The problem is you can't say you have to accommodate one disability, but not another. Say you have an excellent employee who becomes wheelchair-bound and can't get to their second floor office. They ask for their office to be moved to the first floor. Are you going to say no? Because they don't deserve special treatment? Of course not. It will cost the company more in the long run to replace them than just move the office. But beyond that, in the USA there is a law that requires it, so by running a business in the USA you are required to follow their laws, on safety, taxes, minimum wage etc., including equal opportunity employment. The short version is if an employee, who is otherwise qualified, has a disability that significantly impairs a major life activity, you must provide an accommodation. It's the difference between equality and equity. But if you are on the side of "we shouldn't have to make a bunch of changes so everyone gets what they want!" Why? Wouldn't you rather everyone perform at the top of their ability, even if it means some exceptions to the norm, rather than give everyone the same loadout and only get 40-80% efficiency? I'll give you my personal example: my brain is broken and can't manage it's chemical levels correctly, causing me pain that isn't linked to any injury and exhaustion that has no cause. There is no cure, only meds that can sortof help, which causes further mental issues like depression. This started about 8 years ago, and before that I was peak heath and mentally agile. Now it's hard to go up and down stairs without my legs shaking and most days my mind feels like jello. To be able to work anywhere near what I was previously able to do, I need accommodations: flexible hours and ability to work from home if needed. All of this is documented by my Dr. with explanations given to my employer. With this "special treatment" I can give above and beyond what is needed from me to do my job. Without it, I'm a seat warmer powered by coffee. There are limits to what is required of employers: it can't be an undue hardship on the company, i.e. it can't be a huge cost or majorly disrupt the business, and they have to be able to perform all the essential duties of the job (with the accommodation), so you don't have to change the job description or make it easier for them. You just have to give them an even playing field.

Lawyer up.

We don't help with job placement, but we do have resources for jobseekers listed on our site at AskJAN.org/info-by-role.cfm#for-individuals:job-seekers

Lol same. hahah. got fired but that job was a headache to anyone, and they treated their customers like shit. they were crooks, and it was disgusting.