Thank you so much for the feedback! We are glad you found this webinar valuable.

I think yes it can, we used to see GFP expression by injecting mRNA in the ear fold of mice

In mitochondria which enzyme is not working for you ?

@@madhu_1489 As my mother and sister, we present a mutation on mitochondrial gene MT-CYB, being m.15674T>C, which produces the amino acid change Ser310Pro and its frequency is in homoplasmy

@@miguelangelherrerapons is this onset or born with this one . Are you from Europe nations?

@@miguelangelherrerapons tell me the date of birth of persons affected

@@madhu_1489 Imagine I was born with the mutation, because it is inherited from my mother, but the onset of phenotypes two years ago

You are not going to see it sooner . it will take another 10 years !

homo sapiens to homo erectus 😜

@@ronr.53400 Good one!!! Civilization and humanity is on the decline. Stock up and run to the hills

They did not sell all their shares. They have long-standing 10b5-1 trading plans, which are basically automated very small limited sell orders at preset price targets that have been reviewed and cleared, often literally years in advance. The largest sale was less than 5% of the investor’s stake. This is very common for people who actually know what they’re doing and aren’t trying to maintain majority control of a company (the reason more famous company owners typically don’t use this) because it’s a form of regular income, liquidity improvement, and diversification. Please stop reading bs news and spreading their nonsense. It’s important to pursue an education in how public companies actually work before deciding to play in the market.

@@JQuinPhD I wonder whether Moderna might consider to sue some of these publications for slander.

Cause they still have 8 million shares lol sold like 1%

@jonniecypher I recommend having a re-evaluation of what you’re reading and listening to. If it’s accessible for you (probably needs a BSc or higher degree), I recommend reading the actual research that they’ve published in some of our highest quality journals. If that’s not accessible, I recommend getting your science info from a proper science publisher; both Nature and Science Magazine have very high quality newsletters and articles written for the general public. If those are still a bit too sciencey, two highly reputable news sources that have covered these topics at length are the New York Times (leans left) and the Wall St Journal (leans right). These vaccines currently being deployed are not in the evaluation stage, much less development, and we are definitely not “in-field test subjects”. The concurrent testing (not in-field and definitely not concurrent with development) you’re referring to was the semi-overlap of the clinical trial phases. These trials have produced more than sufficient results, which have been published for the public to read in our most stringent academic journals, and have been secondarily covered by the aforementioned reputable publications. These concerns and subsequent negative public opinion are the result of misinformation, and it is important to regularly critically screen your sources of information. Good luck mate

@jonniecypher Jonnie, please, Global Research is run by Michel Chossudovsky , a disreputable conspiracy theorist. That website is a known proxy for Russian disinformation campaigns. This is exactly what I'm referring to regarding misinformation. Having a quick look at your KZbin account, I see you are subscribed to several Russia-affiliated channels. I think the best approach for you would be to quickly check each of your info sources for Russian affiliation before blindly believing whatever they write/say.