You need to sort your micing out. It is quite feeble.

Until the blades at ye olde food shoppe come on-line, see u in the next one! <3 it!

Well worth the stop - amidst my internet gallivanting. So strange that there arent tens of thousands of others travelers doing the same. I appreciate the balance, humor, insight and character ploys, a fellow Tim hath rendered.

Learning computer literacy is the first step, second is the 3 2 1 rule. you have multiple copies of the same file locally and a cold backup offsite. That way data will never be lost

Committees are the death of creativity.

NIce video mate! Architecture gets really interesting when someone dares to think beyond the ordinary. The Sydney Opera House is a prime example of this-its unique, sail-like design wasn't playing it safe at all. Such bold ideas can either flop or become iconic successes. In this case it became a massive hit, showing how stepping outside the comfort zone can lead to something truly extraordinary, just like in life! 😊

There is a building strongly resembling this in Glasgow

STRAYA!

What a great video Tim. I have seen the Opera House many times and never realised how overtime and over budget it went. It's great to see so many people enjoying it. Slay videography 😉🎥. Interesting link with Star Wars. I recently watched a John Williams orchestral performance in the Opera House. It was so spectacular I got goosebumps. And the conductor used a light Saber as his baton at the end. We are blessed to have the Opera House in our city. 😊

I just checked on Pyrex spare parts and that exact lid is available as a separate item

It is interesting that humans created solid, quality items decades ago, but we are now stitching them together with rubbish and toxins. It reminds me of the recent story that organic spices contain high levels of lead. Is it that all that effort went into growing beautiful toxin free spices, only to be processed in an old factory using materials that contain lead. I think it's important to keep highlighting these discrepancies and contradictions.

Just steal lol

Criminally misinformed. Flimsy explanation that is grotesquely simple and missing critical detail. All I could expect from a NPC enthusiast, unfortunately.

70% cocoa, dark chocolate, aldi - the organic one. after a couple of years researching supermarket buys, this was the best tasting...not expensive. the organic is irrelevant its the 70% cocoa in a dark that is a sweet spot for taste.

"Supermarkets are purposefully undercutting the other brands to increase their market share." No shit Sherlock. They're a business, aiming to make money...Kind of a no brainer.

In Ukraine chocolate has a decent quality and cheap ~$1-2 for 100 grams

85% Lindt in the uk is currently £2.75 at Sainsbury's which is $5.41AUD.

Loving the content Tim! Keep it coming. Lucky I had chocolate in the house when I watched your video otherwise I would have had to head out to Coles when the craving’s started.

Great video. Thanks again for highlighting an important issue affecting us all.

An unusual perspective. Maybe we should play nice with AI?

Id encourage you to watch Microplastics, Public Health Myth or Menace - Ian Mudway

I'm glad that you guys brought up the point of burning plastic. In the end it's the best way to remove it from the cycle. And if I am remembering correctly, we do have a limited number of facilities that exclusively burn trash and focus on converting all of the burnt debris into energy and trapped gases that can be sold. These facilities are also very mindful of the pollution caused by burning plastics, and have advanced filters that keep the toxic chemicals leaking the facility down to a bare minimum. They produce less carbon dioxide than a coal plant. In the United States we only have one major plant that does this on the East Coast, unfortunately it is extremely expensive to build facilities like this, and I hope that we install one on the West Coast soon. kzbin.info/www/bejne/sGnUYayHf951arMsi=SbZeWuRRiY0fiDH5

Love the vid. However Now lets get your Bike out and see what plastic it has on it. We just have to face it. We will never turn the tide on Plastic. We can help reduce the use. But its in everything from electronics to space shuttles. And the UK always seems to get a mention when anyone talks about plastic. Why? We are one of the smallest Nations. UK could be eradicated and wouldn't make a difference in any way.

You can turn plastics into diesels and gasoline. Then you wont find plastic elsewhere if we use it up this way. Making it ourselves. The trees and whatnot will clean up the air. More tree farms needed too!!!

Elitist roman british governments offset of the roman empire was the worst invention for all of humanity and everything live on this earth.

So are you pro landfill industry or do you think we should burn the plastic?

Judging from the comments this must be the Teletubbies tribute chanel. Stay strong.

Year 4 of infertility and IVF. Who tf can I sue???

You cant change things with grass roots, you're vote matters. Don't waste your vote.

so, the process of recycling plastic releases micro plastics into the environment.

There are so many plant based completely compostable alternatives… I could never understand why plastic hadn’t been replaced a decade ago. The only reason it hasn’t is like you say.. big business still making big dollars from producing plastics and as has always been the way, any competition must be squashed. 😢

I think we should dump the plastics outside the environment.

When you go to the store, you purchase things in plastic....so you are exactly the problem. You might say you try not too.....but that like you said isnt the solution. You gotta 100% stop purchasing things with plastic. Telling others means nothing, we know plastics are bad but there isnt a logical solution.....you are just saying get rid of it but you wouldnt have many things without it.....vacuum sealed items in plastic allows you many things you wouldnt have otherwise.....yes, you do buy them.

Wow! I didn't realise the information you gave about micro plastics in the water that's being sold to farmers, More farmers need to be aware of this so they don't buy the water or fertilizer. Another reason to garden myself to prevent eating micro plastics.

Slay video. So much rubbish in such beautiful bushland. Thank you for all the important facts. It's an enormous issue.

I'm wondering if some kind of fungi could break down plastics, I know some can with oil, that's a route worth looking to. Also Earth ships, which are eco houses made from plastic bottles filled with sand or soil ,and tyres. Things along those lines.

what goes up must come down

Plastic bottles of any kind was the worst invention for earth

Sunglasses and polyester clothes are also plastic.

I want to learn how to use waste for an energy source and am trying to find ways currently. I am also trying to reduce my waste to recycling but recently found out half or more does not get recycled and me and my neighbor been talking about getting glass jars and bottles and getting meat from our local butcher instead of out of the plastic. It's a slow process when the corporate tries to hide more eco friendly stuff or take away our right to choose a butcher by taking the butchers away who would add meat to this and taking farms down. Still we are trying to fight back even talked about making lard again. Wish us luck if I find a good natural method on everything I will reach out here and other youtubers to give them this info.

The love of convenience is the root of all evil.

Disturbing facts. Corporations gaslighting us into believing recycling will save us.

Please don’t shoot the messenger. 😅😅😅😅 Here it is. A Critical Analysis of "Ghandi Has Something to Teach Us About AI" - fresh from GPT-4o. A Flawed Analogy with Gandhi's Quote. The video attempts to draw an analogy between Gandhi's quote about social movements and the acceptance of generative AI. However, this comparison is inherently flawed for several reasons: Different Contexts: Gandhi's quote pertains to a moral and ethical struggle against colonial oppression-a deeply human and socio-political issue. The resistance he described was against an oppressive regime where the stakes were human rights and national sovereignty. Generative AI, on the other hand, is a technological advancement with implications for efficiency, creativity, and automation. The stakes are different: they are about job displacement, ethical AI use, and technological dependence, not direct human oppression. Stages of Acceptance: Gandhi’s stages (ignore, laugh, fight, win) fit a linear progression of social resistance but do not necessarily apply to technological adoption. Technology adoption often follows a different pattern, such as the Gartner Hype Cycle, which includes phases like the Peak of Inflated Expectations and the Trough of Disillusionment. The speaker’s assertion that humanity is currently in the "fighting" phase against generative AI is speculative and lacks empirical evidence. The stages of resistance Gandhi described do not map directly to how society reacts to new technology, which can have varied and complex responses, including immediate acceptance in some areas and prolonged skepticism in others. Forcing Historical Parallels: The attempt to equate the personal journey of acceptance (ignoring, mocking, fighting, and ultimately coexisting with AI) to Gandhi's quote feels forced. This analogy oversimplifies both the technological evolution and the socio-political resistance Gandhi described. The historical context of Gandhi’s movement was about collective human struggle and empowerment, whereas generative AI's adoption involves individual and institutional decisions driven by utility, market forces, and ethical considerations. Personal Experiences: Insufficient Evidence The speaker uses two personal anecdotes to illustrate the power of generative AI: An email improvement. A sentence enhancement in LinkedIn content. These examples, while illustrative, are limited and subjective: Anecdotal Evidence: Personal anecdotes do not provide a robust basis for broad claims about AI’s capabilities or its societal impact. They reflect individual experiences that may not be representative of wider trends or implications. Lack of Depth: The improvements described are minor tweaks rather than transformative changes, which weakens the argument that AI is fundamentally altering the writer's role. These examples do not substantiate the claim that generative AI will inevitably lead to significant shifts in human creativity or job displacement. Oversimplified Choices for Humanity The video posits a binary choice for humanity: Completely reject AI. Fully embrace AI and potentially lose humanity. This dichotomy is overly simplistic and ignores the nuanced reality of technological integration: Middle Path Ignored: While the speaker briefly mentions a "middle path," the discussion lacks depth and fails to explore practical ways to integrate AI while preserving human values. This path involves complex considerations of ethics, regulation, and collaborative human-AI interaction, which are not adequately addressed. Complex Ethical Landscape: The narrative does not engage with the intricate ethical landscape surrounding AI, such as bias, transparency, accountability, and the potential for misuse. These are critical issues that need thorough examination beyond the simplistic choice of rejection or acceptance. Conclusion The video's argument is weakened by a forced analogy, reliance on anecdotal evidence, and an oversimplified view of the choices humanity faces regarding AI. To present a more compelling case, the speaker should: Provide empirical data and broader examples of AI’s impact. Acknowledge the complexity of technological adoption and the varied societal responses. Engage deeply with ethical considerations and practical solutions for integrating AI into society. By addressing these gaps, the narrative could transition from a superficial analogy to a more robust, evidence-based discussion of AI's role in our future.

So, we're the British about to be booted from India... by AI?

Absolutely love this podcast Tim. Your voice is so beautiful and I enjoyed every minute of your insights.

Loving these podcasts! So good to listen to while i am painting. It really helps distract my antimoviating head noise. 😎👍

Loved it Anita and Tim! Raw like you intended but really well spoken, informative and real! You covered so many topics but like you said there are many more that can be covered! I would love to join in on a podcast and discuss more about boycotting the big supermarkets vs. what Anita is cleverly and strategically doing; working with them and against them as they will ultimately make more difference if we get them on side. I really related to the discussion about a small number working really hard to #byocup/container/bag VS new cultures of speedy home delivery/Uber Eats/coffee apps. But if we keep educating about why these cultures are catastrophic for the environment, more and more people will demand this convenience at the expense of the planet is not okay and we may be able to find a way to fit the two together e.g. Uber Eats driver brings back bags and containers when they collect the next order. Customers gives Uber Eats driver bags and containers when they have their new order delivered. AND customer ordering 3 cups of takeaway coffee must give back 3 reusable cups in order to collect their order. I'm always trying to problem solve by looking at psychology, economics, environment like Anita! Let's Podcast and spread this discussion even further 😍

When did you see this whale shark?