But "Palestine" didn't exist during that time period.

Beside the misinformation the video presents here and there, It is weird how the narrator refers to the Arabs as “Palestinian”, they are Arabs, not Palestinian. No attention for cause and effect either.. but well. The video needs likes and traffic and there’s less knowledgeable people in the crowd so that’s mass media for you.

The wording in the documentary reveals an evil in the arab people and their motives. I fully support isreal. Palestine should simply not exist.

This crime must be reversed. Palestine shall be free and soon.

Arabs come from Arabia-Israelis from Israel.

British lies.

What goes arround comes arround.

The west plagiarized the judaism and Christianity from Semites and still obsessed with them while they claim to be untheocratic 😂

Semitic Lands belong to semites not gentile europeans.

Yahweh will never like or tolerate western self-indulgent in his land. The westerners better become Atheists or Pagans before it is too late.

Every disease has its own origins in Europe.

Britain screwed half the world back then and itself NOW.

They don't talk about Christians in Palestine. Entire towns were Christians. Christians were treated the same way than Muslims during the Nakba 😢 no words about the Haganah and Irgun 😮

Ive been a history guy my entire life. As a kid, to my age of 71, i always woundered why a bunch of White Guys got to carve up the world, with a map, and then creating colonial states? I get it, you win wars, and you take all the stuff that the losers had. Worse still, they carved it up in secret, while telling lies face to face to Arabic peoples. Wars are fought over resources, people and land...

The Romans named Judea (Jews) Palestine to get rid of the rebellious Jews. They named it that after the Philistines. Do the research...there really is No Such Place as Palestine... it's a cover story brought to you and the miserable Philistines, that now sacrifice themselves for Hamas.

…and then there’s the little known secret that the Arabs didn’t notice the barren land until the Jew was mentioned. Hmmmmm. Well now I shall go purge my ears after listening to this editorial.

The British used the Holocaust to establish a military base in Palestine called Israel. They trained the Zionists and prevented the Palestinians to organise themselves into a group.

Leave it to the British to draw whimsical borders and split a people across two land-masses as they did with Pakistan/India/Bangledesh (“East Pakistan”). Both partitions caused catastrophes with many people killed and expelled. But have no worries, the British and collective west will thumb their noses when called out for stupidity. They hold steadfast in their eurocentric superiority complex and will continue to do so as their colonies and former colonies and the rest of the world turn their backs on these thoroughly antiquated perspectives.

Britain gave Palestine to Jews. Bastards, Balfour was a disgrace to Britain.

I'm sharing this with my friends. This is so important! Thank you for this excellent work of journalism.

When did the region start being called Palestine and by whom? The Romans referred to it as Syria Palestina in the second century AD but that did not stick. The Ottoman Empire who ruled that territory did not use the term Palestine. So who did from 1917?

More than 70% of Jewish men and half of the Arab men whose DNA was studied inherited their Y chromosomes from the same paternal ancestors who lived in the region within the last few thousand years.

The Romans deported Jews from HOLY LAND and it took the remnants of this empire, Britain and France, to restore Jews in their homeland. The Palestinian Arabs came from Jordan to settle in Judea, Samaria and Galilee. Jews should never allow a 2 state in Holy land. Jesus was born, lived, died and resurrected in Holy land.

Very good summary. There are a few errors, and one I mention is around 9:38. The Arabs were promised self determination by McMahon in 1915, two years before the Balfour Declaration. The most astonishing revelation is the Balfour Memorandum of 1919, in which Balfour exposes the British disregard for Arab human rights. Here's what ChatGPT says: - - - - What is the text of the Balfour Memorandum, or Note, of 1919? ChatGPT The Balfour Memorandum of 1919, also known as the Balfour Note, is a lesser-known document written by Arthur James Balfour. While the full text is less commonly cited than the 1917 Balfour Declaration, key excerpts from it have been referenced in various historical sources. The memorandum was part of a communication within the British government and with other Allied leaders, outlining British intentions in the Middle East following World War I. Key Excerpt from the Balfour Memorandum of 1919: One of the most cited and significant excerpts from the memorandum includes: "In Palestine, we do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country, though the American Commission has been going through the form of asking what they are. The four great powers are committed to Zionism and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land." Context and Significance: Dismissal of Arab Opinion: This excerpt reveals a blunt dismissal of the desires of the Arab population in Palestine, reflecting the imperialist attitudes of the time. The British government's commitment to the Zionist cause was prioritized over the local population's wishes. Commitment to Zionism: The memorandum reinforces the British support for the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine, as initially expressed in the Balfour Declaration of 1917. It underscores the geopolitical and strategic motivations behind this support. International Diplomacy: The document was written in the context of the Paris Peace Conference, where the future of territories formerly under Ottoman control, including Palestine, was being negotiated. Balfour's note was intended to influence the discussions and ensure that the British commitment to Zionism was recognized and supported by other Allied powers. Historical Impact: The Balfour Memorandum of 1919 is historically significant because it candidly exposes the British government's disregard for Arab self-determination in Palestine and its unwavering support for the Zionist project. This stance contributed to the longstanding conflict between Jewish and Arab communities in the region, as well as the broader Middle Eastern conflict. For those interested in a more detailed study of the memorandum and its implications, it can be found referenced in works such as "The Israel-Arab Reader: A Documentary History of the Middle East Conflict" by Walter Laqueur and Barry Rubin, among other historical analyses of British policy in the Middle East. - - - The more I read, the more I learn that the Arabs got royally screwed (pun intended). They never had a chance and they have suffered in a slow motion genocide over almost a hundred years. And now with Gaza destroyed for generations, what will become of them, especially after the Jews finish gnawing on the West Bank and East Jerusalem? The Star of David from now on will be identified by most of the world with the Swastika.

October 7 it didn’t start on October the 7 just rember the Zionist government didn’t have anything no one wanted then British messed everything up

When Britain ruled Palestine. A tragically short time when there was some hope for the region.

Give the Jewish people Denmark and put the Danes on to a little island

Also neglected in this is the fact that most Arabs in Palestine were relative newcomers brought there by the Ottoman Empire and Egypt in the mid to late 1800's. Not to mention the other fact that many of them were descended from Jews and Jewish Christians who converted to Islam due to them being under "Dhimmi." It was supposed to "grant" them certain rights, but it basically had them as second class citizens. Especially when one considers how Mohammad went from considering them children of the book to as bad as pagan, etc. when they refused to acknowledge him as a prophet, etc. Another interesting fact left out, among many, is although it does mention the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, what it did not say was that when he fled due to the problems he was causing, he fled to Fascist Italy and then to Germany, was good friends Adolph and other high ranking Nazi's, that he wanted to bring the solution to the Middle East, etc.

Britain still refuses to get out of Ireland. They think if they call it "Northern Ireland" that makes it theirs.

Very educational about how the British created a can of worms for generations to come. The Arabs were the majority and the Jews were only 10% of the population but the British pushed the Balfour declaration down their throats. Jews were kicked out of their land because they broke God's covenant with Moses. God used the Romans to purge the land of Jews. All this concern about a Jewish homeland that was occupied by Muslims was very stupid. Jews can live wherever they want but not in the ancient land of Israel. That's God's will because they murdered his Son and broke his covenant. The new covenant is the Christian church founded by Jews and is for Jews and Gentiles.

Where does the name Palestine come from? Latin? It’s not Arabic, is it?

In her book ‘Legacy of Violence - A History of the British Empire’, Professor Caroline Elkins devotes a couple of chapters to Britain’s role in Palestine.

No such country as Palestine, the Ottomans called the provinces Musrtarrifate of Jerusalem and the Beirut Vilayest. The dumb British knowing a little Latin called the area by it's Roman name Palestine.

No no no ...if you are trying to explain this to the protesters you are doing it all wrong .First you need some crayons and construction paper then some cut out paper figures ,have some toy soldiers probably green then some gold stars if they can stay quiet long enough to learn something give them a star and if they happen to actually learn something Give them the special reward of a hand stamp. Don't spend to much on stamper be a waste of money ...

So the Zionists were the terrorists 😂

The Arabs should’ve just accepted the peel commission. But nevertheless they didn’t know what the future was going to look like 😢

It is reported that Britain was ready to hand their responsibility ot the UN but that was refused, leaving what happened to fall upon the shoulders of the British. Fast forward to the present day.

They should blame the Zionists that had infiltrated most Western governments for at least the previous one hundred years, even as far back as the French revolution and the American war of independence.

The devious British empire.

The Rothschild banking empire in Rheinland Germany 🇩🇪 and Frankfurt Germany financial services for Zionists proxy wars and endless wars.

Kings and Queens have left a severe stain on history but we still glory them and their decisions.

Moral of the story " Stay the fuck out of other peoples' squabbles ." End of story. We here in the U.S. should heed the lessons of the past.

All of this is insane, but it is the silence inflicted by a regime who have closed its border crossing and shutting out the world beyond this open-air prison, seem to be repeating their own history. Surely 'never again' means one learns from the atrocities of WW2 and would learn from it to never want to do it to another. In a bigger picture, this sounds like revenge. "An eye for an eye" which only makes one only too blind to see. 😥

From the river to the sea…Palestine will never be. There are times when the hard won lessons of the past have to be relearned at great cost. “The preservation of the Jews is really one of the most single and illustrious acts of divine Providence… and what but a supernatural power could have preserved them in such a manner as none other nation upon earth hath been preserved. Nor is the providence of God less remarkable in the destruction of their enemies, than in their preservation… We see that the great empires, which in their turn subdued and oppressed the people of God, are all come to ruin… And if such hath been the fatal end of the enemies and oppressors of the Jews, let it serve as a warning to all those, who at any time or upon any occasion are for raising a clamor and persecution against them.” Thomas Newton, Bishop of Bristol (1704-1782) From the river to the sea…Israel will always be.

Religious war requires a two state solution of biblical proportions….and a floating pier. The idea that Biden, the UK and states of the EU might unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state without including Israel in the discussions is front and center…especially after the faux cease fire agreement Israel was excluded from and the subsequent Biden arms embargo. Aside from the fact doing so would be an egregious act of hubris; doing so would be rewarding Hamas for the October 7th atrocity while putting Israel in an untenable situation in that the lesson Islamists would embrace is clear…terrorism is far more effective than negotiations. There is a far more tenable solution but it would require upending the current paradigm that Israel must once again trade land for peace i.e. the solution would require Arabs and Turkey to trade land for peace. Turkey’s Erdogan has long dreamed of uniting Islamic countries and here is his chance…perhaps to win the Nobel Peace Prize rather than be ejected from NATO. There is a place for every Palestinian in Gaza and the West Bank but first one must accept negotiating with a fictional people has passed; “Palestinians” are stateless Arabs and Muslims. There is no need to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state when a far more viable state can be negotiated with the added benefit of an answer in distance…but not apartheid which simply means apartness; I mean real distance. There is a common sense solution when one calculates the length of the coastline going north from Lebanon including the Tartus/Latakia Governorates of Syria combined with the Hatay (appendix) Province of Turkey it constitutes a strip of land on the Mediterranean that equals Israel’s shoreline. The Tartus Governorate is 731 sq. mi. / the Latakia Governorate is 887 sq. mi. / the Hatay Province is 2133 sq. mi. for a total of 3751 sq. mi. of mostly arable land far exceeding the 1450 sq. mi. of arable land in Israel…and enough shoreline to create an Arab Riviera along with enough land to absorb the every Palestinian in the 2,183 sq. mi. West Bank and the 17 sq. mi. Gaza strip with ease. Hatay Province is a dirty little secret kept quiet and away from outside eyes; Hatay was annexed in 1939 within a year of the death of Turkey’s founder Ataturk who recognized Hatay as a Syrian province; a deal that was a French ploy to preempt any Turkish alliance with Nazi Germany in an echo of WW1. Land for peace has been a mantra for decades as have the two state and one state “solutions” and all have failed miserably. It is both reasonable and logical a just God of Sinai would impose upon Islam the definition of justice they themselves imposed upon Israel. The land for peace solution requires detaching the festering appendix that is Hatay Province from Turkey to be joined with Tartus and Latakia to create a federal district much like the District of Columbia; the capitol of the nation of Ishmael which would form around it; an Arab Mediterranean Riviera. It is a vision Erdogan, the Arab states and the Palestinians should find very appealing. It would be very easy to evacuate Gaza by ship for the short 340 mile trip to Hatay Province. Once the pretense of an identifiable “Palestinian” people is dropped they can start building the Mediterranean Riviera that was originally envisioned by the fools who ceded Gaza in the first place…land for peace with no peace.

The zionists violated the Balfour agreement the moment they entered the region in1948. They got Palestine and proceeded to destroy the people there. All of this would have been AVOIDED if the Jews honored the agreement they made in England in 1917. GOD admonished them and said LET YOUR YES MEAN "YES". The zionists violated not only the Balfour Agreement, but blatantly violated GOD'S commandment.

Boy there is a lot of propaganda laced in this video. There was no palastine during Ottoman rule. The land sporadically after the fall of Judea at the hands of the Romans, was called "Syria Palaestina". The league of nations called it Palestine to make it simple. Some like to argue that the palastinians were decended from the Philistines, because the Hebrew name for the Philistines is "philistina ". But genetic tests have conclusively demonstrated that all those claiming to be decendants are in fact Arabs and Egyptions. With any trace of the philisteins having vanished centuries ago. Further, there is already a palistinian state, it's called Jordan, which is composed of 85 percent palastinians. The big question is, why doesn't Jordon want the palastinians from Gaza? Because, Gaza palastinians are entierly wrapped up in the darkest side of radical Islamic fundementalism.. In fact no Muslim country on the planet wants anything to do with Gaza Palastinians. But country's like Iran do use them frequently as expendable pawns in a broader game. As far as the Jews go. They have Been on that land continually for 3500 years. During the Roman and Ottoman years, the Jews kept an extreemly low profile, but yes they were still there.

In this world, one of the real evil politics played by the British is unimaginable. There are so many crises of war. Conflict between faith and territory is all because of evil policy by British. Divide and Rule. That why they are still running under monarchy. Worse Nation on earth.

That geopolitical positioning, the Suez canal and oil resources were the factors of being there, two of the three parts are still relevant in most post colonial thinkers minds.

follow the money , who demanded a Jew state in the first place? look at the globalist bankster cabal, greed and money always seems to prevail