Bpth the French and the British attacked and took strong defensive positions but the british took more casaulties in the battle, not showing the french is nott he same as misrepresnting what they where up to.

That isn't how the purchasing system worked you couldn't simply buy a commission and to go up the ranks required a set amount of time at each rank as well, raglan had been a soldier since 1805 for example and fought in many of the battles in Portugal, Spai nand france that Wellington's army fought.

Where the British won almost every single war... Also this was an extreme case where some genius put 2 people who despised each other in command of half of the cavalry each which caused a lot of problems o nits own.

Ah yes, the abolition of slavery wasn’t a principled stand at all, no it was just for the hell of it!

*Becuase*

"the more noble you are the more ignorant you are" That bit certainly isn't true, imagine thinking you can write off everyone from a paticular group based solely on their birth and "Nobles" by dint of being noble where some of the best educated people as a rsult. As for the purchasing system which is what I assume you're talking about you realise it stil had compulsary time at each rank yes? So even if you purchase your way up the ranks you still have to spend years learning the trade... The problem became curroption where people who should ahve been denied the right to go further then their competancy where not being denied due to a long peace like they used to be.

Should we go again sir?

bold statement, what do you think compares to the holocaust that British officers have done?

@@DelogrosOI BRUV YOUR COMING WITH ME MATE

@@Headingyourhome I can't see (literally YT isn't showing me) what you're replying to so I have no idea if thats you agreeing with whatever it was or not :)

@@Delogros I was

Not particularly it was fairly common in the time period to have people come watch over a picnic, happened in the US civil war as well.

Far less then their victorys

@@Delogros Times have changed, and for them the era of defeats has begun.

@@williammorellini5403 Times have changed, your own comment makes no sense I'm not sure there are any colonizers now - but FYI the colonizers have like a 80-90% win rate in modern times as well.

@@Delogros "FYI the colonizers have like a 80-90% win rate in modern times as well." Vietnam? Syria? Afghanistan? Ukraine? The hegemony of UK and USA is over. From now on I doubt there will be roses, but there will definitely be thorns. Especially with the Bidens and Hillarys.

Having said all that it one may observe, in mitigation, that the French and British were better dressed than the Russians and marched into battle with better music.