I kind of messed up this video. The final answer should be x<=-2 or x=0. So in interval notation that would be (-infinity,-2] U [0,infinity).
@matei_woold_wewu19 сағат бұрын
@@hebertengineering x∈[-∞,-2)∪[0,∞)
@hebertengineering18 сағат бұрын
@@matei_woold_wewu yes exactly.
@matei_woold_wewu19 сағат бұрын
|ℝ|=𝖈=+∞ So its better use x∈ℝ
@alee14389Күн бұрын
But how did you get the -25 and 26 to execute your Grouping Technique? I first found that 5 is a root of the polynomial, then executed long division with x-5, then found that resulting 2nd-degree quotient had no solution, thereby leaving 5 as the only root.
@romulanwangКүн бұрын
x <= -2 NOT x >= -2
@justwingingit8110Күн бұрын
I mean why not just square it
@521UndertakerКүн бұрын
Oops. Proofread.
@SamrawitTesfaye-zn4rqКүн бұрын
Thanks ❤❤❤❤
@davidseed2939Күн бұрын
your words and diagram are correct but the writing is wrong. it should read x<=-2
@IbsaMitiku-cw3sdКүн бұрын
10q so much
@jeroens62502 күн бұрын
Didn't the properties of absolute value inequalities say u < -k or u > k then you would also get the correct x <= -2 or x >= 0
@hebertengineering2 күн бұрын
@@jeroens6250 yes they do. I point this out in the long form content. I forgot to add the long form content link to this video will do that soon.
@natox75552 күн бұрын
I personnaly don't like the way you do it. I think you should treat 3 cases : 1.when x<-5 2.when -5<x<3/2 3.when x>3/2 even tho it is longer to do, there's also no risk to have a wrong answer at the end
@jackychan46403 күн бұрын
Happy Holidays to you.
@xnoshutdownx3 күн бұрын
I’m very excited for this as I was not a fan of Trig in high school. I started school again recently for Comp Sci and am falling in love with Math all over again.
@amolkhade4454 күн бұрын
Thank you so much for such a wonderful exercise. :) needs more puzzles like this to make mind used to of the visual decodation of Functions and its respective Derivative. Will be awesome if it will go to higher order derivative too.
@matei_woold_wewu5 күн бұрын
|u|=|w| ⟹ ±u=±w
@hetanshthakore58865 күн бұрын
Where is trigonometry Playlist?
@hebertengineering5 күн бұрын
@@hetanshthakore5886 not up yet sorry. There will be a Trig playlist though.
@hetanshthakore58865 күн бұрын
@hebertengineering OK sir
@kingcvc5 күн бұрын
I see people talking about checking their answers. Let me explain my course of action as someone who will be taking calculus 3 in a couple weeks (assuming i pass the final) Checking the answer can be a pain. However, sometimes you take, not the best path for getting the answer and end up with numerous extraneous solutions and only 1 real answer. As someone who personally has seen this. I always check my answer. Then i double and triple check those checks. I used to never check my answer... and somehow this worked all the way up until calculus 1. I dont know how. I guess i got lucky. When calculus 1 hit logarthims kicked my butt. You cannot take the log of a negative number. Yeah, check your answers. I did not. However, i also learned checking your answer takes time. So i learned through some very good professors, you do not always have to check your answers. For example, a simple quadratic, or solving a simple log might need a check, but you can do a "lazy check" which involves just checking if its in the domain. Overall: checking your solution is necessary, and i tend to look for 3 things: if im doing the absoulute value. If im doing a log. And most important, if im doing the integral. I triple check these.
@ultimategotea5 күн бұрын
I was doing it in my head and I almost forgot about the second solution lol
@amolkhade4456 күн бұрын
Thanks for a very IMP pointing of crossverifying solution by putting back to equation. I will make sure to keep that in mind hereforth !
@AliceObscura6 күн бұрын
Ah, yes...the bane of my students' existence: checking their solutions. I'm glad this one didn't have any extraneous solutions, but the number of students who forget to verify their answers for absolute value equalities and inequalities will always amaze me.
@hebertengineering6 күн бұрын
Lol yes I could see that being an issue. I think the confusion is that a student thinks you are just saying "check your answers". It's different than a normal equation you actually have to check your answers even if you did not make a mistake working the problem.
@MathsArena20116 күн бұрын
There should be 4 roots as we can write it as x+5 = -3 +2x.
@dragonvalcano58574 күн бұрын
Still gives answer 8
@JaimeBeilis6 күн бұрын
actually pretty darn cool, thanks for sharing
@matei_woold_wewu7 күн бұрын
dy/dx
@hebertengineering7 күн бұрын
Note: In the final answer, the absolute value on the natural log could be omitted since (1+4y^2) is always positive.
@carlpowell23147 күн бұрын
The answer is the sqrt 2
@matei_woold_wewu8 күн бұрын
Don't forget +C
@hebertengineering8 күн бұрын
@@matei_woold_wewu It’s there lol.
@matei_woold_wewu8 күн бұрын
@hebertengineering ok but you always put +C on indefinite integrals
@ThePowerfulOne075 күн бұрын
@@matei_woold_wewuits at the of the boxed answer.
@ZeenatAra-i2r8 күн бұрын
😢
@DasubhaiKatara8 күн бұрын
Harharmahadev
@santhiswaminathan73028 күн бұрын
(*´∇`*)(*´∇`*)(*´∇`*)
@kailashsingh97378 күн бұрын
Very beautiful sweet tq ❤❤❤
@SonuKumar-um1du8 күн бұрын
😊0p😊😊😊😊0
@SunilkumarSunil-i3m8 күн бұрын
😂
@prashantsakharkar42158 күн бұрын
😡😡😡😡😡😡
@TeodoroRamirez-md7tl8 күн бұрын
M🌄 0:52 🪹
@chandrashekharkori80338 күн бұрын
राहुल गाँधी महारथी है जब राहुल गाँधी से पीछे धक्का लगा बीजेपी सांसद आई सीओ पहुँच गया अगर आगे से धक्का लगा होता तो भगवान् के प्यारे हो जाता
@rathnameenakshi28868 күн бұрын
😊😊😅😊😅
@mozuloves54668 күн бұрын
Soul of Mozu Romeo
@kingcvc9 күн бұрын
Now do product rule with full factored form 😂 Not the power rule or any other rule 😂😂
@erinsgeography361910 күн бұрын
I don't know why we have to do that rearrangement, I can see it working even without that step: p¹¹-64p⁸-p³+64 p⁸(p³-64)-(p³-64) (p⁸-1)(p³-64) ... It still gives the same result even without that rearrangement. Why do we have to rearrange, though?
@hebertengineering10 күн бұрын
You're right we didn't have to rearrange. I didn't notice that it would work either way. A lot of times it only works one way not two.
@matei_woold_wewu10 күн бұрын
(a+b)²=a²+2ab+b²
@carlpowell231411 күн бұрын
The answer is (pie/8+1/4)
@JohnNucci-v9q11 күн бұрын
I love this stuff. It’s in my DNA after 60 years. After doing so many problems you don’t need the tables anymore. I just love to see these examples worked out again. THX. Keep them coming.
@calebmonaco906811 күн бұрын
If anything i like deriving the table integrals just for fun.
@johannes785611 күн бұрын
Hmm.. that seems to be useful for differential equations. Thank you. :)
@suhail_6911 күн бұрын
👌👌
@Gluon_Velvet12 күн бұрын
I am not at calculus yet but if this is what it's like then needless to say, I'm terrified
@ajacks888712 күн бұрын
Or you could just do a u sub with u=(t/2) was easier imo
@qw50412 күн бұрын
Still can’t believe I passed calculus two with a C.
@hebertengineering12 күн бұрын
@@qw504 Integral calculus is definitely tougher than differential calculus.
@qw50411 күн бұрын
@ Super hard. I worked my butt off for that C. But you make some amazing videos. Thank you.
@hebertengineering11 күн бұрын
@@qw504 thanks man I appreciate that…
@matei_woold_wewu12 күн бұрын
On m=-2 just the square root of a number is always positive, so m≠-2 and m=7