I like how everything is physics is actually linked if you go deep enough into trying to understand them. And in doing so look at more complex models that unify every topic in physics so very clearly!

He invented gravity.

Nice😎👍💯💯💯

now learning quantum mechanics is a fun once you start seeing your video desire to learn more increases thankyou for explaining difficult concepts so well

Quantum time dilation needs to be taken into account as well as quantum length contraction equivalent of the Lorentz contraction but at the quantum level Another thing is: attosecond spectroscopy applied to observation of the motion of the electron in electrodynamics debunked the Heisenberg uncertainty principle This data needs to be taken into account in modifying and revising quantum mechanics and dynamics and quantum electrodynamics I have proposed that attosecond spectroscopy be applied to observe the motion of the proton and its constituent quarks and gluons and lion fields and with that data modify and revise quantum chromodynamics and quantum electrodynamics applied to the fractional and net charges of quarks comprising protons and neutrons where the net charge is + 1 in protons and 0 in neutrons And in the electric charge interactions between the proton and electron The electric charge of the proton comes from the net positive electric charge resulting from the fractional electric charge interactions between the 2 up and 1 down quarks comprising the proton. These quarks comprising the proton are valence quarks. There are also sea quarks which includes the mesons (pi mesons). The data would also include interactions between color charges as described in quantum chromodynamics I propose that each quark in surrounded by a gluon field which imbues color charge on the quark and gluons attached to each of the gluon fields surrounding each quark binds the quarks together while the gluon field surrounding all three of the quarks (valence quarks) comprising the proton confines them within the proton and this gluon field I refer to as the proton envelope By applying attosecond spectroscopy to observe the motion of the proton and its constituent quarks and gluons and gluon fields it will give us a better understanding of the dynamics of the proton and its constituent quarks and gluons and gluon fields in quantum electrodynamics and quantum chromodynamics and the electrical charge interactions between the proton and electron The electrical charge interactions which causes the electron to be attracted to and causes the electron to be captured by the proton is what I call coulomb charge capture which results in the formation of the hydrogen atom and between protons and electrons in the formation of other atoms. The same process occurs in the formation of anti-hydrogen and other anti-atoms Anti-hydrogen is comprised of anti-protons and positrons (anti-electrons) when the anti-proton is negatively charged and the positron is positively charged. These anti -particles have opposite charges in anti-matter which is also referred to as mirror matter compared to particles of matter. The Dirac equation predicted anti-matter. While at first he thought it was a mistake but realized that it was not a mistake. He also noted spinners in his work and noted spin 1/2 particles (spin 1/2 (+ 1/2) and spin - 1/2 particles, etc. See the Dirac equation and Dirac’s work and the papers he had published. Quantum electrodynamics and quantum mechanics need to be modified and revised to take into account that attosecond spectroscopy has debunked the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. And attosecond spectroscopy needs to be applied to observe the motion of the proton and its constituent quarks and gluons and gluon fields - Robert K. Tarquinio, PhD

It's an amazing explanation ...but I have a simple query that if an electron is to be excited from one energy state to the next energy state say 2nd to 3rd, then we have to impart energy equal to hcut omega then how energy is taken from that electron so it can down excite say from 2nd to 1st?

So if I change the spin of one electron, the other one will change in opposition?

I had many doubts about maxwel equation, this video helps me...

Spin can be anything. Who knows about the axis of rotation of those particles therefore, there could be infinite number of spins for a single particle. Wouldn't you agree? Does that make sense to you??

Thanks Partha for giving me lucid explanation of Schrodinger equation, I ran through several videos pertaining to quantum physics, I couldn't comprehend the equation 🎉🎉

could you please drive the equation using same method that Scrodinger kimself did.

Why do I waste my potential

you are splendid

Very nice video! Only a trivial comment: The "i" in "Ψ" is simply pronounced as "i", (like in "thin"), not as "ái". The same applies to π, μ, ν, ξ, χ symbols used in science.

Wow! Not you are teaching calculus in a few minutes! Well done, thanks.

Great job with this intro to Maxwell's equations. Just watch a Brian Greene on World Science Festival where he discussed Einstein and the quantum. Many experts on that one and Greene mentioned the challenge to Maxwell's equation as you mentioned.

Superluminal, nearly instantaneous EM pulses were observed in the nearfield of a resent experiment! See the last paper linked below. The speed of light is not a constant as once thought, and this has now been proved by Electrodynamic theory and by Experiments done by many independent researchers. The results clearly show that light propagates instantaneously when it is created by a source, and reduces to approximately the speed of light in the farfield, about one wavelength from the source, and never becomes equal to exactly c. This corresponds the phase speed, group speed, and information speed. Any theory assuming the speed of light is a constant, such as Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong, and it has implications to Quantum theories as well. So this fact about the speed of light affects all of Modern Physics. Often it is stated that Relativity has been verified by so many experiments, how can it be wrong. Well no experiment can prove a theory, and can only provide evidence that a theory is correct. But one experiment can absolutely disprove a theory, and the new speed of light experiments proving the speed of light is not a constant is such a proof. So what does it mean? Well a derivation of Relativity using instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity. This can easily seen by inserting c=infinity into the Lorentz Transform, yielding the GalileanTransform, where time is the same in all inertial frames. So a moving object observed with instantaneous nearfield light will yield no Relativistic effects, whereas by changing the frequency of the light such that farfield light is used will observe Relativistic effects. But since time and space are real and independent of the frequency of light used to measure its effects, then one must conclude the effects of Relativity are just an optical illusion. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, then it has the same problem. A better theory of Gravity is Gravitoelectromagnetism which assumes gravity can be mathematically described by 4 Maxwell equations, similar to to those of electromagnetic theory. It is well known that General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism for weak fields, which is all that we observe. Using this theory, analysis of an oscillating mass yields a wave equation set equal to a source term. Analysis of this equation shows that the phase speed, group speed, and information speed are instantaneous in the nearfield and reduce to the speed of light in the farfield. This theory then accounts for all the observed gravitational effects including instantaneous nearfield and the speed of light farfield. The main difference is that this theory is a field theory, and not a geometrical theory like General Relativity. Because it is a field theory, Gravity can be then be quantized as the Graviton. Lastly it should be mentioned that this research shows that the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics can no longer be criticized for requiring instantaneous interaction of the pilot wave, thereby violating Relativity. It should also be noted that nearfield electromagnetic fields can be explained by quantum mechanics using the Pilot Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle (HUP), where Δx and Δp are interpreted as averages, and not the uncertainty in the values as in other interpretations of quantum mechanics. So in HUP: Δx Δp = h, where Δp=mΔv, and m is an effective mass due to momentum, thus HUP becomes: Δx Δv = h/m. In the nearfield where the field is created, Δx=0, therefore Δv=infinity. In the farfield, HUP: Δx Δp = h, where p = h/λ. HUP then becomes: Δx h/λ = h, or Δx=λ. Also in the farfield HUP becomes: λmΔv=h, thus Δv=h/(mλ). Since p=h/λ, then Δv=p/m. Also since p=mc, then Δv=c. So in summary, in the nearfield Δv=infinity, and in the farfield Δv=c, where Δv is the average velocity of the photon according to Pilot Wave theory. Consequently the Pilot wave interpretation should become the preferred interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. It should also be noted that this argument can be applied to all fields, including the graviton. Hence all fields should exhibit instantaneous nearfield and speed c farfield behavior, and this can explain the non-local effects observed in quantum entangled particles. *KZbin presentation of above arguments: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZazlX1tq7iErLM <kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZazlX1tq7iErLM> *More extensive paper for the above arguments: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 *Electromagnetic pulse experiment paper: www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1 Dr. William Walker - PhD in physics from ETH Zurich, 1997

B: bipolar, as all magnetic fields are. Dunno if that was Maxwell's intention

Wow i loved this

My fav thing in physics is light and time

As an alien, the logarithm in the definition of enthropy always cracks me up, because it's sooooo typical for you Earthlings and your obsession with "things"! How so? Well, you could very well have defined entropy as constant times Ω - but there would be a problem: When you combine two systems A and B with numbers of microstates Ωᴬ and Ωᴮ, the combined number of microstates would be Ωᴬᴮ = Ωᴬ × Ωᴮ. Now, you like to imagine entropy as "thing", like energy or mass, and "things" add up when you combine them, rather than multiplying. So, you would very much like to replace the multiplication sign by a plus sign. And to do so, you put a logarithm in front : ln(Ωᴬᴮ) = ln(Ωᴬ) + ln(Ωᴮ). Now, entropy behaves like a thing and you Earthlings are happy.

"Happy new decade" *watching from 2024*

simply best. i am glad i am a teacher and student of physics.

really good video

Another terrible quantum physics video

Tell me how to approach gamma matrices of Dirac mathematically and conceptually. It appears to be with too hard mathematics Dirac too admitted.

How would you study for comps?

hey what is "measurement", do it have to do something with entropy, because measurement is information and information is entropy. Can you cover something of these lines. please

hello Sir!,i just want to thank you for really clear explanations and also a person can easily recognize that you have understood physics subjects really well (:

2:52

I want to know about ampares law and guass lawa i.e. other three equations of maxwell from u😊

This one definitely needs to dig into a couple things, like why we use FT's at all, or how we choose the "units" of the sinusoids, pretty disorienting otherwise.

Best explanation of bra-ket notation

Wow I've been watching some of your videos and it's basically impossible NOT to understand.. best QM videos on YT to me, thank you!

The wilder the hair, the more trustable the science source.

This, then, would create memory.

Brilliant video, very clear and amazingly simple. Well done.

Another thing to point out is were not able to see whether or not the black space surrounding objects in space moves or stays with an object but I'd say anything producing heat past the point of no gravity keeps that same black space were just not able to see it yet.

The metric tensor explanation is wrong the light would be straight and seen from all angles irregardless of were your at it's more like a light in the dark. On a sphere the lines are kind of parallel but there not because they curve and create more of an oval meaning there not parallel. Einstein last work is explained through magnetism and electricity or heat essentially creating all molecules magneticly attracted to each other creating gravity. The real question should be why do they do this inevitably you reach the answer of God. If you could decrease something so cold beyond the capabilities of the universe itself it would have no gravitational pull or gravity essentially being space itself as to why when its heated up it doesn't accumulate is because there's nothing there to accumulate all the negatives and positives are gone within the surrounding planets or stars.

sorry bro but you're wrong, it is still under process

Bell's inequality was proved to be wrong according to Quantum Mechanics

So how is this first Maxwell equation useful

3:30 the solution of the differential equation is somewhat like k*e^y type. how is this value ever negative??

Very real

Thank you.

Thanks!

slow it down, you are going too fast

Time can be explained as a process of energy exchange formed by photon electron interactions. We have photon ∆E=hf electron couplings continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons as an uncertainty ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π probabilistic future comes into existence. All it takes for this to be logical is for the spontaneous absorption and emission of light waves to precedes absolutely everything that happens in our three-dimensional world.

I watched your first equation. Divergence etc. Well explained. Thank you. I am your subscriber

Wow sir. Just wow