Military Basics

Пікірлер

@Phuong.Nguyen- 10 күн бұрын

Thanks for sharing and please stay connected my new friend ❤😊

@Ventura.pascal93 11 күн бұрын

Waffen SS français, ont combattus jusqu'à la fin..❤

@bozhena31 12 күн бұрын

Т-34 -76 були вибиті ще в 44-му. І СТЕН в руках якогось вояка свідчить що в цей фотам попала не тільки битва за Берлін !

@sermat3887 12 күн бұрын

Ополченец со стеном это скорее всего кадры из Варшавы

@jufit4865 12 күн бұрын

🗺🌎🇺🇲🌈🌞🌫🎥KZbin 🎥📸👑🏆🎮🕹PS2,3,4,5GAME 🎭ACE COMBAT 1~7~Seris 👨‍✈️👩‍✈️🧑‍✈️🎖

@User-EntersdegNsifghrteysba 13 күн бұрын

Слава Красной Армии!

@ronaldhill7180 14 күн бұрын

The balloon is expanding inside of a room. So, the balloon example doesn't do me any good.

@PhuckYourExistence 11 күн бұрын

Indeed! I never liked this balloon analogy. I get that when we draw dots and inflate the balloon the dots expand further apart. However, the balloon expands OUTWARD into the space its occupying already. I have yet to encounter a satisfactory analogy without inherent discrepancies.

@МаринаКислая-у5ф 15 күн бұрын

Мой дед артиллерист,дошёл до Берлина.Слав Красной армии.

@AlkoDehond-xz3js 15 күн бұрын

Old shit 🙄 life goes on .

@fernandocardenas3050 16 күн бұрын

Grandes vencedores el ejército rojo

@torstenjungmann5201 16 күн бұрын

Halts Maul ,Vollidiot mein Opa hat viele Russen im Endkampf 45 in Berlin gelassen

@JanMCPocket 20 күн бұрын

Su 35

@doughboybellmore2347 21 күн бұрын

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqGuiYCGgbx-f80si=Gxx83JU_WoN5ny29

@louisjamin7195 25 күн бұрын

Without music would have been nice.

@SooziinCa 27 күн бұрын

So says the comment below 👇 But, he thinks the Earth Is flat 😂

@DavidLariccia-b9x 27 күн бұрын

We never went to the moon!

@Marie-sp6ku 27 күн бұрын

You're a sad little person. 😢

@DanielGarcia-nq1bu 28 күн бұрын

Incorrect, USA doesn't have this technology, won't have it, anytime soon, Russia, China, Iran North Korea have had it, have perfected it and are prepared to use it in defensive circumstances, stop misinforming USA never needed it therefore never bothered with it, because Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and now Lebanon do not have anything USA needs to defend against, 1 because no country ever possess a threat to the continental sovereignty of America, 2 USA focused on offensively taking the lands with the majority of the don perignon of petroleum

@BurRun-kt3tf 28 күн бұрын

Good ល្អរ

@barbmitch6866 Ай бұрын

See that f22 ?? ......er no?..... Exactly

@rubixrex7731 Ай бұрын

But the F-35B comes at the cost of reduced range, power, weapon strength and agility. It is limited to 7G’s. So at what cost is VTOL necessary

@ThaigkThiago Ай бұрын

Imagine if it’s at mach3.2 and it has weapons 💀we win the hole world

@JanKowalski-ci8xp Ай бұрын

Cool edit also i know its pretty of topic but imagine a abrams but instead of a 50 cal it has a gau-8 avenger

@willconwayjr5874 Ай бұрын

The SR-71 and the X‐15 are not fighters.

@GaryStipes Ай бұрын

There’s way too many untrained DOT inspectors out here now and their practicing on you

@kafir1mw2quick Ай бұрын

The US isn't racing to perfect the technology, they're racing to make theirs work while Russia and China already have their working.

@nanolog522 Ай бұрын

This is bs. While Starlink can provide internet access to remote locations, it isn’t practical in doing so. You know, there are other satellite internet companies out there. They can also provide internet to those areas. So, what would be special about Starlink? Starlink tries to reduce latency by using many satellites in LEO instead of them sitting in GEO. This, however, means that you need a ton of satellites, and they have to be replaced relatively often by comparison. And the only benefit they offer is latency. The cost for that reduced latency, apart from the cost for the satellite network, is that you need a phased array antenna and electronics to handle switching between satellites. So, if you take someone somewhere in rural Africa, what would make more sense for them? Conventional satellite internet where the dish is essentially free and doesn’t require much electricity at all, where they are getting a latency low enough to play online shooters, or a satellite antenna that costs more than what the average person there can spend in a year, and that draws 25-40W (or even more) of power all the time? When you are in a remote place, chances are you won’t be playing video games. And apart from that, slightly better latency when compared to mobile data or conventional satellite internet doesn’t really add value to the connection when considering the high costs and power consumption. Starlink is for rich countries. That’s it. Westerners that live somewhere where there is no other option for them, but they still want to play games. Which is a tiny minority compared to the other people without internet.

@FarmerTed71 Ай бұрын

3 flew over my house just today. Very cool.

@Satoltana Ай бұрын

That’s cool 🗿👍

@Klaaism Ай бұрын

Ultimately that's what doomed the Soviet Union... they couldn't afford all the huge expensive crap they built, and even that was smoke and mirrors. For example slapping new serial numbers on parade missiles and circling them around again.

@Lockheed_jets Ай бұрын

This guy is speaking truth, but military helicopters have a hoist to help them land in rough seas

@kalo616 Ай бұрын

That's an opinion, everyone has one. Some think China 🇨🇳 has the biggest and strongest navy.

@nintendoandwowsblitz Ай бұрын

not true though. china is far from best.

@chonpuiichhakchhuak1665 Ай бұрын

Wrong it suppose to be. This is rhe GAU 8 avenger with its own plane😂😂

@Odin-vu8fn Ай бұрын

We train for failure so when shit goes wrong we don’t freak out

@hellstromcarbunkle8857 Ай бұрын

so, can't evade. Can't out run. Can't outclimb. VFR dogfight? you lose.

@vancearama Ай бұрын

This is only the B variant. This is not intended for anything more than limited dogfighting. The C and particularly the A series are better suited for dogfighting

@WilliaminOz Ай бұрын

ME was a flying coffin. The pilots didn't have to be shot down by the P51.

@Fidd88-mc4sz Ай бұрын

These short films about WW2 are profoundly bloody ignorant. The Me262 was defeated on the ground, as the aircraft made scorch marks on runways it landed on, and it required a long strip to operate from. This meant that the allies soon knew the airfields they operated out of, and could make fairly accurate estimates of when the 262's would be close to their home airfields at low altitude and slow. Shooting them down with P51's then became fairly straight-forwards, although there remained a risk of AAA fire from the airfield if they got too close.

@Stanley2009Cubic Ай бұрын

SU-57 Felon :D

@brachio1000 Ай бұрын

Pronounced "em-e," not "me."

@stephengardiner9867 Ай бұрын

The Me 262 might ambush a P-51 but could not hope to dogfight with one. The 262 was a bomber interceptor, misused famously as a light bomber/attack aircraft. It had a great speed advantage but was nowhere near as agile as the Mustang. These simulations of 262s attacking Mustangs are rather bogus because the German jet was SUPPOSED to be attacking the bombers, not the escorts.

@pislanmarianflorin5932 Ай бұрын

În WW 2, anglo-americanii au avut un avion care a înregistrat câteva victorii împotriva lui Me 262. Este vorba de avionul Hawker Tempest, cel mai bun avion cu motor clasic din vremea aceea, care a doborât în jur de 12 Me 262, cu o tactică specială. Cu injecție de metanol în cilindri, Tempest putea atinge o viteză apropiată de viteza sunetului, fiind capabil să se înalțe până în stratosferă. Și colonelul sovietic Ivan Gojedub a doborât un Me 262, la manșa unui Lavochkin 5.... A doborât el și două P 51 Mustang, din eroare, deasupra Berlinului, neștiind ce sunt cele două avioane...

@camarenilla Ай бұрын

Fallas 35

@AA-xo9uw Ай бұрын

pogue

@ADude-f3z Ай бұрын

The problem with reusable rockets is that it takes more fuel to land them than it takes to reach orbital velocity…. Not as expensive as a new rocket body , but the environmental concerns are significant, especially if they are used frequently (like to produce an orbiting data network… do ya give a shi+ about that, Elon?)