Clamer general scientist CEO of international criminal court law of Islamic of general scientist globally peace
@assignmentuot7963Ай бұрын
All world criminal court notes open trial to United nation and Saudi Arabia and Qatar
@assignmentuot7963Ай бұрын
T
@edinshealtiel37542 ай бұрын
GOAT ......
@pubguc67716 ай бұрын
T 0:10
@the_falconview7 ай бұрын
This was so easy to understand and less cumbersome. Thank you
@GideonZodzenu7 ай бұрын
Please what are the citations
@roman2soiko29 ай бұрын
i memorized the three regional human rights systems in English French Spanish portuguese and Arabic and the special protocol to teh ACHPR is the Maputo protocol something very close to me because i am dating an africanwomen so i can abuse the hell out of the africancommission/court ofhumanand peoples rights
@AymanElargouvi9 ай бұрын
2024 is coming , and this video still useful
@Bozewani10 ай бұрын
i work for the this new ngo for enforicng human rights in africa under the african human rights system (african charter on human and peoples, maputo protocol, africna charter on teh rights and welfare ofr the child, african youth charter, african disability protocoL )
@andrejvirag10 ай бұрын
Volina (AT) said to me, that I can clean my ass with European Convention on Human Rights. I realised on 8th of september 2020, that He was actually correct! THAT'S IT! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
@kishanakamendu816011 ай бұрын
++😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
@brokkenpap Жыл бұрын
Spoken language is still learned and invented. We learn to assert certain sounds to certain ideas just as we learn to assert certain signs to certain sounds. The differences lie with oneself and the audience. Orality is in the moment with an audience that is able to react directly. Literacy is isolated, removed from writer or audience. There is no possibility for a direct reaction. Where orality is dialogical and concerned with the in the moment human life form, literacy is monological and describes a more abstract, linear cause and effect.
@j.pocket Жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: At 8:10 what she wanted to say is that _The principles and practices which established the fundamentals of performance, public pageantry, the coercive subtleties of creating the consentual surrender of authority over oneself and his livelihoods, mastering and maintaining an openly and acceptably harmful double use of the common uses of a person's native language, establishing rules and compliance through perceptions and programs of entertainment, education, excessive enforcement and plausibly denying or posturing omniscient military superiority with a progressively empowered disregard for human decency and proficiency in maintaining societal unrest both domestically and internationally were initially taught in posh, carefully funded homeschools which were owned and operated by royal and noble elites, and eventually became more openly conducted as precursors to modern day "Law Schools." These treaturous institutions were initially called 'Inns of Court' because more appropriate titles such as 'Theatre School' and 'College of Arts' were resigned for respectable institutions which taught honorable skills and when to employ them._ Or, something like that.
@nickieglazer3311 ай бұрын
👁
@omega_t.v3 Жыл бұрын
Thank you ❤
@rogueamusement9240 Жыл бұрын
Heavy stuff!
@PaulEEish Жыл бұрын
Inventio, dispositio, elocutio, memoria and actio, per Cicero.
@thatsthewayitgoes9 Жыл бұрын
The federal legislature doesn’t see 30 million illegal aliens entering here, an invasion?
@JWPeace_4MyBoys Жыл бұрын
what about the birth certificate changing myself to a citizen when i was born a national
@JPPorcaro Жыл бұрын
Richard Boyatzis is god tier.
@mikienne60582 жыл бұрын
I was the 1000 subscriber ... hahaha
@stereofreq71122 жыл бұрын
I think people should be asking themselves, "is a 'U.S. Citizen' a foreigner to 'The United States of America;' and if so, what does that imply with regard to Plenary Authority?" "If a 'resident' is someone temporarily relocated to do business, what is the inference of where they are being relocated from?" If you think that's not what "resident" means, before looking it up, ask yourself: "why would they ever need to make a distinction between a 'resident' and a 'permanent resident' if it didn't infer a relocation?" "If all 'persons' are corporations, and all 'individuals' are 'persons,' does Plenary Authority have force and effect with regard to all 'persons'?" "If I am subordinate to Plenary Authority, am I 'free?'"
@anjulimaistry84642 жыл бұрын
Summer of 2016 - in the US or Africa? If in Africa when - summer can be December or all year round.
@gourisai83152 жыл бұрын
Hi sir Will cedaw support private marriage problems?
@PritamKey2 жыл бұрын
Given to good advice thank you sir, 💖💖💖
@Bozewani2 жыл бұрын
one of my dreams is to start a new human rights Ngo to enforce the african human rights system (African Charter oN human and peoples Rights, African youth CHarter, African Disabiity Protocol, African Charter on the rights and welfare of the Child, maputo Protocol on the rights of women in Africa0
@uztulei2 жыл бұрын
Roman law = civil lav, Canon law, common law , etc..
@santoshsinghsingh36452 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot maam for this content.
@antonioacosta17132 жыл бұрын
Law is the same all around 5 areas family prooerty successions contracts and persons civil law
@Bozewani2 жыл бұрын
African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights African Youth Charter African Disability protocol African Charter on the rights and welfare of the child maputo Protocol African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights African Court of Human and peoples Rights
@pauls70562 жыл бұрын
I love that Main point: state it, explain it, prove it, conclude it structure. So easy to memorise and use. Thank you for posting, Luana.
@pauls70562 жыл бұрын
Wow, this speaker really knows his stuff. Better still, he knows how to convey it
@pauls70562 жыл бұрын
Luana, I love the way the speaker dives straight into the topic - which is what everyone tunes in to hear. Thank you for posting this great presentation.
@nancywysocki2 жыл бұрын
What about "Prisons for Profit?" and why is white collar crime seem to hardly get same degree of justice....
@nancywysocki2 жыл бұрын
Why do stores get police to press charges but a citizen being stolen from police say its a civil matter....?
@nancywysocki2 жыл бұрын
Hahaha at your humour! Great lecture dear one.
@vitorgabriel92082 жыл бұрын
Top
@paullarkin24862 жыл бұрын
Brilliant. Very well presented and easy to understand.
@manishda38312 жыл бұрын
FEA students 😁
@chancebutler64722 жыл бұрын
thank you :D
@chancebutler64722 жыл бұрын
ahh i love this ty. its very misleading though when he slips in wording like "our founding fathers" at 3:43 ish. making it seem like anyone else has no choice just cause he choice to be their slave! :p or cause theyre simply learning about that cartels slave laws. also he said impeachment means the ability to remove, but in definition, and practice ive only seen it ever mean to "attempt to remove confidence in"
@chancebutler64722 жыл бұрын
thank you very much
@ethereumrise78602 жыл бұрын
There is no Muslim law: it is called Sharia law! Faites un effort, ma grande!
@nommuwodzeri40762 жыл бұрын
very helpful
@Bozewani3 жыл бұрын
one day i will enforce a ngo for human righs in africa un jour je travai pour les organizaiton des non gouvermental pour les drotis des les hommes en Afrique eu trabalho para organiziçao de novo gobierno em africa انا اعملي في متمة الجكوك النسم في جمعت المليكة
@Bozewani3 жыл бұрын
انا اعملي في محكوةمة دولية 我知道大人发 Id xid m yrtsanbsitional justice je me conoi le sjustice Я учил в переходный юстиция Yo trabajho para justicia transitional
@Tommykennedy1013 жыл бұрын
See page. Common Law comes from the dome, a book of old rules and customs. Broken down they equate to 4 Laws only. No harm, loss, breach of peace, no deceit within contract. The Common Law cannot be changed by anyone as it is the foundation of the best justice system in the world. All it needs to work is for the ppl on a whole who make up the Common Law to take responsibility to uphold the Law. Out side of the Law, we have legislation, statutes, or acts, that would only have Lawful backing if consented to by the ppl after being made fully aware of the facts.
@shizanepimp1 Жыл бұрын
Well said and so true 👍
@mikoajbaczynski373311 ай бұрын
Common law can be changed by a simple judge via overruling or differentiation while civil law is more stable as the courts cannot completely change the intepretation of written regulations. It is therefore more accessible for the everyman who can just look up a law in one of the unified codes as well as search for precedents, which, although of no binding value, ought to be the same as long as the written regulation didn't change. It can also more easily adapt to changes, as the legislation isn't bound by precedents. And while the Doom books may be old, they aren't as old as the Code of Justinian from 534 CE, the oldest unified code and the basis for private continental law from the Middle Ages up to the present day or the Twelve Tables from 449 BCE, the oldest written civil law regulation.
@Tommykennedy10111 ай бұрын
@@mikoajbaczynski3733 The Common Law cannot be changed. Legislation can be, but only with the consent of the ppl it serves after being fully informed.
@mikoajbaczynski373311 ай бұрын
@@Tommykennedy101 So, if the 13th amendment hadn't been pased, would slavery still be legal?
@Tommykennedy10111 ай бұрын
@@mikoajbaczynski3733 The Common Law applies to ALL human beings.
@Bozewani3 жыл бұрын
انا اعملي في حكوك النسم في افريكة I work fohuman right sin Africa je travai pour droits des les homme s en Afrique eu trabalho para diertos humanos em Africa
@romanianfps3 жыл бұрын
Dude what the fuck this didn't explain anything, now I'm going to fail my exam lmao.