Zrównoważony rozwój to już był kiedy ludzie sami mogli produkować sobie jedzenie, współdziałali wspólnie. Rozwój to tylko u masoniwca u nas kontrolę i przymus tego co uważają za słuszne.

Two observations. In all four Vostock climate cycles. Clearly the rise in CO2 followed not lead temperature rise. Second, you didn't say anything supporting why human activity causes climate change. If fact dudnt say anything to explain why the four 100k year cycles repeated

'Carbon footprint' - A government thinktank promotional concept or maybe an attempt by Greenpeace as a reaction to 'global warming' ? Actually, a term invented in 2004 by an oil company (BP) through their PR company (Ogilivy & Mather) at a cost of approx $100M to shift the blame from the producer onto the consumer when the oil companies were getting grief after the millenium from enviromentalist groups. This term has efficiently and affectively been normalised into society and the majority of people have fallen for this genius marketing ploy. The shift of the 'problem' onto 'individuals' and 'your lifestyle' is well established thus diverting attention away from the oil refining process and all of it's associated emissions. The 'carbon capture' scheme championed and funded by oil companies is to facilitate the collection and use of CO2 in order to extract more oil from the earth in a more effective process (called EOR 'Enhanced Oil Recovery' ). Can't believe this old nonsense misinformation is still being banded about in 2024. By all means try to reduce your 'carbon footprint' but don't let huge multinational oil companies convince you that it is your fault. Impeccable social engineering accepted by gullible and unsuspicious populations.

Thank you so much for sharing 🙏🙏🙏

What many don't realize is that the elites of the world want about 90% of the world’s human population eliminated, because there aren’t enough resources to support all of those humans . The idea isn't new, it was started by Thomas Robert Malthus (14 February 1766 - 29 December 1834), and the Malthusian concept is alive and well in the 21st Century--Obama's "Science Czar. John P. Holdren coauthored a book entitled Eco-Science along with George and Anne Ehrlich which called for strict control over human reproduction in order to achieve the Georgia Guidestones' demand that we keep human poulation at under 500,000,000. Climate Change is the excuse for these demands ostensibly to save the Earth. Not much hard science in public school curriculum these days. Most people graduate high schools here never knowing that in the 1600’s the Earth experienced a “mini” ice age, that left many areas of the north Atlantic under hundreds of feet of glacial ice that persists to this very day. The Earth isn’t as warm as it was in the 1500’s-when the world famously did NOT burst into flames-and until the last of those hundreds of feet of glacial ice are completely gone, still won’t be as warm as it was. It is THIS glacial ice that’s slowly melting, causing the oceans to rise. NASA and NOAA can’t seem to agree on the rate at which they’re rising-one says 1/8” per year, the other 1/10” per year. No need to build an Ark just yet. I’ve lived in the same house for 40 years, and the climate in my backyard hasn’t changed. No species have actually disappeared. We have the same wild plants (you might call them weeds); Purslane, Salsify, Goatheads, Silverleaf Nightshade, Black Nightshade, Kochia, Lamb’s Quarters, Amaranth, Wild Mustard, Native Clump grasses, and Dandelions. In my front yard, Prickly Pear Cactus volunteers (seeded by birds) and Spiny Goldenweed.Only one species of reptile-Aspidoscelis neomexicanus. Harvester Ants, “Sugar” Ants, two species of Grasshoppers, Chinese Praying Mantis (Invasive but welcome)Lady Bugs, Leaf Hoppers, Darkling and Dermestid Beetles, Cottonwood Borer Beetles, Black Crickets, Paper Wasps, Yellow Jacket Wasps, Hawk Moths, Noctuid Moths, the occasional Monarch, Tiger Swallowtail and Cabbage Butterflies, the Oriental Cockroach (invasive, unwelcome) and a Mediterranean Cockroach (invasive, unwelcome)-and Sowbugs, not insects, but… . For Spiders, we have two species of Wolf Spiders, two species of Jumping Spiders, Western Black Widows, 2 species of Crab Spiders, Yellow Sac Spiders (invasive, unwelcome), Southern House Spiders,Psilochirus, Herpyllus, Dysdera, Oecobius, Lithyphantes and Clubiona. For birds, we have Flickers, Robins, Sparrows, House Finches, Road Runners, Cooper’s Hawks, Screech Owls, Barn Owls, Mourning Doves-being pressured out of the area by Eurasian Collared Doves (invasive, but good eating) and Grackles (invasive) who ran out the equally invasive Starlings. Only a few mammals-I live in a fairly large city: Squirrels (don’t know the variety), Field Mice, Skunks and Raccoons. It’s true that we’re going through a period of several years of drought, but fossil trees from the area have growth rings that indicate that we’ve had droughts lasting for more than a century. Some Summers are hotter than others, some Winters colder than others, some entire years wetter/dryer than others. In the end, though, it’s the same mile-high Rocky Mountain scrub desert it’s always been. The sky ain’t falling. Remember, when you drive your SUV and your cows are farting, you’re RISKING THE LIVES OF 8 BILLION PEOPLE who will almost certainly die from climate change, and so the punishment for your crime is you have to PAY A TAX. If you build hand grenades in your garage without proper licenses, you risk the lives of your family, and maybe the family next door to your garage-RISKING THE LIVES OF PERHAPS 10 PEOPLE in all, the punishment is 20 YEARS IN A FEDERAL PRISON. Hmmmm… A great book by actual scientists that don’t live on govt grant money stolen from the paychecks of taxpayers is “Hot Talk, Cold Science” by S. Fred Singer, David R. Legates and Anthony R. Lupo. They state that none of the “harm” you’re being told is happening is actually happening to the Earth or any of it’s inhabitants. There is NO empirical evidence that any of the claims of the dangers of “Greenhouse Gases” exists, nor have any of these claims ever been proven, nor is there any evidence to support the claims. Instead of evidence,”CLIMATE CHANGE” COMPUTER MODELS HAVE BEEN CREATED that allegedly prove their wild claims. A COMPUTER MODEL IS A COMPUTER PROGRAM THAT DOES WHAT IT WAS CREATED TO DO. Excel can total a column of numbers because that’s what it was created to do: crunch numbers, and Climate models were created to increase the temperatures automatically, once entered into the system from the raw data received from satellites that collect the actual temperatures on the ground all over the world, all day, all night. Remember, when your smiling, lying elected officials tell you about a dangerous situation that can only be solved by you paying higher taxes, the problem is that your lying elected officials want more of your money, and want to convince you that it’s somehow your own fault. One last fun fact: Cows DON’T fart…

How foolish people have become!

Thanks I finally understand about the carbon footprint

All countries should Ban private jet first

Fantastic video. I've gained a wealth of knowledge from your video and have applied much of this information to a paper for my college course!

How many tree do you need to off set you 8.x amount? I have some bamboo tree if you need to buy some.

What a wonderful video, playful, interesting, insightful, clear! Thank you!!! Very useful tool for learning!

Sacrée propagande !

Carbon Footprint originated from a £ multi-million marketing campaign by BP, aimed successfully to place the blame, on you. Don’t believe me, then check it out.

Co2 levels above 300 .13000 years ago wooly mammoth roam around the northern hemisphere. It makes since we are in a ice age

I would rename the 9 Human needs to: subsistence, safety/security, power/contol, leisure, connection/love, knoledge, self-expression, significance, and freedom/spoteneiety! That would be my version of the 9 Human needs!

J’ai enfin compris la RSE merci.

This video by Sustainability Illustrated offers a brilliant breakdown of the circular economy, making complex concepts easy to understand. I particularly appreciated the emphasis on substitution and dematerialization as key transition strategies. The analogy of explaining the circular economy to a child was both charming and insightful.

🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:38 *🦟 DDT spraying led to unintended consequences, including collapsing roofs due to the elimination of parasitic wasps controlling thatch-eating caterpillars.* 01:35 *🦎 Accumulation of DDT in geckos, consumed by cats, led to cat mortality, causing an increase in the rat population.* 02:05 *🐈 Operation "Cat drop" was initiated to control the rat population, highlighting the unforeseen consequences of environmental interventions.* Made with HARPA AI

You missed the drawings of all the people losing their homes and starving to death in all of the slave camps. You should do an update.

Is a con

🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤

Si vous avez des questions sur le sujet, essayez donc la science de l'ignorance....edifiant !

The best way to erase carbon footprints Is to Put John Kerry And Al Gore In prison For this Scam they have Perpetrated!

So how does the video define the term "cradle to cradle" in the context of the circular economy?

We need more Co2 not less, we are a 0.004, when we come under 0.003 all plant life begins to die! This is the real plan by the NWO terrorists.

The approach to sustainability and corporate social responsibility showcased in this video is truly commendable. By prioritizing environmental stewardship, social impact, and ethical business practices, the company is setting a positive example for others to follow. It's inspiring to see businesses taking proactive steps towards creating a more sustainable and socially responsible future. This video serves as a reminder of the importance of corporate citizenship and the power of businesses to drive positive change in the world. Kudos to the company for their commitment to making a meaningful difference!

Hi, I love your video. It is now 2024, do you still use the pen tablet to draw or something else, like an iPad, for example?

Petite clarification à toutes les personnes qui tirent des conclusions hâtives et lisent des commentaires aux raisonnements erronés. Par le passé, ce sont des mécanismes naturels et non anthropiques qui expliquent que les variations de températures précèdent les variations de CO2 dans l'atmosphère : cycles de Milankovitch, changement de l'orbite terrestre, de l'irradiance solaire, de l'albédo, de la solubilité du CO2 dans les océans... C'est cette chronologie de processus et de boucles de rétroactions positives qui explique l'écart observé d'environ 800 ans entre la température et le CO2 atmosphérique. Actuellement et notamment depuis la révolution industrielle, ce sont les activités humaines telles que la combustion des énergies fossiles, la déforestation ou encore le changement d'utilisation des sols, qui expliquent la variation et l'émission massive de gaz à effet de serre (GES) dans l'atmosphère. Ces émissions de GES représentent un ajout, car initialement stockés dans les sols (sous forme de pétrole, de charbon ou de gaz) ou dans les puits de carbone. Les échelles de temps ne sont d'ailleurs pas du tout les mêmes. Sur les 800'000 dernières années, les niveaux de dioxyde de carbone dans l'atmosphère ont oscillé entre environ 180 ppm lors des périodes glaciaires et au maximum jusqu'à environ 300 ppm lors des périodes interglaciaires (soit les périodes les plus chaudes), selon les données recueillies à partir de carottes de glace (et la mesure des isotopes de l'oxygène) et d'autres archives climatiques. La concentration de CO2 variait de quelques dizaines de ppm sur des dizaines de milliers d'années. Depuis la révolution industrielle, nous sommes passés de niveaux de CO2 relativement stables, d'environ 280 ppm, à plus de 420 ppm aujourd'hui. Ceci représente une augmentation de plus d’une centaine de ppm en moins de 200 ans (et non pas sur plusieurs dizaines de milliers d'années). La science est faite pour être remise en cause me direz-vous. Cependant, nous ne sommes plus à l'époque où l'on doit se protéger des foudres de l'Église ou bien à l'époque d'Aristote et de sa théorie géocentrique, sans validation par la donnée mesurée voire prédite. Ce que nous observons aujourd'hui et depuis des années par des données empiriques résulte de causes anthropiques et non d'une variabilité naturelle. Contrairement à ce qui a pu se passer dans l'histoire de la Terre (soit des milliards d'années), aucun évènement naturel récent (activité tectonique, volcanisme, activité solaire...) n'explique aujourd'hui la variation actuelle de GES et de températures. Les modèles climatiques doivent prendre en compte les variations naturelles du climat, comme les cycles solaires, les éruptions volcaniques et les oscillations océaniques. Cependant, ces variations ne suffisent pas à expliquer les tendances observées de réchauffement climatique au cours des dernières décennies. Lorsque les émissions humaines de GES ne sont pas prises en compte dans les modèles climatiques solides dont nous disposons, les résultats ne concordent pas avec les mesures réalisées et observées aux 4 coins du globe, loin de perturbations et de sources de pollutions humaines (Mauna Loa, Neumayer III en Antarctique, Observatoire de l'île de Pâques, balises au milieu de l’océan…). Ainsi, sans inclure les émissions humaines dans les modèles, le forçage radiatif global est sous-estimé, ce qui conduit à des projections de températures plus faibles que celles observées. En somme : Oui, la Terre s'est naturellement réchauffée par le passé et le climat de la Terre a toujours fluctué au fil du temps en raison de facteurs naturels tels que les cycles solaires, les éruptions volcaniques et les variations de l'orbite terrestre et ce, sans activités humaines. Oui, par le passé le CO2 a été la conséquence du réchauffement et non la cause. MAIS NON, le CO2 et la température ne varieraient pas naturellement de la manière actuelle sans émissions humaines. Oui, l'augmentation actuelle du taux de CO2 est la cause d'une hausse de la température et non sa conséquence. Oui certaines études et groupes scientifiques démontrent solidement le contraire, grâce à de beaux éléments de langage, des raisonnement tordus et en étant massivement financés par l’industrie du pétrole (ils n'ont aucun intérêt à ce que l'on arrête de les rendre riches et puissants). Oui, il y a un consensus mondial sur le sujet et sur la différence entre la variation du climat passé en lien avec les cycles de Milankovitch et ce qu’il se passe aujourd’hui. Oui on peut trouver des périodes de refroidissement localisé ou des fluctuations à court terme dans les températures globales. Oui le changement climatique représente aussi du greenwashing, des transferts de responsabilité (triangle de l’inaction), de la culpabilisation ainsi que des intérêts et des conflits d'intérêts économiques et politiques. Attention donc, car le climatoscepticisme, ses raisonnements erronés et le refus de prise de responsabilité compromettent notre capacité collective à prendre des mesures urgentes et efficaces pour atténuer les effets du changement climatique et à protéger notre génération ainsi que les générations futures. Il est donc essentiel de combattre activement les idées fausses et les informations trompeuses en fournissant des arguments solides et accessibles, basés sur des preuves scientifiques vérifiables.

Carbon Footprint is a gigantic scam scheme. That's what it is.

Thank you

Thank you so much

Great!

Commercial greenhouse growers pump co2 into the greenhouse to improve their produce. The globe has never seen so much green vegetation. Human beings are made from carbon. Reduce carbon may reduce the human population?

Je préfère les solutions en français qu'en anglais

I hope this kind of content is taught in schools right now. Their future depends on knowing the truth and demanding change ASAP.

Great work, thank you for sharing.

Thank you so much , very useful

'Carbon footprint' is fossil fuel company propaganda to push blame onto individuals and away from these same companies.

What about the CO2 produced in making the electric vehicle and it’s batteries.

Regardez les températures sur 800 000 ans et vous aurez une autre version.......

Briliant

Ah c’est cool

😮😮😮😮😮😮🤓

Do you think we are all silly adolescents ? Don’t say another word to any of us until you are bold enough to challenge the real offender: China. we can’t even have a conversation until you share your bold initiative with Xi , and if you don’t the whole movement and concern is a sham. What Bill Gates who is a vile man means when he says “rush to zero” is the reduction of the global population. Why would you be a mouth piece for eugenics ?

Gutes Video. Mach weiter so

I am a cynical.... to make batteries you need lithium which is a pain in the arse to find and there basically isn't enough of it for everyone to have an EC. The whole thing is a ball ache. If you forget to charge your phone overnight.... not a big deal, take your charger to work, forget to 'plug' your car in you're fucked! You've got essentially 2 tons of scrap metal on your drive.

El salto más significativo en tecnología llegará gracias a la biomimética. Pienso que es posible crear dispositivos que usen el diseño y comportamiento de las semillas como base para formar estructuras en otros planetas o satélites usando los recursos locales. Una semilla no es un dispositivo mágico. Usa la física y la química para formar estructuras de todo tipo. Desde delicadas flores, hasta gigantescos y pesados troncos, a partir de una pequeña capsula llena de información que libera mecanismos a medida que absorbe, procesa y organiza los minerales disponibles en el suelo. Transportar semillas artificiales al espacio, ayudaría a construir estructuras, módulos y generar materias primas de manera más rápida, económica, eficiente y sustentable que en la actualidad. Se me hace un poco extraño que propuestas así no se toquen en ningún canal que hable sobre "biomimética" o "bioinspiración". De hecho, también se está trabajando en bacterias que pueden ayudar a construir hormigón en otros lugares usando los recursos locales, sin embargo, poca información se divulga al respecto. Cuando veo las animaciones donde se hablan de proyectos para poblar otros planetas como Marte, se me hace un poco difícil creer que sigan planteando la opción de transportar toneladas y toneladas de material en naves espaciales para construir módulos y cosas así. Más que la propuesta de un proyecto serio, parece la animación de una historia de Julio Verne, donde al parecer, ni los mismos encargados del marketing han sido informados de las nuevas tecnologías que ya se están desarrolando.

abrege frere

All BS

Mandatory watch or all year 8 children who are heading to high school.. thank you .