Thanks! Excellent drawing explanation for how the prism works!
@outfitescoffie5615Ай бұрын
whats is better 127eq or c90 mak?
@robertcairney2955Ай бұрын
Spine tingling ,was it after this spiderman was invented 😂
@robertcairney2955Ай бұрын
Space travel doesn’t compare to the guys who first gave the eigar north face a real run for its money absolutely legends of the rock climbing world,those mountain goats woudnt attempt the north face of the eigar lol
@seanmangan2769Ай бұрын
Great music! And not too loud. 👍
@ArnaudSiemons4 ай бұрын
This guy died. He doesn't know it yet.
@persimmon34584 ай бұрын
Hi there, trying to go ultralite visual astronomy. My optics are an AT50 finderscope which accepts eyepieces. Looking forward your posts, Amos
@pavelsedov99825 ай бұрын
Хороший обзор, спасибо!
@VirtualPathfinder4 ай бұрын
🙏
@neilhay21557 ай бұрын
Nice review. You covered what people probably want to know when deciding about a lens. You have for me. Thank you, "Australia, east coast"
@VirtualPathfinder4 ай бұрын
Awesome, thank you!
@shanoferos58827 ай бұрын
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😮
@Fartmaster6997 ай бұрын
Very cool!
@adambreuse18758 ай бұрын
Razor sharp 👏👏👏👏👏
@marekgumienny58138 ай бұрын
thanks for sharing, those crappy images. I tried imaging jupiter several times in the beginning of my hobby and kept getting similar results. On one occasion i got a much better image with 2.2um pixel camera and 2x barlow. after stacking and wavelets it looked half decent but still nowhere close to what most people publish. Definitely seeing played a role plus my lack of experience. Shortly after I started playing with collimation and only recently fully understood it... I think I did anyway😂. It's good for beginners to understand what they are likely to get on first few tries. Video with barlow looks like convection inside the tube or really bad seeing.
@SPACE_GUY2998 ай бұрын
Sounds more like PLANET X
@denisla35469 ай бұрын
Naaah u cant tell me thats the best zoom we have ?!?!?! Satellite can supposedly read car plates.. but this is the best we can get of satellites 😂😂😂 Someting here dosnt add up
@terryvalentine3699 ай бұрын
I’d rather not imagine Uranus. Don’t care to think that much about myanus ether. !!
@Pestex-wj3nr9 ай бұрын
Awful noise, stopped watching.
@jackiefuller34599 ай бұрын
Well that was just a few blobs in the sky...thanks that's 10 minutes I will never get back. Do better
@utubefrog099 ай бұрын
That’s a bit creepy, why would you be imagining my anus, and how do you know I have gas?
@Rengki4310 ай бұрын
How do i add a object?
@rickyvecchio777410 ай бұрын
it's not real ....That's CGI.....but at Bruce See All....( in you Tube......) you can see THE REAL MOON....and many objets inside!!!
@nochinamade11 ай бұрын
2:04 Ego
@assassinartistic58111 ай бұрын
what telescope is it?
@VirtualPathfinder11 ай бұрын
It is a shot with a mirrorless camera attached to a Celestron C90 MAK telescope
@assassinartistic58111 ай бұрын
@@VirtualPathfinder oh thanks
@richardrojas630611 ай бұрын
Nice information. I just ordered one from Amazon to try out. I had to ditch the music so I could concentrate on the information.
@VirtualPathfinder11 ай бұрын
I hope it will be useful, as soon as the weather gets better I may try it again
@dvd0505 Жыл бұрын
❤❤❤ i can take a big moon.
@VirtualPathfinder11 ай бұрын
Good luck!
@GregHenson-iu6ps Жыл бұрын
You could be my guest for the Lunar Earth Flyby.
@brandirebeca8484 Жыл бұрын
P R O M O S M 😒
@ninjasmoke100 Жыл бұрын
Now that some time has passed, there is currently a more minimalist kit called the dwarf 2 (dwarf lab). And it weighs 2 pounds.
@alex-E7WHU Жыл бұрын
Love it, and the music is great 👍
@Astronurd Жыл бұрын
Is your 130PDS collimated? Did you align the centre point of the ADC with the horizon. Those images are terrible. Sorry.
@GS-yg9wk Жыл бұрын
visible chromatic aberration
@moralcombat8096 Жыл бұрын
Was the shooting done through some kind of eyepiece or T-ring?
@gundalf9348 Жыл бұрын
0.15"-0.30"/pixel are OK for planetary astrophotography, thanks to Lucky Imaging technique. Use formula: [pixel size (in microns)/focal lenght (in mm)]x206,3
@donaldjorgensen8818 Жыл бұрын
The surface must be heated from the sun
@kailaspatil15 Жыл бұрын
Well Explained Brother! Thanks
@rclines001 Жыл бұрын
Too much magnification. Bad skies. Not enough light gathering. That's like trying to use the 4mm eyepiece my nephew got with his 70mm refractor. Something that shouldn't be done. When your light is that bad, less magnification is required.
@ligmaanl Жыл бұрын
how to build a mount for laying chair?
@AndresMejiaV68 Жыл бұрын
Quite an example of terrible atmospheric seeing!
@pgknippel Жыл бұрын
That music is diabolical…”how to wreck a video!”
@ligmaanl Жыл бұрын
how? what is your moumt ?
@sunngifuwetzel1197 Жыл бұрын
What
@Мищь Жыл бұрын
В этот телескоп можно увидеть намного лучше😒
@az2ert187 Жыл бұрын
Nice video man, i bought my first telescope 2 day ago and cant wait to try capturing things like this although i have to practive first
@s.a.t.o6124 Жыл бұрын
Can you see a bit of color without exposure videos?
@VirtualPathfinder Жыл бұрын
This video is added to the “Astronomy” playlist, where it can be viewed without all the description text over the video.
@astrophotographyuk Жыл бұрын
Nice capture 🤓👍🔭
@VirtualPathfinder Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Next time I’ll try to stack some frames to reduce noise.