Limit Problems: Intermediate Level
50:29
4 сағат бұрын
Angles Example Problems  |  Trigonometry
43:07
Angles  |  Trigonometry
35:45
4 сағат бұрын
Introduction to Trigonometry
16:31
7 сағат бұрын
Power Series
43:32
9 сағат бұрын
Integral Test Example Problems - Part 1
29:37
Convergence Testing Half Marathon
2:07:20
14 сағат бұрын
Reduction of Force System on Block to Wrench
36:56
The Integral Test  |  Convergence Testing
39:26
Introduction to Integration Example Problems
22:17
Quadratic Equations
14:06
21 сағат бұрын
The Power of Improper Integrals
11:38
Approximate Integration
9:52
14 күн бұрын
Drug Dose Infinite Sequence & Sum
19:12
Пікірлер
@MunshiYadav-l5r
@MunshiYadav-l5r 15 сағат бұрын
I
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 19 сағат бұрын
x ∈ ⟨-2, 0⟩ right?
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 19 сағат бұрын
I kind of messed up this video. The final answer should be x<=-2 or x=0. So in interval notation that would be (-infinity,-2] U [0,infinity).
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 19 сағат бұрын
@@hebertengineering x∈[-∞,-2)∪[0,∞)
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 18 сағат бұрын
@@matei_woold_wewu yes exactly.
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 19 сағат бұрын
|ℝ|=𝖈=+∞ So its better use x∈ℝ
@alee14389
@alee14389 Күн бұрын
But how did you get the -25 and 26 to execute your Grouping Technique? I first found that 5 is a root of the polynomial, then executed long division with x-5, then found that resulting 2nd-degree quotient had no solution, thereby leaving 5 as the only root.
@romulanwang
@romulanwang Күн бұрын
x <= -2 NOT x >= -2
@justwingingit8110
@justwingingit8110 Күн бұрын
I mean why not just square it
@521Undertaker
@521Undertaker Күн бұрын
Oops. Proofread.
@SamrawitTesfaye-zn4rq
@SamrawitTesfaye-zn4rq Күн бұрын
Thanks ❤❤❤❤
@davidseed2939
@davidseed2939 Күн бұрын
your words and diagram are correct but the writing is wrong. it should read x<=-2
@IbsaMitiku-cw3sd
@IbsaMitiku-cw3sd Күн бұрын
10q so much
@jeroens6250
@jeroens6250 2 күн бұрын
Didn't the properties of absolute value inequalities say u < -k or u > k then you would also get the correct x <= -2 or x >= 0
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 2 күн бұрын
@@jeroens6250 yes they do. I point this out in the long form content. I forgot to add the long form content link to this video will do that soon.
@natox7555
@natox7555 2 күн бұрын
I personnaly don't like the way you do it. I think you should treat 3 cases : 1.when x<-5 2.when -5<x<3/2 3.when x>3/2 even tho it is longer to do, there's also no risk to have a wrong answer at the end
@jackychan4640
@jackychan4640 3 күн бұрын
Happy Holidays to you.
@xnoshutdownx
@xnoshutdownx 3 күн бұрын
I’m very excited for this as I was not a fan of Trig in high school. I started school again recently for Comp Sci and am falling in love with Math all over again.
@amolkhade445
@amolkhade445 4 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for such a wonderful exercise. :) needs more puzzles like this to make mind used to of the visual decodation of Functions and its respective Derivative. Will be awesome if it will go to higher order derivative too.
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 5 күн бұрын
|u|=|w| ⟹ ±u=±w
@hetanshthakore5886
@hetanshthakore5886 5 күн бұрын
Where is trigonometry Playlist?
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 5 күн бұрын
@@hetanshthakore5886 not up yet sorry. There will be a Trig playlist though.
@hetanshthakore5886
@hetanshthakore5886 5 күн бұрын
@hebertengineering OK sir
@kingcvc
@kingcvc 5 күн бұрын
I see people talking about checking their answers. Let me explain my course of action as someone who will be taking calculus 3 in a couple weeks (assuming i pass the final) Checking the answer can be a pain. However, sometimes you take, not the best path for getting the answer and end up with numerous extraneous solutions and only 1 real answer. As someone who personally has seen this. I always check my answer. Then i double and triple check those checks. I used to never check my answer... and somehow this worked all the way up until calculus 1. I dont know how. I guess i got lucky. When calculus 1 hit logarthims kicked my butt. You cannot take the log of a negative number. Yeah, check your answers. I did not. However, i also learned checking your answer takes time. So i learned through some very good professors, you do not always have to check your answers. For example, a simple quadratic, or solving a simple log might need a check, but you can do a "lazy check" which involves just checking if its in the domain. Overall: checking your solution is necessary, and i tend to look for 3 things: if im doing the absoulute value. If im doing a log. And most important, if im doing the integral. I triple check these.
@ultimategotea
@ultimategotea 5 күн бұрын
I was doing it in my head and I almost forgot about the second solution lol
@amolkhade445
@amolkhade445 6 күн бұрын
Thanks for a very IMP pointing of crossverifying solution by putting back to equation. I will make sure to keep that in mind hereforth !
@AliceObscura
@AliceObscura 6 күн бұрын
Ah, yes...the bane of my students' existence: checking their solutions. I'm glad this one didn't have any extraneous solutions, but the number of students who forget to verify their answers for absolute value equalities and inequalities will always amaze me.
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 6 күн бұрын
Lol yes I could see that being an issue. I think the confusion is that a student thinks you are just saying "check your answers". It's different than a normal equation you actually have to check your answers even if you did not make a mistake working the problem.
@MathsArena2011
@MathsArena2011 6 күн бұрын
There should be 4 roots as we can write it as x+5 = -3 +2x.
@dragonvalcano5857
@dragonvalcano5857 4 күн бұрын
Still gives answer 8
@JaimeBeilis
@JaimeBeilis 6 күн бұрын
actually pretty darn cool, thanks for sharing
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 7 күн бұрын
dy/dx
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 7 күн бұрын
Note: In the final answer, the absolute value on the natural log could be omitted since (1+4y^2) is always positive.
@carlpowell2314
@carlpowell2314 7 күн бұрын
The answer is the sqrt 2
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 8 күн бұрын
Don't forget +C
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 8 күн бұрын
@@matei_woold_wewu It’s there lol.
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 8 күн бұрын
@hebertengineering ok but you always put +C on indefinite integrals
@ThePowerfulOne07
@ThePowerfulOne07 5 күн бұрын
@@matei_woold_wewuits at the of the boxed answer.
@ZeenatAra-i2r
@ZeenatAra-i2r 8 күн бұрын
😢
@DasubhaiKatara
@DasubhaiKatara 8 күн бұрын
Harharmahadev
@santhiswaminathan7302
@santhiswaminathan7302 8 күн бұрын
(*´∇`*)(*´∇`*)(*´∇`*)
@kailashsingh9737
@kailashsingh9737 8 күн бұрын
Very beautiful sweet tq ❤❤❤
@SonuKumar-um1du
@SonuKumar-um1du 8 күн бұрын
😊0p😊😊😊😊0
@SunilkumarSunil-i3m
@SunilkumarSunil-i3m 8 күн бұрын
😂
@prashantsakharkar4215
@prashantsakharkar4215 8 күн бұрын
😡😡😡😡😡😡
@TeodoroRamirez-md7tl
@TeodoroRamirez-md7tl 8 күн бұрын
M🌄 0:52 🪹
@chandrashekharkori8033
@chandrashekharkori8033 8 күн бұрын
राहुल गाँधी महारथी है जब राहुल गाँधी से पीछे धक्का लगा बीजेपी सांसद आई सीओ पहुँच गया अगर आगे से धक्का लगा होता तो भगवान् के प्यारे हो जाता
@rathnameenakshi2886
@rathnameenakshi2886 8 күн бұрын
😊😊😅😊😅
@mozuloves5466
@mozuloves5466 8 күн бұрын
Soul of Mozu Romeo
@kingcvc
@kingcvc 9 күн бұрын
Now do product rule with full factored form 😂 Not the power rule or any other rule 😂😂
@erinsgeography3619
@erinsgeography3619 10 күн бұрын
I don't know why we have to do that rearrangement, I can see it working even without that step: p¹¹-64p⁸-p³+64 p⁸(p³-64)-(p³-64) (p⁸-1)(p³-64) ... It still gives the same result even without that rearrangement. Why do we have to rearrange, though?
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 10 күн бұрын
You're right we didn't have to rearrange. I didn't notice that it would work either way. A lot of times it only works one way not two.
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 10 күн бұрын
(a+b)²=a²+2ab+b²
@carlpowell2314
@carlpowell2314 11 күн бұрын
The answer is (pie/8+1/4)
@JohnNucci-v9q
@JohnNucci-v9q 11 күн бұрын
I love this stuff. It’s in my DNA after 60 years. After doing so many problems you don’t need the tables anymore. I just love to see these examples worked out again. THX. Keep them coming.
@calebmonaco9068
@calebmonaco9068 11 күн бұрын
If anything i like deriving the table integrals just for fun.
@johannes7856
@johannes7856 11 күн бұрын
Hmm.. that seems to be useful for differential equations. Thank you. :)
@suhail_69
@suhail_69 11 күн бұрын
👌👌
@Gluon_Velvet
@Gluon_Velvet 12 күн бұрын
I am not at calculus yet but if this is what it's like then needless to say, I'm terrified
@ajacks8887
@ajacks8887 12 күн бұрын
Or you could just do a u sub with u=(t/2) was easier imo
@qw504
@qw504 12 күн бұрын
Still can’t believe I passed calculus two with a C.
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 12 күн бұрын
@@qw504 Integral calculus is definitely tougher than differential calculus.
@qw504
@qw504 11 күн бұрын
@ Super hard. I worked my butt off for that C. But you make some amazing videos. Thank you.
@hebertengineering
@hebertengineering 11 күн бұрын
@@qw504 thanks man I appreciate that…
@matei_woold_wewu
@matei_woold_wewu 12 күн бұрын
On m=-2 just the square root of a number is always positive, so m≠-2 and m=7
@smokygarlic801
@smokygarlic801 12 күн бұрын
Voice break “factor out the foURr”