Great video Rod. My instructor has always drummed into me, the stick or yoke position is the first give-away a stall is imminent. AOA is directly related to stick/yoke position. For example, if the stick is central or forward during the turn, the aircraft is not close to a stall.
@Kervalen16 күн бұрын
Thank you for the laugh! If only Orange County… I mean, John Wayne airport was still that fun. Best, Jeff
@mikeperry28146 күн бұрын
LMAO!
@philiproesel78856 күн бұрын
You’re the best! I learned instrument flying from your training material in the 90’s and I haven’t killed myself yet! I also give pilots, “Say again Please” if they need it.
@Flight-Instructor6 күн бұрын
Thank you, Philip. Appreciate it. And "Say again please" is a good one. My favorite is, "Standby." Best, Rod
@airmackeeee67926 күн бұрын
Maaaaaate, that was hilarious!!! 😅😅😅😅😅😅
@Flight-Instructor6 күн бұрын
I'm pleased that you enjoyed it! Best, Rod
@HerbertTowers8 күн бұрын
Look at the bar opening hours in case you need a long self-debrief.
@AC-jk8wq10 күн бұрын
Thanks Rod! 😃
@badgerfishinski685712 күн бұрын
Do these best practices apply to flying my mother-in-law? Great video Rod. Thank you for your quality years of service while giving us a lot of smiles along the way.
@Flight-Instructor11 күн бұрын
Thank you, 6857!
@filakyle366313 күн бұрын
I just see new video from you and instantly go like and comment. Always great to see you Rod.
@raybrown699214 күн бұрын
Great stuff Rod! Apart from your KZbin content, I definitely recommend your books 📚 to my trainees too. Keep the good work up mate 👍🏽
@gcorriveau686414 күн бұрын
Always great information. Thanks for posting.
@damienmilk302514 күн бұрын
I wish I had an instructor like yourself when I learned to fly in the late 70s. I have learned so much from your videos, etc. Thanks. (Australia)
@Flight-Instructor11 күн бұрын
Thank you, Damien. Rod
@JustSayN2O15 күн бұрын
Outstanding comedy!
@Flight-Instructor15 күн бұрын
Thank you, JSN20. I really appreciate that comment. Make pilots laugh; reduce their stress. That's the game plan. Best, Rod
@AC-jk8wq9 күн бұрын
Nice work Rod, as always…. 😃 M20 pilots are special!
@TheMathius7815 күн бұрын
Oh come on, Rod! You ended the video just when it was gettin' good! I've already used two exclamation points in this comment so don't make me return and use a third.
@Reuben-15 күн бұрын
If it helps Rod to finish this awesome story, here are a couple more exclamation points!! Please! Finish the story!
@Flight-Instructor15 күн бұрын
What happened was I got a call (as I recall) from Neil Savoy at the FAA (one of the very good guys at the FAA during the 70s). He asked if this was my student. I replied, "Yes." He said, "Make sure he doesn't do that again." I replied, "OK, thank you." And that was that. No muss; no fuss. But what was nearly 50 years ago when things were a lot different--very different. Nothing happened to the student, fortunately. Yes, he clearly had a bit of good fortune on his side. Best, Rod
@TheMathius7814 күн бұрын
@@Flight-Instructor good fortune indeed! Thanks for wrapping that up.
@NickSantos121820 күн бұрын
Great video!
@OzzyInSpace20 күн бұрын
Always love your approach to explaining things like this, over the years. Thanks, Rod!
@mnflyin554921 күн бұрын
Thanks, Rod!
@whoanelly737-821 күн бұрын
I dunno. I think someone’s high school physics teacher buddy was given a gig at the FAA. It only adds terms that are just not helpful to piloting. I doubt anyone is going to be talking about kinetic or potential energy outside of a checkride. “Well Jim, your kinetic energy is a bit off, you see if you just….” Nonsense.
@AwestrikeFearofGods6 күн бұрын
The difference between trading airspeed for altitude vs. trading kinetic energy for potential energy, is it's difficult to quantify how many knots are traded per foot of altitude, because "it depends." However, precisely 1 unit of kinetic energy is traded for 1 unit of potential energy. That makes energy a useful concept, if you can be bothered to do some math.
@user-iw3mr2lv6f21 күн бұрын
Good example, very important with a sick or dead engine. Engine problems dead or running come in high provided you know the tricks to lose altitude very fast. Maybe you can lead into how to get down quick.aka drag without gaining air speed. Flaps,gear,prop,cowl flaps,forward slips,etc…❤
@timhoke221 күн бұрын
You make it seem so simple, sir.
@Flight-Instructor21 күн бұрын
Thank you, Tim. I sure do appreciate the comment. Best, Rod
@ScottWoodland28 күн бұрын
I know a student who on their Private Checkride called out the DPE when he "failed" her engine....she fixed it and pushed the throttle back in...he asked why, and she said because you didn't tell me you were simulating the engine failure... He was/is a great DPE and he laughed, and then made her deal with the "failed" engine.
@Flight-Instructor27 күн бұрын
That's my kind of student! Best, Rod
@ronbuellwinkler458629 күн бұрын
Have to admit, I've thought about doing that to my instructor. LOL
@dermick29 күн бұрын
Funny story! Love your books, you really explain things so that even a knuckledragger like me can learn!
@Flight-Instructor29 күн бұрын
Thank you Mr. D. I sure appreciate the comment. Best, Rod
@jazzz803029 күн бұрын
gr8 vid mate
@340AviationsАй бұрын
Memories in Microsoft flight simulator X your young and happy those days, now... Where did the times go?
@abdulrahmanalhrabi870Ай бұрын
Hi cap I have questions I am in IFR and I am confused a little bit and now I understand from your video that the important instrument for ILSis rate of descent and HSI and ASI is that right but for Rnav or RNP what is the primary thank you
@Flight-InstructorАй бұрын
Greetings: If I understand your question correctly, there's no change in how you scan instruments for an ILS or any approach with vertical guidance. Best, Rod
@user-bl5dv2es5jАй бұрын
Never understood why induced drag decreases in ground effect. Thanks to this video, I now do!!
@Flight-InstructorАй бұрын
Thank you, Nick. Best, Rod
@AwestrikeFearofGodsАй бұрын
That makes sense that AoA gauges are another heads-down distraction. Ideally, we'd replace it with a flight-path vector projected onto a HUD, but with the amount that glass cockpits cost, I'm scared to think about HUD prices.
@AwestrikeFearofGodsАй бұрын
Another benefit of dihedral is that it inclines the bottom surface of the wing fuel tanks, for more effective sumping of fuel contaminants and water (while parked on level ground). This is probably why high-wing designs bother to include a small degree of dihedral.
@AwestrikeFearofGodsАй бұрын
I suspect this is a contraction of the more descriptive terms: "controlled-movement area" and "uncontrolled-movement area". At least, that's how I justify it in my head.
@AwestrikeFearofGodsАй бұрын
Strictly speaking, is the ADSA, etc. for jets, or multi-engine planes in general? Wouldn't a multi-engine piston have reason to calculate aborted or single-engine takeoff distances?
@bk1bennettАй бұрын
This is fantastic
@triskellianАй бұрын
Excellent content. Some of these techniques are the same things that my instructor taught me so many years ago!
@Flight-InstructorАй бұрын
Thank you for that comment. You had good instructor!
@AwestrikeFearofGodsАй бұрын
6:27 Finally! Someone addresses the elephant in the room of equal maximum lift, regardless of weight and/or g. In many cases, the entire fuselage might be considered a fixed-weight component (e.g. aircraft with wing-mounted fuel tanks). For a given lift force, a heavy fuselage with light wings would stress the wing roots more than a heavy fuselage with heavy wings. If we assume that the wing-root joint is the primary structural limitation of an aircraft, the ideal configuration for maximum maneuvering speed would be a light fuselage with heavy wings, so long as such weight/fuel is stored somewhat inboard (i.e. not tip tanks). An F-14 can safely carry 2 engines, 4 Phoenix missiles, 2 external fuel tanks, and some internal fuel on its fuselage, because the fuselage is wide enough to contribute a significant portion of lift, while also reducing the span of each (cantilever-beam) wing. Structurally and aerodynamically, such aircraft with lifting-body fuselages can be thought of as a hybrid between a conventional aircraft design and a flying wing.
@phiberoptik232Ай бұрын
Good stuff
@Flight-InstructorАй бұрын
Thank you, Phil.
@anthonynelson40152 ай бұрын
Awesome 😂😅
@user-iw3mr2lv6f2 ай бұрын
Best explanation visually I have seen! Worth a look for sure. I will remember it on my next precision approach!❤️👍🇺🇸🛬
@TheGweedMan2 ай бұрын
It says the clink on the link below to learn more, but there is no link below.
@Flight-Instructor2 ай бұрын
Here's the URL: www.rodmachado.com. Best, Rod
@dtsh44512 ай бұрын
Rob should have his standup show at local airport 🤣
@PabloDezon2 ай бұрын
Hi, Rod. Can you please, make a comprehensive video about flying and Teardrrop and Racetrack course reversal NDB, including the V/S computation for a constant descent, please? Kindly.
@gabrielvazquez16912 ай бұрын
A great way to see the relationship between mentor and mentee, with a good sense of humor 😅
@alexandrmeyer2 ай бұрын
Can listen to it over and over 😂
@carmenquintin93412 ай бұрын
💯 Promo>SM
@bobcfi13062 ай бұрын
That’s funny
@alejandrodebasilio16062 ай бұрын
Thank you for this video. This is great! I'm still a bit confused about the ceiling of class G airspace. I thought it was 700 AGL around certain airports up to 1,200 AGL, but on this graph is goes beyond 1,200 AGL.
@Flight-Instructor2 ай бұрын
Greetings Alejandro: Class G can go up higher than 1,200 feet AGL where the floor of airways (Class E airspace) begin at higher altitudes. The FAA began removing these higher Class E floor several years ago, reducing all Class G tops to 700 or 1,200 feet AGL. Best, Rod
@alejandrodebasilio16062 ай бұрын
@@Flight-Instructor Thanks for the clarification and Mach-1 speedy reply!
@CaptMoo2 ай бұрын
It never gets old... Love your stories!
@gregellis38592 ай бұрын
So funny. I really miss seeing your talks at Airventure, etc... Your talk was always a highlight of my week there. I always used to flip directly to your article in AOPA magazine when you wrote for them. It was the first article I would read. Miss your wit, your humor and of course the education that you provided to make me a better pilot. Thanks Rod.
@Flight-Instructor2 ай бұрын
Thank you, Greg. I sure miss going to Oshkosh. I've been so busy that I just can't make it there this year. Maybe next year! Best, Rod Machado
@alexandrmeyer2 ай бұрын
hahaha.... lol)))))))
@realnewsthatmatters93192 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 This is hilarious 😂 😂😂
@jschlock4482 ай бұрын
Rod, you helped me get my private pilots license about twenty years ago with your great writing skills and illustrations. Sincere Thanks
@Flight-Instructor2 ай бұрын
Thank you! I sure do appreciate the comment. Best, Rod