This is fuckin vibey

I'm a new fan of this band and what I find most intriguing about them is that it's almost terrible but instead it's amazing. They walk this bizarre line.

Exceptional

you are a god! thank you

comes off as a bit rude and vindictive

Some call it avant-garde, some call it "contemporary music", or experimental, I call this beyond stupid.

Music to play while having a lobotomy.

Deleuze

Constipation ❔

The distinction between Form and Bit is this: Bit is binary. Bit is either on = 1 or off = 0. For bit all that is required is a dividing line, while Form is ternary in that it encircles the inside to the outside. This circle is the mediating, reconciling third -the boundary.

actually breathtaking

you keep calling it a cross, when it's a mark....but how is this different at all to set braces? Secondly, colors are not a good choice as this takes away from the colorblind, and do have to create something specifically for them you might as well just use that thing for everyone, I suggest using a tally "|" symbol for black and normal mark for green. Third, negative space can be written as a continuous infinite compliment of the positive space, which would allow all the math operations normally, just like computer binary.....you would need a mark that is similar to re-entry but dives into a deeper nesting state, re-entry could work but would need rules on "peeling" (taking digits out). As for complex states, "i" is universal in math for the reductive position so you could either use a new mark and/or have a new way to encompass the state itself, I suggest a rightside facing mark (which is a left-right mirror image to the current mark) while everything under the tier would still be correctly facing. For reciprocals, easy enough, a new score "_" mark above the parts that are inversed of 1, done. Lastly, you will need a symbol representing not only the summation but the re-entry target of what is to be summed from 1 to infinite, in order to write most of the transcendentals, or at least a lambda. At this point, set theory is nothing more than a re-write of basic algebra concepts using drawings instead of letters....I honestly do not see the point other than to pat yourselves on the back for using proofs within the idiom space to prove the proofs are provable. Math already exists, it actually has quite a bit of symbols you can try out.

Thanks for uploading

29:37 more faster

9:53 silver grit passing through my teeth

Concussion-core

Rakalam brought me here. Yeah!!!

😊 min 5:34 ...the spheres are splitting up similarly like biological cells multiply by division into more equal cells first then further external/internal algorithm is differntiating them etc. It's a fantastic analogy to what happens in all lifeforms which we know. That alone shows me that there is a kind of truth in this model of Heim. There must be structural analogies between "life" and the rest that we unknowingly call "non-life" - forms! Maybe it's like Giordano Bruno already said. There's life everywhere in the universe. So the "suns" are also life-forms of their own kind, and we - the earth - are his kids (cells) or subcells ...and so on.

lovely!

Garcia Linda Rodriguez Deborah Walker Brenda

Louna Sbou? DU hast keine guten Hintergedanken, my Lady.

Great musicians! Great voice. Deep souls. 💜

NO WAY THATS MY DAD

yes ! thanks

What universe is this on?

Thanks for this!

Finallt finally a band that speak to me. You know theyre good when in the comments people dislike it -thats the proper music brigade, with their boring melodic sense. Please dont call it post or math rock., its actually art what they are doing, not what they are putting in , but what they are leaving out. I love their. Non image, please lets hope that they dont get big headed and start dressing up silly and making expensive videos in america. So keep it x

Bloody great

❤

love your work!!

Very impressive👏👏👏

@12:00 whaaat? The ℂ numbers are not "complex" as in _complicated._ They are just one representation of an even subalgebra of a Clifford algebra. Hardly anything could be simpler.

@3:00 not a great start. Torsion geometry is nothing but what you get for free when constructing GR as a gauge theory, q.v. Lasenby & Doran. There is nothing more to it, it's just using the symmetry of rotational invariance to get a proper covariant derivative. How he jumps from there to neuroscience and consciousness is .. a joke? If not, what else? Mild insanity?

fresh

Meer dan 50 jaar oud en nog altijd zo heet.

Always the illest

Good lord! Excellent, excellent!

Mozart has been real silent

What a joke 😂

Gordon Pask made perfectly clear (to his seminar class at the University of Illinois, Chicago ("Circle") in 1975), that GEORGE SPENCER BROWN and DAVID SPENCER BROWN SHARED a SINGLE BODY. The electrical engineer and the logician (to say it again) were distinct individuals with one human body; they cited one another in professional publications, quite properly and informatively. Pask's epistemological ontology makes it reasonably simple to discuss non-pathological cases of multiple Psychological Individuals acting primarily through a single Mechanical Individual - a single physiological human body. For comparison, today's 4E philosophy allows for spatially-extended P-individuals. Similarly, specific interpretations of EPR-B, (i.e. as recent 'interpretations' of quantum 'Action-at-a-Distance') allow us to work productive with "entangled particles," those that exist "at spatially separate locations" but not at spatial regions "in between." Quantum Information Theory ought to be able to enhance, and maybe be enhanced by, Gordon Pask's Conversation Theory.

Is this a joke!?

awesome

No other band is getting a look in at the moment on my headphones. Just sublime.

I love the vocals

Ribonkulous

Great Combination and playing!

Totally Badass!

Love the interplay between guitar drums and the vocals, which are definitely an acquired taste. Personally, I’ve acquired it!

Lotto's music should take more center stage

30 = 2*3*5, it is the mod number for the residual class made from sieving the multiples of 2, then the multiples of 3 (that aren’t multiples of 2, i.e. the 3rd multiples of the the previous res. class’s elements, leaving 2/3 of what was left from the prior sieve), then the (those) multiples of 5. Since the next thing to sieve after that would be 7*7, which is greater than 30, we’ll have sieved every # that isn’t prime (as well as 2, 3, and 5 themselves). 29 is reflected across 15 to 1, 23 to 7, 19 to 11, 17 to 13. The pattern repeats 30-60, but excluding 49. The number of elements in the nth such residual class (30 is the 3rd) = the product of the first n primes each minus 1. So under 30 (2*3*5), that’s (2-1)(3-1)(5-1) = 8.