Excellent talk and book…

This is a monotonous and narrow-minded recitation of trivia about the miserable history of Haiti, recited by a twitchy and trivia-loving professor from Yale, and it is UNWATCHABLE!

Time waste he is selling a book

Get to the point here 14:54

Religion is entertainment - Prosperity ministry aside they preach but not teaching the power of rational thinking for yourself. It is "goyism" paid for by the Jewish lobby .

Statelessness is a pressing human rights issue that affects millions of people worldwide, leaving them without legal recognition by any country. Being stateless means lacking the nationality or citizenship that provides access to fundamental rights and services such as education, healthcare, employment, and legal protection. It often results in marginalization, poverty, and vulnerability to exploitation. The causes of statelessness are varied and complex, ranging from gaps in nationality laws, discrimination based on ethnicity, religion, or gender, and arbitrary deprivation of nationality, to historical shifts like the dissolution of states or forced displacement. For example, children born to stateless parents or in regions with restrictive birth registration practices can inherit this condition, perpetuating cycles of exclusion. Addressing statelessness requires coordinated efforts at both national and international levels. Governments can take steps to reform discriminatory laws, improve civil registration systems, and implement measures to prevent statelessness, such as granting nationality to children born on their territory if they would otherwise be stateless. International organizations, such as the UNHCR, play a critical role in advocating for the rights of stateless individuals, supporting legal reforms, and raising awareness of the issue. At its core, statelessness is a denial of dignity and humanity. By tackling its root causes and ensuring that every person has the legal recognition they deserve, we can move closer to a world where everyone is empowered to live with the rights and opportunities afforded by citizenship.

Historians should also look at those displaced post-Cold War and possible lessons we could learn from that. All in all, an excellent presentation... thank you!

Read the Mississippi history book produced by WPA program. You will find that when Ms. entered the Union, there was little separation between church and state due to Catholic influence but when the Chickasaw land was ceded later to the state, Protestant settlers moved in and took over politics in the state and rewrote the state constitution with clear separation between church and state. One of the clearest separations in constitutions that exist. I’ll also add, as I was reared in Mississippi, on my first trip to Germany in 1979, you could look around and realize that there was no Marshall plan for Mississippi.

Wow. What a treat to come across this with heather cox, richardson, an absolute treasure

Love me some FANNIE LOU HANER❤ A BEAUTIFUL QUEEN IN HER OWN RIGT!!! RIH my SHEROE🙏🏿💋🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿🙏🏿

Of course landowners brought up this issue - THERE WAS NO INCOME TAX AT THAT TIME!!! Also in general this lady is obviously an anti moral relativist, so she thinks people should have known that not letting women vote was morally wrong even though basically the entire civilized world operated that way. These ppl are retarded. They basically think cave men were evil because they behaved like cave men.

Professor Jackckon forgets that Petain did not have three lawyers but four Payen, Lemaire, Isaorny and Nicolay, the latter claiming incompetence from the court which judged Petain But what skills did the high court have which judged those supposedly responsible for the defeat of the Riom trial, ordered by Mr Petain?

The interesting thing here is the failure of fission rollout, we had a huge youth bulge that strenuously opposed nuclear fission in the west, and planning deficiencies of GOSPLAN-style planned economics obviously meant the USSR couldn't just build, build, build. France did, with the Messmer Plan, but that was not repeated across the West, we did not become energy independent through fission energy. The failure of the fission rollout, and also the American Thorium reactor cancellation, effectively gave up the promise of better fission energy, something China has recently been pursuing, incidentally.

@Wahington History Seminar Everything is summed up in the words of General De Gaulle who once, wrongly, admired him so much, and who since June 10, 1940, considered him a traitor!

thanks. why no comment. bless you.

As a Chinese, watching Professor Pantsov interpreting the history of CKS gives me another angle of understanding this controversial character but kind of twisted by both side of the channel.

I got a snippet, very big subject, wish I had more time to devote.

Dr. Richardson, I appreciate your work and contribution to American history studies. I do understand your position. However . . . your seeing Confederate ideology as moving west in contradistinction to simultaneous white, male supremacy in the east sets aside certain facts. I’ll mention two. One, that interpretation belies the simultaneous reality of the pioneer woman (white, black, Indian, mixed) as the indefatigable woman who plowed before dawn and saved the farm or ranch when husband died of illness, or gunshot. Weren’t the first US women to vote in the West? And second, the epitome of American literature with its quiet yet overt message of equality was banned in Boston. Boston is not in the west but was horrified about what Huck Finn said. After pondering by the river, Huck said that if helping Jim stay free meant going to hell, so be it, he’d go to hell. Is that *not* white, male “Confederate” ideology just because Yankees did the banning? I’d go on with your other points, but that’s pointless as you’ll never read this.

If the thesis is that John Fitzgerald Kennedy was a peacenik then I find myself in agreement with Richard Milhous Nixon. No.

In September 1951, it was Georges Pompidou who announced to Charles de Gaulle that "Pétain is dead". De Gaulle then corrected him by responding: "Yes, the Marshal is dead." This response from de Gaulle is quite telling.

Its monumental foot shot! also unprecedented! makes me laugh

Thanks you for this, I bought the book because I really wanted a biography of Stalin that was unbiased and didn’t have a negative (or positive) interpretation from the get go. The nuanced portrait is much more interesting to understand the complexity behind the man then a diatribe or a glorious eulogy could be. 😊

The fact that Africans were rescued from cannibalism should matter And no one has ever been telling the truth about history instead of what you prefer to hear .

Scientifically it's called The Big 5 Conference of Interest .Use The Science of Corruption in Governments ,to understand the problem . The fact that they still use wages slavery proves what a tyrant the Christian church is !

As a middle eastern i find it offensive the blame is west more so than Middle Easterns who commit the violence by their owns hands against their neighbors . middle easterns stop blaming others accept responsibility & west needs to stop thinking they can change that. has experienced violence from ancient times through to the modern era. This region’s deep-rooted tribalism has been a fundamental issue. It’s important to recognize that the conflicts and challenges are not solely the result of Western influence or the existence of Israel. Even in the absence of these external factors, tribal dynamics alone have historically driven and could continue to drive violence in the region

Great conversation. Peace

Thank you very much¡¡

Pétain was a bad general in 14 18 Capitulare at Verdun in 1916 on two occasions and a notorious defeatist in 1918 on 4 occasions Deposed of his title of generalissimo in March 1918 at the interallied conference of Doullens. Between the two wars, 1920-1939, despite the military positions he occupied, including Minister of War, Petain did everything to strip France of its military alliances in the East, such as with Russia, Yuslavia, Czechoslovakia and Poland. Petain prevented the Maginot Line from being completed in 1927, again in 1932 and especially in 1934 as Minister of War Petain will again refuse Daladier to come on January 14, 1940. He will always refuse as cowardly a 3rd time, to the new head of Government Paul Reynaud on May 1, 1940 at Paul Reynaud's 2nd call on May 14, 1940 Petain said to his ordering officer "The situation seems lost, I accept!" and will arrive on May 17, 1940 in Paris with a cowardly refusal to occupy the Ministry of Defense that the Reynaud Government logically offers him, because Petain has already occupied this position in the year 1934 and for more than one career soldier it is natural to expect him to defend his homeland since he is paid for that. Resuming his 14-18 defeatist posture Petain on June 17, 1940 hastened to lay down his arms by asking for a dishonorable armistice from the enemy.

in my father's home country of Sri Lanka, the legacy of british colonialism was more than a quarter century of violent civil war. Thanks Britain. i count myself as an unwanted waste product of british imperialism.

"Legacy of Violence" buries the complete lie of "fair play Britain" that still survives throughout all aspects of English so-called culture.

Thanks for this. I'm a fan of Professor Jackson.

Thank you for exposing how 1935 to 1945 was mythologized.

Hell

u go into a man's country ,take away his land , when he resisted your actions you turn big guns on him , what brutality.

Colonialism should be designated a crime against humanity .

Well done!!!

this is realy goooooooood book , muy recomendable

HCR is a national treasure ❤

Aye, Don't forget the incredible pressure the Democrats were under by the Republican right since Reagan. This forced the Democrats to compromise in order to accomplish anything. There are solutions to this, but the Democrats are unable to implement these policy solutions due to Republican political obstruction and vilification.

IV HEARD ANYTHING BUT SOME THINGS GOOD EVER EVERY TIME. THE WRITING OF THE HISTORY OF LATIN AMERICA. BYE. WHITE PEOPLE WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WHOLE MESS. WHO DREW THE BORDER. WHO RECATAGORIZED AND RESETTELMENT. WHO GAVE THEM THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE PARTNERSHIP. WHO'S THE DOMINANT AND MORE POWERFUL ONE. SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS. YOU CAN START RIGHT NOW.

LOST FROM THE NATION'S 🌐 THE ABOLISHED NATION'S. THE CAST AWAY S. THE BORDER CRISIS. BE CAUSE THEY CAN NOT LIVE IN THE ABOLISHED NATION'S 🌐🛬 GHOST PLANS FOR THE ERADICATING OF THE CAST AWAYS. DELAVERD TO AN UNKNOWN UNSHOWEN AND BLACKED OUT LOCATION. TOO NEVER BE SEEN AGAIN. 📄✍️💲 THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE PARTNERSHIP.

👑️🇷🇺

The main and decisive factor in the collapse of the Soviet Union was the struggle for power between Gorbachev and Yeltsin. The Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR, Boris Yeltsin, most actively contributed to the collapse of the united country, because he really wanted to overthrow the President of the USSR Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev. And for this he entered into a secret conspiracy with the Balts. On January 13, 1991, he arrived in the Estonian capital, where he held negotiations with them. In Tallinn, the Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR signed a completely illegitimate agreement with the Estonian SSR, Latvian SSR and Lithuanian SSR, according to which the RSFSR allegedly recognizes the Baltic republics as independent states. Later, on December 8, 1991, in Belarus, in the government sanatorium "Viskuli", Boris Yeltsin initiated the signing of an agreement on the creation of the Union of Independent States and the liquidation of the USSR. Although initially neither Kravchuk nor Shushkevich wanted to sign the Belovezhskaya Agreement at the meeting.

If FDR reappeared today, he’d be booed off the stage with shouts of “Socialist!”

19:10 "Neoliberal is was profoundly appealing to those... down low... To those on the... New Left." 😅 Okay, bud. I haven't heard this much BS coming out of one mouth since that David Brooks TED talk. This guy is a human mayonnaise stain.

12:50 "Opened up space for... Bernie Sanders style socialism to flourish." 😅 Yeah, it's really flourishing.

Claiming that neoliberalism has fallen does not make it so. It shuffles on like a lifeless zombie devouring all in its path, laying waste and impoverishing the world.

48:58 These people have a poor understanding of Nationalism. Of course Natalism is congruent with Nationalism (along with other forms of nativism). How this something not understood or need to be "explored?" To have a strong self-sufficient economy you need to have a strong birth rate to sustain the economic structures of your society and not rely on the foreign "other" to amend any labor gaps (that free market capitalism does because free market Capitalist Globalists see man as merely an economic unit to fulfill gaps in economies and see countries as nothing more than giant shopping malls for consumerism. whereas Nationalists see nations as organic communities that include race, ethnicity, culture, language, religion, identity to create a collective organic community. and the economy is the serve the nation. not the nation serving the economy).

You're trying to claim the contradiction is that nationalism being xenophobic ironically takes foreign ideas? This is the best you got? Who cares? Yes, they're not all the same. There are some xenophobic nativist that won't take some idea that is based upon xenophobic nativism like protectionism. All groups have contradictions. Xenophiles will worship the other but then have xenophobic ideas that contradict their ideas in certain ways too.

How about simple terms of Portugal like WW2 Germany were a Fascist state and many Russians had a huge hate for anyone from NATO but above all Fascists. So from being any opportunity to diminish the West but above all end Fascism. For the independence fighters they had no option but to go with communism, this was the only way to fight Fascism and keep control of the land by force, surely none of them wanted a Republic so as to ensure no race bias elections (this actually happens in most countries that the majority were farmers and minority army forces now fight any democratic elected government with civil war) just look at ex French lands (not all but some). Now we also have to look at racism faced not just at home but specially in Europe, remember this was a time after WW2, in 1937 everyone loved Hitler including EU and USA some countries were so under the "Theory of evolution" bull that they even had humans Zoos filled with inferior races (this was common thinking back then now imagine how this translated in to a mix or black kid in Europe and above all how many miss-treated Africans worldwide. Knowing Portugal was fascist during WW2 they still not take axes side of the fight remaining neutral but letting the USA and UK use Acores as air base and supplying raw materials to help UK and USSR makes Russians real back stabbers. Guess Germany should have accepted Franco's help and then things would have been very different but then again can't expect much logic from racism