Commenting for reach

This is a phenomenal panel and incisive communication between all panelists that is not unnecessary complicated. Excellent insight from the panelists especially pinpointing that current AI companies have a poorly defined target of AGI they are all working towards whereas deep thinkers usually start with a question and continuously seek answers to his question. Very pertinent difference. Please, this is excellent content. Ignore the naysayers.

We know there is a short section during the introductions where the audio dropped out. There was a problem behind the scene that was quickly fixed.

gravity as a metaphor makes perfect sense to me, in the sense that in the space of possible progressions the ideal would be the attractor.. no? as very abstract as it may be

Thanks SFI for streaming this.

The Lord gave us the atoms, and it's up to us to make them dance.

The century of Complexity science? I would need to watch this.

Starts at 1 min 57. Main talk starts at 14 min 10. Good talk. Daniel Dennet also mentioned Prof Pangloss in his book on evolution. Keen to see Part 2. My interest is creativity and it seems to me this has links to emergence.

Aren’t mechanisms of protection really just homeostasis.

When this comes out in English i think i might enjoy it.... 😂😂😂

great thank you

I love being here in the comment section at SFI. It is a breath of fresh air that the less scientifically oriented seem to be blind to its existence.

A fantastic introduction to Complexity Thinking-I absolutely love it! However, I would be more likely to share it with others if the images were a bit more stable, less distracting.

"That's what temperature is: the speed of clock time with respect to thermal time." I love this man.

Excellent proposal, but I think that at the beginning Professor Rovelli refers specifically to the 'Ehrenfest-Tolman effect' and not to the 'Tolman effect'. As a suggestion for the next one, it would be better if what was written on the board was seen more clearly.

Looking forward to a presentation of the work

Is it possible, now that I have seen this lecture, I know something that my professors do not know? (Provided they did not see this lecture.)

Sad in a way. Religions are trying to use quantum mechanics to push religious delusions and helping prevent people from learning more. Flip it around besides which religion. Polytheism or monotheistic. If you killed off all religious to have a better world. Then it becomes a plus plus and no need to worry about dead. lol. Religions have infected sciences. The manyworlds people vs many possible states. Again, this avoids how some can classify religious delusions and, more so, to humans as a highly delusional species and such. Or actual bringing people back from short-term clinical death and time frames for brain damage and such. Or variants of an actual afterlife set. Some black hole stuff would also be good argument material against such. If you want to test something. Build a tunable metamaterial for slits and the orbital energy levels for part of the tunable range. No religious delusions are needed. All the graves in the world and various religions are dead and living and and no singular one showing proof. None showing proof of pre bang conditions and such. The closest being Erdos and the book. No valkuries or such showing up during wars. Not to getting into mapping the morphology over time or religious delusions. Or mapping stupidity in finite sets and trees and classifications. Good luck in your religious social wars, and you might be able to see why I avoid such creatures. Sad to see them holding people back in ways, but they have a few things like that that are self-defeating. Kind of like saying thought or contiousness is quantum mechanics and not biochemical and bioelectrical. But great for showing stupidity is not infinite. It comes in finite sets.

Great

Noyce....

nonsense

there are currently four comments, so maybe you can see mine. i was a major proponent in the development of free music software (vst developer xoxos) being cogent of memetics and synergy. not everyone wants people to know how to do things. i'll be brief. i got my congresswoman and classmate shot in the head by people in a lodge. it took 16 years until i, me, the champion, could actually encounter the notation of the cepstral method fft(log10(fft())). i was so pissed it took three years for me to use it. here's the main factor in what you study. the intentional restriction of learning and development by collusion. notice how academics never notices anything lodge. well nobody does now, HSS from satellite and a dozen other methods.

Thats an inspiration. I wish to follow in similar steps soon.

Such an amazing lecture! Thanks for organizing and sharing the record. Please, please do not disable transcripts. You reduce the accessibility of the content. Please, always make the transcripts enabled when you upload videos.

Great talk. I have 2 reflections. @51:10 about diffusion vs. invention of technology. What if this is just recombination of building blocks/constructs that happens in all layers of our society i.e. the existing building social building blocks (B2C, B2B, government policies, internet, etc.)? @1:05:35 about 'more electric cars' vs. different forms of mobility. What if this is a case of 'both and'. The change to a lower energy cost electrical power society leads to new affordances for which new inventions can spawn i.e. 'arrival of the fittest'?

Thank you

How can this model of tech diffusion be 'universal' when an estimated 80% of new tech introductions fail in the market?

If you don’t mind I have a couple questions I’m trying to understand at functionally accurate level : If you’re talking about understanding beyond words.🧐 So say Words are descriptors in our life to communicate. We are the platform maybe? Within science perhaps it’s a lattice of representational maps matching pure evolutions of nature and minds physical reality in moments through communication. 🤔in humans, it’s about depth of encapsulated compressed scalular data of both the understood and the ignorant? We all have different locus’s in relativity maybe?🤔 So how does group synchronization in minds in teams for maximum mutual world view work? Idk. Fun think. Fascinating . Thanks for lecture🥰 Derek

Very interesting, thanks. I predict a third way will emerge, so first the John with dark hair's modeling method as revealing information, now John with light hair way of modeling revealing knowledge and the third way will get at initial conditions for profound understanding.

We can simplify our political-economic system by focusing on basic precepts. If we value Truth as a primary value, we need to account for externalities, so prices will honestly represent costs. We can do this efficiently and fairly by charging fees to industries proportional to emissions, resource extraction or habitat destruction. Random surveys can show where fees should be raised (where most people say that particular kinds of impact on the environmennt should be further reduced). A system of fees can replace other, bureaucratic methods of control.

Reminds me of Donna and Dennis meadows expansion of complex systems combined with entropy and scaled to c and von Neumann utility theory and game theory of sorts combined into evolutionary behavior biology. It’s my dream to visit and talk to others there someday! 😅

Get rid of this moronic background music and I may just may listen to this again ..but I don’t expect this to happen

Some say "we" is the original psychological operation. We think it's fascinating.

Good points. We need sustainable technology, that creates conditions of stability and fairness.

It's like different elemental powers in video games relative to resistance. (force framing)/(inertial framing) = power output, therefore (power output - a enduring meter)/time = endurance cost/time, where the network's kinetics in a simple analogous case relative to (ice force, or physical force, or fire force)/(ice resistance, physical resistance, fire resistance) forms a network of specialization success and backdoor weaknesses relative to force specialization. When one parameter becomes lopsided in relation to (force framing)/(inertial framing), hierarchies emerge, and inequalities, and these can render a (reinforcement growing factor * degree of power differential * time), leading to a stretching of the hierarchy, and accelerations into new strategy spaces (a bifurcation of classes, and extreme power differentials between different players).

The whole really is the sum of the parts. I have seen a little parameter in a equation within massive amounts of code and systems of equations create huge exponentially scaling problems. We really have to preserve the sum of computations at the small scale is what is predicting the whole, to accurately predict the large scale behavior. A analogue to this is, If biological cells do not have the ability to send signals and action through connection, you don't get the large scale complex behavior. It's about the small scale complex features coming together the make the complex whole. In the market, there is a bunch of players running data analytics, therefore you could be making a error, and another person (a little component) detects it and says to the whole (hey there is a problem here we need to correct for), meaning you might be making errors and others are eating the cost. And we know this is occurring, because there is a exponential decrease in biodiversity, from many small errors building up in our system, biodiversity eats the cost. You know what I mean? How do you know you are accurately power scaling, especially in changing conditions? You would first have to sum the small scale factors, find the average, then make that average your based for power scaling (it's also about the modes that are symbiotic with the average, there is many analytical directions). Because at the end of the day (for every action, there is a equal and opposite reaction, therefore summing over a distribution is the first thing you do, then you find the average, then you find the modes that have high fitness with the average as you progressively calculate the average of parameters, from multiple progression directions to triangulate [to get granularities, and better and better description]). For instance, we need to understand electron behaviors at smaller and smaller time scales, to better understand protein behavior and it's shape in different conditions. I'm not a very smart person myself, but I also know we have to be honest and precise.

Look forward to reading your book. Thank you!

Thank you

Nice Leica tilescan

Thank you that was absolutely stellar! In between other tasks I thought of so many questions :) good luck 🍀

At what level / instance does your mechanics break?

Dynamite! Brandon, you'd have made one helluva Preacher Man! Engages with, and questions, some key assumptions, spoken and unspoken, which often just slide by unquestioned. The epistemic equivalent of removing an unnoticed blindfold. Gets thought going! Wild applause, Respect, Kudos, and Thanks!

Dynamite! Actually engages and queries some deep, and other deep and unquestioned, assumptions. Eloquent, passionate, and very, very provocative of thought. What more can I ask? Admiration, respect, and thanks!

very nice and apt comment at the end of this lecture.

This is my perfect Sunday… Baptist preacher/Yale prof mashup.

Thank you

What an epic talk!!! Thank you Dr. Ogbunu for sharing your amazing insight and having the strength and courage to put yourself out there.

The world is Cosme, not Caos.

What is Lyfe??? 🌿 🌌 Bayesian Don't Hurt Me!!!

I'm lucky that I've read all other Melanie's books , so I know how to deal with Complex Chaos and Fake Robot Intelligence only by using my human brains and brute computing power of the machines, combining Copy Cat Startegies with Mad Dog Typing Promts