Sold to collectors with the provison that were never raced. A friend saw one of the tubs when he was at the factory in the early 2000's..
@EduSanjuan7778 күн бұрын
Is so ugly that is beautiful! And its the BEST Ferrari ever made by performance. It was designed for group b which never raced in Le Mans, or mostly on circuits was a total beast. And the base for the F40 that mounted a detuned versión of this engine. Which in itself is a detuned versión of group C Lancia Ferrari LC2.Which is why F40 can be massaged to 650 or 700 hp pretty easily.
@ernetoescobar-vy7uf13 күн бұрын
😮😮😮❤ amg
@SavionWright-qm4et14 күн бұрын
This is the true beast
@projectg40815 күн бұрын
That 0-60 stat is absolute bullcrap and I’m also a bit dubious about that dry weight figure
@claudiobonis742016 күн бұрын
Thanks Mr Nicola Materazzi..
@johnb212716 күн бұрын
Man this ain’t Bugatti this was mythbusters.
@Christoffski18 күн бұрын
Mercedes ruin it every time. 😅 They go too far.
@warrenchambers481922 күн бұрын
Still my FAVORITE wingcar paint scheme.
@user-nf3oq2ge3g24 күн бұрын
Thanks for not speeding up the film like everyone else did. How on earth do those 2 fans create that much vaccum. We have giant vacuum pumps in series in the paper mill that can’t do that pressure how do 2 electric fans do it.
@OhNiceMatt25 күн бұрын
Driving by the Dealership, in a houston suburb, on a monday morning, in the backseat of my dad's station wagon, and seeing these on the car lot was jaw-dropping.
@N3wbMa5t3r27 күн бұрын
Baby F40
@EduSanjuan7778 күн бұрын
Its actually way faster than an F40. And lighter too
@gregorygolden1296Ай бұрын
Worth Every penny Bobby is a legend. He won in more different car makes than anyone. This car is going to only go up in value.
@41aragonАй бұрын
That’s the ugliest f**king thing I’ve ever seen. 288 GTO is pure art but this is crap
@ratonlaveur-ss9qwАй бұрын
but the f50gt had better performance than a 911 gt1 or even a f1 gt1 am i wrong ?
@Ara23Ara275Ай бұрын
Those taillights look scary 🥶
@shanebrbich5698Ай бұрын
“BBATHTUB”?🤣 RAT ROASTER BABY
@andresguerin7162Ай бұрын
Safety was secondary! Now safety ruined most of racing!
@markdessert4077Ай бұрын
It's amazing what engineering can do when rules and budgets do not get in the way. AWESOME
@user-wv5tr4dy5tАй бұрын
I got that hemi except with the cross ram. I wish I had a Daytona to put it in
@manofweed1Ай бұрын
A dustbin with a very powerful engine for its day. Any hot rodder could make the same or better now. I know, it’s the history and the provenance that separate a 50k car from a 1.5 million car. But it’s still a very fast dustbin ?!
@cjin0101Ай бұрын
Talks about diablo gtr and continuously shows a stock countach.
@grandduke2145Ай бұрын
I remember them. My favorite racer of All Time. Killed Cam Am though.
@craig4874Ай бұрын
😲 nasty 🤔 that's a lot of bread 🍞 but I'd buy it if I had the 💰
@David_243032 ай бұрын
ME TOO MY DREAM CAR ❤
@wingnutmcspazatron39572 ай бұрын
Very cool
@alexandersimpson36382 ай бұрын
Given its power to weight, this would be a hyper car even today. They only made 3 complete cars, I'll assume it's the holy trinity then!
@gowen_places_54712 ай бұрын
i will without a doubt own this car in the future. i love luigi chinetti's business and the history is amazing. unfortunately, i am on the west coast so i have never met mr. coates or seen him racing the car, but when i get the opportunity to own it i surely will not pass it up. i am very fortunate to have attended several vintage races in California throughout the years, and one day i will race this car at laguna seca! if you see him again please put in a good word haha
@ManiacRacing2 ай бұрын
Hollow titanium screws to save weight. Serious!
@David_243032 ай бұрын
I would love 💕 to buy this car ❤❤
@richardfinney31792 ай бұрын
I remember that race it was so cool to see Bobby run that fast back then Ford had the boss 429 in that race to
@johnharris81912 ай бұрын
Not in a Mustang.
@motorhomemac2 ай бұрын
Still fast by today's standards. 🕶️
@charleswaynewright20422 ай бұрын
Bill Elliott smoked it not in a closed track test But RACE LAPS SMALL BLOCK 351 no freak nise stupid wing eat on that mopar
@johnharris81912 ай бұрын
Yes but many years later with upgraded technology.
@thethirdman2252 ай бұрын
Sorry but 1,580 hp could not have happened. I know everyone says it but there is zero evidence and even less evidence that it ever raced with that kind of power. Ian Bamsey, not known for showing restraint in these matters*, wrote that on one occasion, the engine was in a test chamber and may have been putting out as much as 1,500 hp when it blew up. Remember too that this was 1973 and boost dials were not calibrated like they are today. So there’s no way to get any kind of precise idea of what it was producing when the knob was fully wound out. This engine was descended from the 908, which produced 350-375 hp from three litres and eight cylinders. With an extra four cylinders, the engine became the 912 and came out of the box at about 540 hp, which scales almost perfectly. Bored out to 4.9 litres, the normally aspirated 912 _might_ have made 620 but 600 is likely the top. This was the engine that powered the vast bulk of endurance racing 917s in 1970-71. For CanAm, it was eventually enlarged to 5.4 litres and turbocharged. The Eberspacher turbos came from truck engines and were probably sourced from some far flung arm of Roger Penske’s trucking empire. In any case, they were never designed with racing in mind. In 1973, the best F1 engines were making about 160 hp/litre. The old 908 was good for 125 hp/litre at best. If this figure is to be believed then it must have been making 292.59 hp/litre. Yes, it was turbocharged. Yes it was beefed up. But there are some things that could not be changed. The original 912 block was made up of two flat sixes with the power take off and the cooling fan in the middle. The cylinders were simply bolted on individually and it shared the same valve gear as the original. Because it was air cooled, it was necessarily less rigid than a conventional water cooled engine. Even allowing for beefing up, 292 hp per litre is an awful lot to ask of components that were designed for a maximum of 125. As power doubles, the internal stresses quadruple. So those components would have to be very much stronger indeed than their ancestors, which simultaneously increases rotating mass. But the biggest problem was the length of the engine. It was very long and this meant it suffered from flex. Flex will eventually lead to components not aligning properly and ultimately engine failure. And that harder you push it, the more likely that is to happen. Even if I accept the race figure of 1,100 hp - which I do - that still nearly 204 hp/litre. The normally quoted maximum in the day was 1,400 and that is nearly 260. At 1,580 hp, each cylinder would have to make 131.66 hp… from components that were originally designed for 46.9 hp per cylinder. Boost up to two atmospheres was also highly unlikely and 1.3-1.4 was far more likely. I don’t expect everyone to just believe me but an Adam Carolla interview with a Porsche engineer who was actually working on the engine referred to that figure. Again, the boost was not calibrated. The claims for this engine are simply implausible. *When the Sauber C9 did 400 km/h at Le Mans, Bamsey wrote that it did 410. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, he has stuck with this figure.
@davidantiwan930Ай бұрын
One of the most revered engines and beautiful at that but no need to be sorry you’re just stating common sense facts, that being said it doesn’t take away it was an amazing motor
@SSR2696Ай бұрын
Boost gauges not calibrated in 1973... now who's stretching the narrative here.
@thethirdman225Ай бұрын
@@SSR2696 *_"Boost gauges not calibrated in 1973... now who's stretching the narrative here."_* They were nothing like today's computerised, accurate-to-a-billionth, gauges. Not 'stretching the narrative' at all. Certainly not reverse proof that '1,580 hp!' was ever a possibility.
@thethirdman225Ай бұрын
@@davidantiwan930 It was indeed.
@user-kw3lr7cl4t22 күн бұрын
I am not sure about the boost dials reliability you refer to; I mean: there is no rocket science behind these instruments, but rocket science was already there thirty years before. In other words, I assume the existing technology at that point in history allowed this kind of tools to be properly tuned to give a reliable reading. Anyway, I really appreciated your comment: sometimes, someone has done its homework here.
@user-lf9mk8lf7x2 ай бұрын
Didnt know about the duel shocks.
@2fast2nick2 ай бұрын
That engine is wild
@stepanbandera52062 ай бұрын
And 1 4 bbl. carb! 👍
@majiddaher67492 ай бұрын
Its not a car..its an huge rc with a car moteur...any rc cars with big.moteurs can make a record on any track
@6Alpha-yankie_novemberdy2n3 ай бұрын
Check out the flush back light for fast back air flow
@ATD_Detailing3 ай бұрын
I’ve met the owner of one and they all now go for $6.2M and only 8 we’re made
@3.2Carrera4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the close up look at this amazing engine.
@goodymob96384 ай бұрын
I would love to drive that.
@CobraRaptor64 ай бұрын
I have that in forza, mine I think has the 6.2 out of the hellcat and the stock tires, spins a lot for the tires being as thick is possible🫥 even if it is like 800 horsepower
@xtreamstunt98854 ай бұрын
Now that's a fast moving room air filter if i ever saw one
@TonyK31304 ай бұрын
Banning innovative technologies from "racing": is kind of like: "Johnnie, go out and play just don't have too much fun." Street cars are now cooler than race cars. F1, Indy, Formula E, WEC, NASCAR are essentially single design spec series. We have told the future Jim Hall, Colin Chapman, Bruce McLaren, Jack Brabham's to stay home and keep their mouth's shut.
@Jamie_064 ай бұрын
Love this car
@visionportal51984 ай бұрын
Two beasts,no way to reach it out....legend drivers i wasnt still born but if i remember well the daytona was drove to bobby isaac and the plymouth to richard petty?
@Romulus10014 ай бұрын
It's worth mentioning that the V8 used at Le Mans is not the same V8 used during the FIA GT Championship. The LM used the M119 at Le Mans (as you mentioned in this clip), and both DNF'd. After Le Mans, Mercedes used the GT108B, which is a noticeably different engine if you listen to the engine notes. The Le Mans spec engine is much more bassy like the Sauber C9, while the FIA GT spec sounds like it has a flat plane crank, like a DTM spec engine.
@theiceman75904 ай бұрын
Isnt the GT108B built from the M119, or is it completely built from scratch?
@Romulus10014 ай бұрын
@theiceman7590 it's hard to get a concrete answer on it based on what I can find online. It seems to be a derivative of the M119, but even the M119 had different displacement configurations, so it seems like the engine version that Mercedes used was application-specific. But there's no mistaking that the engine used in the 1998 FIA GT Championship is a different one than the Le Mans spec if you listen to any of the videos online. Even old forum threads online have debated this question if you try to look for an answer. Mercedes-AMG was really pushing the envelope with the development of the CLK in its heyday.
@user-bg8zb3bn8e4 ай бұрын
I have the Aston Martin Vulcan in need for speed payback it sounds menacing