Frank Glencairn

Пікірлер

@jaystonegold Ай бұрын

❤❤❤

@KrunoslavStifter Ай бұрын

Why does this sounds like AI voice is used and why does it sound like its a Good Morning America show? Who is this made for and why? Honest question. Its the most off sounding podcast I've heard in a while. You guys, if it is guys and not binaries, something more humane with this.

@FrankGlencairn Ай бұрын

Just turning my tech articles into something that you can listen to. If you really want to geek out, you can still read the original article - linked in the description.

@KrunoslavStifter Ай бұрын

@@FrankGlencairn Is this made with AI or not?

@FrankGlencairn Ай бұрын

Of course - but the content is based on my tech articles. It's called NotebookLM by Google, and I think it is pretty amazing. Try it out, it's free.

@martinbaumann6256 5 ай бұрын

Looks great. Like to see the Nodetrre of that grades - and i will not understand it... ;-) Greetings from Slashcam Forum

@NicoleGallant-oo4dp 7 ай бұрын

I buy it

@NicoleGallant-oo4dp 7 ай бұрын

Pingu igloo clock is cool said noot noot

@josephsee2425 8 ай бұрын

Topaz seems to be doing a better job adding in detail(look at the lichen/rocks in the focus rack, and skin/hair texture). It clearly messed with the color grade as well, reducing highlights in a few areas but the detail seems seperate from that.

@PanDownTiltLeft 10 ай бұрын

Awesome!

@jl25735 Жыл бұрын

IDK. IMO, the impression of Topaz being better is more due to the colors being more saturated. But is it crispier? hard for me to tell

@KrunoslavStifter Жыл бұрын

Advantages of Resolve SuperScale are that it’s built into the Davinci, its relatively fast, although the latest 2x Enhance is very slow right now, maybe they will optimize it. Resolve SuperScale has the advantage of not changing the colors of the video, while Topaz Video AI sadly is unusable for some projects because it’s not colored managed and actively tries to average colors according to its AI trained dataset. Making sometimes images better looking which is cool, but not when you have made your color grade or have color critical projects. This is where Topaz Video AI in its current form is unusable because it will change color. I asked the developers at Topaz they say they are aware of this and working on it. So maybe in the future. In your examples you can clearly see the color and tone change. Latest Topaz Video AI 3.x offers optimized, speedy rendering and some nice control over the level of detail and noise reduction, etc., but its biggest advantage is removing compression artifacts. If you are restoring compress footage, working with already compressed and processed stock footage, etc. Topaz will clean it up really nicely, same as if you work with cameras that have 8-bit, h264 codecs. Resolve SuperScale works a lot better if the input footage is with no visible compression artifacts, otherwise it will enhance and magnify those as well, while Topaz will actually replace them with new clean details. Bottom line Resolve as you would expect it is more for color managed, color critical, professionally shot, low compression footage. While Topaz is more for casual use and restoration. While Topaz can be used professionally, one needs to be aware of the alterations to the footage. Also there is an option where one uses Topaz too clean up source footage from compression artifacts, etc. And then color grades in Resolve and use SuperScale to upscale clean, color-corrected footage in Resolve. Just my 2 cents. Cheers!

@jjd4034 9 ай бұрын

Thank you for this comment. I was looking for some thoughts on how these two programs affect the colours

@KrunoslavStifter 9 ай бұрын

@@jjd4034My pleasure. Cheers! Sadly it does not seem new version of Topaz has addressed the color issues, but some have made claim that its less drastic change in color with latest releases, although I haven't tested it myself... yet.

@ashleyjosephs1561 Ай бұрын

Thank you for this.This has really helped

@AFilmmakersJourney-vo9is Жыл бұрын

How long did it take to render in Topaz Ai?

@glkoop Жыл бұрын

you should add a 3rd comoaration to this tumeline which is the nee 18.5 version of davinci super scale

@WelcomeTo Жыл бұрын

Could you do a comparison between Resolve's Speed Warp and Topaz Video Enhance AI for slowing down footage to 25-50%? I can't seem to find a video of anyone doing a comparison with the same footage.

@KrunoslavStifter Жыл бұрын

Topaz has several more AI models that in some cases will do a better job than in other cases, usually at the expense of speed. Davinci only has your average model that works well in standard, non-challenging cases, but like some of the Topaz models suffers when it needs to deal with more challenging footage. Overall I prefer Davinci for its ease of use and being part of workflow, but some of the more advance topaz models are a bit better and produce fewer artifacts for challenging shots. But none of them is all powerful, so sooner or later you will run into a situation where they all break down. You can't replace high frame rate coming out of the camera, but you can get away with some stuff if you are careful how and what you shoot and how you post process. Also keep in mind that Topat is frequently updating and tweaking their models, while Davinci does not. This makes resolve more reliable , while Topaz keeps making changes, sometimes its 3 steps forward two steps back and its less reliable, depending on the model and version of topaz software. A bit of a gamble sometimes.

@WelcomeTo Жыл бұрын

@KrunoslavStifter Thank you very much for your detailed response! 🙏

@KrunoslavStifter Жыл бұрын

@@WelcomeTo No problem.

@momentsPY Жыл бұрын

Useless comparison. No two samples are from the same scene nor they are shown side by side. How can the result be compared ?

@UKHeritageRailways Жыл бұрын

Are you watching the same video? Not only is the exact same video played twice, once with Topaz and then Super Scale, they are then shown together one above the other.

@MehmetKozal Жыл бұрын

What?

@dietalarmclock2607 Жыл бұрын

Resolve by a little bit better Dynamic range, color accuracy and visual pop, as seen from a mobile device with slightly dirty eyeglasses

@Tommo020788 2 жыл бұрын

Topaz is clearly better when it comes to human skin/faces and hair. Everything else seems like there isn't a huge difference.

@SoundSpeeds 2 жыл бұрын

I think that Topaz did a better job. You'd expect it to for the money. The Resolve solution is nothing to sneeze at though.

@focuspulling 2 жыл бұрын

This is an extremely interesting test. Not inconsistent with your results actually, I think Topaz might have the clear advantage for EXTREMELY worse source material, such as old VHS tapes and DVD rips at 480p or less, going up to HD or 4k. That is what Topaz's extra processing time is designed to crunch through, compared to material that is already "in the ballpark."

@gary5028 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for doing this. What are the specs of the computer that you used?

@OscarParraCine 2 жыл бұрын

Dude, in my opinion, Topaz does a better job. And you can see it.

@focuspulling 2 жыл бұрын

You missed his point; he is making a cost/benefit analysis as to Topaz taking 800% longer to render out footage that's nearly identical in the end, when feeding it footage that's already in decent shape, but simply lower-resolution.

@aman-mn5kc Жыл бұрын

How much is Davinci Resolve Studio? (Superscale is not in the free version)

@Andresvideo Жыл бұрын

@@aman-mn5kc €300 approx.

@DiminishingAugmentation 2 жыл бұрын

Topaz is better.

@stefanschwarzloh1360 2 жыл бұрын

Wahnsinn Gruß an meinem Freund

@helmutjerryeberle5465 3 жыл бұрын

Einfach nur genial Frank!

@usernamenotvisibIe 3 жыл бұрын

This is absolutely awesome! May I please ask (I have seen your previous videos with the Original BMPCC)...what are your render settings when exporting your Original BMPCC projects?

@FrankGlencairn 3 жыл бұрын

You mean like in exporting for KZbin? I export an uncompressed AVI and encode it with Handbreake.

@ToriOnClaws 3 жыл бұрын

Lyrics noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot noot

@MiguelAngel-bu3ds 6 жыл бұрын

You made this? It's amazing!

@knowkim6697 6 жыл бұрын

Sooooo cute! Where did u get it?

@FrankGlencairn 6 жыл бұрын

I made it :-)

@knowkim6697 6 жыл бұрын

Soooo lovely item♥ I want to buy it :-D

@RalfKaufmann 9 жыл бұрын

Brilliant #garage ambience and #vintage road movie ;-)

@amolinaromusic 10 жыл бұрын

export the clip from davinci resolve in uncompressed or ProRes? Manage images in rec 709 or bmd film? Thank you!

@Pettergrindahl 10 жыл бұрын

what camera were used?

@FrankGlencairn 10 жыл бұрын

The original 2.5k Blackmagic cinma camera with EF mount and a Canon 17-55 f2.8, plus some Samyang primes

@Vautksch 8 жыл бұрын

Wow, the dynamic range is awesome

@MichaelKuznar 10 жыл бұрын

What lenses were used?

@FrankGlencairn 10 жыл бұрын

Samyang/Rokinon and a Canon 17-55 f2.8 for the handheld stuff, because of the IS.

@arrycat 11 жыл бұрын

Schickes Auto! Tolles Filmchen & witzige Story :D !

@deelofilms 11 жыл бұрын

Frank, lovely work! I have a Black Magic pocket camera, still figuring out a good project to test it with. It's hard to me to nail focus using the tiny LCD and using lens adapters, so I've ordered a 7" monitor finally. Looking forward to getting out and shooting something with it. I love the color and texture of this footage. It really does look & feel like film emulsion compared to h.264 / 8 bit.