Someday, I want to work through these lectures.

shouldn't professors have stronger voices? aren't they speaking and teaching all the time?

hi

The explanation of the course at lower part of the screen needs correction.

❤

god bless u sir in this trouble times.

il disegno della curva (t^2, t^3) al minuto 25 circa, non dovrebbe essere ruotato di 90 gradi in senso orario?

Dear Madam/Sir, Please please please kindly upload the remaining three videos of the series. I will remain so grateful.

Im Ben

hey do you folks have lecture notes? Thanks for posting

Nice lecture

Hello sir

The first curve at 25:10 does not match to image drawn; the y coordinate should be -- abs(t^3)-4.

please how do i fix this sound problem?

Great lecture. I was very lucky that I could find it.

Wonderful lecture!

all explanation in particle physics is strange

Would it be possible for you to remove the blue stripes in the video so the image gets bigger?

Is lecture 11 going to be uploaded?

o1pfhi #vom.ngo

Amazing keep going thank you so much

Lecture 4 is deleted please do something

Outstanding lecture by R Gebauer , thanks for the efforts

Amazing lectures by Ralph Gebauer, Thanks for the effort

At 1:11:39, I don't think that tau is an isometry. (99999..., 0000..) have distance 1 but (tau(9999...), tau(00000...)) have distance 0.1.

I think we are not supposed to consider product topology as the topology over the set of all infinite sequences over A. The product topology is discrete topology. It is not the same as the topology induced by the metric that is defined by using powers of 2. So the comment at 25:13 mentioning "product of compact spaces is compact can be used" is probably wrong.

Which book did he mention?

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, makes the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon and Mercury, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. Version 1.0 060121

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, makes the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon and Mercury, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. Version 3.0 052721

at 58.11 the question is why do we extend that solution in the set R/{n \phi/2}. I think the answer is no because as the ODE suggest us that the function is continuous at all points in R. So If we extend the function in the domain R/{n \phi/2} then it looses its continuous nature.

Sir is there any way to access the exercises for this course? If yes please give the link for it. It will be more helpful for further understanding.

Thank you for uploading this video. I am now very much interested in this subject.

Great lecture Learnt a lot.

First one. Every time he said this is the last lecture, I feel somehow a bit sad. I always wish he could continue on this topic and talk more, or at least finish the content in his lecture notes. Anyway Prof.dr. Lothar Göttsche is an awesome professor and this is the algebraic geometry course I want to have.

Hey I am undergraduate engineering student, I want to learn reinforcement learning ,should I invest my time in this lecture series or I should learn it from somewhere else ... is it understandable by anyone having mathematics background ?

1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, makes the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon and Mercury, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. Version 1.0 040621

Is there a possibility to access the two first lectures?

Feynman, Dirac, Murray Gell-man

Great delivery

Genius

It to small i can’t see your the letter that you write on the bord

🙂

at 5:06, what makes the phase exp(i\alpha) in (2) and (3) have to be equal? can't the phase in (2), exp(i\alpha) be different to the phase in (3), say exp(i\beta)?

Boo-yaaa first one to comment

At 1:11:25 can someone tell me if this is true for all t<T as well?

These are great lectures but I wish the camera was pointing at the slides.

This is the kind of teachers we need

Where is lecture-8?

There is a textbook or lecture notes to follow the lectures?