M4 Survival Test
0:28
21 күн бұрын
Ocean Wave Energy in Australia
3:09
Peter Osman, CSIRO on ICOE 2024
0:20
Cultural License to Operate
5:12
3 ай бұрын
Blue Economy Corporate Overview
2:05
Пікірлер
@愛莎-l4w
@愛莎-l4w 2 ай бұрын
Ecosystem-Friendly ideas Marine Life-Friendly design Ocean-Friendly design Sustainability🌎♥️🐟🐠🐬🐳
@愛莎-l4w
@愛莎-l4w 2 ай бұрын
Ecosystem-Friendly ideas Marine Life-Friendly design Ocean-Friendly design
@suechandler8162
@suechandler8162 2 ай бұрын
No wonder there were no questions....no one was watching.
@suechandler8162
@suechandler8162 2 ай бұрын
Did anyone know this was going to be on?
@MichaelSmith-px1ev
@MichaelSmith-px1ev 3 ай бұрын
Sounds like the speakers weren’t aware how much time they were allowed to speak. Supply chain has massive issues here hopefully they can resolve this ASAP
@iantag
@iantag 4 ай бұрын
Construction from scratch in Australia is of a magnitude that dwarfs previous shipbuilding. Eg Hunter 5GW floating offshore at 15 MW/unit ~ 330 units. Lets say 1st phase in 100 units deployed in 1 year (1500 MW) - about 2 'coal fired boilers' worth). Estimated steel is 4000t/unit. So to construct 100 units = 400,000 tonnes. Biggest ships that used to be built in Australia were 10-12,000 tonnes. To build 100 units requires Port of Newcastle to construct and deploy about 2 units per week (in this scenario) . This is all getting to be a bit of a stretch. Failure statistics for offshore turbines have been quoted as high a 8 failures per year per turbine !! (about 1000 hr MTBF per unit) - so you need a fully function maintenance and supply facility once the first units are even online. Failure of Electrical Cabling interconnects are well known/reported and bordering on UN-insurability (that alone is a project killer). This tells me that : a single step into an offshore wind mega-project in Australia is extremely risky (or simply foolhardy) and instead, Australia needs a softly-softly staged approach to even know the beast they are trying to create. A staged approach says start with a fast-tracked pilot project of (say) 5-10 offshore units before you bet the farm. BTW - part of my background was reviewing major capital projects for an O&G majors - where serial #1 was something that rarely delivered. Not impossible; but a supply chain nightmare for the 1st in Oz.
@RitaInko-Tariah-q4x
@RitaInko-Tariah-q4x 5 ай бұрын
I am Rita Solari Inko-Tariah from Nigeria
@puncakbharu5066
@puncakbharu5066 6 ай бұрын
blueeconomy.sabah.gov.my/sibec2024
@puncakbharu5066
@puncakbharu5066 6 ай бұрын
see you all in Sabah Malaysia, Sabah international blue economy conference 2024 (sibec 2024)
@nilton7735
@nilton7735 9 ай бұрын
Dar pra cultivar aer nessa gaiola mis de 20 mil peixes. Sustentavel! So uma duvida, como sera feita a alimentacao uma vez que a gaiola encontra-se no fundo do mar?
@StudentDesignLab
@StudentDesignLab 7 ай бұрын
Through a feed barge as seen in 00:07
@nilton7735
@nilton7735 7 ай бұрын
Isso sim deveria ser feito no mundo todo!!!
@HernandoLetriz-vx7ux
@HernandoLetriz-vx7ux Жыл бұрын
Greener World is better than WWIII
@HernandoLetriz-vx7ux
@HernandoLetriz-vx7ux Жыл бұрын
Green Work to save earth is Logical
@josephineedward8233
@josephineedward8233 Жыл бұрын
This is very interesting, thank you for this informative webinar.
@drykedorsay8748
@drykedorsay8748 Жыл бұрын
🙄 *PromoSM*
@kasperjansen5467
@kasperjansen5467 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Why would you not consider ammonia / methanol for short sea shipping (instead of hydrogen)?
@mohanpedia6811
@mohanpedia6811 Жыл бұрын
First like and first comment me only
@fengchenwei8311
@fengchenwei8311 2 жыл бұрын
So cool.
@Steven-sp8mc
@Steven-sp8mc 2 жыл бұрын
ρɾσɱσʂɱ 😍
@craigelliott2524
@craigelliott2524 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Blue Economy
@oscart7506
@oscart7506 2 жыл бұрын
🄿🅁🄾🄼🄾🅂🄼 🎉
@yeelunlai4592
@yeelunlai4592 2 жыл бұрын
Current main seaweed product in NZ is fertilizer. In addition to the carbon sequestered for seaweed growth, seaweed fertilizer help soil to sequester carbon with plants growth. Biochar is a good soil conditioner which just show how seaweed play important roles at different level to sequester carbon. To further complicate the formula, if we replace our food source to ocean (seaweed, fish, seafood, etc instead of beef, lamb) the land can focus on sequestering carbon (timber farming or conservation lands). Just a few of my thoughts which I thought may be important to get amplified
@sherrylan5019
@sherrylan5019 2 жыл бұрын
唉唉唉唉唉唉唉
@soonhenglim7349
@soonhenglim7349 2 жыл бұрын
It is a fact of life that technological advances will always precede the formation of a regulatory environment. It cannot be the other way round. The regulators cannot predict the direction of technology and hence they have no means of drafting regulations which are emerging. In fact those at the forefront of emerging technologies do not either. The Wright Brothers could not have imagined that flying machines would one day have payloads of hundreds of passengers making intercontinental flights. The technology was able to advance with little regulatory impediment. We have voluminous regulations covering the design of ships or offshore rigs, to take on example, but they all are drafted based on the experience acquired in the field, in design offices, shipyards, and from trials and errors in real life operation and maintenance. My message to regulators, is they should not be heavy handed if they wish to encourage innovations. Lim Soon Heng, Founder President. Society of Floating Solutions (Singapore) Organizer of World Conferences on Floating Solutions.
@pika.v5662
@pika.v5662 3 жыл бұрын
I like to aquacultuer.and i larning aquacultuer
@keithnance4209
@keithnance4209 3 жыл бұрын
In the main video, Carnegie’s CEO asked for ideas on what to do with the excess energy….how ‘bout Crypto Mining!!! Seriously!!!
@climatechange-aerobservato2891
@climatechange-aerobservato2891 3 жыл бұрын
EAC artisanal Fisherman need Vocational Diploma Rebel-edu to become EQUAL stakeholders in the Blue Economy Best : Prof.Dr.Ezekiel Okemwa TUM University Mombasa / Faculty Health & Environment