America was full of French & Germans back then

You still sour.

made in spain

If that's the ONLY word you find offensive in this film, God would be ashamed. Love thy neighbor as thyself after all, right?

Why are you judging someone else for their choice of words? Wouldn't that be against your religion?

Stephen, well clearly you shouldn’t be watching westerns.

Well, God Damn. (Jesus Christ, grow a pair.) Oh, and Peter Pan and Santa Claus!

North and south used muzzleloaders. Very few in the north had Henry’s. Probably were rarely used because ammo was scare for both sides.

Dutch

@Steveknowles Knowles Just one of those things you notice when you are familiar with the gun. Plus you had the character at MCU for so long holding the same pose, one tends to see details like somebody holding a rifle on an opponent with the hammer down.

Noticed that on a lot of these new short or even full length westerns. They also make it look like a .44 rim fire kicks like a .45-70.

It’s a amateur film so there’s bound to be some errors but a hammer down means no one gets accidentally shot. Wouldn’t want another rouge gun like Alec Baldwin had shooting people.🤨

@@sokodad rogue gun? You really mean rogue Alec Baldwin!

I agree with you

History disagrees with you. Jefferson Davis had bodyguards armed with the Henrys. 50 were purchased by the CSA only 200 by the union. The CSA captured a few more Henrys and Spencer rifles, ammo was the hard part to get. Both sides also had the sharps rifle and both sides had gatling gun or an analog. Production of ammo was the defining factor. The south didn't produce the rimfire ammo required for the Spencer. Britain supplied alot of the ammo, guns, cannon, and "machine" guns. Transportation from Europe was too slow to overcome the unions production capacity. Both sides allowed troops to purchase and use personal weapons. Some generals from both sides would personally contribute to supplies and arming their troops as well. The CSA also had extensive militia (partisan patriot) involvement. Bloody Bill Anderson and William Quantrill being the two best know militia leaders. They captured and used anything they could.

Sett....thanks for your info...

@@sett6970 you are correct in factd at one point so many supplies rifles and uniforms had been taken by confederate raiders on union supply depots that the armies were almost equal in that area

Probably stole the rifle off a dead Yankee or got it from someone who did.

By "ring of truth" you mean that it's different from what you've been told? Think about that.

@@asc_missions3080 What would make you think that was what I meant, ASC? I specifically said "a perspective we don't usually hear." Do you not see that that suggests that I accept and value the things he is saying that are different from "what I've been told"? Think about that. I listened to that conversation again, and to be honest I'm not sure what it was I found lacking the ring of truth five months ago. I suspect it has to do with his seemingly heartfelt speech at the fireside in the context of other things he said or did in the rest of the story. I will say this: At some points he paints himself as almost a benevolent protector of the slaves; and then at other points he makes his disdain and contempt for them explicit. In other words, his own tone in one place contradicts his words in another. Bottom line: It sounds like he's trying real hard to justify the unjustifiable. He is lying to himself, so how can we know what parts of what comes out of his mouth we should believe?

@@KZbinallowedmynametobestolen I expected that when you said parts don't have the ring of truth and then indirectly referenced what we usually do hear (the war was about slavery and southerners only fought to keep their slaves), that you meant this was what didn't have the ring of truth. HOWever, your clarification pushed that aside, raising the question of whether the man is contradicting himself. I don't think so. The story develops piecemeal and a bit out of sequence, as often happens in conversation. For me as a lifelong debriefer and counselor, used to sorting out what a confounded person is trying to say, I saw it fall together thusly: He didn't fight to keep his slaves because he had freed them 2 years prior. He did that because his beloved idealistic new Northern wife convinced him to trust them to be able to take care of themselves. He points out along the way that there were far more slaves than whites in the south, implying a hidden danger his wife couldn't see and that he didn't consider. He tells how so many former slaves were impressed into the Northern Army and were involved in the burning of the South. He was gone fighting somewhere else when they came through his place; he came home to his find his horrifically battered and multiply-raped wife hanging from a tree and his son burned to death in the barn. He blames himself (and secretly, his naive and unfortunate wife) for misplacing trust in those former slaves' future behavior, he hates them for betraying that trust, and he has all the proof he needs for why he will never make that mistake again. So he demands they stay away from him and his, and he kills them at the first sign of trouble. It's a typical traumatic stress "solution".

@@asc_missions3080 Wow, thanks for all of that, ASC. It sounds like you heard him a lot more clearly than I did.

Well, that man was clearly guilty of attempted murder when he hung the black man. I suppose the marshal could save his life--so that he could arrest him for attempted murder.

History Hunter?

bien sur que c'est du plagiat, c'est même écrit dans la description que c'est un exercice imposé par mon école de cinéma qui consistait à copier une vidéo. Golden Moustache l'a bien compris et m'as envoyé un mail pour me confirmer qu'ils n'y voyaient aucun inconvénient. Et pour ce qui est du "tu (ne) sais rien faire": kzbin.info/www/bejne/rausiIpua8lpm5Y kzbin.info/www/bejne/f56bmHRobqmWjsU kzbin.info/www/bejne/d2WpeJKCj9FkocU kzbin.info/www/bejne/fKSoaZanpbCDmdE regarde ça et essaye de me le redire en face. De plus de la part d'un type qui as une chaine youtube vide je trouve ça juste méprisable