Yes you can. But you won't win the race, since everyone else is much faster than you are in higher gears.

@BoardgameNinjas Thank you very much. That was helpful!

We will be making or have made a short explanation for each game. Otherwise it would not take only 3 minutes!

Thanks!

Thank you

Thank you! Enjoy the game.

Dank je wel voor je reactie! Dat is precies wat we hopen te bewerkstelligen. Veel plezier met Wingspan.

Can't wait to play the game

Nice! That is what it is meant for.

I hope you will enjoy the game as well

The new characters are especially a stretch. They overdid it a tiny bit. But it doesn't deter me from playing.

Thank you for watching!

It is indeed very hard to win. Especially when you want the best boxes. Utilise the rover to its maximum efficiency.

Thank you! Hope you will enjoy the game as well.

Als je een kaart die je gesloten hebt neergelegd als wandeling, bij het scoren toch open speelt, dan leg je er een fiche op zodat je onthoudt dat die als wandeling is gespeeld. Sommige score-condities tellen het aantal wandelingen dat je gemaakt hebt en op deze manier onthoudt je dat.

Thanks!

Lot's of videos still to come :-)

I did not know! I should move over to BGA more often, apparently.

I sheepishly have to admit, that I don't know what you mean. The game Guildhall is not like Agent Avenue at all, I think. Care to elaborate?

Ja dat was enorm verwarrend. Tot je erachter komt dat het anders niet te spelen is...

The twist that the lowest card is more valuable than winning the trick, makes the difference. Then you transfer power (in which you have limited or no choice) and setup the power cords for the next player. If you want Red to have the most power, you can only transfer one of the power plugs to the Red socket and hope that the next player who manipulates the board, is willing to transfer power to red instead of away. I can imagine that with two players this aspect becomes more tit-for-tat and less strategic planning.

Hello Natphil, thank you for your question. No we are not Iello employees. We specialise in making explainer videos and make them for their channel. You can also find us on different other channels like White Goblin Games, Jolly Dutch, Rebel Studio, Horrible Guild and several other publishers.

Hi Fernwehtwl, that is the first time I got a comment like that, but that doesn't mean it isn't valid. I do have a solution: if you go to the little cog-wheel on the bottom of a video (with all the settings), you can adjust the speed of play. Just put it at 0,75 and Jay talks a little slower, so you can take everything in! Hope you still enjoy the content and thanks for your feedback.

Hi Fernwehtwl, that is the first time I got a comment like that, but that doesn't mean it isn't valid. I do have a solution: if you go to the little cog-wheel on the bottom of a video (with all the settings), you can adjust the speed of play. Just put it at 0,75 and Jay talks a little slower, so you can take everything in! Hope you still enjoy the content and thanks for your feedback.

Correct. The rulebook says the following for the team variant (3-4 players): "deal each player 4 agent cards in hand".

Interesting. Of course you are right, since you are the author of the game. I got confused by the picture in the rules and the wording. 'Their' in this sentence is very inclusive, but made me believe one team plays as two players and in the other each plays on their own. Combine that with the picture. On a different note: isn't it quite unfair for the player who plays alone? The team with two players has eight cards to choose from, although they don't know each other's cards. But since the turn order is not set, they can confer who goes first and plays the open card. So the player with the right card for the open spot volunteers while the other can put in the closed card and still has four cards to choose from (one more that the player with only one hand).

So my question to you is: how did you balance this and what were your findings during play testing? Have you considered playing with two hand of four or turn it around and give the two-players only three cards in hand each, so they have the advantage of two extra cards on their side but the disadvantage of not knowing exactly what the other player has...

Good questions! :) In this mode, the two sides hve diffetent advantages. The two players have more total cards, but the single player had an easier time coordinating clever plays as they don’t need to rely on a teammate to place the right card face up. In playtesting, the two sides turned out to be surprisingly even.

Thanks!

Thank you for your response. I always play the classic version, but will consider making an extra version of the video with the extra cards.

Too bad we couldn't play Agent Avenue then, but I hope it went well with the tournament you were heading to! Thanks.

Thank you!

Sure it will take a little time, but I'll put it on the list!

In all those years I have never seen anyone misbehave, especially alcohol related. I did not know they sell beer there, but that might be me. Water is indeed important, maybe with added electrolytes.

Dit jaar weer dus? Zwaai even als je ons ziet langslopen 🙂

Thank you. Never thought about making playthroughs. Maybe we should. Even in my group BSG gets played often. I think it is because the theme fits like a glove and people have invested a lot of money in it. I think Unfathomable has a slightly better rules set, just because they learned from BSG and improved on that.

Thanks!

Thank you! We hope to make many more great videos.

I don't think it was meant to be a strategic game, but it still has some though decisions in it. The fun comes from the different goals you are pursuing, so only chasing your own goal quickly gets you in trouble.

En er zijn ook twee leuke uitbreidingen, die allebei een goede BGG rating hebben.

Heel veel plezier! Spreek ons aan als je ons ziet lopen, we zijn benieuwd wat je eerste indruk is.

@@BoardgameNinjas Ik hou mijn ogen en oren voor jullie open 👍🏻

No, thank you for the great games!

Thank you!

En binnenkort in het Nederlands, als je daar behoefte aan hebt. Dank voor je reactie.

Yes, your Hungry Monkey acts as a copy of the card below, so the next player has to play a 10 or higher for it to be valid. Unless he plays a Hungry Monkey himself or a Tiny Ant, which is always valid.

Next the leader reveals what is behind the two doors that were opened on their board. If a dog is found, then the 'search' stops. If no dog was found, the first player also has to reveal what is behind the two doors. If no dogs were found at all, you are a little wiser and start the following round.

Awe thanks!!

Yes, unless you decide to close them all (and open new ones + 1) or initiate a search. But as I said before, I think part of the game is lost with two players. If you want a game with a similar feel, where you have to figure out what your opponent is doing and it is for 2 players; try Dracula vs Van Helsing: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bIPVpmWugb11mpY

You are amazing! Thanks gurlfriend!!

No I don't think so. If the Ant is the topmost card, you take all the cards in the animal pile, except the ant you just played. So you better use the 8 with other cards.