greatest explanations, thank you so much
@manasreddy3979 2 ай бұрын
Thank you sir
@NexiOHome 2 ай бұрын
its pronounced kirkoffffff not kirk chofff
@s.n.victory3408 3 ай бұрын
"We are just gonna assume" 4:08 This was such happy moment. I was literally so confused like everyone was saying that the extension of both springs is same and ........ Now i got it
@Someone-1997 3 ай бұрын
Even 14 years later your videos are helping me
@balloooga9915 3 ай бұрын
So happy you're back!
@KledAteTacos 3 ай бұрын
Went from helping students in physics to helping people in the kitchen. legend
@Dana-ls9eq 3 ай бұрын
Question, for charge density, shouldn't we be using the volume of a sphere on the denom not 4pir^2?
@yourname6443 3 ай бұрын
AA vericem fizik 2 yi. Sağ olun hocam.
@dedede5586 3 ай бұрын
thank you 😭🙏
@shinyyo4291 3 ай бұрын
Legend
@kirby3694 3 ай бұрын
This guy has some problems in his brain or something, because he clearly isn't talking straight, mixing r1 and m1 and mumbling you one doesn't even understand what he is saying.
@flurryofsnow 3 ай бұрын
Really wish I knew this.
@niall_al3059 3 ай бұрын
this was so helpful
@lduh9446 4 ай бұрын
Can i use the method if one spring is torsional spring and the other is translational spring and i need to find the k eq of the tow springs.
@a.meforyou 4 ай бұрын
9:16 wait what did he do here?
@VanJake-pu2us 4 ай бұрын
Thañks sir for ur video has helped me so much 🙏
@Hello-ev3gr 4 ай бұрын
Hi, you helped me in physics so many times, I just wanted to see how you were doing, Hope you are having a wonderful life!! THANKS
@Kesxh 4 ай бұрын
bro knew I would need this 14 years ago.
@user-bv3wq6mi4c 4 ай бұрын
He example KVI lavun solve karun dya please
@Mudiyanse-cq8lx 4 ай бұрын
Super explaining..👍
@PerJohannessen 4 ай бұрын
@lasseviren1 I am amazed of how simple you are able to explain things. What is your background and how do you manage to break down explanations so elegantly?
@AbrahamYohannes-mo4xj 4 ай бұрын
Thankes sir
@akumaplays8121 4 ай бұрын
Anyone in 2024?
@realman1512 4 ай бұрын
timeless legend 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
@ajithakumari5736 4 ай бұрын
14 years ago❤
@nourelzahraashamseddine7513 4 ай бұрын
Why i used to put 1/2 after the (y^2+a^2) ?
@SouvikCivil 4 ай бұрын
Thank you so much sir! These videos are so helpful. Keep up the great work!
@qzorn4440 4 ай бұрын
I appreciate the more explicit RC time example. Like the Greek 'tau' for 63.3%. 🥳 Thank you.
@Lvcrazysisters74588 4 ай бұрын
❤
@Lvcrazysisters74588 4 ай бұрын
❤
@oscarpesantes6342 4 ай бұрын
My textbook… almost every university textbook said that the motional emf=Blv not negative Blv. Your derivative makes sense but I’m confused for how inconsistent the equations are. Are you representing the induced motional emf or motions emf? I hope you read this to clarify my confusion.