Пікірлер
@seanraymond9529
@seanraymond9529 8 күн бұрын
Do people fly on planes on round trips just to do it??
@lightblueyonder
@lightblueyonder 7 күн бұрын
Oh absolutely! That or building a flight itinerary that prioritizes airplanes over time.
@seanraymond9529
@seanraymond9529 7 күн бұрын
@@lightblueyonder dang how accessible is it to do? Never been on a plane never had a reason to but I’ve recently found an interest in planes.
@MrJimmyMcGill
@MrJimmyMcGill 12 күн бұрын
@Adamm0896
@Adamm0896 Ай бұрын
Rare 15R departure too
@ogie7488
@ogie7488 2 ай бұрын
Epic flight
@charliemaggionyc-commercia4362
@charliemaggionyc-commercia4362 2 ай бұрын
Nothing like and old school 757 powefull takeoff. Boeing's biggest mistake not continuing production and making a new generation version of it. Thanks for this posting.
@davidpowell3347
@davidpowell3347 2 ай бұрын
Not at full power
@mylesfields466
@mylesfields466 Ай бұрын
On the contrary, if you noticed the runway is contaminated (raining), which means the TOGA thrust is very likely being used, not a de-rated thrust setting.
@rkan2
@rkan2 23 күн бұрын
@@mylesfields466 It is a 40min flight, of course it is not full power even if it is raining.
@mylesfields466
@mylesfields466 23 күн бұрын
@rkan2 the duration of the flight has nothing to do with the thrust setting during the takeoff phase. What I'm referring to is a required SOP for the majority of US operators during inclement weather/contaminated runways.
@rkan2
@rkan2 23 күн бұрын
@@mylesfields466 No, not the duration of the flight, but the takeoff weight certainly has a lot to do with thrust settings. Newark has plenty of runway to do a derated takeoff and still have time to stop on a 757, even when loaded and with a wet runway.
@clqudy4750
@clqudy4750 3 ай бұрын
Really nice climb out and break through of the clouds!
@PaulPhilbin-wu5ny
@PaulPhilbin-wu5ny 3 ай бұрын
If 🌯 0:03
@vielumiereg9794
@vielumiereg9794 3 ай бұрын
Holy crap that was a super short takeoff roll lol
@MarkSav1
@MarkSav1 2 ай бұрын
Newark, NJ is a short 45 min/1 hour flight, not much fuel loaded adding to weight.
@lb_reflections
@lb_reflections 3 ай бұрын
What a thick cloud layer!! 😅😅
@v1spotter
@v1spotter 4 ай бұрын
RB-211 never fails to disappoint. Nice video 👍
@rickybrown5817
@rickybrown5817 2 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait all old air Canada airbus a321 211 retire and be scrapped by 2025!
@calvinrovinescu6166
@calvinrovinescu6166 2 жыл бұрын
Hate to break it to ya but the 211 isn’t gonna be gone by 2025. Between mainline and rouge they have 29 to “scrap” by then. The rouge ones are all practically brand new and the oldest mainline one even at that point will only be 25 years old which is a premature retirement for an A321.
@rickybrown5817
@rickybrown5817 2 жыл бұрын
The old cfm56-5a engine garbage! Replaced by! Brand new! Air Canada Airbus a321neo! Pw1100g engine! Yayyyyy! Can’t wait get order 2024!
@calvinrovinescu6166
@calvinrovinescu6166 2 жыл бұрын
These don’t have -5A engines, they have -5B engines and they are not garbage. They are far more reliable and always will have a better hours between overhaul record than the new engines will.