This was interesting

Machine translation is all good and well. This is however NOT a replacement of the translation process. In a MT process, it is the Post-Editing (PE) that replaces the translation phase. Language service users are still advised to enforce a reviewing process like you'd normally do with conventional translations.

4:59 that's how translation workforce keep their job. they have more quality translation data than all the publicly available pieces combined, whose models will output far better translations than google and the other giants. E.g., for "Go get it / keep up the good work / keep at it," you'll only see "Come on" spit out from a chinese-english translation LOL

Is it a coincidence that there an article with the EXACT wording as this video? And the article was published one year earlier than this one? State your sources bro

espcially for lawyers lol international law here I come lol

Would like to contact Marta. We have same surname [email protected]

Incorrect data. As of now Promts RnD is 4 , not 80 people.

Computers 'learn' in this sense by collecting and using patterns from texts fed to them.

I know it is an introduction but am sorry but I think this is just rehashed common knowledge plus one huge error, that grammar checkers can sort out the problems, before adding the disclaimer at that end that, they can't after all. I want to see an example of how grammar checkers are actually used in conjunction with MT in practice before I watch another one of your videos.

EuroMatrixPlus = fake

Awesome explanation....I agree that machine can do a lot, but not everything...there is always limitations.

All slides have been published on our website: www.meta-net.eu/events/meta-forum-2015/programme

thanks for sharing META-NET

My major is Machine Translation. Is there anyone who has the same field?

Dieser äußerst wirre Vortrag ist das beste Beispiel dafür, warum man möglichst seine Muttersprache verwenden und auf menschliche Dolmetscher zurückgreifen sollte.

nice