Please let the sentences /subtitles stay a longer while. Thx.
@warrenwills325116 күн бұрын
All you got was an extra cookie. Relax
@JettsetterJake16 күн бұрын
United has the best airline app
@matthewfunk73421 күн бұрын
Wow! What a tailwind to make it from PDX to JFK in less than 4.5 hours!
@robcook762723 күн бұрын
Nice video! I like the way you leave your message up long enough to read, and I greatly appreciate that! From your name, it sounds like United Airlines is your go-to airline. If so, how did you decide that? I ask as I recently moved from a hub city of one of the major airlines, not UA, and my closest airport is served by AA, DL and UA. I’ve been thinking about switching to UA as I’ve been impressed with what I’ve read about them for a while now. I now live near a much smaller airport and United Express offers 3 flights to IAD, 2 or 3 to EWR, 2 to ORD and one to DEN. I also have the United Infinite card which seems much better than other major airlines credit cards.
@theunitedflyer45323 күн бұрын
@@robcook7627 my main airport is EWR, which as you probably know, is a major united hub. i’ve grown up in nj all my life, so i’ve grown up flying united, and i’ve always really enjoyed flying them, but now that they’re getting even better, i’ll always check united flights before any other airline. generally their product is decent, decent prices, and they’re super consistent with on time performance and stuff. their service and customer service are fantastic as well. i’ve dealt with issues with other airlines such as delta and american. however, because i go to college in portland, oregon, PDX is an alaska airlines hub and i think alaska is a fantastic airline, so they’re another go-to airline when i’m flying to/from the west coast. so i’d definitely recommend switching to united. their credit card has really fantastic benefits as well, especially if you travel a lot. i rarely have issues with them, and if there’s a delay or something, it’s usually not their fault. i recently haf some issues with delta that were their fault, and a lot of people bring that up about delta, and american is not great with it either.
@petercole879824 күн бұрын
Whats upper class like on the neo.
@SyFlys24 күн бұрын
Never get sick of that 28L Approach overlooking the Columbia, Wish you many safe flights, and a Happy holidays!
@idxluaviation25 күн бұрын
It's good to see other trip reporters in the beginning of their careers! Good video, continue to make content! :D
@marcman844Ай бұрын
Wellll, maybe if you had the Delta app....
@theunitedflyer453Ай бұрын
@@marcman844 i do have it so maybe…
@theunitedflyer453Ай бұрын
@@marcman844 i do have it and i have notifs on they sent nothing lol
@marcman844Ай бұрын
Don't forget to ask for your trading card!
@theunitedflyer453Ай бұрын
@@marcman844 i knew i forgot something :(
@alexismarch8144Ай бұрын
D d d d y y y y n k p I p p p p p p p p p p p p p p b
@StatesAirlinesАй бұрын
Could you do one flight to Los Angeles from Atlanta
Hi, great trip report! About your question concerning the configuraton of these 767's: The London to New York/Newark run (and vice versa) is a massive money making route for both British and American Airlines. This is because this route you flew is what's known as a 'high frequency, low yeald route'. Essentially, this means that the LHR-EWR/JFK route runs like a bus service. (Have as many flights as possible but with relatively empty aircraft ie. emphisis on frequency) In addition to this, this route is also 'premium heavy'. Many business people cross the Atlantic daily thus the need of an aircraft with a high Business Class seating configuration. As a result, United have elected to configure their smallest widebody (767) with half business class and roughly 1/4 premium economy. This leaves their 767's with very little 'standard economy' as there simply isn't enough revenue to be made here compared to business class. There are two ways in which this is seen with these 767's on this route: 1) The EWR-LHR-EWR service is operated 6x daily. This clearly shows how important this route is for frequency! 2) The 6x EWR-LHR-EWR services are all operated by very sparsely-configured 767-300ER's. So why the 767? Well, the 767 has more than enough range for the route but when configured business-heavy (in terms of seating) becomes the ideal aircraft for this route. It's a widebody so brings good revenue due to good load factors (something a bigger aircraft couldn't due to operating costs exceeding revenue received on this service) but also, the 767 isn't small either so the route is still profitable if load factors were to be low on certain days! This is why Delta too operated their 767's but mainly the longer 767-400 due to it being able to carry more business seats. This is United's issue with the 767 however. In my opinion, it's the perfect aircraft for the route however, like you experienced, it's not the youngest aircraft or the most efficient (slower cruise, higher fuel burn) out there so suffers a lot from mechanical/technical delays. In fact, it is quite usual to see United 767-400's here at LHR due to the -300's going tech! Not to mention they're pushing 3 decades of service with the airline. However, United know about these issues but simply don't know what aircraft to replace them with: The 787-8 is a bit bigger than the 767-300 so cutting margins fine on this route and the newly introduced A321 XLR is too small to operate into LHR. You can almost say that the 767 is too perfect at the EWR-LHR service! On the other hand, consider yourself lucky having flown on a 767 as there are not many left in passenger service! Anyways, I hoped this answered your question!! s of seating) becomes the ideal aircr
@theunitedflyer4534 ай бұрын
@@ahyanremtulla yeah i knew about the high frequency for all these airlines, but that explains a lot! thanks so much!
@theunitedflyer4534 ай бұрын
@@ahyanremtulla yeah the 763s do often break down but i much preferred flying it over the 764 which i’ve flown many MANY times, so i’m glad I had that experience!
@ahyanremtulla4 ай бұрын
@@theunitedflyer453 Hi, hope you're doing well, you are very much welcome for the info! I hope to travel in a 767 one day. Good luck for the channel, I've subscribed!
@MatheusOGplayer5 ай бұрын
6:38 OMG THIS IS THE WORST YEAR FOR UNITED
@AeroTravels6 ай бұрын
Great report!
@upaviation7876 ай бұрын
Keep up the great work man! I’ve been subbed to you since you started! Great video!
@alexismarch81448 ай бұрын
A s s y d 7 p d p 7
@alexismarch81448 ай бұрын
D d 9 u y s d e t t 5
@DTpdx19 ай бұрын
Fun trip, thanks for sharing! Looking forward to seeing the new PDX terminal in August.
@theunitedflyer4539 ай бұрын
You and me both!
@denn2366 Жыл бұрын
Nice job... enjoyed your trip... just a little too long . Around 8 minuteswould be perfect. Thank you
@eprohoda Жыл бұрын
woohoo- thanks~how beautiful recording!see ya, amigo- =))
@stef5281 Жыл бұрын
Killer video 👐!! Get to the top FAST > *promo sm* !!
@HDNYCAviation2 жыл бұрын
the wide angle did a really good job on capturing everything
@elinorblake2 жыл бұрын
Amazing trip report 🔥♥️
@LMays-cu2hp2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing your trip.
@chicken2000-j1e2 жыл бұрын
hi mate. good video. i am a aviation geek, have been living literally 15 years in planes. my suggestions-show more details i.e. lounge-who can access, what booz and food they have, selection, is it one of these crap US lounges or normal lounge i.e. Lufthansa, on plane-again details, food drinks, choises. etc etc. show the details, then You will get pump on your views. keep it up mate
@upaviation7872 жыл бұрын
Keep it up man! Great video for such a small channel!
@geetamoonesar2492 жыл бұрын
Good morning and thank you for the vlog. I do have a question, why are the airports designed to send you upstairs then back downstairs to get to your gate?