Can you explain the hamiltonian operator in simple words for any newcomers in physics, thanks!
@andreandriole68916 сағат бұрын
Don't watch this dumb video Full of sponsors and spam and other videos not worth it and use the no spam always
@stevewhitt9109Күн бұрын
You failed to explain WHY! Check out Richard Behiel
@MANDELASUDAISКүн бұрын
I am in senior two help me
@mendous86642 күн бұрын
I'm preparing for my French bac that is in 5 months. Normally, i take the lesson and notes and re read then thoroughly to understand it on a deeper level and then (normally i do it with a friend) i go to chatgpt and start explaining the concepts and process, and let him correct me and i redo this until i can explain it very simply and efficiently. This helps that when i go face the problems i relate everything thats going on with my understanding, so i already are subconsciously at ease when solving.
@uzomefuna2 күн бұрын
How different is learning the scientific method in a physics degree vs in a statistics degree?
@HansHaz20002 күн бұрын
Thank you, very good explained ! There should be more research about this effekt !
@mehdizangiabadi-iw6tn3 күн бұрын
Nothing is said about the space of a black hole, its relationship to the mass and velocity of the black hole, or how black hole radio waves are produced.
@mehdizangiabadi-iw6tn3 күн бұрын
If the space of a black hole is radioisotope, how are its dimensions and volume measured?
@mehdizangiabadi-iw6tn3 күн бұрын
How is the mass of a black hole measured?
@vanamali_kun8923 күн бұрын
this shi's bomb bruh thanks 💪
@tonyjohnson89293 күн бұрын
Excellent!
@mohammedpatel30513 күн бұрын
Thank you Parth
@ashokkumarmishra96874 күн бұрын
How the equation became like this.. Can you please explain that.. How lhs equal to rhs based on what...
@AbihashfaQ4 күн бұрын
Sir Where from you I love the way you explained the field equation ❤
@AbihashfaQ4 күн бұрын
Love you ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I love you Sir, Very beautifully explained
@samarthadke86744 күн бұрын
Hii, thanks for explaining, but can't electric field E be perpendicular to the surface, in that case won't dL be always perpendicular to E?
@eltayebeltayeb15684 күн бұрын
Thank you 😊
@azyzah_x_me4 күн бұрын
My favorite thing about physics is that it's the logic of every scientific field
@tumuramyekellet66765 күн бұрын
I prefer using questions to read physics😊😊😊
@richardngjoobeng14035 күн бұрын
Awesome video! Thanks!
@alebenny785 күн бұрын
Finally someone who states clearly the pure mathematical (and not physical) nature of this theoretical item!
@MRUK3305 күн бұрын
You loo 10:24 k like my physics teacher years ago. You lost me already.
@RealWaveQuantumMechanics6 күн бұрын
Love your videos. You might be interested in a theory which is compatible with Quantum Mechanics and which does explain spin of hbar/2 in normal way rather than requiring it to be 'intrinsic'. The theory is described in the video The Distributed Electron and more full explained in the video series the Road to Quantum Reality. Would love your comments
@faisalshams70016 күн бұрын
Amazing way to explain . Before this video , I have no idea what these things mean. 😊
@willhay31086 күн бұрын
Came to this after reading the Physics World mini article on Quantum Computing phonons.
@michaelwesterland18536 күн бұрын
Very well done, a clear and compelling review without a lot of extraneous factoids cluttering the message Like it a lot, you've got a good style and I'm subscribing now. Thank you. 👍
@rehandolamulla71457 күн бұрын
FInal someone that explains the theory instead of just saying this is how it should be.MUCH APPRECIATION
@MathCuriousity7 күн бұрын
Can you do a video on differentials for intro calc based physics courses. All the texts I look at use differentials to derive equations and I just hate it! Why can’t they use derivatives or some other way that doesn’t leave us wondering “how and why can we do this with dy dx etc. Please genius friend Parth!
@adespade1197 күн бұрын
h bar = h / 2 x pi, does this mean in Fermi's eqn, the 2 pi /hbar = 4pi^2/h ?
@adespade1197 күн бұрын
Succesive approx / but I can't imagine that hasn't been thought of already,
@cloudkicker-gx7gb8 күн бұрын
Really enjoyed that thanks
@000_008 күн бұрын
thank you soooo much
@adespade1198 күн бұрын
Does empty space, devoid of all matter, except quantum fluctuations, have a continuity that is -ve, 0 or +ve. if space / the universe is expanding, does this mean it is +ve ?
@Unotch10 күн бұрын
Shouldn't it rather read that the shortest path will route the particle? Because the particle knows nothing and can't "take" anything. The path tells the particle: I will allow you to go from here to there.
@anuraagnath886610 күн бұрын
Now why is that? Why does the particle take the path in which L is the least?
@fangyinghu893910 күн бұрын
If you mean philosophically... nature seems to prefer efficiency, whatever that might imply. Physically, action is also defined as mass times velocity times distance. Things want to minimise the travelled distance, they want to minimise the speed required to travel it, they want to minimise the mass they have to carry while travelling.
@bayjuan-g5w11 күн бұрын
The first step to learning is to grow a beard, just like this instructor.
@peternewzella642811 күн бұрын
Could you talk about entropy in quantum information theory?
@fancyfree822812 күн бұрын
I know what some of these words mean 👍👍
@archonphilosopher822112 күн бұрын
Due to Schrodinger's inclusion of i in his Equation, we may understand a quantization (of phase) which reveals an ontological issue, that is an issue of Being. When one passes a wave function (a critical ontological element) near a Law of Physical Nature (electromagnetism), there will be a reaction. In terms of potentials, the main ontological potential is of Being, that is, of inclusion into reality, a reality that includes a set of Laws of Physical Nature which must align themselves in order to provide a stable universe in which such experiments may be conducted.
@PallaviPandeyaa13 күн бұрын
👍
@kingplunger113 күн бұрын
Path integrals
@Handimedia13 күн бұрын
Why do you keep deleting my reply to @messenger-of-truth-4u ?
@JohnSmith-pt3hl13 күн бұрын
Multiplication should be the highest form of mathematics along with division
@JohnSmith-pt3hl13 күн бұрын
So when physicists write letters they are only imagining it might be correct?
@thedeemon13 күн бұрын
Did you accidentally use the thumbnail from another video? It poses a question about Feynman that's never addressed in the video itself.
@Mighty-Nate98_pro.13 күн бұрын
Love the help thanks for newtons law of motion it helped me t undertand it very well!✅ Also if you dont know who I am, I'm MightyNate98 link here - kzbin.info/door/tE4lbBCAO5Ag5GSeYZSu_A
@joseleonardofabian13 күн бұрын
How could they complicate something as simple as MOVEMENT or GYROSCOPIC INERTIA or TIME GRAVITY or wrongly called GRAVITY into the principle of action, different names for the same thing. Where there is GRAVITY or TIME GRAVITY there is action or MOVEMENT at a speed of 38 million times the speed of light, without the need for dark matter and energy or expansion of the universe or the big bang.