Thanks so much for your kind words! It means a lot to me to know that my approach resonates with you. I do believe that education should extend beyond just passing exams.

Thank you John. There is a flow of knowledge in both directions between the Muslim and the Christian worlds. And both have shaped science today.

Thank you!

Glad it helps.

Sama-sama. Dah lama video ni, jadi saya pun dapat manfaat bila tengok balik 😊

You're most welcome. Let me know if you have questions yeah.

Thank you Azlim. Honestly I uploaded this because I had never felt so engaged during my presentation before this one. There was something that just right. And I want to experience that again. I am still very much interested in studying and sharing more about Kalām and Science. It is so beneficial to the ummah. So inshaAllah if I'll figure out how to fit that project into my schedule. Please pray for me.

Irwan Hanish, I would request you if possible to join with the clubhouse app on your phone and engage in discussion in “Ismaili Gnosis” club run by professor Khalil Andani, where we can discuss things like Quantum Occasionalism in context of A theory of time vs the B theory of time. To my understanding, al-Ghazali’s critic of the Avicennian Neo Platonism - power of causality to secondary agents. The Batiniyya whom al-Ghazali also refutes were also Neo Platonists but their theological ontology differs from the Avicennian model where an apophatic God whose Essence is without associated divine attributes and transcends the originated necessary being. The asharite philosopher Shahrastani has responded to al-Ghazali’s criticism of the Batiniyya as has Averroes had responded to al-Ghazalis criticism of Avicenna in his “The Incoherence of the Incoherence”. I am in the process of digesting all the arguments and would welcome your clarity and input.

Irwan Hanish, it is interesting the solution by Spinoza to the substance dualism, which the Cartesian failed to explain, which denies both occasionalism or non occasionalism.

​@@MyIMANVideo Sounds interesting. Although I have to admit I am in a couple of philosophy groups already, and have been embarassingly inactive. So I'll look for Dr Andani's group when I'm sure I can to contribute to the discussion. I have listened to some of Dr Andani's videos and I know I'm interested.

Thanks for your encouragement, Salman. You are right, learning intellectual history is key to tackle scientism. Hopefully it will become a more common feature of science curricula than it is today.

You're most welcome. Let me know if you have any questions yeah.