2024 Entrusted Conference
1:55
2 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@Tiddwelle
@Tiddwelle Күн бұрын
Oh my me!!! Religion is pathetic. This guy is pathetic.
@colleencarrita1492
@colleencarrita1492 Күн бұрын
I have heard that scientist don't know what holds the universe together, I believe that it is His love. How simple.
@jmisssjb05
@jmisssjb05 10 күн бұрын
How sad that this pastor does not have the fullness of faith. And sadly he doesn’t know why we even bother honoring Mary (as the Bible says we aught, by calling her blessed) and has no idea the theological issues in denying Mary the position bestowed upon her by God Himself.
@bonifaceonyekaba8849
@bonifaceonyekaba8849 12 күн бұрын
Mary, filled with the Holy Spirit, did prophesy all generation will call her blessed. Now full of grace, I mean, do you expect Christ to be in the womb of a sinner for 9 months? There is a reason why the dogma of Theotokos was defined, it’s because of such teaching. People start messing around with how the Divinity of Christ could be tolerated. And sorry, she has taken a lot of my prayers to God. She is a sworn enemy of Satan himself and through her prayers, I have been cut off his vices and drawn closer to the Trinity. The Rosary is a powerful source of meditation of the New Covenant my dear Pastor. Learn about it and don’t lead people astray. If you don’t understand it, best stay away from it. A church guided by the Helper has defined this teachings for 2000 years!! Let’s all be humble here. Whose authority do you preach?
@michaelcontreras148
@michaelcontreras148 14 күн бұрын
Praying, reading and teaching scripture is not worship. Worship requires a sacrifice and an altar. The Eucharist is what Jesus left us for worship
@colleencarrita1492
@colleencarrita1492 16 күн бұрын
I live in Massachusetts, I chose to listen to Jesse, because I want to be held accountable for my acceptance of Jesus's work on the cross, to live every day like I believe, so I don't fall prey to the deception of the world.
@Feralfax
@Feralfax 19 күн бұрын
Glad he exposes the error of partitive exegesis
@LegacyAtty
@LegacyAtty 21 күн бұрын
I have enjoyed many of Jesse’s sermons, but he missed the mark on this one. The perfection of Christ under the law cannot be so neatly separated from His atoning death as Randolph seems to suggest (1 Peter 1:18-19). Both are required. In fact, His final sacrifice is his ultimate demonstration of obedience to the Father and the law (Phil 2:1-11). I would point to Phil 2:1-11; 3:9; 2 Cor 5:21; Gal 2:15-16; Rom 5:12-21 in support of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness to us. The presuppositions articulated by Randolph in his message (many of which are factually false or logically fallacious) prevent him from accepting these passages at face value. - He says that the doctrine of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness to us is founded upon the assumption that Christians today must keep the law - This assumption, though possible, is not necessary to the doctrine. I believe that the proper assumption is not that we must keep the law and therefore Christ had to keep the law, but that before Christ’s atoning sacrifice it was the obligation of all followers of Yahweh to keep the law, including Christ. Additionally, absent Christ’s perfect obedience to the law and sacrificial death for us, we would have been required to keep the law today. - From a dispensational perspective, this assertion (that imputation is founded upon our present obligation to keep the law) commits the fallacy of begging the question. It is true that Christians today are not obligated to keep the law. But why? Because Christ kept the law perfectly and abolished our obligation to it in this age by his death (Eph 2). The only reason we are not obligated to keep the law is the very thing Randolph is trying to deny: the perfect obedience of Christ to the law which merited to Him experiential righteousness (though as God He had always been righteous), which righteousness is imputed to those who believe. - Randolph dismisses 2 Cor 5:21 because he mistakenly believes that the doctrine of imputation is founded on this assumption. His attempt to argue from context that this verse is not about the imputation of Christ’s righteousness is unpersuasive. The context is not about the death of Christ, but reconciliation to God (18-21). Verse 21 explicitly incorporates both Christ’s atoning sacrifice and His imputation of righteousness to us as elements of that reconciliation. - He says that the active obedience of Christ is inseparably linked to covenant theology and the covenant of works - This is factually incorrect. While covenantalists, like those quoted by Randolph like to argue this, the doctrine of the imputation of Christ’s righteousness is actually founded on the doctrines of imputation and representation. See, e.g. MacArthur, John, and Richard Mayhue, eds. Biblical Doctrine: A Systematic Summary of Bible Truth. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2017, p. 464-66. These are critical components of biblical soteriology and do not require the covenant of works or covenant theology. - I concur that the covenant of works and covenant theology as a whole are extra-biblical theological constructs that lack support in Scripture. But that does not disprove the imputation of the righteousness of Christ to us as it is not dependent on those doctrines. - He asks if we are under the law or under grace, and then seeks to apply that question to Christ to show that he could not have merited righteousness by obedience to the law. But he makes 2 different category mistakes (false assumptions) with that line of argument. - First, Christ did not live under grace. Christ lived under the law and was obligated to obey it perfectly, which he did. We do not live under the law, but only because Christ perfectly obeyed it and abolished the requirements of the law by his death (Eph 2). - Second, he assumes that no one can earn righteousness by obedience to the law. Separately, he argues that this is supported by Gal 2:20-21, implying that if Christ earned righteousness by obedience to the law, then he need not have died. But this wrongly assumes that Christ is included in the audience that Paul is addressing. Not only is Christ not a member of the Galatian church, His human experience is radically different from ours. As we interact with the law, the law serves only to show us our sin (Rom 2, 7). But the God/man did not have that problem because he was perfect from inception. Christ’s interaction with the law was only obedience, meriting righteousness. Finally, the notion that a perfect life under the law would not merit righteousness seems contrary to Scripture (e.g. Lev18:5; Gal 5:3; Rom 2:25; 7:10; 10:5; James 2:10). Our problem is that perfection is an insurmountable obstacle for us because we are conceived sinful having inherited Adam’s moral corruption, but that is not so for Christ. - He asks if Christ’s righteousness were imputed to us, then why did he have to die? But this is a straw man (logical fallacy). - The question assumes that someone is arguing the efficacious atonement of Christ’s righteousness apart from His atoning death, which to my knowledge, no one is arguing. - The question also falsely assumes that because Christ had to die to atone for sin (again no one is disputing that, to my knowledge), that Christ’s righteousness is not imputed to us. But this is a logical fallacy because the premise that Christ had to die to atone for sin does not logically necessitate the lack of imputation of Christ’s righteousness. - Finally, the Randolph's argument rests upon some fundamental misunderstandings of the biblical text: - Randolph denies that Jesus will be exalted for His obedience (Phil 2), but instead will be exalted only because of His death. This is false. Very clearly Phil 2 has in view the humility of Christ demonstrated by his life of obedience, the ultimate example of His obedience to the Father being his atoning death on the cross. To suggest that Christ is exalted only for his death and not for his humble obedience (ultimately including his death) misses the point of the passage. - Randolph cites Gal 2:20-21 for the proposition that if righteousness comes through the law then Christ died needlessly, implying that if Christ earned righteousness by obedience to the law, then he need not have died. I have mentioned this already, but it is worth repeating. This cannot apply to Christ, because as the perfect God-man, Christ’s relationship to the law is not the same as any other human’s. Christ’s experiential righteousness did come through obedience to the law, fulfilling the requirement that humans had toward God. That righteousness is imputed to those who believe.
@cavemancaveman5190
@cavemancaveman5190 21 күн бұрын
BLOOD MAGIC RAISING THE DEAD
@steveshields8643
@steveshields8643 21 күн бұрын
❤AMEN AND PRAISE JESUS CHRIST ❤THANKYOU MY LORD AND SAVIOR ❤
@PossQueen
@PossQueen 25 күн бұрын
Im still waiting for preachers to look like people and not two faced buissnessmen
@BabakPA
@BabakPA Ай бұрын
God has galaxies upon galaxies to attend to, but he is specially concerned with one primate! Lucky us!
@EasyRiderBob
@EasyRiderBob Ай бұрын
This theological hair splitting can be frustrating when the world is crumbling around us and the church appears to be in poor condition…but I think this pastor’s earnestness is warranted. How does the Law of Moses apply to Jesus when: we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully; knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers… Still, Jesus was born under the law, in order to redeem those under the law. And it was impossible for death to hold Jesus, because he had committed no sin- but I don’t think the pastor disagreed with that. It was just a bit unclear to me his distinction between obedience to the Father in general vs obedience to the Law.
@junkerjorg6310
@junkerjorg6310 Ай бұрын
Dispensationalists argue that Christ's obedience during His life was not necessary for our salvation, but rather demonstrated His sinlessness and qualified Him to be the perfect sacrifice. So if it wasn't necessary for Him to be obedient, which attributed to him being sinless for our salvation, then what if he did sin? Then it would have disqualified him from being the perfect sacrifice, which defeats the distinction that dispensationalists want to draw to support their system. Christ was the spotless lamb, not just a lamb. Without law, there is no need for grace.
@ilokoko410
@ilokoko410 Ай бұрын
I have a question
@Feralfax
@Feralfax Ай бұрын
The question for me is whether Adam was created righteous already or only innocent but not righteous. If he was created already righteous then Christ’s death returns us to that original righteousness. Christs perfect life was then a vindication of that righteousness not a precondition for it.
@framebrain
@framebrain Ай бұрын
Thanks Jesse. I’ve been wondering about this topic and have much more clarify on it now
@thelmaotazu3256
@thelmaotazu3256 Ай бұрын
@georgestroh4412
@georgestroh4412 Ай бұрын
Bob was a good friend and a very gifted brother in Christ. So blessed to hear his music again. Thanks!
@max_iver
@max_iver Ай бұрын
Thank you. So glad the Indian Hills team was able to put this together.
@cuzettehodge1820
@cuzettehodge1820 Ай бұрын
Completely agree. Often thought about this
@mikefinley3726
@mikefinley3726 2 ай бұрын
Great message
@pastorpitman
@pastorpitman 2 ай бұрын
Painful, powerful message.
@paulclayton5161
@paulclayton5161 2 ай бұрын
Oh yeah, “being filled with the spirit ‘with the evidence of speaking in tongues,’” is actually a modern doctrine of the 20th century, promulgated by William J. Seymour and his mentors. There are manifestations of the gifts of the Holy Spirit and the “evidence” is actually just the fruit of the spirit. Doctrine of man that’s pretty damaging.
@prissylovejoy702
@prissylovejoy702 2 ай бұрын
Oh boy I look forward to these comments .
@scooteranthony6297
@scooteranthony6297 2 ай бұрын
Absolutely love the teachings of this pastor... Love the history he talks about of the early church.. I'll add this quote about trying to comprehend the Trinity... "We can never understand how Father, Son, and Holy Spirit can be three and yet one. For my part, I have long ago given up any desire to understand this great mystery, for I am perfectly satisfied that, if I could understand it, it would not be true, because God, from the very nature of things, must be incomprehensible." - Charles Spurgeon
@marlondelrosario635
@marlondelrosario635 2 ай бұрын
Is this church Calvinist?
@Mike65809
@Mike65809 2 ай бұрын
The problem with Chalcedon it is makes it sound like Jesus did miracles by his own attributes of deity. But Scripture does not bear this out. The book of John illustrates many times that Jesus did miracles by the Father dwelling in him in the power of the Holy Spirit. This is why Jesus did no miracles in his childhood, or early adult life. It was after the Holy Spirit came upon him that the miracles started. This was the Kenosis.
@johnwilliams5995
@johnwilliams5995 2 ай бұрын
Be very careful about denigrating the mother of Jesus....that is a door I would never open...
@dan_m7774
@dan_m7774 2 ай бұрын
Yes Mary is full of Grace, as she was acknowledged her status from God. She rightly acknowledged by the power of God she will be blessed for all generations until the end of time. In contrast to this preacher who no one especially an angel sent by God, appeared before him stated his status being in Favor of God. Yet I am sure he will state his own status as a Man of God, without proof. In Luke 1:28, the word that the angel uses is kecharitomene. So it’s not literally “full of grace,” but its root word is the Greek verb “to give grace” (charitoo). The word is the past perfect tense, meaning that the action of giving grace has already occurred. It was not something that was about to happen to her but something that has already been accomplished. The word was also used as a title. The angel did not say, “Hail Mary, you are kecharitomene” but rather, “Hail kecharitomene.” Therefore the word is not simply an action but an identity. Your Pastor will not be called Blessed for all generations, the vast majority of the world does not even know he exists Your Pastor is only giving his opinion, which is not scripture. He has failed to comprehend the Queen Mother of the King and reduces her to inanimate vessel, to even deny her being created in the image of God in his distortion in understanding scripture.
@jacqueboyce3176
@jacqueboyce3176 2 ай бұрын
If God works a miracle that neither a human nor an angel can do because both are subject to the laws of nature both human and angelic, then to deny that miracle is the sin against the Holy Spirit. When we ask each other to pray for something we have no problem. In Heaven too, Revelation tells us that the angels offer the prayers of the saints. When the Virgin Mary intercedes for us and God works miracles only He can do, this gives witness to the truth of the apparition as at Lourdes. To attribute miracles only God can do to evil spirits is, as Jesus tells us, a sin against the Holy Spirit. Satan is pleased when people attribute to him miracles only God can do because he want to be thought of as equal or superior to God. Regarding the Virgin Mary she had to be free from sin for, Galatians 4:4-5 says But when the time of fulfilment had come, God sent his Son, born of a woman, born under the law”. Under the Law the high priest could only enter the Holy of Holies after multiple purifications, washings and sacrifices for sin. Since Mary was to have the Son of God within Her for nine months, She had to be holy and without sin or else She could not have had God present in her at all since she was under the law. As Paul states. As Jesus is looked upon as the Second Adam, so the earliest Church Fathers saw Mary as the Second Eve. Eve chose to sin but Mary did not choose to sin. This would have all been impossible if there was sin in One who bore the Holy One of awesome spiritual holiness itself, God Himself within Her flesh. In regard to Mary’s virginity before it was proclaimed to be believed, God testified by miracles. Even when the Church proclaims a particular person to be a saint, it is not before God has given His divine witness by miracles only God can work. Such statements are called Ex Cathedra - Only such statements are infallible. Anything else the pope says is not infallible and can even be in error, but Ex Cathedra statements are not. This includes those things we believe of the virgin Mary. Some are Ex Cathedra and some are not. Full investigations are made, sometimes lasting centuries before such a statement is made. Mary as virgin and sinless is such a statement - we cannot question God’s own witness through miracles only He can do.
@Dobiegal
@Dobiegal 3 ай бұрын
I don't reject Him.
@diannaleger1819
@diannaleger1819 3 ай бұрын
Amen m
@alanlierz3745
@alanlierz3745 3 ай бұрын
Well done pastor. I’ll be sharing this often.
@dan_m7774
@dan_m7774 2 ай бұрын
He does not understand scripture, get a better source.
@alanlierz3745
@alanlierz3745 2 ай бұрын
@@dan_m7774 Catholics don’t understand scripture, because they interpret scripture through the lense of man-made doctrines that are false, ie all of the Marion doctrines. This man was spot on.
@NubalanceDNAcDc
@NubalanceDNAcDc 3 ай бұрын
Hebrevvs Nndra
@NubalanceDNAcDc
@NubalanceDNAcDc 3 ай бұрын
Btvv vve r naut church noreligion.... Our bdy TEMPLE GRUMEBRYDEGRUM
@NubalanceDNAcDc
@NubalanceDNAcDc 3 ай бұрын
I'm naut just hs Vesel EyemmHsTruSulTvvnSakrdÆvyne. ...nbdy cld vesel he ta 0ur Fr unle Eye hs TvvnVvyfe..
@Alexzoidberg245
@Alexzoidberg245 3 ай бұрын
Hey pastor, bear with me here, but wouldn’t it be better to just preach the truth of Jesus instead of attacking other pastors? Seems like a weird thing to do. I hope you all have fun at the “Country Club of Christ” or “The Jesus home-owners association”, but my household and family are full of sinners, and we will keep working to follow Christ more and more every day. Forgive us sinners if we dont join the Country Club, we must not be rich enough spiritually yet❤
@audreygarcia3726
@audreygarcia3726 3 ай бұрын
Read the Mystical City of God. Our Mother is and always has been an intercession for us. It is not extra biblical fiction...it is beautiful..I can't wait for all to understand that. It takes us to a higher level. Ave ave Ave Maria
@amandawhite4590
@amandawhite4590 3 ай бұрын
There is some Mediator, His name is Jesus Christ. Your idolatry will be your damnation. Follow the Lord not fallen man.
@paolomontelbano
@paolomontelbano 3 ай бұрын
Where are the teachings of sola scriptura and sola fide in scripture
@hiphop74100
@hiphop74100 3 ай бұрын
Well said sir amen amen
@VME28
@VME28 3 ай бұрын
This man is wrong, he is a wolf teaching lies to divide the flock. Catholics who know there faith can put this guy in his place any day.
@amandawhite4590
@amandawhite4590 3 ай бұрын
There won’t be any; Catholics, Protestants, Baptists, Methodists, Lutherans, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, Evangelicals, Orthodox, Anglicans, Charismatics, etc, etc in heaven. Heaven is for those that love and obey Christ.
@Ann-ej6tf
@Ann-ej6tf 3 ай бұрын
Mary was always a virgin, and reminded a virgin after that, sorry your wrong, Be carful of what your saying about Jesus mother, what do you know anyways your religion alone speaks volumns protest everything, and why and who told you Jesus was an angel, cause thats what youll belief.Oh let me correct that its Johova witness who belief Jesus was an angel.
@amandawhite4590
@amandawhite4590 3 ай бұрын
I hope your eyes are opened to the Truth one day!
@WiggleJimmy
@WiggleJimmy 3 ай бұрын
Didn't Mary have other children with Joseph after Jesus? Jesus our Lord was born by the will of the Father and Spirit, to say that all of Mary's children were born of her a virgin says that Mary has the power to create children without a father, but that is a power only God has. That is one of the ways that Jesus was special.
@VME28
@VME28 3 ай бұрын
​@@WiggleJimmyno
@amandawhite4590
@amandawhite4590 3 ай бұрын
@@WiggleJimmy she did, but those that want to remain blind in their false religion, will.
@WiggleJimmy
@WiggleJimmy 3 ай бұрын
@@VME28 "No" isn't going to cut it on something this important brother.
@lonecar144
@lonecar144 3 ай бұрын
The Core 37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On these two commandments hang ALL THE LAW and the prophets. Matt 22:37-40 (KJV) “with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind” means that the first commandment is to be obeyed under all circumstances. And this love of the first law is “to love (in a social or moral sense) -Strong's Talking Greek & Hebrew Dictionary”, it means to do the right thing. And who is God that we are to love no matter the circumstance? ...and the Word was God […and the Law was God]. John 1:1 (KJV). God’s word is law (rules, ethics, morals, principles,) Matt 4:4. Man must coexist to survive. To coexist we must have laws to protect the rights of all. God gave us laws that would allow us to do just that, live, IF adhered to. 33 Heaven and earth shall pass away: but my words shall not pass away. Luke 21:33 (KJV). Let’s face it the laws that we choose to govern by are not working no matter where you live at in this world. It is not enough to just to confess that you believe in the [fairy tales] fables 1 Tim 1:4 (KJV) (the leaven of today’s teachers). You can’t judge the world nor angels 1 Cor 6:2-3 (KJV) unless you know the right laws to judge by. And it is not enough to just know the letter of the law, 14 Thou shalt not commit adultery. Ex 20:14 (KJV), but you need to know why they are laws and what happens if disobeyed. 28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. Matt 5:28 (KJV). You need to take it to heart and know that adultery causes strife, contention, and disturbs the peace of all involved and tempts others to do the same. One who loves their neighbor as themself would not want to disturb their neighbor’s peace, they are not ruled by law but by love. Those that “don’t” only because they are told “thou shalt not” easily fall to temptation because there is no conviction and are ruled by law and are condemned by law. Those that are sincere in their want for peace and truth are drawn to God because that is what God is, peace IN truth, 44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him:… John 6:44 (KJV) and 8 Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you. …10 Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up. James 4:8-10 (KJV) This is what Jesus and the New Testament do, they teach the true meanings and principles of the laws that are in the Old Testament, “the spirit of the law”. Being washed in the blood of the lamb means to learn and follow the true meaning of God’s laws, especially through trials and tribulations, (which is the chastisement of God, thereby showing his love for his children, 6 For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. Heb 12:6 (KJV)). That blood washing also being present for those who were sincere in their walk with God since the creation of mankind, hence: 8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever. Heb 13:8 (KJV) and 58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. John 8:58 (KJV). The prophets, which includes Jesus, died BECAUSE of our sins. We (mankind) were ignorant, and our leaders were greedy, and their deeds were in darkness, and they killed the prophets because they brought those deeds to light. Jesus laid down his life FOR our salvation (John 10:17-18 (KJV)) by his blood, 20 …This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you. Luke 22:20 (KJV) that was shed for the bringing of the New Testament (true meaning to laws), this is why it said that Jesus is the only way to salvation. 16 For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. Heb 9:16 (KJV). And he followed those laws as an example for us to follow, being a man and not God, showing us how to live according to the word in the flesh. 21 … because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an EXAMPLE, THAT YE SHOULD FOLLOW HIS STEPS: … 1 Peter 2:21-24 (KJV). Jesus was a man primed and groomed to be our master, high priest, and the mediator between us and God. 8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; 9 And being made perfect, he BECAME the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him; 10 Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec. Heb 5:8-10 (KJV). 14 Seeing then that we have a great HIGH PRIEST (not God), that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. 15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but WAS in all points TEMPTED (in contradiction to 13 … for God CANNOT be tempted with evil, …James 1:13 (KJV)) like as we are, yet without sin. Heb 4:14-15 (KJV). Two separate wills mean two separate beings. 42 Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done. Luke 22:42 (KJV) And 30 I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me. John 5:30 (KJV) And 28 And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all. 1 Cor 15:28 (KJV) {By principle of this; 14 … For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away. James 4:14 (KJV) Jesus’ life and sacrifice can be likened to less than a finger prick if he is THE God, for God is eternal.} Take a good look at the world and you can plainly see that sin (crime) causes nothing but pain and death. To nutshell it, unless you do your very best by your love and faith to put God (the word) before all else you are not worthy of the protection that the word (law) facilitates, Matt 10:37 (KJV). And make no mistake God will not jeopardize the peace of heaven for no one. 27 And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life. Rev 21:27 (KJV) May God have mercy on his children. Amen P.S. 15 If ye love me, keep my commandments. … 21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him. John 14:15-21 (KJV) And 20 Let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins. James 5:20 (KJV) And 8 And above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall cover the multitude of sins. 1 Peter 4:8 (KJV) To be saved you not only have to believe in Jesus, but you must believe his testament that he signed off on with his own blood. “If you love me keep my commandments”. Salvation is free to all and cannot be bought (grace), but once you accept this “grace” the bible (KJV) tells us we are to work out our own salvation by the works of our faith without wavering and not to willfully sin. 27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world. James 1:27 (KJV)
@carolynfugerer1145
@carolynfugerer1145 3 ай бұрын
Gird up...Amen!!
@BornOnceMore1
@BornOnceMore1 3 ай бұрын
This is solid!
@marissacooley7983
@marissacooley7983 3 ай бұрын
Wonderful! What a cool project!
@JerubbaalgodSlayer
@JerubbaalgodSlayer 3 ай бұрын
This is a heaven and hell issue. If I don’t forgive, I won’t be forgiven. By the grace of God I am applying Matthew 5:44 to my situation and trying to grow from it. It’s very painful when you are a peace maker, but you can’t even approach your brother or sister in the Lord because of how they are, and they should be apologizing to you for the words they hurled out of their mouth to you. *James 3:18* *And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.* 🇨🇦
@Mosob1952
@Mosob1952 3 ай бұрын
Why does it bother you so much. How is this really affecting you? It just shows how you are just opposite if what you preach, you are full of hate. I don't care who does what with who, its their life not yours, you're disgraceful
@jonathanshepherd3275
@jonathanshepherd3275 3 ай бұрын
Praise God our Mothers, Fathers and we their holy sovereign children !! The world will be scorched by the Sun of Man, a baptism by flame this time, all that will remain is all that is pure. The WEF is behind the anti christ "Klaus Schwab" and his Constantiate Justin Trudeau