Great, I found the same solution. I coundn't find this problem with google with the forcing term on the other side of the spring and damper as the mass. It is not very hard but it is nice to see the confirmation that my calculation was correct. This solution is quite interesting for many cases where a small mass is connected through a spring and damper to a large moving mass/object that does not 'feel' the small mass. Choosing sinusoids with different frequencies for u and then computing the resultant x or (x-u) is also very interesting. In some cases u is unknown but (x-u) can be determined allowing to find u through inversion.
@INTEGRALPHYSICS3 жыл бұрын
Great vid. This whole video is tremendously helpful once you realize that most of the l-lo-x-xo-u 's that show up are just expressing the change in length (or rate thereof) of the spring/damper.
@r.d.75753 жыл бұрын
Thanks, it's very helpful. Do you know how to calculate the energy stored in the damper ?
@richardbloemenkamp85323 жыл бұрын
Dampers don't store energy. They dissipate energy. All energy that goes into the damper turns into heat. No energy can come out of an ideal damper therefore we cannot speak of energy storage. An ideal spring is exactly the opposite. It dissipates no energy and all the energy put into it is stored and will come out when the spring returns to its non-compressed length.
@عادلالاسدي-ط5ح4 жыл бұрын
can you help me to derive second order of difrential equation to find y''(0), y'''(0) and so on. Thanks for any way.
@bilmohammed55775 жыл бұрын
what does it mean if the mass spring damper is = 0 does that mean the system is in equilibrium and is on level ground??
@AniketSharmacodes5 жыл бұрын
Thanks. This a quite overlooked concept. I was perplexed when I realised (after doing many classes on dynamics) while solving a problem that why don't I take weight of the body in the equilibrium. This video proved what I needed
@monikwrite96545 жыл бұрын
Amazing explain than my classroom.....😄🙏
@monikwrite96545 жыл бұрын
Really helpful work..... Love from India....
@biniyamayele3815 жыл бұрын
how about acceleration plot
@biniyamayele3815 жыл бұрын
can you help me how I plot acceleration vs time graph for the similar problem on matlab
@annamauroam6 жыл бұрын
I don't get what u(t) is
@aamirsheikh97897 жыл бұрын
Hii sir ..can you help in finding out the dynamic parameters like stiffness, mass of spring , damping of a mass tuned liquid damper ..
@asmaasma-ex4qj7 жыл бұрын
y jumped the most important step, really disappointed :(
@daviderecordis72597 жыл бұрын
hello admin. i need to help about one problem. i need graphic and solution.. Please help me. (d^2 Q)/ (dx^2) + (d^2 Q)/(dy^2) +2= 0 Q(-,+ 1;y)=Q(x;-,+1)=0
@ruhengluo80537 жыл бұрын
I like, a little doubt you can ask?
@malezacaminante95777 жыл бұрын
super nice
@ashaiena98477 жыл бұрын
Why is it in your final FBD the weight of the vehicle is no more to be found.
@jowillyntimtim82347 жыл бұрын
Why is it in your final FBD the weight of the vehicle is no more to be found.
@sakthimurugan38887 жыл бұрын
sir ,kindly tell me which tool or software you use for creating this video.. your video are nice and clearly expressed. thanks sir.
@Vatea978 жыл бұрын
Hi Greg, When you sum all the forces at static equilibrium, can you neglect the damper because the speed is 0 and the damper's equation depends only on that? I'm working on a project right now and trying to model the same device except the mass is downward (as if the ground was the surface of water and the mass was sinking). The wheel would serve as a floater and both would be connected through a spring with damping properties too. Are your differential equations appliable in such case? At static equilibrium, the mass' weight would be compensated by the wheels buoyancy.
@malezacaminante95777 жыл бұрын
To the first question you ask, the answer is yes as velocity is dx/dt, in equilibrium dx/dt= 0 so all the damper term is cancelled. To the second, yes the equations are the same, the only thing you should notice is that instead the spring compressing it is expanding, but in the end the direction doesnt matter as all the forces act in opposite ways, (newton's third law)
@boudzzzzsssdddfffg8 жыл бұрын
methlab
@youmah258 жыл бұрын
looks like state space representation
@abhideepsingh44848 жыл бұрын
what is 'u' at 8:12?
@wolfavie8 жыл бұрын
u is u(t) which is the change in height of the ground over time
@annamauroam6 жыл бұрын
wolfavie Of the ground????? why should the ground move???
@AvinashKumar-co1hj4 жыл бұрын
@@annamauroam the ground don't move it's uneven...like giving lift to the axle is u(t)
@BetulKaplan8 жыл бұрын
omg!!! it was soo helpful dude! you teach very simple. thank you!!
@romygupta14648 жыл бұрын
how can i solve this in fortran 77 ?
@HabboBear18 жыл бұрын
I came here to see how hard engineering is. Lmfao, I didn't understand anything.
@melochin82378 жыл бұрын
this is acctualy quite easy if you know how to solve differential equations
@soumyajitsarkar23728 жыл бұрын
u need to learn basic engineering mechanics, basic mechanics on general and also basic differential equation and then natural vibration , then only u will be able to understand this clearly.This are mainly taught at the end of 2nd year or intro of 3rd year in Mech.Engg
@kashefalgita79507 жыл бұрын
HabboBear1 😂😂😂you didn't see any think
@eee037061928 жыл бұрын
firstly thank you very much for this helpful tutorial.but i have one question that how can i code this equation with applying euler forward method in matlab?please anybody can give me the solution.
@eyadalhazouri95378 жыл бұрын
thank you for your helpful video, but i have to write a code of second Order Differential Equations of heat transfer (fourier equation) rho*c* dT/dt= d(k*dT/dx)/dx + d( k* dT/dy)/dy + d( k* dT/dz)/dz + M could you please help me to write the code
@micho0oo8 жыл бұрын
hi, did you find the solution for your problem?
@eyadalhazouri95378 жыл бұрын
actually not yet .... i try to read something about FVM cause i am ganna solve it in this Methode after that I will see how can u apply it in matlab
@eyadalhazouri95378 жыл бұрын
have you maybe some suggestions?
@micho0oo8 жыл бұрын
+Eyad Alhazouri no I'm still searching for a solution
@ervingjonaj90828 жыл бұрын
Whats the point of using a matlab when you solved it on paper
@thentust8 жыл бұрын
In my code ,it drifted when it rotates few turns. How do you calibrate it?
@roshankarki25789 жыл бұрын
HI , -74% coupon to Learn Matlab Udemy course Couponcode: ML25 www.udemy.com/learn-matlab/?couponCode=ML25
@twinklekoh82199 жыл бұрын
hi, thank you this was really clear. however, am i able to use runge kutta for motion equations? M(d2x/dt2)=Fn(sin θ - uCos θ ) M(d2z/dt2)=Fn(cos θ + uSin θ ) - Mg fn/M = 0.866 θ = 30 deg
@bryansingh74169 жыл бұрын
Can you add a link to the arduino code please
@Simagha9 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@danielawittmann22539 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This is really nice and it's a detailled description, that I really appreciate!!
@chinesecultureinessence15349 жыл бұрын
This is just purely terrific! Many thanks!
@Baracudus9 жыл бұрын
Nice! You missed a dt "^2" at 11:26 :)
@mavisakal779 жыл бұрын
Can you provide the Arduino code?
@zoala00110 жыл бұрын
I wish u had used ode45 or od23 for solving the equation in matlab :(
@tolgacakir193910 жыл бұрын
Hello, first I'd like to thank you for such a good tutorial, but I have a question regarding u. In the video you conveniently look at 0+, so du/dt is 0 anyway. At the moment I'm studying a mass-spring-damper system which would go over a threshold. A friend of mine has already made an equation which gives you the exact location of the axle(shaft) at any time. So I wonder how I could implement this in the steady-state function? For any instance, there is a derivative, but would that not mean that you would have a different functon for x, at any time?
@disbecknell10 жыл бұрын
What program did you produce this tutorial in?
@rw122911 жыл бұрын
Is there a way to modify how large the jump is for the step function? I would like to model a 1000 N force acting on the spring from the ground, as if the "car" went over a bump
@sourosael311 жыл бұрын
hi excellent job. what about the video of the of the arduino software??
@shamm803811 жыл бұрын
I dont understand why there is a (k/m)u instead of (1/m)u
@RohitBhat8711 жыл бұрын
That was an excellent explanation. Thank you very much!
@giladt111 жыл бұрын
Your explained very well, it helped me to understand. Thank you!
@greglewin58911 жыл бұрын
It gets much harder. Sorry, I'm not planning on attacking that one here.
@Luis-jr3nt11 жыл бұрын
what if I have a time dependence instead of just constant coefficients?
@insightfu11 жыл бұрын
Can this method be generalized to non dynamic systems? If not i think you should indicate that somewhere in the title. I watched the entire 17 minutes and then realized i couldn't use it for my thermal convection problem. Thanks!