The explanation and bullet points for each verse is wonderful. Thank you for sharing this for those who cannot physically be there.

The modern institution of marriage is a cruel joke

Our job as Christians, it is not to condemn, judge. Christ wants us to love one another as he has loved us. So don't worry about the speck in your brother's eye pray for him instead. We are to share the gospel of Christ. We're not supposed to bicker or argue amongst each other about religion. We're under spiritual warfare. You don't know what people are going through that they're acting in such a way. Pray for them. You don't have to agree with them. Silence is golden. You go condemning people pointing out their flaws. You keep in mind how many people before you have done that. That opens them up for the spirit of rebellion, and then you're going to have to ask yourself who you are working for. Pray for them that's what we're here for.

What a beautiful message ❤️🥹

Excellent message for the Church today! Enjoyed watching from SW Missouri!

Would your church be a good fit for someone who is not a capital C Calvinist?

(Same counter statement to thee, as to Matthew J. Trewhella.) We are prepared to enter a digital Lincoln-Douglas debate on this matter. In the Name of Jesus Christ the King and by the authority of His One True Church, We denounce Matthew Trewhella's book "The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates (DOLM)" as anti-Christos, anti-Scriptual, anti-historical, anti-logo, and profoundly heretical. We oppose him and his disciples and urge him to recant this position based upon the following: 1) Mr. Trewhella (MT) has no biblical authority to claim to be a "pastor" or declare "doctrines/dogmas" (Acts: 1-2, 15.) Moreover, Satan, the first "lesser magistrate," used this thinking in his rebellion against God the Father. 2) MT uses the pagan Roman Empire, which crucified our Blessed Lord, and slaughtered Christians, to define DOLM. He turns anti-Christos. 3) The life of God the Son, Jesus Christ, found in the gospels, provides no support for DOLM. 4) MT fails to define "resistance." Does he endorse fullfledged violence against the state as the final resort? The protestant tradition that he draws from in the 1600th Century would agree, and his book's appendix d-e. If he endorses violence, murder, schism, rebellion, and mortal sin, he directly violates Scripture and the example of the early Church of the first three centuries. 5) He has no authority to interpret Scripture, and every passage of Scripture he cites provides evidence against his position. Other passages of Scripture, such as Number's 17 (Rebellion of Core), David's non-violent actions against Saul (1st Samuel), and the Acts of the Apostles, do not advocate the type of resistance MT defines. 6) MT fails to define "The Church" in his argument. He incorrectly references examples such as St. Ambrose, Bishop of Milan, and the 1215 Magna Carter, which defined Catholic Church liberty in England, was led by Bishops and clergy, and support from Pope Innocent III. But this Church is the One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church. Thus will he accept the Catholic Church during these 1500 years of Christendom? If he does not, his examples are then invalid. 7) MT fails to recognize there are also "supreme, greater, and general 'magistrates'" in addition to lesser magistrates, failure to acknowledge this confounds the problem. 8) MT fails to provide which bible translation he used in DOLA and precisely what denomination of Christianity he claims. 9) MT quotes from men such as Luther, Calvin, and John Knox, that denied the body, blood, soul, and divinity of our Blessed Lord Jesus Christ, tied their fate to the power of the secular state, rebelled against The Church, became Tyrants in their own right, and had disagreed on fundamental doctrines. This is anti-historical and heretical. 10) Will MT condemn the tyranny of John Calvin's rule over Geneva? Will he condemn Martin Luther's support and advocacy of over 300,000 peasants butchered by the German nobility? Will, he condemn John Knox's actions that led to the dethronement of a lawful queen of Scotland. And will he condemn all these men's actions, denying Christian religion's freedom to other denominations? 11) MT contradicts his entire position, asserting that because several Lutheran Pastors define DOLM, it is a valid "doctrine/dogma ." Martin Luther and John Calvin declared all Church Officers, Councils, Doctrines, and Canon Law invalidated. Therefore the "Magdeburge Confession" cannot be considered a "doctrine" of validity as there is no Universal Church to approve its infallibility. Can MT provide one example in Church History before 1500 on how "Christian Doctrine" was defined? 12) MT fails to tell the fate of Magdeburge in 1631...the city was sacked, looted, and pillaged, with over 20,000 people of a city of 30,000 slaughtered. Why does he omit this fact? (The legacy of DOLM).

Excellent sermon. Very blessed message of Truth. Thank you and blessings in Jesus’ name. 🙏🏼

Great teaching 👍

Bravo family! I love this so much❤️

What an incredible blessing this is to see you you guys connected as a family making music together. Sweet! Thank you for sharing.

What a wonderful service.

Love and miss you all so so so much!! ♥️♥️♥️

Loved this xxx stay safe