Tino Aviation

Пікірлер

@juleshammond5652 4 күн бұрын

A fascinating aeroplane and remarkable. Considering it had creditable range, payload, twin engines and two crewmen it defies logic that the Lightning was developed in preference to a supersonic Javelin variant?

@dash7stol 8 күн бұрын

Thanks for highlighting a great aircraft but there are several inaccuracies or wrong information. The DHC-6 wasn't usually called "Dash 6" There were just 113 aircraft built, not 133. The flaps were not full-span but rather about 3/4. The Arkia plane shown as a -101 variant does not have a cargo door. Finally the Dash 7 was successful in doing for what it was built for but was not a real commercial success as the market DHC had envisioned for it did not really exist (contrary to your mention in the video when listing aircraft of similar size) wasn't big enough and cities failed to build the "urban STOLports" the DHC-7 was meant to use.

@wildskel6350 12 күн бұрын

Nice, but w0uld've appreciated clearer narrati0n, hard t0 f0ll0w at times.

@fighterbomberMiG27 18 күн бұрын

You reminded me of my years in the Air Force, I started flying the Il-28 at the academy in my third year, when I was 19 years old student pilot. Great reliable car. Thank you for such an excursion into the history of aviation. WOW, my big like and Sub for this footage

@Grandlake-outfitters 23 күн бұрын

A big operator of Dash 7 aircraft now is Air Tindi in Canada not counting parts planes they have 7 in there fleet

@thomassharp2719 Ай бұрын

They should have put Jet Props on the 1649A Starliner.

@tango6nf477 Ай бұрын

To see one of these flying extremely low over the ground while navigating narrow valleys (North Wales) at speed was an incredible experience. I know because I was climbing and they flew below me on a practice mission, something never to be forgotten.

@douglassshephard3732 Ай бұрын

If Britain has any of these buccaneers, Jets see if Ukraine could use these buccaneers have Great Britain has any of them left over, and they can be upgraded they shouldn't be that hard for Ukrainian pilots to learn how to fly them, they would be definitely better Russian jets that Ukraine has right now

@stephengilbert-p7z Ай бұрын

its a bomber not a fighter.

@Sacto1654 Ай бұрын

The Buccaneer was really effective because it could fly very close to water level at over 600 mph, which made interception difficult for the radars on Soviet warships at the time.

@michaelmcnally2331 Ай бұрын

The joke about the bucc was that was the only plane that had to raise its undercarriage to descend to operating altitude.

@paultootill7062 Ай бұрын

It is not pronounced “herms “ the carrier’s name is Hermes, pronounced “Her-meez “

@hinanden7 2 ай бұрын

good vidio from mads,

@allanwilson8161 3 ай бұрын

Sales so bad with over 500 units sold ?

@thomassharp2719 4 ай бұрын

Hughes Airwest F-27 prop-jet.

@christainmarks106 5 ай бұрын

DC-10 was first to Market and tad bit more affordable. Thats it… thats the only good thing about that passenger killing POS. Lockheed Martin’s L-10-11 was superior in everything else. Better more reliable engines( TY rolls-Royce)..better passenger experience. Loved by the pilots. Even aesthetically looked better than the DC 10.

@Tinoaviation 5 ай бұрын

jep, and the dc-10 dint have the best start 🥶

@bernardanderson3758 5 ай бұрын

Great memories of the L-1011

@johannesbols57 5 ай бұрын

I hope to see regular uploads from your channel.

@jarrodnolan7326 6 ай бұрын

A splendid video. The little-mentioned SA227-CC often forgotten - only 5 were built, originally constructed at SA277-DC Metro 23's but modified (in reverse!) to be fitted with the slightly worse -11 engines of the Metro III. This due to either having trouble sourcing enough -12 engines as fitted to 23's or having leftover -11's still on hand.

@gilbertotrevisan6538 8 ай бұрын

Besides it's fantastic engines, the plane itself are a piece of sh....The wings cracked right under the landing gears, the avionics and electric systems were a nightmare to work, there was some places where only a pigmeo could fit to do maintenance...to mention a few things...

@ivanlussich8146 9 ай бұрын

I am from Uruguay, 85. I flew in HS 748 in the sixties. They were used by Argentine Airlines (AR) on the "air bridge" MVD/ BUE/ MVD. Good aircraft indeed. I also flew in the Japanese NAMCO YS-11 (Austral Airlines-AU), same route. A solid, dependable airliner.

@mebeasensei 9 ай бұрын

What about the Japanese YS-11? Very similar?

@Tinoaviation 9 ай бұрын

It is not mentioned due to it having nothing to do with the 748. Tho they do look similar, they dint take anything from the 748 - thanks for watching!

@gilbertotrevisan6538 8 ай бұрын

Yep, they're very similar in the looks, sort of a bigger version of the Avro and a fantastic airplane, a little bit underpowered for it's weight and size nonetheless...

@pascalcoole2725 9 ай бұрын

The F27 handled like a dump truck, but it was rugged and reliable.. just like the DC-3

@michaelosgood9876 9 ай бұрын

You left out Mt Cook Airlines in NZ who operated these for 28 years & loved this aircraft. No other 50 seat plane of the 748 era was as rugged or do the job as well as this aircraft. You say little known-- any plane buff knows the 748, my bro...

@thedkgamer8369 9 ай бұрын

Cool video!

@topofthegreen 9 ай бұрын

this plane has no autopilot.😊

@ЭкремСулейманов-ш6б 9 ай бұрын

Ил красавцы

@bernardanderson3758 9 ай бұрын

Love the Metro

@KamilMB 9 ай бұрын

C'mon! Saying, that Il-62 and VC-10 are copies is like saying that 737 and A320 are. In both cases it is just a matter od external design. Aeroflot, Cubana, Interflug and OK-Jet airlines also had fatal accidents of IL-62 in this plane hey-days. So not just our Polish LOT.

@Tinoaviation 9 ай бұрын

yes, but after I did indeed say that they are nothing alike! But some spying was done, that we know. About LOT, it was just hoose guys who had most interesting story and crashes... Anyway thanks for watching!

@KamilMB 9 ай бұрын

@@Tinoaviation Yes, wathing about Il-62 never gest boring for me. But about espionage in the sense of airplanes, I get very iritated, as I am a bit of a nerd in relation to airliners, and when i hear or read thet, Il-62 is VC-10 it is not nice, but far wores is to read that Tu-144 is Concorde, when in fact in some cases it was the other way around, plus in the same way as Il-62 and VC-10 - Tu-144 and Concorde were totally different, as the delta wing is simply the way to go if you want a supersonic plane. If you check Boeing 2707 or other less advanced studies about supersonic airliners (Douglas did one) you will see, all of those concepts were alike. And my ground argument was - Tu-144 flew first!

@NathanEllis-n3u 29 күн бұрын

@@KamilMBhave you ever heard of this channel called skyships eng. Amazing channel and I think you would love it. As an avid av geek who is currently working on getting there pilots license . It's really informative and I think you would love it. From one av geek to another

@arnoldpalthe3915 9 ай бұрын

Don't forget this: The F-27 Friendship was developed by Fokker in the Netherlands and built under licence by Fairchild. I should know, my uncle flew the plane on its maiden flight and took it all around the world for promotional purposes.

@pascalcoole2725 9 ай бұрын

I wonder why this was not really mentioned, there where way more Fokker F27 than Fairchild build. Beside, I might be wrong but i think the Fairchild was called F-227

@stevenwolff6866 9 ай бұрын

If you're going to make a video at least be accurate with the visuals. You showed an L1049G Super Constellation throughout. Not once did you show an actual L1649 Starliner. The narrative was accurate however

@anthonyvallillo422 9 ай бұрын

Probably no Starliners left flying to get good quality video of....

@mbaxevan 9 ай бұрын

Interesting video, but why the annoying background music, it so distracting. Lower or mute it.

@Tinoaviation 9 ай бұрын

Hmm yea, I just feel it adds a lot, like it be boring if it was just me talking and nothing else, so ill lower it for next! Thanks for watching!

@charlesivey100 9 ай бұрын

The Lockheed Constellation and the Starliner imo, had classic style. At any angle, these airplanes were pleasing to look at, whether flying or standing still.

@xSoNiCcRaCkErSx 9 ай бұрын

I'm a bit confused at the numbers mentioned at 3:08 - as far as I can find Airbus did not produce 18,000 320 Neos, but only ~3100 and the 737 Max is only ~1400.

@thefunnyd0ck200 9 ай бұрын

crazy daisy video best ever chubbabi moneno

@robertl606 9 ай бұрын

Good video. I have worked on these aircraft. A friend had 3 of these believe it or not. He and I were the last people to ever taxi an L1649A under its own power. Good memories.

@joelbrown4507 9 ай бұрын

Great job on the video but I always want to know the aircrafts range and cruising speed

@realvanman1 9 ай бұрын

He kept saying turboprop, but those looked like radials?

@robertl606 9 ай бұрын

He is right. There was a plan to build them with turboprops. They even flew one. There are pictures of it out there. It's a shame they did not go with the turboprop engines. There would have been amazing aircraft that would have been in service much longer.

@WAL_DC-6B 9 ай бұрын

@@robertl606 At about 1:20 the narrator says, "Wright R-3350 turbo-prop engines" (perhaps he meant to say turbo-compound engines). The 3350 was an 18-cylinder, radial piston engine that used three power recover turbines which used exhaust gases to provide extra power to the engine's crankshaft via hydraulic couplings from the turbines. There indeed was a model of the Super Constellation that was powered by Pratt & Whitney T-34 turbo-prop engines. This was the Lockheed model 1249. Four were built for the U.S. Navy as the R7V-2 (two were later allocated to the USAF as the YC-121F). Curiously, the T-34 powered "Connies" didn't have the turbo-prop engines installed to improve the performance of the aircraft but just to merely test the engines themselves.

@stuartlee6622 9 ай бұрын

He's wrong, while they considered turboprops, he meant

@aj-2savage896 9 ай бұрын

That jackwagon who sabotaged and terminated Lufthansa's Starliner restoration-to-flight project should be in the aviation Hall of Shame.

@Flyairtindi 10 ай бұрын

Great video. How many are still flying today ;) ?

@Tinoaviation 9 ай бұрын

I dont know for sure, but not a whole lot! If ya wanna fly with one, you better hurry up!

@luckeyhaskins1734 Жыл бұрын

The “Stepchild” to its pilots. Not a favorite but served its purpose and made money.

@reneegudjon3204 Жыл бұрын

This is a workhorse at least the Fokker and proofed it's worth in Iceland for decades in various conditions

@nasirghani4891 Жыл бұрын

Nose wheel steering and braking was quite tricky due to pneumatic system. First flew it in 1978.

@pascalcoole2725 9 ай бұрын

Uhu pff-pff-pff-pff-pff cheeeee pff-pff-pff-pff-pff cheeeee Check the air pressure before taxi and before landing.

@paulkile9998 Жыл бұрын

😢 0🎉😂:4🎉7

@paulkile9998 Жыл бұрын

😢 0🎉😂:4🎉7

@paulkile9998 Жыл бұрын

😢 0🎉😂:4🎉7

@paulkile9998 Жыл бұрын

😢 0🎉😂:4🎉7

@slimeplayz8752 Жыл бұрын

W Video!

@JakelsAwake 6 ай бұрын

indeed

@obiemichaels9675 Жыл бұрын

Fairchild…..? I worked on the f27 at Ansett and they were Fokker not Fairchild

@Tinoaviation Жыл бұрын

Sorry for the confusion, this is the story of the american f-27, which is made by fairchild, and not the world wide one...

@alexandergutfeldt1144 Жыл бұрын

⁠@@TinoaviationYou still should look into who designed and developed the F27 ( Fokker ) and who built it with a license ( Fairchild ). I saw the F27 'Fokker Friendship' many times flying over Berne in the 1970-ies.

@Tinoaviation Жыл бұрын

@@alexandergutfeldt1144 Alright, ill clarify more on my up coming videos, thanks for info!

@kiska5947 9 ай бұрын

I flew the Fairchild F-27 on to the gravel and rock strips in Saudi Arabia 1976-78. It was rugged and took a beating - our prop blades looked like serrated knives with all the stone chips dressed out. You mentioned quiet - the Dart Powered Chicken was NOT quiet.

@jayfrank1913 Жыл бұрын

Yay! A new aircraft video. Keep it up, Tino.

@tompatterson3163 Жыл бұрын

'Promosm' ☺️

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер