brain,please,these information deserve your energy
@girishpai45386 күн бұрын
In case of ROCE M+M theory does not give significant impact although the ROE has a big impact on the Returns made by the investment. through the choice of investment.
@sasan20597 күн бұрын
Can you make a video about treasury department and its role?
@asrieljhirad11 күн бұрын
Wonderful video! Such a clear way of explaining
@Markus-um1lk22 күн бұрын
Great video! But what do I miss? I get that the capitalstructure is irrelevant regarding EBIT but it can not be true for ROE - even if you do not consider deductables and taxes?! If you see it from an accounting/reporting perspective where equity is a residual size and (last-ranking in the event of liquidation ) compared to debt, which is always served first. There are always some provision for debt equity but never for equity. Also: Anyone who has ever recognized goodwill in a business transaction, knows that it is significantly influenced by the debt capital acquired. Thanks for a reply :)
@Ash-vu5voАй бұрын
At 2:56, “doesn’t depend on an ordinary variable x but Brownian motion Zt”. Umm… whyyy?? Feels like there is a conceptual leap between df(x) and df(Zt), that needs more context - what is this new f? Does it transform the stochastic process into a new stochastic process? If so, what’s the point of doing that, what purpose does it serve? Determinism, class of random variables, differentiability, so much conceptual context needed. Not to mention you haven’t actually stated what the lemma is. But ofc, no one questions any of this.
@tomasborralho7460Ай бұрын
best content for rookie bankers like myself, ty so much
@cryptogirlusaАй бұрын
Very interesting! It seems that every strategy has a capital range at which it doesn’t work anymore
@cryptogirlusaАй бұрын
Thank you so much for making this video! I absolutely love everything that has to do with derivatives, Black Scholes and financial contacts. I have been watching all your other videos as well, you’re doing an amazing job! Keep it up! Thank you so much!!!!
@JanCRTАй бұрын
Great video!!
@victorurbina8186Ай бұрын
If tomorrow I get a good grade would be bc of u thx so much
@cyberpunkalphamaleАй бұрын
Skew is delicious
@cyberpunkalphamaleАй бұрын
We call them Pumpementals
@desmondcampbell9358Ай бұрын
Thanks. I had no idea looking at the original econometrics papers what was going on.
@elishemaksАй бұрын
Hey, I would like to ask. Is the expected value (EV) perspective you mentioned here the same as the Economic Value of Equity (EVE) perspective?
@partyboat123Ай бұрын
Could you go over the second pillar of Liquidity gap analysis? Great video!!!
@justins5756Ай бұрын
Nice
@kingdoggie5231Ай бұрын
By far one of the best explanations on KZbin I could find. You should consider teacher this to university students.
@dixztubeАй бұрын
aren't most of these models wrong - i'm reading a book by thaler (misbehavior) he didn't have the most flattering comments for miller and his ideas (seem stuck in old school U of C group think). i'm not a finance or econ guy (computer) so i probably have no idea what i'm talking about
@FinAndEconАй бұрын
You may have heard the saying: All models are wrong, but some are useful. These models try to explain what is going on on financial markets. Because there is so much going on at the same time and these marketsts are so complex, there is no hope of explaining everything. But these famous models capture one of the large channels that move the leverage decision of companies - in that sense they are quite useful in explaining SOME of what is going on.
@user-wr4yl7tx3wАй бұрын
Can you explain the connection between GMM and OLS
@user-wr4yl7tx3wАй бұрын
Really well explained. Thank you
@JuhoKim-qg1tkАй бұрын
my professor needs to see this video
@AnlMeydanАй бұрын
Hello, thank you for the great video. I'm curious about this; if the intervention group consists of a large number of people and it's difficult to regulate the control group, can we still apply the synthetic control method? Or is there a possibility of obtaining unhealthy results?
@FinAndEconАй бұрын
Yes you can, you would just make a separate synthetic control for every person in the intervention group,
@fabianchacon568Ай бұрын
Excellent video, I would like to see more videos of this type
@RnanknАй бұрын
Economic growth, both scale and speed, exceed the carry capacity of the planet, and the rate at which nature regenerates. Financial capital creates more money by issuing debt, at which point it does not create the interest. So there is simultaneously never enough money and too much debt. More economic activity is required to attempt to pay debt, which means the poor and indebted must convert more of nature and resources into commodities. Production, consumption and disposal. Yet, the ever growing pools of money are claims on future resources which exceeds their ever diminishing supply. Depletion and supply constraints should cause money to lose value, but interest rates are adjusted to increase the cost of capital and therefore on a relative basis devalue nature and people - thus preserving the value of capital and saving capitalism. And as the wealthy realize their money exceeds the supply of resources, they purchase all of the assets, and rely on a system of debt bondage and rent seeking to maintain their lifestyles. As feudalism returns, human civilization enters a new dark ages on a dying, increasingly uninhabitable planet.
@FinAndEconАй бұрын
I do not agree fully. Think about this: Not all economic activity is bad for the planet (e.g. planting trees).
@anthonyshula3642 ай бұрын
but what is the implication of the variance or standard deviation for that matter? if i find a variance of X what does this mean? what is the significance or interpretation of this?
@kimchi_taco2 ай бұрын
Best ito lemma explanation I've ever listened.
@jorgeqveloso2 ай бұрын
Really good explanation. Thank you.
@AiaDK2 ай бұрын
Thank you very much for this series!!! I really appreciate how you explained everything step by step! Could you please also explain American option and Heston model? I really struggle understanding those two....
@kyriakosgazis81822 ай бұрын
Excellent video, keep on doing videos like this.
@yousefhashem27432 ай бұрын
Great job with these videos. Helped me greatly!
@bennetluccafeld87182 ай бұрын
cool! I was waiting for something like this.
@IkerCasilliasrocks2 ай бұрын
This was a great video. Happy to have learned something new: the sewage bacteria/ pharmaceuticalstocks trading idea .Still not convinced when you said satellite trading ideas are exhausted, as we have more precise imaging now than ever, and AI that can scan and analyze with great accuracy; but yeah probably a creative out of the box approach is needed to make use of this abundance of data.
@tsurotafadzwachikari40392 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video. I would like to understand the Itos Lemma and Brownian Motion. Any videos that can take me through, its for the financial engineering class under stochastic and optimisation in finance so would @ like something finance related but handy
@xilongli8212 ай бұрын
OMG you are a treasure! I am so glad that I found your videos and you explained so well!
@eliazonta72352 ай бұрын
great video but I have a doubt: in the risk-neutral pricing you are calculating pi*1 based on a price value (9.1) given in the risky pricing. this actually brings us to the same conclusion but you are assuming the risky pricing is already computed. I mean you are pricing in "risk neutral" using a value from risky pricing ain't you?
@FinAndEcon2 ай бұрын
Great spot. Yeah, I just made up the "risky" discount rate without an in-depth explanation on how to obtain it. I did not want to elaborate on that, because it can be quite complex (in simple models, the risky discount rate comes e.g. from the capital asset pricing model.)
@eliazonta72352 ай бұрын
@@FinAndEcon ooh thanks, I thought I was missing something or misunderstood something. would you recommend any books or resources to dive deep further in this topics ? many thanks
@lolalila-fh3zu2 ай бұрын
Can you recommend any papers regarding this topic ? :)
@FinAndEcon2 ай бұрын
Maybe look at this for a start: Gabaix, Xavier. "A behavioral New Keynesian model." American Economic Review 110.8 (2020): 2271-2327.
@Josh-lf8qi2 ай бұрын
please make a separate video on risk discount rate
@FinAndEcon2 ай бұрын
I put it on the list:)
@dilinijayasinghe81342 ай бұрын
Please do a video on convergence in probability and convergence in distribution, if possible covering chebyshev's inequality etc. It would be very helpful. Thanks!
@tata7lato3 ай бұрын
Thank u so much, u have managed to turn a very difficult concept into an easy one for beginners
@user-wr4yl7tx3w3 ай бұрын
If you have a simple example illustrating the exact steps in calculation, that would be really helpful. May be an idea for a video.
@user-ob7fo5gp9l3 ай бұрын
i've never seen anyone write 1 like that
@user-wr4yl7tx3w3 ай бұрын
But isn’t the counterfactual only as good as your construction of your model of synthetic control?
@FinAndEcon2 ай бұрын
Absolutely.
@yvonne.m99993 ай бұрын
thanks a million, this is really helpful for me to prepare market risk interview!
@nc38263 ай бұрын
Thank you for such a poignant post. Considering the current Basel 3 proposed legislation. And the populist rhetoric ads, attacking it as big government, costly overreach, by US Financial trade groups. Without even mentioning what the actual legislation is about. So thanks for the clarification.
@SomeTrader743 ай бұрын
This takes the fun out of being a banker. Stops the gambling culture 😱
@chiliarla3 ай бұрын
Schade, dass du die Reihe nicht weiter führst! Hast eine sehr verständliche Art zu erklären, so dass ich mir freiwillig ohne Zwang durch Uni weitere Statistik oder Ökonometrie Videos von dir angucken wollen würde :)
@FinAndEcon2 ай бұрын
Thanks. I will try to make more videos :).
@622948383 ай бұрын
This series is really the best from 1st principle. I love it!
@jwbpark3 ай бұрын
Video on difference meaning of convergences would be great. Covergence in probability vs convergence in distribution vs etc.....