Levy non manca mai l'occasione di essere un cretino .

And now theyre claiming its defence again. Yes, starving children is certainly "defence"

This long time myth about a so called clash is similarly to ideas like 'western' 'judeo-christian' values etc is just another tool to uphold a certain narrative that facilitates oppressing others and exploiting them. It's a tale as old as time itself. As soon as the first cities arose and there was a need for more resources or territorial expansion or political ambitions in the region , far or near, it was just all too convenient to say anyone living outside the cities not sharing the city dweller lifestyle is 'barbaric' i.e is at odds with the 'civil' and therefore needs to be put in line.

Chomp is hated in china cause he used to say there’s a chink in yer argument

Chomsky was, and and still is, a pathetic cult-leading narcissist who thinks his thoughts are fact. His trivialisation 'the big bad guy is Islam' had some credibility 20 years ago, but we all know his view-point has caused mass rape, murder, drug crime, and sedition across the EU. Just this weekend Germans had to watch Muslims march for a Caliphate in Germany. The AfD is right - the UK (Corbyn, Abbot, Blair and Brown) and hundred of EU parliamentarians are evil and should be prosecuted for treason. We are 5 years from civil war.

excellent explaination

The man who defended the mass murderer Slobodan Milošević

when this video came out i was tryna get the pokemon cards

There're only two classes of people. The 1% and the 99%.

Noam Chomsky is another Far Left Lunatic who is rightly named the Godfather of the Regressive Left

Alex Jones and Noam Chomsky agreed there is a propaganda system that keeps people from knowing the truth but that people should in fact be informed. Fast forward to now. Alex Jones is banned. Noam Chomsky though somewhat marginalized is not banned, but hardly anyone cares anymore about what he says. Alex Jones comes out looking better now.

When exactly did Alex become compromised? Sources indicate 2012, the real Alex Jones fell off the air.

I wish old Alex and Chomsky had gotten along throughout the entire conversation. So much common ground, but I think 30 minutes in or so Alex turns on Noam and accuses him of being part of the New World Order and so forth. Back then I think Alex was more of a libertarian of the right, and of course Noam is one of the left. So even with differences, they have a lot in common. But now Alex is more of a right-wing populist, since the rise of Trump. Which would still mean they have a fair bit of common ground, but I think Alex would be even less interested in exploring said common ground in 2023 than he was back when this interview took place. When did this interview take place? I see the upload was May 2007.

There's no way food produced in America is cheaper than food produced in Mexico, even with those subsidies. Anyone who's gone to a third world country knows how cheap the local grub is, and anyone who's gone vacationing on an island knows how expensive imported food is. So no, there's no way US food imports are destroying local agribusiness.

Nonsense. They love it. Just read some elite theory on the matter.

This is from 15 years ago, and the clash of civilizations wasn’t quite as clear as it is now. But right now? Huntington was completely right, and we really are in a clash of civilizations

Lmao it’s hilarious how Alex Jones spent the entire interview pretty much exactly agreeing with everything Chomsky says, and praises his research and his books, specifically about how the government has to distract us with culture war bs, and then the one time he disagrees with him it’s about a culture war issue, and that one disagreement alone is enough to get Alex to entirely discredit him as a globalist shill when he just spent like an hour agreeing with him…

Alex Jones was right again. Noam Chomsky IS a $hill for the new world order

Not a honest person.

So odd having Chomsky stopped for adverts...

Nunchomsky fails to realize that the question themselves elicit the ideas. Yes if you ask people who do you think really controls the government and give them the option of the few or ask them do you really think the election matters? Those questions are basically "leading the witness." The problem is that they didn't even realize that's what they believed until someone asked them those questions.

If only Jones was a bit more intelligent and was willing to agree to disagree with Noam Chomsky. It's such a great conversation between two great minds. And then he goes insane because Noam Chomsky has different economic views than him.

It's insane how prophetic Jones was. You have to keep in mind that this was before the PC culture came to rise. However Jones was terrible in that he lowered the morale of everyone who questioned the mainstream narrative by always freaking out about the problems and never dedicating any time to featuring the solutions. He could have spent one day per week just having people call in to talk about the solutions they were implementing. Hell he could have given away $1,000 each month to the person who had done the most to wake people up that month. Jones failed to wake people up AND inspire them to take action. In that sense he failed miserably. He should have bounced his show about some of the good things were happening in the world so that his listeners didn't become depressed, as was often the case.

How sad that so many videos of Jones interviewing some of the most interesting people in the world are now almost impossible to find online. I'm highly surprised that I was able to find this one. I should really download it and upload it to one of the free speech platforms so it doesn't get lost.

Whatever language this man is speaking, I don't speak it

Why does he keep bringing "ethnic" up? Islam isn't an ethnicity. I don't know if he just misspoke or if this is just a strawman. Also this didn't age well, Biden is starting to distance the US from Saudi Arabia now lol.

Sorry Chomsky But Huntington has been proved right. And you, like many times before, have spoken a lot without saying much and once again proved wrong.

Huntington’s thesis contemplated individual non-Western nation states allying themselves with the West for monetary or security based reasons. The frequent nitpicking of Huntington’s argument with outlier examples is intellectually disingenuous. Plus there’s no guarantee that those isolated alliances between Islamic and Western nations will endure-the oil trade will only last so long.

Finally, a Chomsky video we’re the quality of video matches the audio quality

Chomsky really misrepresents Huntington's argument here. Ethnic divisions are different from the civilization ones Huntington thinks to define the world. He argues that what happened in the former Yugoslavia was a result of a clash between the Muslim and more orthodox groups in that region. In some cases, according to Huntington, ethnic conflict will decrease as ethnic groups in the same civilisation see each other as allies.

Future of Globalization is ...hunger

Poor decision of politicians. This is what Globalization mean.

this is fucking gold i cannot believe this exists

You can't just @ people in the comments, you have to leave a reply for them to see it.

noam should read Strange Death of Europe written by Douglas Murray his idea is very obscure

Wtf, they only disagree in the guns issue and Alex called him “ a NWO shill “ 🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️

where is this from? this discussion by chomsky

So... how are the continents moving? Do you see or hear any techtonic plates shifting? You don't? Well, that's it then. They're not moving.

Huntington and Spengler were right.

I find the "right wing nut" phenomenon to be quite tragic. When legitimate public educators like Noam Chomsky get censored and censured, we lose a critical source of information. In the absence of quality information, people will eat up anything they're given. Legitimate anti-establishment anger leads people to charletans like Trump or Jones. When being suspicious of power is relegated to the margins, (nuts, exotic academia, etc.) the people lose. The elites and their corporatocracy are free to continue unchallenged and unexposed. Alex Jones and Noam Chomsky should be fighting back to back and spreading this very important reality. Instead Alex behaves like a barbarian thus making the entire issue less credible. Very sad and also quite irresponsible.

Listen to this over and over again

It's weird that you only have to generalise a little above the details and Chomsky and Wacko agree with each other.

If someone watches this: The book he talks about is Selling Free Enterprise: The Business assault on Labour and Liberalism 1945-60 by Elizabeth A. Fones Wolf. The australian author is Alex Carey, Chomsky based much of his work about the media on the work of Carey.

Idk how your a rational humna being giving this a thumbs down.

That intro...brings back great memories...even though it was doom n gloom porn.. 4 years straight for 4 hours a day....what a ride miss the guy. Where can i find him these days miss his youtube vids.

This really shows how immature and childish Jones is. Uses the last couple seconds to chide Chomsky without allowing a response, and then makes unfounded claims about his guest as soon as he hangs up.

I have about 10 pages to read and finish the Huntington's book, to me, it's like I've been looking through a crystal ball. I've read stuff in the book that is on the nightly news. This guy would defend the book vigorously, if, and only if, he he had written it himself.

Fast forward to today and the facts are clearly on Huntington's side.

what a confused and superficial argumentation

anyone who rejects the theory of Clash of Civilizations - may you enjoy watching your native country and culture (presumably western, because most other civilizations tend to display some form of common sense) being devoured by the cultural enrichment of an invading incompatible culture. Keep spitting on your ancestors' legacy, you are hip like that.