Jacques Villeneuve was correct, knows more about F1 than those rose tinted glassed F1 presenters

I’d be more worried about that patchy beard

Fastest Lap was purely for someone like Max Verstappen when he was dominating and wanted to destroy the opposition mentally; I'm sure the teams themselves are happy to see it gone.

Wrong!!! There was no cheating at all. That device is on ALL F1 cars of all teams. RBR never changed it between Quali and race in Parc Fermee!! Stop spreading blatant lies! The device is legal and on all cars.

"Maybe I should buy a bra" gold 😂

I’m the young girl that asked Danica Patrick in Budapest about women in F1 in the future.

This was actually the same as last year's purchasing experience (for the 2024 race) with the "dynamic pricing". I couldn't get any grandstand tickets and was looking at just the standard access until I saw they were close to $200 each - way over the advertised price of $140 (I think). I still don't see how this is acceptable or legal, given the ACCC's stance on these situations: www.accc.gov.au/consumers/advertising-and-promotions/false-or-misleading-claims. It's not like other event tickets which state: 1st release, 2nd release, etc. to incentivise people to purchase early.

I went two years ago; decided to go pre-sale via the AusGP access and bought tickets to a suite. The insanity is the buying of the tokens at the time in order to just be able to not have to fight in a queue. I can see now it’s gotten even worse. I did manage to get a full refund for my AusGP access tokens though (I think $500) as the lie was that you would get particular access to certain experiences - they changed the terms and experiences after we purchased (basically I paid to get the pitlane walk etc) but they decided they could make more money bleeding everyone else dry. I am now going to Zandvoort as its better value (excluding the flights).

She is odd, and most likely a lizard person. They should hold her till she shows her real face!

Lol you say RB have charmed existence? 😂 Man, don’t you know that MARKO SCOUTS THESE DRIVERS LIKE VETTEL AND MAX at a very young age? Don’t you know that RB JUNIORTEAM is the most active academy in racing? In all junior series they sponsor drivers to give them the chance to show their skills. They even host a TALENT TEST WEEKEND and have recently signed several VERY YOUNG karters/drivers from age 13 and up! And the RB TALENTS are also still driving or have been driving at at the FERRARI, ASTON MARTIN, WILLIAMS, Alpine, , MCLAREN teams! RB DELIVERS THE WHOLE GRID with their drivers. Drivers that RB trained, sponsored. Carlos, Seb, DR, Albon, Max, Gasly are ALL great examples of RB TALENTS of whom several have driven at several teams on the grid THANKS TO RB JUNIORTEAM signing them in the first place!

The timing MAKES SENSE GUYS…. Cos in both DR and Liam’s contract end of Sept was the date to which Liam and DR should hear if they have a seat or not. Thus, THE TIMING WAS NECCESSARY. If they had kept DR in the VCARB seat, then Liam’s contract with RB would’ve expired and he would’ve been a free agent…to sign at another team. And THAT RB DOES NOT WANT. They want to keep Liam and are even considering him for 2025 next to Max in the RBR…. You need to catch up on the REAL INFO ABT THE CONTRACTS!!! Its not abt your idea but ABOUT CONTRACT DATES.

you need to put in the Villanelle (Killing Eve) clip when she laughs at the people that tell her about the Lizard people....it is so fucked up that she has a serious conversation with this nut job. so fucked up.

I totally agree

unfortunately in the modern era of F1, there will always be unhinged fans of the younger drivers.... I remember the girls melting at Alessandro Naninni back in the day.... but for the purists, such as myself, it's about the teams not the drivers although I do prefer some over others, for example... I've not heard anyone say anything nice about Esteban Ocon. my point is it's all subjective and about perspectives, but real F1 fans don't lose their sh1t over drivers and call other people names. :)

Red Bull culture. Blame everyone else for your mistake. And they don’t have to give enough space. This analysis is really well done and put together.

I enjoy your videos, I hope you'll post more! Also, are you Australian or South African (English)? Or am I completely off in trying to place your accent? 😅

I stumbled on this channel after seeing that video, so far im interested in this channel now, love the content 👍

THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU.

but I was on the racing line, and the wall came out of no where. What happened? - SAI @SGPF1

Perez is a crash prone crybaby and gets away with his constant bullshit.

Sorry but you're not taking into account any racing strategy. Just as Sainz has control of the track from his car and to the right so does Perez have control of the track from his car and to the left. Sergio has overlap with Sainz and thus can control how far to the left Sainz can move. Sergio has the right to hold whatever line he wants and doesn't have to allow Sainz to move to the left. It's a rule in racing. It's strategy to cause the other car to be on a suboptimal line for the next corner. Sainz caused the contact.

They saying this is racing incident that happens every time.I disagree because Checo clearly was behind and tried to hold on there for gain advantage by squeezing Carlos to wall.People being okey with it but there was no punishment.What if that Red Bull was Max and that Ferrari was Lando.They didn't gave punishment so that mean Max would do same and get away with it?That would mean end of the champinship chase wouldn't it?Am I thinking wrong?

Well on the flip side of that coin, some Piastri Stans are just the same. It's not like bad fans are exclusive to one driver, lets be real here.

In skiing the person behind has the responsibility for the people ahead so if the person down hill of you is swerving all over the place or anything, it’s your responsibility to give them space because you have the better view of them ahead, apply that same logic here, Perez has a clear view of Sainz’s car and he has plenty of open road to the right to avoid the contact. Coming out of the corner right against the right wall, no driver will stay pinned to the wall as they accelerate out they always get to the open road, no one’s going to go 200mph squeezed to a wall when there’s plenty of road to work with. Perez tried to keep him pinned there and it’s a really foolish push. Regardless, having full view of the car ahead of him, he had the burden of responsibility to avoid the contact. I don’t understand the stewards logic at all on this

No mate sorry but it is Carlos fault. Carlos admitted that he knew Checo was beside him, now if he knew that why did he stil cut across so abruptly???? The video footage clearly shows that. Yes carlos also said that he slowly inched his way across...........again not so as the video clip clearly shows an abrupt swing to the left. As a driver common sense must prevail, if he knew Checo was beside him but unable to clearly see where, why make that abrupt move????? And Carlos said that he did that because it was his usual move on that track all thru out the race, but there was never a car alongside him in his blind sight at anytime during the race except on that unfortunate lap. Checo on the other hand was not obilged in anyway to shift his racing line. Carlos assumed that Checo would be forced to move aside. I have always been a Carlos fan but if he's made a mistake, then I'll call it.

This season I was rooting for all team 2nd drivers like Perez, Sainz and Tsunoda (except for Lance Stroll) but contrary to this guys analysis that was a very stupid move for Sainz. Perez had the racing line and Saiz said it was his preferred line. Sorry 2 objects cannot occupy the same space at the same time. If he was a top tier driver he would have backed up a bit and dived on the inside line. Big gap on Perez's left and he knew it. Sainz definitely knew that was coming. There 2 kinds of people who try to defend their mistakes. 1 -Max who would insist he is right and 2 - Carlos who would pretend to be dumb and knows nothing and pretends its a normal racing incident

Dude you can see the tire marks that is where the racing line is. Perez was on the line and Sainz is inching towords the line. Go have your eyes checked. You clearly see it from top view. Look at 4:40 on your video. Keep lying maybe it becomes true.

You're correct. I said the same thing immediately after the incident. Perez has a history of blaming other people for his mistake. Verstappen behaves in the same way. Maybe it's a Red Bull tactical policy? Whatever, as the leading car, Sainz had priority over Perez. Those wing mirrors are almost useless, giving minimal rearward visibility. Perez could see exactly what was about to happen and should have moved over and reduced speed slightly. It's also possible that he 'froze' for an instant and could not react; a kind of startled rabbit effect. But, given his experience and undoubted skill set, it's not an expected behaviour.

Pervious can mean open to new ideas, arguments, or change.

I have to disagree with you and the part in 9:00 where you mention about being aware of their surrounding is completely baffling to me. Because not just a corner ago Perez was way more in front of Charles and yet Charles took a heavy defensive position to the point where Perez had to avoid contact at the same time tries not to hit the wall, which cause Carlos to take advantage. Does your statement indicate that Charles was in the wrong for making the move because Perez was in front? I don’t like this line of reasoning because it discourages harder racing.

Thank you for showing what “really” happened 😡 more than annoyed!!!

also I think Perez had a bit of red mist after having had a sniff at the lead and then losing it, likely clouding his judgement

What a joke it was100% Perez fault, what a cheap shot and he gets away with it.

Wow, this was enlightening. I felt bad for Perez when it happened, now not so much. He screwed Sainz out of a third place, and Ferrari out of a 2,3 finish.

Bruh just look at a helicopter shot of the incident. Sainz's right wheel is initially over the white line and as the go forward his right wheels drift to the left side of the white line. Checo holds his position dead straight not expecting Sainz to kamikaze into him.

This was the section of track where sun is right in front of drivers, closely check out the shadows of cars from aerial view and the camera views from back of cars. That phenomena was discussed by commentators throughout the race, of visibility issue in parts of track due to sun getting right in front of drivers.

Perez was allready on the racing line

Good argument. Cheers.

leclerk is actually at fault

Sainz it closing on Perez. Tring to make him drift out and brake. It is all on Sainz not on Perez.

Pure racing incident caused by neither driver paying proper attention to what was happening around them. There is NO rule that says you have to leave the racing line for a driver on a straight. Yes you do in a corner if your not half way along side.

The stewards have been getting it wrong for years trying to help Vercrashin become a winning driver. Why should they stop now? I stopped watching F1, as a lot of people have, because of the incompetent and biased race stewards.

This 'stupid' move got Verstappen 10 points instead of 6.... Go figure

Stupid move--or lack of move i should say, on Perez... He blew his own race by not moving over and to the left as Sainz was doing..and in a slow manner too--he gave perez plenty of time to adjust as well... but just chose to hold his stupid straight line... even a rookie would know better than that. Time for NASCAR Perez! arriba, arriba … andale, andale!!

interestingly if you watch Leclerc in front, Sainz is following the exact same drivers line, wear as Checo took a centre line without deviation which caused the crash. Perez also has a steering wheel, he was behind trying to overtake and should have been aware of Sainz taking the drivers line

Sainz fault! See all that space off to the right?? He tried to close the inside door where Checo was already there!

The point is that Checo would have out dragged him if he had not crashed into him, so Checo was allowed to be on the track. Your argument is stupid. When Oscar overtook Charles, he was not on the racing line. Was he not allowed to overtake Charles there?

I’m kind of laughing right now. My reason?.. If that was Max and Lewis in the same predicament you know this wouldn’t be deemed as a racing incident. Crashstappen would have complained (as always) and Hambo(going about his business) would have been blamed by the FIA for this! Even with him being ahead(as Sainz was). Perez was faster, but like George(Russell) at Imola who took a chance to gain a position on Valterie(Bottas). We know what happened there! Street Circuit.. Racing.. it’s going to happen. That’s why we love it! Let’s move it on and wait for the next instalment.

I'm 100% with you on this one. I've been surprised by the opposing comments. Sainz can't even see where Perez is exactly. Perez can see exactly where Sainz is.

4:26 PER is half-car length aside of SAI. If not, they are so close that at their speeds and their driving position, it was indiscernible. We couch drivers all have the advantage of hindsight and camera angles. None of us were in the seats. SAI wheels are not even over the white line and still plenty of space on the right. Then he slowly drifts. If you are both going nearly the same speed, who blinks first will lose the turn. Since the turn was left, naturally SAI would lose road eventually. He would have had to break first if he was going to make the turn if they were still nearly side by side. Neither blinked, thus it was a racing incident. Neither could be found to be predominately at fault. The rest of the fan debate is just splitting hairs. It's done and dusted, time to move on.