But you are Quwm-Lut. You are a man who takes husbands. Why are you even here? At least hide your sins first. What about MBS. Do you like him also?

1. The attendees are students may Allah preserve them 2. I’m not sure if you know the different type of ijaazat but this type of ijaazah is not an ijaazah to teach the book but rather a testimony of hearing the book from a shaykh to his student

@@ahmedduale6540 yes akhi there is إجازة رواية و إجازة تدريس but the issue of ijazah has been made lenient in this day and age that is why alot of ulama have made strict conditions even for إجازة رواية , alot students think that ijazaat proves Knowledge and rely on it soley , that ia why this issue has to be approached with caution. و الله أعلم

do you even care to verify your accusations? or you are like the person described?

@@MODEST500 I have seen it in videos. He literally said the rulers are muslims, those who rule by man-made laws. What is the issue? Do you believe ruling by man-made laws is only a sin, and not disbelief?

kzbin.info/aero/PLv6TZluNhDk7frtnrB7Oh_DEl47APH-b8

Ahmad jibril is a dog brother, ponder about it

@@omanhakimi3321 Mikaaaaaaaa, Shaaaaaan, take meeeee hahahaahaha

Then he is a salafi

Ascribing to the salafi sect means ascribing one's self to the understanding of the shahabas, taabi'een and taabi'u at-taabi'een. So anything thing that is different to or opposes the understanding of those three generations (who are the best generations according to the prophet ﷺ , so they have got to be upon the correct path) has to mean that he is a mubtadi'. because anything that is other than the straight path is definitely misguidance and innovation.

The word 'salafi' is used in an time where there are so many sects that contradict one another. Which is now. And it is used to differentiate the ones who follow the correct understanding of qur'an and sunnah (which is the understanding of the sahabahs) and the many understandings that are newly brought to the religion (bid'ah).

No. When you show me where in the Qur'an this saudi zionist sect is mentioned i will accept it today. Where the prophet SAW himself mentioned it then i will say it. Dont attach saudi zionist movements to the companions ​@davideffendy8327

lol you must be young this fitnah is well known amongst the salafis, Alhamdulillah this channel refutes and clarify the characteristics in which these individuals come with!!

You are very Dangerous by your blatant and smelly ignorance. Just walk away and go learn the basics of Arabic.

they are posted taken from entire lessons which are uploaded and the links in the description lead to the full dawrah, inshaAllah open the description and you will see it. if a person is confused about what is said, no problem inshaAllah they can watch the whole dawrah, only 4 lessons I think it's on the Salafi Manhaj and see the lead-up points and the entire videos for clarification

btw the Ustadh is warning against an action some people come with that corrupts their manhaj, and this is praiseworthy unlike how you make it seem

@@lhommemystere3938 not helpful brother

In Arabic, "maslaha" (مصلحة) means "public interest" or "welfare." It's often used in the context of Islamic jurisprudence to indicate actions or policies that are intended for the common good of the community.

@@MODEST500 so how do people use it against sheikh shuaymee for example? I didn’t understand the clip very well

@@raulrahaman9863 watch the entire dawrah for clarification inshaAllah, the link is in the description to that lecture in full which is one of a 4-part intensive course explaining the salafi manhaj 👍 kzbin.info/aero/PLCxZUKhToxr_qs2FqhArD1FCIcTdmDMlO

All people replying to you, except me of course, are madkhali murji'a, taghut w0r.shippers.

May Allah honour and bless both of them

@@محمد-س3ك9جameen

@@محمد-س3ك9جaameen

@@محمد-س3ك9ج ameen

@@mohammadiaa madkhali murji'a

Imam Abu Muhammad Al-Hasan b. ‘Ali b. Khalaf al-Barbahāri (died 329H, rahimahullah) stated in his Sharhus-Sunnah (point 153): “Testing people is an innovation in Islam. However as for today, then one is tested with the Sunnah due his saying: “Indeed this knowledge is Religion, so look from whom you take your Religion.” And due to his saying: “Do not accept hadeeth except from the one whose witness you would accept.” So look, and so if he is a person of Sunnah and he has knowledge and is truthful, then write from him (i.e. his knowledge) and if not, then leave him.” والمحنة في الإسلام بدعة وأما اليوم فيمتحن بالسنة لقوله إن هذا العلم دين فانظروا ممن تأخذون دينكم ولا تقبلوا الحديث الا ممن تقبلون شهادته فانظر إن كان صاحب سنة له معرفة صدوق كتبت عنه وإلا تركته . Explanation: Shaikh Saalih al-Fawzaan (hafidhahullaah) commenting upon this stated in It-haaf al-Qaaree (vol. 2, p. 241): His saying: “Testing people is an innovation in Islaam. However as for our times then one is tested with the Sunnah.” The origin in Islaam is to have good thoughts regarding a person so long as there has not emanated from him that opposes that. So this is a principle. So the author is saying: So long as he is a Muslim and there is nothing that has become apparent from him except good, then we in turn accept from him that good - and this applies even to the hypocrite. The Messenger (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) accepted the outward behaviour of the hypocrites, and he left their hidden and concealed affairs to Allaah (subhaanahu wa ta`aalaa). So long as nothing becomes apparent from a person, then you are to have good thoughts of him. However, if hatred of the Sunnah and towards the people of Sunnah becomes apparent from a person, then be aware of him. This is the meaning of: “Testing people is an innovation in Islaam,” meaning: Any Muslim from whom evil is not apparent, then do not test him. “As for today.” Meaning: In his time it became such that a person would be questioned and tested because of the numerous misguided sects that ascribed to Islaam - so it is necessary to know who is upon the Sunnah and one is not deceived by the one who ascribes himself to Islaam [whilst being from the sects of misguidance]. So the one who loves Ahlus-Sunnah, then this is a proof that he from the people of goodness, and the one who loves Ahlul-Bid’ah, then this is a proof that he is from the people of evil. His saying: “Indeed this knowledge is Religion, so look from whom you take your Religion.” So seeking knowledge takes place at the hands of the Scholars of Ahlus-Sunnah, and not at the hands of Ahlul-Bid’ah. His saying: “Do not accept hadeeth except from the one whose witness you would accept.” Meaning: Do not accept from the narrators of hadeeth except from the one whose witness you would accept in front of a judge because the weak narrators have become numerous, and lying whilst narrating has become plentiful. And this is the duty of the one who is acquainted with the Science of Hadeeth. As for the one who is not, then he returns back to the authentic books of Sunnah. His saying: “So look, and so if he is a person of Sunnah and he has knowledge and is truthful, then write from him (i.e. his knowledge) and if not, then leave him.” This is a clarification of his saying: “Indeed this knowledge is Religion.” Look to whom you are taking knowledge from, and from whom you are narrating hadeeth. So if you see that he is a person of Sunnah and steadfast (istiqaamah), then write hadeeth from him and narrate hadeeth from him. And if he is opposite to this, then do not take hadeeth from him because there are those who narrate from the Messenger of Allaah (salallaahu `alaihi wassallam) whilst they are liars, and fabricators of hadeeth. So this is from the aspect of narrating hadeeth with the chains of narration. And as for citing hadeeth, then one should return the authentic books of hadeeth. (End of the commentary of Shaikh al-Fawzaan)

Therefore this implies all the other major scholars who haven’t made tabdee’ of sheik halibi are also misguided. Wow! Corrupt ideology!!!

Please type your entire message in Arabic, if you cannot then stop wasting your time and go learn. BarakAllahu Feek

Assalamu'alaikum wa rahmatullah. What do you mean akhwa? Ya'nee does this channel support MBH ?

@@AliyuAbdullahiWushishiDBA وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته Allah knows best but by his speech he is against warning of scholars and taking sides. Which i would assume includes MBH, He isn’t vocal on his Stance.

if im correct only the masajid mentioned in quran are to be visited if thats the only reason for journey

​@@bilalbelko You are allowed to travel to seek knowledge.

@@Ali_Imran_Khanyes but not for the masjid.so he isn’t wrong

What's so historic about it?

Aameen Yarabbal Alameen

آمين!

Aameen

I think he’s more referring to a persons stance on a fitna between two shaykhs that occurs or the likes since this has been prevalent within recent years الله المستعان

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIbKY3yqnr93iqcsi=aEjX-R-BP8QsGU6G

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jH7Sd3pvqc6Jp8Usi=FMzG_f48ay4u2wFn

Walaikum salam , brother you’ve either also blinded with this disease because those sheikhs you’ve mentioned there’s many scholars on KZbin for you to find individually that defend them and praise them to this day! You should refrain your hands from writing such things because in this case the scholars who defend these sheikhs are also wrong and they are misguided. Be careful to what you write brother! No doubt you look at what a sheik has to say and his proofs but another sheik might also look at his proofs and believe to be incorrect. When all the sheiks classify some one to be deviated that’s a different story but at the end these are for the sheiks to judge.

الله يشفيك

Akhi take care when you write the Quran in arabic you must write It as is it in the quran and it s forbiden to change a single letter So read your message again and correct it in sha Allah 👍

​​@@swisri Truth subhanallah I didn't realise this mistake maybe is the phone Alhamdulillah I corrected جزاك الله خيرا

​​@@hikmatussalafiyyah آمين و أنت كذلك

May Allah bless them.