I live a form of both and it feeds my soul. 😊

The future for sapiens could be, being able to download our consciousness into computers.

You say at the beginning that Buddhism teaches reincarnation but that is Hinduism. Buddhists believe in rebirth (there is no fixed self, soul or anatta that passes from one life to another).

Thank you for sharing such meaningful and transformative content that touches the hearts of many.

Couple areas I didn’t agree with from the narrator/artist, is that humans didn't affect their environment. Everywhere H. sapiens went megafauna disappeared from the tree of life. And by some type of human design, everything humans do is geared toward making them feel good: eating, exercising, traveling, sex, entertainment, work (being able to afford & enjoy everyday comforts). Great read along with part 2 "Homo Deus" and "21 Lessons." Very nice graphical summary., Thank you!

They didn't win their law suit they counter sued the state as a distraction then settled the race lawsuit out of court.

Well, yes it was part of our dna. 🧬.Single mutation stopped brakes for neuron production in frontal lobes. Allowed us to abstract. No, Neanderthals buried their dead too. We just got better. No, we developed the ability to metabolize gluten. If life was great for the primitives why did the Australian aboriginal lifespan go from 30’s to 70’s after the white man came?

Lies lies and LIES. Stop teaching people LIES. Science is a new corporate religion to kill our souls and makes us a robots without free will. STOP THIS. We are not animals - we are souls in the bodies and demons in human skin wants to make us slaves forever. Wake up.

This book sometimes sounds like globalist propaganda. lol In any case, pretty much each point can be easily disproved, and some facts are inaccurate, based only on this short summary so I fear for the rest. For instance, the scientific era started 500 years ago, despite that all the sciences named here exist since at least the ancient Greeks?... Trying to see our evolution as linear, or divided into small boxes, is pretty naive and pointless. It's all way more chaotic than that.

Every comment is a positive one. Wow. That's pretty hard to accomplish these days. You always have haters.

I believe in God and Jesus teachings. The bible as well. That it is inspired. These enlightened tools are within the same realm of Spiritual Awakening. So i avoid suffering less often and for too long. I can grieve, let go, detach and continue to live on much better honoring God and Jesus sacrifice. King Solomon existed the same time as Prince Sidartha. I believe they all leanrned from each other. Read Ecclesiastes in the Bible. It will help.

Atheists love to say that in Buddhism 'gods' don't exist despite Buddhists clearing worshipping Buddha as if the Buddha is a deity. When you look for an atheist who speaks of Buddhism to explain this contradiction, they word wrangle, or have a ton of other pretenses if they know anything more than superficial things; and you will find that most atheists speak as if they are so sure, and have vast amounts of knowledge on Buddhism, or really any religious subject even when they clearly don't even know basic things. That's atheists of all races who speak about Buddhism whether they claim to be Buddhist or not. The problem is that according to tradition, Mara, the "god" of evil tried to tempt Siddharta Gautama (the original Buddha). Lately, atheist Buddhists are trying to correct this clear contradiction by claiming (or rather lying by saying) Mara is a demon and not a god, but it gets worse. In Buddhism there is Sakra, a deva or god who rules one kind of heaven, who is married to Shachi also called a 'deva' or goddess; in fact Sakra is known by his other name of Indra, or king of the 'gods.' If he's king of the gods, then that means there are more than one god in Buddhism. So Buddhism doesn't live up to the godless people's ideal of a perfect religion without 'gods.' When their lies are called out, atheistic 'Buddhists' twist, and word-wrangle to claim that they 'meant no creator god.' This is a lie as Sakra is in fact a creator god, and Buddhists acknowledge his existence. When that lie is pointed out, they jump to another lie claiming Buddhism doesn't 'worship' a god. But, to the chagrin of lying atheistic people of any race (including Asians) who claim to be Buddhists, Chinese Buddhism has 24 protective devas who are in fact 'prayed' to, and 'venerated.' When their lie about not worshipping gods is called out, they claim not to 'worship' them, but they do 'venerate' them; in other words, more word-wrangling. When that lie or word twisting is pointed out, then they jump to saying that Mahayana Buddhism prays to Buddha, and others, but Theraveda Buddhism prays but doesn't expect anyone is listening. In other words, the major schools do pray to a deity of some sort, and all of the schools know this; and prayer, as even a novice or any complete atheist knows, is in fact a form of worship. So, when you get past the word-wrangling, or just flat out lies, Buddhism does in fact have gods; Buddhism does believe in a creator god, Sakra (Indra); and Buddhists do worship gods in the form of veneration (24 devas) alongside worshipping Buddha himself/itself. To all Buddhists who claim that Buddhism is an atheists dream of a religion without gods worshipped: STOP LYING!!!

It’s not that Buddhists do or do not believe in God, they simply don’t focus on that question

Craving is suffering. There is a way to let go of craving, suffering. He advised how

Budh means wisdom love! It is a a way of being, not a person! dha or dhi means mind. So it is not a person. The person with the most complete love without conditions was siddharta. That was the Buddha. He said he would never take a form again. Also not in dreams or visions. If some one says he met the buddha, he is mistaken.

Seneca was persecuted at some parts of his life

This video was perfect. I really like how it was edited. The visuals made it clear for me comprehend. Nice voice. It's simply and directly to the point. Thanks so much! I resonate with both.

Book Siddhartha from Hermann Hesse. 💫 🙏 🐟

I'm not looking for the history of the Buddha. I want to understand the four Noble truths period do you know anybody who can explain it to a layman period you don't do a good job. You're just giving me the history and the buddha

Daoism's objection to animal sacrifice is actually an objection to Confucianism's rituals, as Confucians believe that observing traditional rituals (especially the Zhu's animal sacrifice) is a way to cultivate virtue.

I have the great fortune to be living in Chiang Mai, Thailand, and have found a teacher here who teaches from the original Pali Canon. This has brought me light years ahead of what I was doing prior to studying with this Teacher. I have learned that Buddhism is a way of life, and changing the way that I used to think, it definitely is not a religion. Gotoma Buddha did not teach, rights, rituals or ceremonies as a path to Enlightenment. Great explanation of the Four Noble Truths…🙏

Very similar to hindu idea of tattva . Satva ,rajas and tamas

Copy pasting bible verses for people who don't read bible and manipulation to gain popularity!

It is wisdom on our part not to regard this book and this video as mere opinion. We need intelligence and education from A philosopher teacher, who can give us a new story of existence. We have enough stories about what's going on in the sports media, enough stories about the sickening private live of movie moguls. It's important to educate ourselves and our children about the Philosophical underpinnings of our world in its history🖖🏻🌹

❤❤

So, if there is a doggy heaven? Would dogs believe in it?

Oculur migraine trigger warning

Totally botched the most important period in human history, the first major agricultural civilizations were not Europe, they were sumer (asia), egypt (africa), indus valley (asia) ... they invented advanced society, our ancestors must be rolling over in their grave such disrespect lol 😂

My ex suggested me this book. That's the only good thing she'd done to me.

The clarity with which this video presents the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path is remarkable. It's a reminder of the timeless relevance of Buddha's teachings in finding inner peace.

Buddhism is cool however I do not consider myself an atheist.

www.currentaffairs.org/news/2022/07/the-dangerous-populist-science-of-yuval-noah-harari#:~:text=The%20best%2Dselling%20author%20is,work%20is%20riddled%20with%20errors.

Family member told me about this book and decided to buy me a copy

The basis of every type of relationship!

Over half the video is just background on Enrico Fermi, which is not at all relevant.

If you still believe in evolution theory that human came from monkeys... Then you are just dumb & stupid

❤❤❤

DANG YUVAL AFRICAN IMAGES ARE AVAILABLE FOR USE TOO

Author did well to explain but his knowledge is limited on God's topic.

Budhism has been recommended by scientists and well educated people

Basis of Budhism is reincarnation and law of karma . The necessity of Budhism is impermanence sufferings and concept of no soul . Budhism guides us to stay in human world and heavens until final stage is attained . 🙏🙏🙏

🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

Very similar to the writings of John Milton .

I have been to some of the villages in Bihar where the Buddha taught the four noble truths. One of them is Bhatgawan mispronounounced as Bandagawan in the Mahaparinirvana story. Very educative. I do research on how Buddhism disappeared in Bihar. I realized it never disappeared from Bihar. Buddhists simply failed to research Indian Buddhism. They looked at Buddhism through the sphere of their own cultures searching for only the Buddha. Buddha had a myriad of names in different villages according to his teachings there. Example. His favorite teaching was 'Lust and desire causes pain. Remove lust and desire, and pain is removed'. Translated into Bihari (where the Buddha story took place) it is DHUKH HARAN meaning to remove dukha. Three dozen villages pray to DUKH HARAN Baba. Its clear that DUKH HARAN Baba is none other than the Buddha. Problem is Buddhists are searching only for the Buddha. In the real Vaishali the Buddha begged for alms. The locals there pray to 'BHIKHAINI' Baba (Beggar Baba). Bhikhaini was mispronounced by Buddhists as Bhikshu. Who is BHIKHAINI Baba. The Buddha no doubt. But people are searching for a man called Buddha. In the real Vaishali, in Beluha the Buddha suffered a sickness and felt he had grown old. The locals pray to 'BURHA' Baba (Old Baba). Who is BURHA Baba. The Buddha no doubt. In the real Vaishali the Lichavies pressurized Buddha not to die. They trailed him to Bandagawan pressurizing him not to die. To put pressure in Hindi is DABESHWAR. Three dozen villages around the stupa where Buddha gave the Lichavies his patra, the villagers pray to Baba 'DABESHWAR NATH' meaning the man who won the pressurizing game. It was the the Buddha no doubt as he gave the Lichavies his patra and succeded in sending them back. But Buddhists are searching for the Buddha. Forgive me for commenting out of the topic. I just wanted to impart this information to you.

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nnfIq5ilpsqNjtksi=5nsOEMa6Uc1nbcft sapiiens audio book

5:13 Where does Daoism say anything about a god?? I've read the Laozi and Zhuangzi and have never encountered any mention of anything roughly relating to a deity... Absolutely nothing. Other than the phrase "Mother Dao", which is meant completely to refer to nature as a whole, and specifically the creative parts of nature, not a literal "Mother Dao".Daoists believe in an order to the universe, which often manifests itself in a nebulous way. Things are the way they are, whether we'd like them to be that way or not. In some ways, it has some things in common with stoicism, but also things which it interprets in a completely different way.

Thank you for the video. You have explained Buddhism so well. I will watch this many times. Slowly I will learn and practice the Middle Path and more

Sound like noble lies fuck this fake ass shit

This is a very useful video, but the background music is ugly and very distracting.

Educative.