Thank you so much this was tremendously helpful! I've got an exam tomorrow and I didn't know anything. Now I've got some ideas of what's going on!!!
@BRO-xp8gx8 ай бұрын
did u pass
@yakulis7804 Жыл бұрын
ᑭяỖmo𝓼𝐦
@mocerlaalacbaino2 жыл бұрын
I've understood.
@dunkanschoose52972 жыл бұрын
1. How many characteristics of Modernism were there? 2. Describe characteristics of Modernism. 3. What was the influence of F. Nietzsche? 4. How Romantic legacy can be described? 5. How do you understand the "Nature of consciousness?" 6. Which of the modernistic themes are the most appealing to you?
@hebatarek79922 жыл бұрын
thank you!💜 that is so much helpful
@peacebe95182 жыл бұрын
Was really helpful for my study. Thank you from India 🇮🇳
@andrewdevonshire17602 жыл бұрын
love you
@archiewoosung50623 жыл бұрын
Do you have any justification for saying Emily 'chose' to become a hermit? Might somebody have had a reason for chosing isolation; not because they wanted it, but because it was 'the lesser of two evils'?
@jottnahar19623 жыл бұрын
igo
@raghadfahad40234 жыл бұрын
To be honest I watched it just because that I like your pronunciation 😂🤍
@vijaysah9124 жыл бұрын
In-depth analysis and elaboration. Praiseworthy work.
I just made a video on this topic too. I really enjoyed your discussion
@khatibulumams87244 жыл бұрын
What intrinsic element of this story?
@fares.s82344 жыл бұрын
😒
@hajirkhalid44414 жыл бұрын
Anyone from my class press a like 🌚😂
@onewyatt14 жыл бұрын
Something I think missed by most. Sir Thomas Wyatt was 15 generations before me but I have perspectives related. Poetry of that day was more for secretly relaying information. The key to understanding was in knowing specific perspectives. Without specific perspectives, it's just poetry. Another much earlier ancestor Wiotus was quoted as saying, "That which makes the scientific treatment of rhetoric possible is, argumentation that awakens conviction". To send secret messages to someone with perspectives with argumentation without raising suspicion, poetry had to be developed for such. Sir Thomas Wyatt the poet did much more than write poetry, he developed a new style for covert reasons. Actually, he took the method from earlier Roman style covert messaging or messages and used it with English. Sir Thomas Wyatt was fluent in many languages including Latin and was once an ambassador to Rome or the Vatican. I think that was just cover though, he was arrested once and escaped to make his way home again. Goes back to another earlier ancestor that delivers William and the Norman's to the island back in 1066 I think. Very much a family business, installing leaders. Don't mean to upset British history but much has been missed or purposely hidden. Just a taste of my perspectives will get your interest maybe. I don't think Sir Thomas Wyatt would have ever written poetry related to Anne Boleyn because he would never place the mother of his daughter Elizabeth at risk. Does that knock your socks off? Why Anne should die and Thomas not, both imply more truth than some could fathom. Anyway, after Elizabeth the 1st, history was altered a bit to separate from the Tudor era. You have more than you know. Even Shakespeare will blow you away with perspective insight. I haven't done much research really but I have much more, most of which I will keep to myself until researched deeper.
@0001D-t3e4 жыл бұрын
Can't hear anything. Too quiet
@Hannalovespowder4 жыл бұрын
very good, thanks a lot!
@criticismonsocietyandnatur71585 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir..
@jupitired7775 жыл бұрын
thank you so much
@tasmiyaali88855 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing 🤗
@Patrick-eu6gi5 жыл бұрын
I came to learn about history but there seems to be a lot of Bias so uhhhh
@terrianstiss98413 жыл бұрын
How?
@balletwb946 жыл бұрын
Thank you, very helpful for studying
@yaseralbadran30946 жыл бұрын
Hello marc, Could you please provide me an electronic books talking about 20th century literature.
@DrMarcBaldwin6 жыл бұрын
yaser albadran Sorry, but I do not know of any.
@sepitheboss6 жыл бұрын
gut obversance
@baroukgari60776 жыл бұрын
I appreciate you, sir. Thanks for this video.
@rociojurado87006 жыл бұрын
Tom Sawyer kzbin.info/www/bejne/m3mpl5pmj9tribc. Like please.Gracias
@Celestialle6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video it was really helpful
@fh.bkrrfvh87736 жыл бұрын
Thanks alot
@StellarStephify6 жыл бұрын
Great review of the major themes of the novel. Thank you!
@whysoserious36446 жыл бұрын
I am studying North American literature and this is certainly extremely useful! Thank you so much and congratulations!
@normbabbitt43257 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Very clarifying.
@johnsonguitarstudio7 жыл бұрын
honestly, I would have been failed out of any class I ever took if I simply read my slides.
@mehdiplp79507 жыл бұрын
Hi Dr May I have ur e-mail please? Im English literature student and need some councilation
@아날로그인간8 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@serkanacu80068 жыл бұрын
thanks doc. this would be helpful :)
@merccadoosis88478 жыл бұрын
*Maggie - A Girl of the Streets* was full of atavistic & hellish symbolism: page 1: "howling urchins" "Devil's Row" "insane demon" All throughout the book there are many more. Crane was portraying an urban jungle, a hell on earth. This is what the book is all about.
@garundip.mcgrundy83118 жыл бұрын
The "White, racist society" that you point out... is a matter of terms and tastes. In the America of 1849 slavery was taken for granted as an economic system. An economic culture going back to classical Greece and beyond. The cultural preference of abolition... or individual rights has its roots in Enlightenment philosophy which predates the French revolution (1789). The economic system which slavery supported in the Old South would have ended, be necessity and practice, at WWI (the dawn of 'globalism'). At that time, a sharecropper system became predominant, not only in the South but throughout America. All the post-modern emphasis on "slavery" is just so much post-modern drivel. Black and minority advocates like to emphasize "slavery" because it makes them feel a sense of superiority. That "feeling" is indeed a romantic throw-back. Time to be more pragmatic. More scientific!
@rc76254 жыл бұрын
Save your revisionist BS for the circus, buddy.
@nawaldemri80883 жыл бұрын
Do you know the novel of the adventure of hachk fin plz
@ridhzi_mahajan109 жыл бұрын
thnku sooo much sir.................. 2morro is mah exam... n this is d best answer to the question..... m soo thankful to u.... :) :) :)
@ToriLillytheauthor9 жыл бұрын
this was super helpful!
@RaunaqSahu9 жыл бұрын
This was nice, thanks a lot!
@rajivc725410 жыл бұрын
Thankyou! This was the perfect last minute revision before my British Lit exam. :-)
10 жыл бұрын
This should help me later to write essays for my exams, thank you very much :)
@shamou198810 жыл бұрын
Great input..thx
@shamou198810 жыл бұрын
I can not thank you enough for this informative lecture. I am so lucky that I've found your channel on KZbin by accident>>>planning to see all your videos.. please sir don't stop uploading new videos. I take my hat off to u, and thxxxxx a million for sharing your knowledge with others.............
@danadavis91710 жыл бұрын
You know, as we study the development of the covenanted society over decades in MA Bay, born of this particular sect, and its spread through the Connecticut River Valley, we find very little that is inherently Calvinist; in fact, aside from predestination I find little that is derived of Calvin. What is even more significant was their opinion of Wycliffe with his emphasis on separation of church and state; this had the effect of institutionalizing the bicameral political entity - church AND state. And while I agree that Roger Williams is significant for his polemics, and a highly intelligent fellow, it would appear, having read Rhode Island's early records, that his colony under English governors very quickly became a highly regimented society, replete with befuddlement and uncertainty. Also, I think I would have included Mather, briefly, for two reasons - his liberal view and his writing style. AND ALSO... to continually hammer home such things as the Mayflower compact, although extremely well written, is to ignore those compacts created by others, for example, those who settled East Hampton, NY. Their compact, although certainly no literary masterpiece, really hits home in reference to the Puritan view of aristocracy versus class-leveling, hierarchy, and such things as "universal" and "perpetual," i.e. the Laws of Nature. Otherwise, I absolutely agree with you on the first few minutes of this video, that none other than these, empowered to challenge aristocracy by this verse - "Thou shalt have none other... " - could have created the America we know. (I liked Harry V. Jaffa's "New Birth," btw,- although somewhat tedious and repetitive, he really hits home on this issue. Otherwise, I enjoyed your video; in fact, I like them all.