At the aption of one or more parties but not at the option of other or others is voifable contract By coercion Section 15 Coercion is committing or threatning to commit any act forbidden by IPC or detain or threatning to detain any property to prejudice of any person whatever with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement
@riyaasinghh84 ай бұрын
Eminem - 10 words/second AB sir - 10 articles/second
@ishii_209474 ай бұрын
Best teacher 🙏✨
@dravidchicha4 ай бұрын
Baban supari 🔫 😂😂😂😂
@riyaasinghh84 ай бұрын
Finally Baban Supari ka face reveal hogya🔫😎
@Dailyearningwithmj4 ай бұрын
Thankyou sir...🙏😊
@ananddwivedi34674 ай бұрын
I accept this answer...✋
@rishiahuja24894 ай бұрын
Ab❤
@shradhajain10835 ай бұрын
Consent must be free for the contract to be a valid contract.Their are five cases in which consent of a party is not said to be free , amoung those five one of the case is COERCION (Defined under Section 15 of The Indian Contract Act 1872.Acoording to this - committing, or threatening to commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code or the unlawful detaining, or threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing any person to enter into an agreement. In the given case Laxmidas has threatened to commit the act by baban supari😀his consent was not free. Hence this contract is Voidable contract.
@sishti175 ай бұрын
Voidable contract🤣
@ananddwivedi34675 ай бұрын
Babban supari...
@gauravjain93785 ай бұрын
In this case consent was not free , as given in sec10 (essentials of contract) the contract must be free consent so,in this case consent was not free hence it was not a valid contact 😊