Пікірлер
@lourdesgracia6767
@lourdesgracia6767 15 күн бұрын
3(81^x) = 6 81^x = (6/3) = 2 log 2 / log 81 = 0.157732438 81^ 0.157732438 = 1.999999997 1.999999997 x 3 = 5.999999999
@Psykolord1989
@Psykolord1989 15 күн бұрын
Before watching: This will go most easily if we square away the radicals on the left. Recall that a^(mn) = (a^m)^n. First, square the left and the right, to get 3sqrt(9 sqrt(27)) = 81^(6x) = 3^(24x) (because 3^4=81) Squaring again we get (3^2)(9)sqrt(27) = 81 sqrt(27)= 81^(12x) And with one last squaring... (81^2)(27) = 81^(24x). Since 81 = 3^4, 27 = 3^3, and (a^m)(a^n) = a^(m+n)... (3^4)^2 * 3^3 = (3^4)^(24x) -> 3^11 = 3^(96x). Then 11 = 96x, and finally x = 11/96
@brucedavis9191
@brucedavis9191 20 күн бұрын
Go away
@sureshkumar-db1jh
@sureshkumar-db1jh 22 күн бұрын
C
@User19rhx13xr
@User19rhx13xr 24 күн бұрын
7/16 in mind
@monroeclewis1973
@monroeclewis1973 24 күн бұрын
Rather than squaring expressions I converted them to exponential form right away: On the left 3^1/2 x 9^1/4 x 27^1/8, all powers of 3; on the right 3^12x. Add exponents on the left to get 11/8 with 12x on the right. X = 11/96.
@Ayushmishra70817
@Ayushmishra70817 Ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@rajanmaths5
@rajanmaths5 Ай бұрын
Nice
@Ayushmishra70817
@Ayushmishra70817 Ай бұрын
@@rajanmaths5 aur kya haal hai bro??
@roger7341
@roger7341 Ай бұрын
Substitute a=b+1/2. (b+1/2)^4-(b-1/2)^4=2[4b^3(1/2)+4b(1/8)]=0 b^3+b/4=0. b=0 or b=±i/2. a=1/2 or (1±i)/2
@mariorueda6715
@mariorueda6715 Ай бұрын
the right answer is 262143
@phishfearme2
@phishfearme2 Ай бұрын
what a waste of time
@joaocardoso2304
@joaocardoso2304 Ай бұрын
Mate, you are among the 99% who got it wrong.
@TeenyPort
@TeenyPort Ай бұрын
0:10 111111111111111111 but in base 2
@DonkeyYote
@DonkeyYote Ай бұрын
I don't get it. Why not say 262144 - 1 ? If you are going to take the step that 512 is 2 to the ninth, why not say that 2 to the eighteenth is 262144 ?
@FritzTheCat_1030
@FritzTheCat_1030 Ай бұрын
This is super-stupid. If you know that 2^9 is 512, you could just do 512^2 - 1...factoring it into (512+1)(512-1) is the single dumbest way you could go about solving from there. But then you do a whole bunch of other time-wasting after.
@TomasGradin
@TomasGradin Ай бұрын
...and end up with the wrong answer 🤔
@timur5788
@timur5788 Ай бұрын
oxymoron
@Time12366
@Time12366 Ай бұрын
Just do multiplication by 2 manually lol
@marcelopacheco2479
@marcelopacheco2479 Ай бұрын
2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096,8192,16384,32768,65536,131072,262144 (2^18) So 262143.
@proffessorclueless
@proffessorclueless Ай бұрын
This won't work for anybody that can't multiply by 2.
@marcelopacheco2479
@marcelopacheco2479 Ай бұрын
@@proffessorclueless Just multiply 1024 x 256 -1. Simpler than all rearrangement. I know power of 2 up to 20 by heart (plus 2^24 and 2^32) as a low level computer guy.
@proffessorclueless
@proffessorclueless Ай бұрын
@@marcelopacheco2479 sounds like binary is the way to go here.
@jerrypaquette5470
@jerrypaquette5470 Ай бұрын
It really is not that difficult toto just multiply 511 x 513 which equals 262,143.
@petercoool
@petercoool Ай бұрын
Yes😂😂😂😂
@GabrieleTafuro
@GabrieleTafuro Ай бұрын
I am afraid that the final sum is wrong.
@jerrypaquette5470
@jerrypaquette5470 Ай бұрын
Your right it should be 262,143.
@honeybee9455
@honeybee9455 Ай бұрын
X=0
@workemail9020
@workemail9020 Ай бұрын
ITNA LAMBA Q KIYA? 4^8/8^4 - 8^4/4^8 can also be written as 64*64*16/64*64 - 64*64/64*64*16 sare 64 cut jayenge, simple bachega 16 - 1/16 = (265-1)16 =255/16
@WalkerGR221
@WalkerGR221 Ай бұрын
The easiest solution is to put everything in powers of 2. You then have 2^2^8 / 2^3^4 - 2^3^4 / 2^2^8 = 2^16/2^12 - 2^12/2^16 = 2^4 - 1/2^4 = 16 - 1/16 = 255/16.
@Victurf
@Victurf Ай бұрын
45 = 3^3.465...rien de plus simple
@despa7726
@despa7726 Ай бұрын
sqrt(10 * sqrt(10 * sqrt(10))) = 100^x (10 * (10 * 10^(1/2))^(1/2))^(1/2) = 10^2x 10 * (10 * 10^(1/2))^(1/2) = 10^4x 100 * 10 * 10^(1/2)) = 10^8x 10 000 * 100 * 10 = 10^16x 10 000 000 = 10^16x 10^7 = 10^16x 7 = 16x 7/16 = x x = 7/16 = 0,4375
@ForumLight
@ForumLight Ай бұрын
He wastes time on several steps. 3^x = 45 can immediately be re-written as log_3 (45) = x. We're not required to use log base 10 to eventually get to this step.
@whosit112
@whosit112 Ай бұрын
Dividing by 2 at the beginning was unnecessary.
@tommymorrison6478
@tommymorrison6478 Ай бұрын
If 99% of entrants failed this they never learned arithmetic.
@JohnRandomness105
@JohnRandomness105 Ай бұрын
2 *sqrt(x) = x. One solution is zero. For the other, divide by sqrt(x) to get 2 = sqrt(x). That means x = 4, the other solution.
Ай бұрын
I don't believe 99% would fail to find the 0 solution. You wouldn't clickbait, would you?
@legendarylegodude11
@legendarylegodude11 Ай бұрын
I literally just looked at it and knew 3⁴ + 3² = 90. You REALLY overcomplicated it
@sunillohia6003
@sunillohia6003 Ай бұрын
Nearby value?
@sunillohia6003
@sunillohia6003 Ай бұрын
Can any suggest what is value of x? In rational
@vpsjdon
@vpsjdon Ай бұрын
Didn't watch the video but I got x=3.465
@allinthemind7364
@allinthemind7364 Ай бұрын
3²+3⁴=90, but answer is 9×5+9×5=45+45=90 because we have to so how much we can remember and show that why 3×3×3×3+×3×3 is 90 Which we never use in our life. I am not telling that math and science is useless be this this 💀😕 education system crush it and fuck it
@charlesmrader
@charlesmrader Ай бұрын
3^x=45, 3^(x-2)=5, (x-2) log 3 = log 5, x=2+(log 5)/(log 3). If 99% failed this, the population had never learned about logarithms.
@manomaybangali
@manomaybangali Ай бұрын
easy toh hai😂😂
@chrismcgowan3938
@chrismcgowan3938 Ай бұрын
x=4 and possibly imaginary values
@JohnRandomness105
@JohnRandomness105 Ай бұрын
No, no imaginary answers. But zero is also a solution.
@chrismcgowan3938
@chrismcgowan3938 Ай бұрын
@@JohnRandomness105 Yes I missed that one.
@MikeRosoftJH
@MikeRosoftJH Ай бұрын
If we divide by √x, we get 2=√x i.e. x=4. But the equation has one more solution (when division is invalid): x=0. (If x is negative, then √x is imaginary. More generally, if x is complex other than a positive real number, then angle of √x in polar coordinates can't be the same as the angle of x.) We can also substitute y=√x; then we get y^2 - 2*y = 0, and that yields y*(y-2)=0, immediately giving the two solutions (a quadratic equation can't have more than two solutions).
@sebastiandomagala9233
@sebastiandomagala9233 Ай бұрын
Nice calculating. But how on earth are you writing the letter "x"?
@FinetalPies
@FinetalPies Ай бұрын
I think they're using n, same concept.
@sebastiandomagala9233
@sebastiandomagala9233 Ай бұрын
@@FinetalPies The Thumbnail says "x", and "n" implies a natural number.
@golddddus
@golddddus Ай бұрын
1:27 x^3 + x^2 + x - 555 = 0👀 1 1 1 -155 Syntetic division 5 5 30 155 1 6 31 0 x^2 + 6x + 31=0 D1=(b/2)2-ac=3^2-1*31 < 0
@marciodasilvamelo7241
@marciodasilvamelo7241 Ай бұрын
Acho que está errado essa resolução.
@nishadhpatel5965
@nishadhpatel5965 Ай бұрын
Isn't that not simple 7+49+343+2401+16807 = 19607
@FFH.
@FFH. Ай бұрын
25
@harishvarbt3989
@harishvarbt3989 Ай бұрын
B 25
@ajayff6539
@ajayff6539 Ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@blackandbluesmurf6294
@blackandbluesmurf6294 Ай бұрын
Silly soundtrack. Left after 20 seconds
@havali_doritos
@havali_doritos Ай бұрын
Oh wow thank you
@ujjwalakulshreshtha9665
@ujjwalakulshreshtha9665 Ай бұрын
Hahaha
@adib3011
@adib3011 Ай бұрын
Isn't that just a simple sum of gp?
@shawnjacob6108
@shawnjacob6108 Ай бұрын
The final result would still have 7 raised to 5
@soniamariadasilveira7003
@soniamariadasilveira7003 Ай бұрын
Muito legal!
@jens2994
@jens2994 Ай бұрын
5^2/25^2 = (5/25)^2 = (1/5)^2 = 1^2/5^2 =1/25