What the heck did Biden do in his 4 years? Let millions of illegals in.

Go away. We are not listening to you people anymore. You have lost all credibility and all honor and all dignity. You people need to sit down and shut up for the next 4 years while we fix what your man broke

Your nothing but a hater......In my book your BULL SHIT

Germany is going bust slowly by switching to renewable energy.

Trump is the worse thing to happen to the world in the last 80 years

America is already behind some other countries in many ways.

You are extremely short-sighted, a sure sign of a tiny IQ!

I must have missed where Biden strengthened our infrastructure...

I think you got that backward buddy?? Lmao uhh BIDEN!!

Source. Trust me bro

I was under the impression that the middle east is so wealthy almost exclusively because of there oil, and we supposedly have more oil in the US than them.

Has Biden done it?

Trump has no plan to uplifting the American homeless.

I feel like he has a plan and he is most likely aware of this...? All I know is that he sure will be remembered for SOMETHING... Good or bad idk...

The content of the video is good I would make the music softer and make your voice louder than the music

lol you are right about the basic tariff but your understanding is sooooo limited. your video shows your whole talking point is from american media and lack any critical thinking. look at what happened to columbia today is an example. your tunel vision is your down fall

Dawg it’s snowing in Florida wym

Omg why are Americans actually so dumb

hahaha You wish alcaraz! i hope you are not illegal immigrants lol

Trump is the only president that can save America. Cry more, wokie. You had your chance for 4 years and didn't do shit.

Stop trying to convince us that we are the ones that will be impacted, its a big fat lie to drive public opinion away from what works for them

USA is about to be finish mexico sing a contract with Russia china north korea and iran and india now they will built a arsenal in mexico and most likely nuke the states from Mexico also the cartel is partners with the mexico president qnd they gonna get their lands back out of usa is a big master plan be careful

Great video. Can you go over RFK Jr's economic plans? He was running for president for 2024, and since I wanted to vote for him, I'm curious what his economics would've done.

Lol

Fake news 😂

MONEY MEANS NOTHING IF MY CHILDREN HAVE NO COUNTRY.

finally... the nature is healing...

This must explain why he's President and YOU have 91 subscribers on youtube. I think you need to go to your school and ask for your money back.

Wont he be the best and take more money from the peopke than any other elite yet. #1

Anybody who wants to be the president of USA in this economic climate has to be a loser of the highest order.

😂😂😂.. Trump will usher in crypto erasing deficits..

Before the shit hits the fan, we fucking told you so

Foreigner says the U.S. economy will be weaker? Yeah I smell big cope.

NOOOTHING UNDERMINES USA MORE THAN Wallstreet C0RRUPTION & SAB0TAGES to succeed their short position on Renewal, EVs, Solar, INTEL, just like they had done to GE 2017--2022.. Now you know why CHINA succeeds in new tech, USA gets sabotaged to lag behind..

Cope

Lies!

Trump changes on day one ❤ european here go trump

Trump! Trump! Trump!

Dream on, you know how Carmen ends?

diluded aint the word

Thanks for another perspective on trumpenomics. Great vid, keep up the good work 👍

As dum as Trump

Trump will be the worst president again

Are you serious? This has to be one of the worst examples of uneducated thinking Trump loves. If the USMCA was so good then why is he coming after Canada again? If you also knew anything about the history of tariffs with Trump you would know that its never worked. Lets look at what happen to the farmers Trump had to subsidized because of his tariffs with China. Taxpayers paid farmers $28 billion to cover for the tariffs with China and China got there soybean from Brazil and you think he will be the best economic president lol. You should not be anywhere near economics

ANNEX CANADA via economic destruction.... its a declaration of war.... and you Fks are obliviouse. You will come up here not knowing its in our perfect right to... Americans... under the laws of War.

This is a joke, right?..... Right?

idiot

I can't belive trump is the only politican to promise tax cuts.

Great content, keep going 🤍

I have time today, so against my better judgement, I'll give an objective counter argument to each of the 8 outlined points you made that sound okay on paper, but, in practice, typically only increase wealth inequality and benefit the rich disproportionately to the middle and lower class. 1. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (2017) While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) initially appeared to stimulate economic growth by slashing corporate tax rates from 35% to 21%, its benefits disproportionately favored large corporations and high income individuals. The promised trickle-down effect-where corporate savings were expected to translate into increased investment, job creation, and wage growth largely failed to materialize for the middle and lower classes. Instead, corporations directed much of their windfall toward stock buybacks, which primarily benefited shareholders rather than employees. Additionally, the TCJA added nearly $2 trillion to the national debt, putting future generations at risk of higher taxes or reduced public services to offset the shortfall. 2. Historic Job Market Although record-low unemployment rates before the pandemic were touted as a major success, even though Donald inherited a thriving economy from the Obama administration, meaning he only had to not mess up what was already going on whilst taking full credit for what was happening, they mask underlying issues. Wage stagnation persisted, meaning many jobs created were low-paying and lacked benefits, leaving workers vulnerable and requiring many to seek second jobs or or income streams. Furthermore, labor force participation rates remained relatively flat, indicating that many individuals had either given up looking for work or were employed part-time out of necessity. These factors suggest that the job market’s health was superficial, benefitting employers with access to cheap labor while offering little long-term security or upward mobility for workers. 3. Energy Independence Becoming the world’s largest oil and gas producer under Trump’s administration was a double-edged sword. While it reduced reliance on foreign energy, it came at a significant environmental cost. Deregulation in the energy sector prioritized short-term economic gains over sustainable practices, exacerbating climate change and environmental degradation. The focus on fossil fuels also hindered investment in renewable energy, leaving the U.S. less prepared for the inevitable global transition to cleaner energy sources. These policies primarily benefited large energy corporations, while rural communities faced health and environmental risks from increased drilling and fracking activities. Furthermore, pulling out of the PCA twice, making the United States appear less than committed to the global goal of carbon neutrality, is not a good look for the nation regarded by many to be the world's overall leader. I will stray away from objectivity here to clarify that I am of the opinion that trading the irreversible damage to the environment from fracking to air pollution to investment in non-renewable energy sources for short term gains will never ever, under any circumstance, be a valid means by which to operate an economy. 4. Trade Policies Trump’s trade policies, including the renegotiation of NAFTA into the USMCA and the trade war with China, aimed to address trade imbalances but often created new challenges. Tariffs on Chinese goods led to higher costs for American consumers and businesses, particularly small and medium sized businesses that struggled to absorb increased input prices. Farmers were hit hard by retaliatory tariffs, necessitating government bailouts that further strained federal resources while adding to our national debt. While these policies aimed to protect American jobs, the overall disruption to supply chains and increased costs undermined their effectiveness, with the benefits, as expected, primarily going to large corporations that could navigate the complexities and expenses of global trade. Tariffs often lead to increased costs for raw materials and finished goods, which are passed on to businesses, which then have to raise prices, which again, passes the burden on to consumers. This makes American products less competitive globally and hurts export-driven industries. Furthermore, the complexity of global supply chains means that tariffs can inadvertently harm U.S. companies reliant on imported components. If that doesn't sound like a big deal, look up how much raw material is imported into the United States that can't reasonably be replaced by domestic production, either due to lack of access or expense of production being unsustainable. Large corporations can absorb these costs or relocate operations, but small businesses and consumers bear the brunt of the impact. 5. Middle-Class Tax Relief Proposed deeper tax cuts for the middle class may appear beneficial but risk exacerbating income inequality. The previous tax cuts under the TCJA primarily favored higher income households, and further reductions would likely follow a similar pattern. Additionally, without corresponding cuts to federal spending, such tax relief only deepens the national deficit, potentially jeopardizing funding for essential programs like Social Security, Medicare, and education that he's already been very vocal about being willing to abandon. The middle class may face long term economic insecurity as a result. In just the first few days of his second administration, he has shown his commitment to this by retracting Biden's executive order regarding Medicaid pricing protections. If tax rates go down, that money has to be accounted for somehow, and there are only two ways to account for it; raise profits or cut expenses. Lose-Lose. 6. Manufacturing Resurgence The idea of universal tariffs to protect domestic industries and revive manufacturing might seem appealing, but if you think at all about it, the risks and significant unintended consequences outweigh the potential gains, even in a best case scenario to the point where this idea isn't even worth considering. Decades ago, the united states intentionally traded away domestic manufacturing jobs with the intent on becoming a global leader in more white collar jobs, which has partially come to fruition, but, the whole H1B visa argument between president Musk and Vice president Trump explain better than I ever could why we have so many highly educated recent college graduates with degrees in computer science, programming, and other once in-demand fields going months if not years without being able to find a single job in their field despite applying to hundreds if not thousands of positions. Tech jobs are being hugely undercut by foreigners on work visas that will work double the hours for half the price of an American with the same qualifications. It makes no sense for us to try to turn back time and bring back manufacturing when we could incentivize companies to employ qualified Americans rather than cheap imported labor. For proof, look up Elon's pay structure for domestic vs international workers. 7. Freedom Cities Initiative Trump’s vision for innovation hubs, or "Freedom Cities," may sound transformative but lacks a clear roadmap for equitable implementation. Without proper safeguards, such initiatives risk becoming enclaves for the wealthy and well-connected, further marginalizing low income communities. The focus on cutting edge technologies could also exacerbate job displacement in traditional industries, leaving many workers behind. Additionally, the funding and governance of these cities raise questions about accountability and whether public resources will primarily benefit private developers and corporations. 8. Energy Boom 2.0 Doubling down on domestic energy production as part of an "Energy Boom 2.0" risks repeating past mistakes. Expanding fossil fuel extraction ignores the urgent need to transition to renewable energy to combat climate change. While rural economies may experience short term gains, they remain vulnerable to the boom-and-bust cycles inherent in the energy sector. Moreover, the environmental degradation associated with increased drilling disproportionately affects rural and indigenous communities, while large energy corporations reap the profits. This approach delays critical investments in sustainable infrastructure, ultimately leaving the U.S. at a disadvantage in the global energy transition. Also, to reiterate, refer to my earlier subjective injection of my opinion on trading the environment for profits from point 3.