Thank god, you exist Sir.

Thanks

me in 3rd grade watching this to learn more about the different:

I mean - I think it should be reminded analyzing as an object is fine but you should keep in mind objects are made of atoms with atomic weights and so force per atom can be same assuming same atomic composition its just 10x the number of atoms or whatever in heavier 'object'. So force doesn't adjust you just have a heap of more atoms in heavier 'object' so whole vector when you f=ma is xf=xma but per atom f doesn't seem to vary if same elemental compositions btwn objects (varies logically if different atomic weights bc different material compositions)

you're just saying radio waves can pass through a wall because they can.

Great Work Champ 🎉

Nice but you missed it by THAT much. I think you should explain the use of the skinny triangle to convert degrees into distance to really bring it home. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skinny_triangle

May i know which software do u use for animations ?

Thank you! I was kinda confused by the concept, i knew it worked but I didnt really get it. Now i see the difference, 10m/s would just be constant while 10m/s/s is acceleration

I belive your theory about the plane not flying is incorrect. Aircraft do not transfer power to the wheels for take off. Aircraft engine power is applied against the air around and behind it. Since the air is not affected by the treadmill and the aircraft wheels free spin, the treadmill would not be able to keep the aircraft from taking off.

Thank you for the equation. I makes so much sense to see it as meters to the second power meaning a force applied per meter every meter.

There is no difference between 1st Theory and 4th. But the 2. theory and 3th are the real reasons.

Very good explanation. Students starting off on a physics course (atoms) really could benefit from your video.

please release chap 8😅

Underrated channel much love from india 🇮🇳

Sir can you please make a video on the difference of scaler and vector units

amazing work very understandable 👏🏼

Amazing. Totally loved the analysis. Thanks a lot

So what about the notes how they work?

Awesome analogy and great explanation! Keep doing it

Thank you so much I understood the difference so well !!

If we substitute the variables respectively according to the video, then E = rest mass which is zero multiplied by the energy due to the momentum. We know that any number multiplied by zero is zero. The equation eventually comes to E =0 so how does this work?!

Very informative. I knew about Scott but not the other two.

Mike tyson punch energy is 1,600 joules

Mike tyson punch energy is 1,600 joules

@ 1:25 Suppose we applied one Netwon of accelerating force to the bow of an aircraft carrier, and over the course of 10 years (or whatever the calculated time required) we moved ship 1 meter away from the dock. Are you saying that, over the course of that 10 years we will have expended only one Joule of energy? i.e. how much does the grocery cart weigh, or is that irrelevant?

Thank you!!

he'll yehaaa, love magic with physics (also a kind of magic)... still not sure what a newton is jaja jkjk

The real answer is that we don't know yet. It is not a pointless question We now know the behavior, but we don't know the real cause

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aWqzgXywmdJkb68si=Jq8_fqXKjVc3CuzT mass & weight dichotomy

thanks so much🙏 your videos on #abhot are sooooo helpful. Please, finish the book🤓🙏

LEgends watching before the science exam lmao

Too childish.

Because the gravitational acceleration is around 9.8m/s2, so the example is quite accurate

In a circuit physically electrons flow from High concentration of electrons to low concentration of electrons so, the reason why electrons have negative charge.

Using positive and negative for charges was a misnomer from the start. If they must be used however, electrons should have been considered the positive charge as the definition of positive suggests something active, such as mobile electrical energy (versus the immobile proton charge). What a failure of accurate scientific categorization that only serves to confuse. Thanks Ben Franklin... Also the slightly pretentious tone of op is annoying. Just get to the point next time, thanks.

Outstandered ❤

Finally i can understand why the acceleration has s2, thanks sirr you help me a lots😁, does anyone watch this in 2024 ?

I want to party with him while playing chess and talking about the universe

Thanks

Awesome explanation thanks

I normally don’t to comment videos in KZbin, but your channel is so enriching and awesome that I had to, I hope you don’t stop making videos, Thank you for the content.

Question: Upon searching on the internet, I have found that electrons are discovered AFTER the conventional current flow was defined to be from positive to negative (in other words, the flow of positive charges). Since we now discover that electrons (containing negative charges) are the ones that are mobile, why do we assign a negative charge to electrons instead of a positive charge? Correct me if I have any misconceptions. I hope that you will reply to this. Thanks.

Thanks man

Even though the proton is much much larger than any electron, it's charge is equal to the charge of the electron?

Excellent description. Thanks!

Thank bro I can't understand you understand me easily 😅

Thank you

Hint of the day: Carl Gustav Jung failed to establish his BS as a proper school of science and has been off the curriculum for decades.

Because they aren’t villains. They’re revolutionaries, the true heroes of our time. They refuse the status quo and opt instead to live free rather than as slaves to ungrateful masters.