Please watch and share with others my five brief videos in which I present examples of scientific facts contained in the Bible, facts that the writers thousands of years ago could not have been aware of without divine knowledge given to them by Jesus Christ / The God of the Bible. And today's scientists agree with those facts!
@stevehoogenakker96194 күн бұрын
Love the 4" Avacado shag that my mom made me "rake" 3 times a week and the mediterranean style desk.
@rudolphguarnacci1977 күн бұрын
Man those lapels are wide.
@OmegaVideoGameGod10 күн бұрын
Carl Sagan will always be proof anything is possible and who we choose to be.
@MegaSkills912 күн бұрын
Did Johnny say "Thank you Kyle" at the end? (And not Thank you Carl.) Play the last few seconds and check for yourself, if he forgot his first name...lol
@FirelifexX21 күн бұрын
I feel like his opinions on social issues would be so interesting to hear.
@FirelifexX21 күн бұрын
Okay… to be fair… Lando. But Carl Sagan is right, the casting could have definitely been more diverse, especially with the number of extras in that movie, it wouldn’t have been that hard.
@MrSteve28021 күн бұрын
Fascinating man. Lucky to have experienced him in our lifetime.
@harminsambajon455621 күн бұрын
You can tell how much people listen to his every word. Not a peep from anyone else while he spoke!
@AJScraps26 күн бұрын
Woaaah Johnny looks so young
@joenahhas437729 күн бұрын
Physicists = dumb. Earth’s rotation alters observation from Circular Line-of-sight (2π) to a Sinusoidal wave-of-sight (7.640395578). r = rₒ e± i ω t; θʹ = θₒʹ e± 2i ω t; T = Tₒ e± 2 i ω t. (Sinusoidal/ Circular) = Errors = All physics.
@AlanCanon222229 күн бұрын
Howdy Doody, Milton Berle, and the Army McCarthy hearings.... See, science is funny!
@AlphaAchillesАй бұрын
Too bad he was so very wrong when it comes to evolution. Considering macro evolution never happened not one single time. And for someone to claim it did as scientific fact either is lying or doesn’t know the information as much as they think they do.
@MNMC-fs8txАй бұрын
He said, "I'm a feces..." My late husband told me that he used that in a bar on a chick that was hitting on him.... LOL
@MNMC-fs8txАй бұрын
I had a border collie who LOVED TV! He particularly enjoyed Billie Mays infomercials and Border Collie trials! I have pictures of him watching this stuff.... He was so funny.
@user-gx5mb4se8pАй бұрын
jack. we're supposed to discuss about throwing a big party johnny carson . oh big party huh ed mcmahon. yeah sure joan rivers. well i'm ready piggy and kermit. let's get this party started!
@user-gx5mb4se8p11 күн бұрын
jack. we're supposed to discuss about throwing a big party johnny carson. oh big party huh ed mcmahon. yeah sure joan rivers . well i'm ready piggy . let's get this party started kermit. woo hoo!
@joenahhas4377Ай бұрын
Carl Sagan for less than a dollar in food stamps Newtonian derivation of E = mc² In Newton’s law: Force = mass x acceleration (Areal velocity = constant is included in Newton’s law) Newton’s gravity law F = - (G m M /r2) r1 Acceleration in mathematical form is: (rʹʹ - r θʹ2) r1 + (2 rʹ θʹ + r θʹʹ) θ1 Force = mass x acceleration = m x [(rʹʹ - r θʹ2) r1 + (2 rʹ θʹ + r θʹʹ) θ1]; Force = F = mass x acceleration = - (G m M /r2) r1 And m (rʹʹ - r θʹ2) = -G m M /r2 ---Newton’s gravitational force law. And (2 rʹ θʹ + r θʹʹ) = 0 -------------- Kepler’s constant areal velocity law. Divide Kepler’s law by r θʹ Visual distance: r = (distance) r₀ x e± i ω t Visual angular speed θʹ = (angular speed) θʹ ₀ x e± 2 i ω t = r₀ e± i ω t And θʹ = θʹ₀ e± 2 i ω t And (2 rʹ / r + θʹʹ/θʹ) = 0; rearrange: (2 rʹ/r) = - (θʹʹ/θʹ) = ± 2 i ω In Kepler law: Areal velocity = (r2θʹ) = constant Or (r2θʹ) = k; r = distance; θʹ = angular speed Take the derivative: d (r2θʹ)/ d t = 0 And (2 r rʹ θʹ + r2θʹʹ) = 0; divide by r2θʹ And (2 rʹ / r + θʹʹ/θʹ) = 0; rearrange (2 rʹ/r) = - (θʹʹ/θʹ) = ± 2 i ω And (rʹ/r) = ± i ω And d r/r = ± i ω d t And ∫ d r/r = ∫± i ω d t L n (r/r₀) = ± i ω t L n e = L n e± i ω t And r = r₀ e± i ω t And - (θʹʹ/θʹ) = ± 2 i ω And θʹʹ/θʹ = ± 2 i ω The solution is: θʹ = θʹ ₀ e± 2 i ω t If r₀ e i ω t; θʹ = θʹ₀ e- 2 i ω t If r₀ e - i ω t; θʹ = θʹ₀ e 2 i ω t E = mc² S = r ℮ ỉ ω t P = [v + ỉ ω r] ℮ ỉ ω t (P. P) = [v² - ω² r² + 2 ỉ ω r v] ℮ 2 ỉ ω t E = m (P. P)/2 = (m/2) [v² - ω² r² + 2 ỉ ω r v] ℮ 2 ỉ ω t E = (m/2) [c² - c² + 2 ỉ c²] ℮ 2 ỉ ω t With ω r = v = c E = (m/2) [2 ỉ c² ℮ 2 ỉ ω t] E = (m/2) │2 ỉ c² ││℮ 2 ỉ ω t│ E = (m/2) (2 c²) E = mc²
@danacoleman40073 күн бұрын
and Deez nuts
@juliemcarthur3004Ай бұрын
She was my favorite angel
@MikkoRantalainenАй бұрын
Carson interrupted Sagan maybe once and apologized immediately for doing it. Compare that to modern talk shows...
@MikkoRantalainenАй бұрын
7:57 "Humans think they are smarter than dolphins because we build cars and buildings and start wars etc., and all that dolphins do is swim in the water, eat fish and play around. Dolphins believe that they are smarter for exactly the same reasons." - Douglas Adams
@j.477Ай бұрын
,,, nuff said,, good way on n off ...
@mp-kq3vcАй бұрын
Johnny Carson could keep up with the best of them and continue the conversation. Met with Carl Sagan today most hosts would say things like "mind blown" and do the "pshew" hand gesture from the forehead.
@captaincoyote1792Ай бұрын
I watch these whenever they “pop up”. As a child in the 60s and 70s….the references are spot on! And Lorraine’s response to what Sandy Duncan was really like? OMG….I LOLed for 10 minutes!
@johnbarnett69242 ай бұрын
Greatly appreciated I revisted this much impressed June 12 2024❤❤❤❤❤ jlk
@Hpzel12 ай бұрын
Only if carl Sagan would have seen *interstellar* 😮
2 ай бұрын
I'm talkin' Arnal & Colonel Angus. that says it all you hippies
@hawaiiusa61472 ай бұрын
Sagan was a force of nature. It's hard to believe he shared the same planet with idiots like Donald Trump and religious morons.
@ReyesRobledo-et6di2 ай бұрын
Most Hotter Very Beautiful Cheryl Ladd 🤍 🎞️
@jamesgarner21032 ай бұрын
wow, this terrible. how did he even get into comedy? nothing was funny.
@TNT-km2eg2 ай бұрын
Martin trying hard , like always
@ericwieboldt70422 ай бұрын
I dont get it. Star trek had a diverse cast.
@humanonearth12 ай бұрын
Woke before wokism was a demonized thing from an increasingly regressive centrist intelligentsia.
@endicotto3 ай бұрын
Had a huge crush on Cheryl. Bought her album when it came out and still got it. She’s got a great voice too.
@EddyMerckx-1964-Sallanches3 ай бұрын
That’s sandy Dunkin’ , from tyler Texas.
@OMGWUNSIU3 ай бұрын
And these days we have these total wastes of sperm and egg telling us what to think, what to do and who to vote for passing themselves off as entertainers. I would rather watch repeats of Carson, Letterman and Snyder. Much more entertaining.
@rolando_roblero3 ай бұрын
Damn! Fallon doesn’t talk to guests like this, I wish late night was more informative instead of just a celebrity masturbation session.
@rick33019583 ай бұрын
Not funny.
@For4Ever-pm6yj3 ай бұрын
Forgettable and forgotten.
@billyx26813 ай бұрын
Was Sagan the first to complain about Chewie not getting a medal?!
@Mentalista37D4 ай бұрын
Carl Sagan 1978 Johnny Carson kzbin.info/www/bejne/mYGwZoqmiJtoqs0si=jGDEdod_jt1ZeIjw
@science2124 ай бұрын
Sagan was a great science writer.
@mrtriffid4 ай бұрын
Funny! Looks like Sagan may have been fooled by the "Coco" scam!
@dickwhisker4 ай бұрын
Greatest comedian of all time.
@onegreengoat97794 ай бұрын
lol Carl Sagan is so bitter about Hollywood messing up physics, yet he messed up mathematics. As a mathematician I want to posthumously take Carl Sagan to task. 1 is not a prime integer. The integers under addition and multiplication form a commutative ring with identity. The integers are classified as a Euclidean Domain, which guarantees that it has specific properties, like having unique factorization. With this in mind, we call the multiplicative identity element, 1, and its negative, -1, units. This helps us define unique factorization: it specifically means that we have unique factorization of every integer into a product of positive prime integers and an arbitrary product of units. If 1 were not to be a unit, but rather a prime, then we could write 6=1*2*3 and 6=2*3 as two different factorizations of 6 into a product of primes, which would contradict the idea of the integers having unique factorization. If the integers did not have unique factorization, then they would not form a Euclidean Domain, which would mean that we could not use the Euclidean algorithm to find greatest common divisors. It would mess up a lot of the arithmetic that we appreciate. Take that Carl Sagan! :D
@danacoleman40073 күн бұрын
and Deez nuts
@johnfox99394 ай бұрын
Carl, the world needs you; there too many fools around..!
@Entedeficción4 ай бұрын
11:18 Sesame Street will save us.
@jarglee44714 ай бұрын
I'm waiting until AI finds out the way to travel in time so I could go back in the 70s
@jarglee44714 ай бұрын
I always answer to my son "let's look this up" and "maybe you'll find the answer in the future" and I never heard this interview or that kind of statement before. I just tell the truth to my son.