Movies Under The Surface

Пікірлер

@sebastianvelazquez9110 7 күн бұрын

This is entirely inaccurate. Thanos was never a narcissist, he was doing it for the betterment of all civilization. The only real source of fate is when he killed 50 percent of them by random.

@otakoimaro9551 20 күн бұрын

i like the vedio

@GustavoSilva-ny8jc 20 күн бұрын

FANTAAAAASTIC VIDEO, i saw the intro and thought it wasnt going to be good

@rageross3430 25 күн бұрын

99% of the world couldn’t understand the magnitude what goes on in the mind of a soldier invested in this particular field. I love every minute of this film the good the bad the ugly. In any form of military service especially technicians, special forces they have humility and modesty concerning what they do and don’t want to be perceived as nothing “special” or they’re just basically doing the job right at least among the civilian population but amongst the military community, they they have to know they’re some bad boy some even would say insane but somebody has to do what they do. Special shout out to the men of THE EOD. #thatsgangsta

@rheneastheorangetankengine8727 Ай бұрын

Honorable mentions (acording to the commenters): Intolerance (1916) It's a wonderful life (1946) Sheoline (1946) Rebel without a cause (1955) The ten commandments (1956) Lawrance of arabia (1962) The revenant (1963) Who's afraid of the virginia woolf? (1966) A clockwork orange (1971) The thing (1982) Aliens (1986) Forrest gump (1994) Satatango (1994) Toy story (1995) Scream (1996) Life is beautiful (1997) Titanic (1997) Lord of the rings 2 (2002) Spider (2002) Dogville (2003) Lord of the rings 3 (2003) The lives of others (2006) The dark knight (2008) In bruges (2008) Inception (2010) Interstellar (2014) Leviathan (2014)

@kenkaplan3654 2 ай бұрын

You misunderstand the film. It is not about "taking action and fighting back". Not in the least. It was a revolutionary film because it ushered in the modern era of movies dealing with two primal American tropes, good guys vs bad guys and the consequences of violence depicted with a realism never seen before. Penn inverts the former, drawing us in to his likeable gangsters, but then the bullets start flying AT the "heroes" and the audience who has identified with them, but not like John Wayne good guy-bad guy violence, but messy horrific violence. The real crescendo of the film is Buck's death, which ensnares the audience in a gruesome depiction. Gone, gone are all out pretensions, our smug beliefs in right and wrong, how much violence can really hurt. And the hero is frigging impotent. Penn upsets the apple cart on a mountain of Hollywood cliches. Audiences were stunned, completely silent coming out of this film. They had never seen anything like this. And critics were outraged. It took years before it's greatness as a watershed film was acknowledged.

@kenkaplan3654 2 ай бұрын

One other thing. Bonnie and C lyde clearly was influenced b y Goddard's "Breathless".

@MoviesUnderTheSurface Ай бұрын

yes, I mention the French New Wave influence on Bonnie and Clyde in my video

@kenkaplan3654 Ай бұрын

@@MoviesUnderTheSurface I think Penn used it and took it a step further in a uniquely American way, which is the love of and fascination with violence. The entire movie revolves around it, inspecting it from many angles.

@MoviesUnderTheSurface Ай бұрын

@@kenkaplan3654 absolutely. it's an American story, characters, and content, and French New Wave technique, style, and tone. No one had ever seen anything like it before

@kenkaplan3654 Ай бұрын

@@MoviesUnderTheSurface Did you see it when it came out? I did. It was haunting and brilliant. Poor Bosley Crowther of the NY times wrote 4 reviews of it, it freaked him out so much. It made me feel things I had never felt in a film. That the main male protagonist was impotent, (until he got shot, like losing your virginity) was an astonishing motif. It almost spit in the face of John Wayne.

@apeters38 2 ай бұрын

My money is still on a janitor.

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

Hey dude, it's me again. Another interesting video from you and great narration, but I have to STRONGLY disagree with you that we are in "another revolutionary period" for filmmaking. As I said in our other comments thread, we are in a pathetic REGURGITATION, not revolution time for filmmaking. It is the age of the sequel, the prequel, the "reimagining," the derivative. And while it's true that the attitude of 1967 was a backlash against conservatism, you completely skipped over just how much Hollywood reflected the Reagan era of new conservatism and traditionally masculine stereotypes throughout the 1980's, all of which are erroneously called "toxic" by the Hollywood of the 2020's. The truth is the same rebellious Hollywood who "raged against the machine," now "rages on BEHALF of the machine." We used to have prudes who clutched their pearls when Bonnie made the first move on Clyde or shot a tommy gun. NOW we have new prudes. They call the Stallone and Schwartznegger of the 1980's "toxic masculinity" instead of heroes and they clutch their pearls when the James Bond of 1985 steals a kiss without asking permission. Am I wrong? Do you disagree? Either way, the pearl-clutching is tiresome. The virtue signaling is tiresome. The woke, post-modernist revisionism of analyzing old movies through a 21st century lens can also be tiresome. But your video was not. Your basic point was kind of self-evident though. 1967 marked a change in American cinema against conservative values. Sure, it makes since given the Marxist-inspired counter-cultural movement. But this point you make about how a "G-rated", harmless version of violence in cinema before Bonnie and Clyde somehow...enabled(?)... the government to get away with shooting people with fire hoses and dropping bombs on Vietnam. That's kind of a stretch and I don't see the connective tissue. It was exactly the violent footage in Vietnam, including the terribly misinterpreted street execution of a VC, which turned public opinion AGAINST the war.

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

I would also add that Bonnie and Clyde ABSOLUTELY delivers the message that "crime doesn't pay," just as much as Henry Hill does at the end of Goodfellas or Ace Rothstein at the end of Casino. Henry Hill ends up in protective custody in a cruddy tract home, unable to even order an authentic bowl of spaghetti. Ace Rothstein lost his marriage and his friends and ends up (in the film at least) completely alone. Bonnie and Clyde are riddled with bullets, cut to pieces, in the prime of their lives on the side of the road. No trial. No jury. Just executed. That screams out: "Crime doesn't pay!" Now...are their movies which have THE OPPOSITE message. Sure - Fight Club is one - and one that you mentioned. He's a domestic te**o*st and he "wins" in the end. So is Natural Born Killers (unless you watch the alternative ending, wherein an avenging angel is sent down and he whacks Mickey and Mallory, in my opinion the superior conclusion) :)

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 2 ай бұрын

My point is that part of the film's appeal is that it showed real violence in a time when other films didn't. "It was exactly the violent footage in Vietnam, including the terribly misinterpreted street execution of a VC, which turned public opinion AGAINST the war" is exactly my point. Bonnie and Clyde appealed to the exact audience that was moved by the violent footage coming from Vietnam. And "enabled" definitely isn't the right word. "Reflected" would be more apropos. From our Hurt Locker conversation, you probably can gather why I would say that. As for the film revolution, it is coming and I think the seeds have already been planted. It's a much slower revolution than the one Bonnie and Clyde brought upon us, but nevertheless, it is happening, even if it is hard to see right now. Everything is difficult to see when you're in the middle of it, but mark my words, fifty years from now, we'll look back on this filmmaking era in a very similar fashion to how we now look on the 60s. Or I'm wrong, which is entirely possible, but I don't think so.

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

@MoviesUnderTheSurface You could be right, and I hope you are. On someone's recommendation. I recently watched the most memorable horror movie I've seen in a decade. It's called STOP-MOTION. The person who recommended it also said that it was coming, in a way, from outside the regular hollywood system. Check it out. Love to see you make a video on it. If there is a film revolution coming, it will be outside the studio system. They are the prudes and curmudgeons now, offended by everything and refusing to take risks. In the 1980s, it was the Moral Majority condemning Hollywood, ruining everyone's good time. Today, it's the woke activists INSIDE The studios themselves, Policing language And attacking fans. Because they always put politics above story. They are incapable of any ingenuity. STOP-MOTION was completely different and I highly recommended it.

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

@MoviesUnderTheSurface speaking of film revolution, I would love to see you. Do a video review on the Horror movie STOP-MOTION

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

Oops I sent the second comment. Because I thought the first one didn't go through Anyway, because you like to review quirky and strange movies that are outside the normal system. I would also recommend SEVEN PSYCHOPATHS.... it's a dark comedy 😃

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

News flash, buddy. Bush's administration was not the only one addicted to war That would also apply to clinton, Obama, Reagan, and most certainly Biden. In fact, there's only been one four year term in the past thirty years, where the president's administration did not actively pursue new wars 😂 Yet something in your commentary tells me. I probably shouldn't say his name. I'm going to presume that you're not a fan and leave it at that

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 2 ай бұрын

The Iraq War was Bush's war, the movie was released less than a year after his presidency ended, and the movie literally provides an indirect reference to Bush with its Yale quote. I never said anything about the other presidencies because this movie isn't about them. Especially not Obama or Trump, since the movie was literally made and released before their presidencies even happened. This video is a discussion on the Hurt Locker, not my (or yours, or anyone's except maybe the film's writer and director) personal political opinions. Regardless, I appreciate your comment.

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

@@MoviesUnderTheSurface And I appreciate your response. It could be that I'm reading too much into the subtext. I liked this video, and your SPR one as well. As a cultural critic, wouldn't you agree however that the way Hollywood depicts modern wars (Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Isreal, Ukraine), tends to fluctuate depending on which president is in office at the time and which president WAS in office during the conflict. I know you're not openly discussing politics, but I've listened to many of your videos and I can tell you're well tuned in to the culture. Would you disagree that Hollywood for the most part walks in lockstep and loyalty to one side of the political divide? Consider Zero Dark Thirty. It was very VERY subtly suggested in that movie that Obama was not responsive to the needs of the team during the operation, but he never appears on screen and there is zero open criticism of him. Would you not agree that this has something to do with Hollywood's idol worship of him?

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 2 ай бұрын

@@retroguyst8132 Hollywood makes whatever movies they think will make lots of money, simple as that. They do this by appealing to the masses while also trying to not alienate any other major demographic. There are exceptions, but in general this is how Hollywood does things. For the most part, if a president is in office, Hollywood will make movies that support or at least don't hurt him if they feel he is popular, and the opposite if he is not. Obama in general was a popular president, so there wasn't much criticism of him from Hollywood. Bush was popular in his first term but not his second, so you see more criticism of him in his second. If they thought criticizing Obama would make them a billion dollars, they would've done it. Likewise, if they think praising him would make a billion dollars they would do that. If they think both would make a billion dollars, they would do both, if neither would they'd make neither. There is a caveat to the above, in that Hollywood might struggle to find talent to make a film that attacks Obama, as much of the artists in Hollywood do seem to support him. But some didn't (Eastwood literally spoke at the 2012 RNC), definitely enough to make that film if they thought they it would make lots of money. There is a second caveat, which is that indie film is completely different, and many of the films that I think you are thinking of for this conversation are technically indie films, for example W., Hurt Locker, Vice, etc. As for Zero Dark Thirty, that one is Hollywood and I saw it once and didn't love it or hate it, I don't remember it well enough to have an in depth discussion on it.

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

@MoviesUnderTheSurface Thank you for taking the time to deliver such an in-depth response. I appreciate this scholarly dialog. I agree with some of what you said, and I am impressed by your understanding of cultural history. However, I would still disagree with you on the idea that Hollywood cares about making money above all else. That statement WOULD certainly be true in the eighties and nineties. If that were still the case today however, hollywood would not waste two hundred million dollars on a sure fire flop, like Indiana Jones 5, The Marvel's, and The Acolyte. A lesson they already had learned with the all female Ghostbusters Remake and the ill fated charlie's angel's reboot In all three of those ventures, The production company, In this case disney and lucas film, Knew exactly what the audience wanted to see and what would make them money... And they intentionally did the exact opposite. Is this due to ignorance? Of course not. They still know what willl make them money. But enforcing a cultural shift from the top down is far more important to them in the long run and to their investors at black rock and state street. I understand that you are not interested in discussing culture War issues on your channel and I Respect that. But in the comments already I can tell that you're smart enough to know what's going on.

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 2 ай бұрын

@@retroguyst8132 Indiana Jones 5, The Marvels, and The Acolyte were all made with the expectation of a billion dollar profit. They are all franchise fare, which is always made to make huge profits. Indiana Jones was trying to restart that franchise and all the love people have for it, Marvels was trying to cash in on the MCU popularity, and Acolyte was trying to keep Star Wars popularity going. None of those films were "sure fire flops", I mean maybe they were in hindsight, but definitely not when the decision was made to make them. Citing lessons learned from "the all female Ghostbusters Remake and the ill fated charlie's angel's reboot" is cherry-picking, as the exact opposite lessons could be learned from Barbie, Star Wars 7, Frozen, Hunger Games, Avatar... You mention "The production company...Knew exactly what the audience wanted to see and what would make them money." This is so far from reality, I can't even tell you how wrong it is. Right now the studios know audiences want franchise fare, which as I said earlier is exactly what Indiana Jones 5, The Marvels, and The Acolyte all are. But the honest reality is, it takes two years minimum to make a quality Hollywood movie and no one knows what audiences will want two years from now. The studios can guess, and some are much better at this than others, but no one knows. This is especially true in the current era, as audiences are changing much more rapidly than in the past. All that being said, what I think you are keying in on is an "out of touch-ness" that Hollywood currently has. The films they've made that lost a lot of money happened because they were out of touch (or lazy, or cynical), and this happens not because Hollywood fails to change people, it happens because audiences change and Hollywood lags behind that change. This also happened in the 1960s, something I discuss at length in my Bonnie and Clyde video, so I definitely recommend watching that if you haven't already. At end of that video, I literally tease what we are discussing now At the end of the day, each studio is owned by a publicly traded corporation, all of which have a fiduciary responsibility to their stockholders. That is the only thing the studios care about, their quarterly reports. Any executive who isn't in line with this was gotten rid of long ago. Whether or not the remaining executives are good at their jobs is a different conversation, but their job is the bottom line, and if they don't execute on that, they will be replace by someone who will. edit: changed people to audiences, you're right that people ie human nature doesn't change, but audiences do

@Azav312 2 ай бұрын

I have watched this numerous times since it debuted, from age 27 to 42, it had changed for me in different stages of my life. I used to think summer took tom for a ride, then i thought the reverse. Now, in my 40s, they were just young kids who were going through it. We were all there before.

@garrison6863 2 ай бұрын

The scene that starts at 3:09 is simply excellent, talk about some first rate acting. Penn really did a nice job with that cast. Neither Beatty nor Dunaway was this good prior to this film. Nice comparison between The Sound of Music and Bonnie and Clyde. Correct, its the characterizations that make this above a gangster film.

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 2 ай бұрын

I love that scene. the writing too. "It's pink! If you're gonna get it right then get it right."

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

Love the video man I Recently read the original script to saving private ryan It's available to anybody for free. It doesn't even have to be downloaded The funny thing about it is the finished film bears almost no resemblance to it whatsoever spielberg kept the title a few names and plot points and changed absolutely, everything else

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 2 ай бұрын

I read the script that was posted online a while ago. I remember it being different but not quite as different as you're describing. We definitely read early drafts of the film, yours probably earlier than mine

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

@MoviesUnderTheSurface I'd love to know where you found your draft. Was it free online? Or was it a physical copy. Because the original version I read was so strangely Different Miller's entire personality was different. He had all the charm of nicki santoro from casino Millish and gaparzo did not exist. But then I remember that depart of was written in by spielberg himself Miller doesn't die in the end of the movie and uppam Is not a coward.

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 2 ай бұрын

@@retroguyst8132 I found it online, I actually dont remember much of the specific differences, other than the script was way shorter than the 180 pages youd expect for a three hour film it was this: assets.scriptslug.com/live/pdf/scripts/saving-private-ryan-1998.pdf I think I actually didn't remember how different it was, cause I just flipped to the last page and Miller survives. I remembered that as I read it but not before. there's also this version: thescriptsavant.com/movies/Saving_Private_Ryan.pdf which I may have read at some point, I cant remember but I dont think so

@retroguyst8132 2 ай бұрын

@@MoviesUnderTheSurface Thanks very much for providing both of those links

@GREGWATSON-lc8cc 3 ай бұрын

Warrens genuis

@frappalina 3 ай бұрын

this is the best review of this movie I have seen :)

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 3 ай бұрын

thanks!

@vladusa 3 ай бұрын

Nah it was the mini me dude, quite obvious lol

@neuto 3 ай бұрын

6:40 I don't think Tom sees "women" as Manic Pixie Dream Girls, just Summer. And honestly, isn't that what infatuation is all about? Falling in love requires you to idealize the other and that's what Tom does. The main thing he's doing wrong is that he's pushing his ideals onto the wrong person, who neither wants a lover nor wants to be worshipped. I'm sure if Summer was more receptive the relationship would grow and infatuation would turn into love and Tom would eventually stop looking at everything from his side. Actually, just fast-forwarding through the film, I don't even see him pushing the girlfriend-boyfriend thing on her either. He literally follows through with her way of taking things casually because he doesn't want to lose her.

@kathurtado13 3 ай бұрын

This review explains a lot why my marriage is over.

@Dorfkind-zm4xi 4 ай бұрын

I played the drums as a kid, and it was exactly like in the movie (minus the physical abuse). My teacher would yell, throw stuff and put people down in front of everyone.

@troco7051 4 ай бұрын

Wow, loves this video, so many details that I didn’t notice, it makes complete sense, thanks.

@waykee3 5 ай бұрын

The romantic becomes the cynic after being heartbroken by a cycnic.

@waykee3 5 ай бұрын

I have learned that just being alone is best because only I can treat myself the best.

@zindagijeenede 5 ай бұрын

Who is shizail ?

@ГеологГео-у9н 5 ай бұрын

Where is "Dogville" in list?

@magau3698 6 ай бұрын

Predictive programming

@badgerproductions24 6 ай бұрын

He did the same thing with Babylon

@bebebe6090 6 ай бұрын

@denniskielton2447 6 ай бұрын

Are you a musician? Do you know anything about the history and context behind this movie and what was really going on under the surface how that kid's journey almost exactly mirrored what bird went through on his way to become the greatest jazz musician of all time in most peoples opinion? I'm sorry too but you got most of this wrong. That brightly lit teachers room as you put it, looked pale and dull compared to warm and vibrant but dark jazzy vibe of the better room. You're right about them all being assholes, that's realistic for most industries but actually in the music industry most people just want to help each other. That's the most unrealistic part of this movie is how hard and how fast he pushes them when in reality there would be no musical gain from that, only psychological, the equivalent of hell week for the Navy SEALs. And make no mistake these guys are training to become musical Navy SEALs. When he walks away from his dad at the end that's not him walking away from the right side to join the Darkside, that's the moment he finally got it. He chose to walk away from the comfort of home and stand up for himself and show that asshole teacher that he was right and that he was worthy, and he did a hell of a job. My performers literally gave me goosebumps the entire time and damn near brought a tear to my eye at the end and I was watching it alone and just about stood up and started clapping. Maybe, leave interpreting is a pursuit of musical greatness of to people who have either been through that pursuit or are currently in that pursuit. Because just about everything you say in this video drives people like myself, currently pursuing a Masters degree in Berkelee College of music, absolutely insane hahaha. You're right about Fletcher representing the devil for sure, but nobody joins the devil. They defeat him. And that's what this is about, defeating your demons to move on. You even used the scene where he broke up with his girlfriend to support that theory, and the whole point of that scene was to show that he wa making a mistake. And that is confirmed as soon as she starts talking about how it would be possible or more like asking him why it would be impossible even if she was supportive of him. Nobody achieve greatness alone, he needed that support and he turned it down at the time he needed it the most. And when he called back to try to fix his mistake it was too late, lesson learned. Bad example of sacrifice lol. This is about defeating your demons no matter how hard you have to fight to achieve what you know you deserve, where do that's great news or just basic happiness. Not joining the Darkside hahaha

@jacob_yancosky 7 ай бұрын

yeah I was re watching this in theaters a few years ago and I thinking the ending had real Columbine vibes.

@ishotmyboss 8 ай бұрын

I've been watching your videos, they're pretty terrible.

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 7 ай бұрын

a view's a view. thank you for watching

@ishotmyboss 8 ай бұрын

Butch beat an innocent man to death.

@luzmariamina7005 8 ай бұрын

Great video

@AmbujSahu-s9f 8 ай бұрын

Bs complete bs😂😂😂

@rexdavidson4028 8 ай бұрын

Masterfully done.

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 8 ай бұрын

thanks!

@thearmchairadmiral 8 ай бұрын

What people forget about 500 days of summer is both characters arent perfect and both let their past control their present. Tom is a romantic who craves love because of the movies he watched and the fact his parents divorced which makes him crave love whereas Summer is the opposite and is a sceptic of loves and feels she doesnt need it because she has seen the damage it can cause in her parents divorce and how she grew up away from movies and pop culture unlike Tom. I will also say both of them lie to each other. Tom craves the full relationship and never fully states that and draws a image of Summer in his own head and when she doesnt fullfil his fantasy he is hurt whereas Summer is clear she doesnt want anything serious but does leed him on for a fact. Both charaters are troubled and honestly this isnt good will hunting. Sean (Robin Williams character from good will hunting) would state they arent perfect for each other.

@Sarasdad91 8 ай бұрын

Where is Titanic? You talk about 100 greatest films of 100 years till 2015 and you didn't include Titanic? Whats wrong with you?

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 8 ай бұрын

Titanic is in my next 100. Despite it being massively successful and imo a very good film, outside of its technical achievements, Titanic had very little influence on the history of Hollywood, probably because the actual story isn't original or unique or groundbreaking. Titanic is basically a classic Hollywood story made with modern Hollywood technology, which for me isn't the most amazing thing, as I prefer movies that push forward rather than look backward with the stories they are telling. Avatar is a similar situation, a well-made, extremely grounbreaking technical achievement that while not telling a classic Hollywood story, it is still looking backward and not pushing forward with the story it is telling. BTW there are ways to ask your question without being a jerk about it. What's wrong with you?

@KevvoLightswift 8 ай бұрын

Growing up and becoming a physical adult doesn't equal success with relationships. It just means you've got more experience. He was an adult before his time with Summer. Becoming a successful adult with whatever your goal is (in this case, dating) will look differently for many people, but it is not an indicator of maturity or adulthood.

@MrTabanese 8 ай бұрын

Good cliffhanger. Can't wait. :)

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 8 ай бұрын

thanks! first time I've done one of those

@Flora-vo9ds 9 ай бұрын

This was the most speculative speculation that was ever speculated about this film

@mynando 9 ай бұрын

There were actually two miracles derived from different reasons. The first one was born from Abuelo’s sacrifice and Abuela’s determination to the community. The candle’s Abuela’s symbol of that but not exactly the source of the miracle. The sacrifice and dedication are the source. Casita is the family’s symbol of the miracle. The second miracle came from Mirabel’s empathy (her actual gift) and opening her family’s eyes that everyone’s more than just their gifts and making them confront their hardships thereby creating a stronger foundation to the family… to casita. That’s how the second miracle came to be. Notice the colors of the sparkles in the first miracle are golden to represent Abuelo & Abuela. The second miracle’s sparkles are blue, green, golden, etc. which represents the family acknowledging their self-worth and were ok with just being themselves. They got their gifts back because now they know who they really are and can contribute so much more to the family and community. I love your video! Well done 💖

@rhop9320 3 ай бұрын

Yes exactly that's what I saw. Mirabel gift is showed at the end of the film.

@MigelAnjel84 9 ай бұрын

After watching Loki, Fate makes a lot of sense.

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 9 ай бұрын

In Endgame, Thanos literally discusses recreating the entire universe by taking things all the way back to a second big bang. If that's not godlike I don't know what is.

@Khoros-Mythos 9 ай бұрын

The director has actually explained in interviews that when he was a musician he had an instructor like Fletcher, and that he wasn't sure if it had helped or hindered his musical development.

@rusy-ok 9 ай бұрын

Это прекрасный разбор. Спасибо

@andyfriederichsen 9 ай бұрын

What's bad about the movie is that it basically dehumanizes German soldiers.

@tarzantabi7845 4 ай бұрын

why would I want to feel empathy for soldiers that did war crimes every day? thats like if I made a movie that portrays Jeffery Dahmer as a misunderstood genius

@andyfriederichsen 4 ай бұрын

@@tarzantabi7845 This is the Heer AKA German Army on the Western Front. And news flash kid, the Soviets on the Eastern Front were just as bad as the Germans. They even made the German soldiers look historically inaccurate in the movie just to dehumanize them more. LOL.

@andyfriederichsen 4 ай бұрын

@@tarzantabi7845 We aren't talking about the Waffen SS or the Eastern Front dude, but the Heer AKA German Army on the Western Front. YT keeps hiding my replies, so I hope this gets through.

@andyfriederichsen 4 ай бұрын

@@tarzantabi7845 KZbin keeps hiding my replies, so I'm just going to say you're wrong and your comparison is a strawman.

@tonywords6713 9 ай бұрын

Very good points but I cant believe you didn't include "COME AND SEE". its the sole greatest war film ever made, and pure anathaema to the dumb "there are no anti war films!" argument.. Spielberg even screened it before making SPR..

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 9 ай бұрын

Definitely one of the best anti war films ever made. I can't remember why I didn't include it

@AIKINCA 9 ай бұрын

Excelente analisis. Saludos desde Lima - Perú.

@MoviesUnderTheSurface 9 ай бұрын

thanks!

@tnightwolf 10 ай бұрын

Either Anti or Pro-War, this movie is a masterpiece!

@tarzantabi7845 4 ай бұрын

true

@MickieMuellerStudio 10 ай бұрын

It’s even in the title, “500 Days of Summer,,” she existed before meeting Tom and after the relationship ends, but to him, the 500 days with her was all. I would suggest that most movies with a manic pixie dream girl would be very different if told from her perspective.

@cmccolton1383 10 ай бұрын

I think Fletcher got his "mini me" to take it. His reaction was reasonable to the core guy. When people screw up Fletcher usually flips his lid especially when he warns them beforehand

@JohnCenaIsMyDad 10 ай бұрын

The film does explain it, it doesn't explain it explicitly but it does explain it. You see a scene where Fletcher talks about "finding one of these lying around" and then a few scenes later one of them goes missing after "lying around"... seems like a clear cut explanation to me

@lans1531 10 ай бұрын

you loved saying the word “bitch” lol

Ең жақсы KZbin

Пікірлер