Tires should be made as sustainable as possible and refueling should be allowed again

Eso es mentira

I HAVE ALWAYS FOUND THE IDEA OF RACING TIRES BEING DESIGNED TO FAIL.... IS PREPOSTEROUS ....THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE OF WHAT RACING SHOULD BE .....WHY NOT HAVE ENGINES BEING FORCED TO LOSE POWER DURING A RACE.... IT MAKES AS MUCH SENSE AS TIRES FAILING !!!!!!!!

You talk about 2015 to 2017 when Honda powered McLaren you left out a key factor!!! Ron Dennis dictated to Honda the dimensions which were the root of Hondas / McLaren performance! Honda had informed Ron Dennis of this. And Hondas partnership with Red Bull proved beyond a doubt who was right. Honda…

This happens to all the time when people change teams

Porsche with e in the end. not porsch! It‘s a name, not an object

Hence M4x will move to AMR 2026

Is Red Bull blocking his tools anything out of the ordinary when someone leaves the team?

I'm glad they are at least considering another supplier again. It should be about the grip, not exclusively about the longevity. Of course softer tyres will wear out faster, but not built in to disintegrate and force a team's hand. A worn tyre should only lose grip, not endanger drivers.

We all want to see Lotus back in F1 and Red Bull have now got two Teams which will be against the Rules from 2026 onward so should legally relinquish ownership back to an FIA holding until auctioned off. So Lotus, Porsche and Toyota are set head to head in a bid for either a new 12 team or Red Bulls second(rate) team.

Karma audi for cancelling lmdh dtm and gt3

I agree with Michelin and the drivers. I'd like to see more durable tyres that enable drivers to be on edge for the whole race. I remember the Bridgestone/Michelin years. Multiple suppliers wasn't a bad thing. It threw more variables into the racing.

Imagine, instead of having to race with two different tire compounds in 1 race, they have to use 1 Michelin set and 1 Pirelli set each Race.

OMG, please no! A Chinese Lotus! CC will be spinning in his grave!

bring back two tyre companies.

In 2005 only Ferrari, Jordan and Minardi started the US Grand Prix on Bridgestone.

Typical French outfit trying to have the tail wagging the dog.. get with the program, it’s about creating the challenge for engineering and strategy, just happens to coincide with an entertainment factor

To quote the great Ayrton Senna: "F1 is not a show"

Sounds a bit silly as they are both owned by VAG.

"stunning"

Tyres that last and push the limits more

High-deg tires need to go the way of DRS....in the trash bin .

I think these were rumors from 2 years ago and went nowhere.

Give them a choice of suppliers and if they degrade over say - 1000 or 10 000 miles that would be OK.

What about the 90s before the grooves when there was goodyear as well

The FIA can implement other rules to make strategy important. Remember the thime cars could refuel during the race. In other words the start weight of the car would be variabel. And with that corner speeds and acceleration. Of coarse they can maximize the fuel consumption (which does not block the introduction of refuelling) to force the developers to make their cars more efficient. (Changing downforce for less energy usage by reducing drag ) The FIA does not need that tyres degrade for spectacle.

Never been a fan of the high deg tyre regime. About time they got rid. And one the phrases that gets my goat is " tyre whisperer." I say bring back tyre wars. We want real racing.

Personally I think that the biggest winner of non-degrading tires would be Oscar Piastri.

So the return of the tire struggle will be interesting for Michelin🇨🇵 and Bridgestone🇯🇵. At least continental 🇩🇪

The crap designed quick wear for tires is just another gimmick in F1.

If MBS is involved, you can bet there's a corruption scandal not far behind.

Unfortunately Pirelli had to concede to the FIA request. I think lifting this requirement can bring back tire wars again. Although, with all this talk of 0 emissions and 0 carbon footprint, not too sure if we would ever get another tire war. That being said, I think if Bridgestone came back and took things over, we'd see some major progress in terms of performance..

I say let them all in. Can you imagine 3+ tire manufactures in a race

I for one am so sick of the F1 grip on everything the fans want and do not get!!!! Tires that degrade, please??? Great video BTW!!!

It's called racing, not tire management. I agree with Micheln make the best tire you can. Let the cars and the drivers determine the winner not tire strategy.

Huh! Racing Bulls was Minardi.

Why would Michelin ruin their business strategy by supplying shoddy goods?

The artificial forcing of tyre changes is running the racing creating artificial problems for the teams the best car and driver can have there race ruined by tyres which suddenly go bad losing them the race

Bring Back the Tyre wars PLEASE! This way we will get the best tyres possible. Go Michelin Man.

Just stop with the 2 different tire demand, so teams can do soft, soft, or hard or whatever, it makes the race more unpredictable because now they know that after a medium it has to be a soft or a hard if it’s a 1 stopper. Then it will be possible to only use one set for the whole race.

Just because RB isn't breaking rules doesn't mean it's not bad for the sport. Personally I have never cared for it as I feel it's a conflict of interest and a passive midfield advantage for their A team. That being said I also dislike the amount of "sharing" teams are allowed to do such as Haas. Clearly the sport needs power train providers but I've always felt a team competing in the Constructor's should be constructing the vast majority of their cars and or getting bits from independent third parties rather than buying/renting the parts from competitors on the grid. The whole point of a constructor's championship is for the engineering marvels of the sport to grow through competition and stand out on their own stage, not to inspire sub par clones of each other. I'd rather see five teams with great construction pipelines over 10 teams that bring conflicts of interest or have half a hand in the design/construction of their cars.

So what exactly is official? That your website is an idiot or just plain liars? Speculation is all this is, nothing official about that

Fuel limits will still force drivers to baby their cars even with good tires. Just means they can be a bit rougher in the corners or on defense.

I admit, I was initially skeptical when I first saw this video, but now that I'm revisiting it, a few things stand out to me. The McLaren and Honda of 2015 are not the same as they are now. Both have improved a lot since then and if this project does happen, I think I could be pretty good. Personally though, I'd like to see them go for Audi engines as a way of saying "this is what you can do for us as a thank you for us giving you Bortoleto."

It is so obvious that the FIA is CORRUPTED..!! EVER SINCE THE UGLY BEN SULAIYAM TAKES OVER, THEY'RE TONS OF CONTROVERSIAL RESULTS FROM THE STEWARDS BEING BIAS WITH RED BULL TEAM.

F1 needs multiple tire suppliers. Teams can pick the best supplier for a given race track. Let’s have more strategy and less BS.

Tire war is what we need in an overly controlled hybrid era

Boom