He can't shoot. He got no game Everybod in his team and everbody else on that court ( refs, statisticians etc ) help him get his stats every game. His passes count as assists.

@@volfi123 smh Then at this point he needs to hang it up cause he's embarrassing him self.

That was a solid Barkley impression. Sh!t is funny hearing Ant (I type that like I know yall) vent all his anti corporate/madison avenue/focus grouped/commercial breatfast cereal commercial...rage. The tides aint gonna turn on Bron man, the media stuff is just getting started. Like yall really think Kamala is done? Current times context doesnt matter to these mega talent agencies. The only hope is guys like you get a million views and... maybe I can short Nike stock, I don't see how they can save that brand...easier to sell a myth than 180 dollar shoes with the ambassadors being a bald guy on steriods who doesnt run back on defense and a watered down Grant Hill...as if Grant Hill wasnt almost at peak watered downess

gotta keep it hood

It might take a nostalgic tone in a few years. Movies from when I was a kid (born ‘99) all have this overexposed look to them

lol

if youre talking about the youtuber i believe they are a woman and the character is a man, i think

@ haha maybe.

i understand someone not wanting to deal with some of the pernicious content that exists all over the place but at some point the "good guys" gotta step on the pedestal and be active in whats going on... like i like the idea that i can watch a movie, judge it honestly for not just its filmmaking quality but also if it has those propagandistic elements. i would want everyone to feel like they can honestly do that if film is something they actually enjoy... throwing the tv away has never been an option for me because i like film/tv too much and i want to point out the rotten milk

@@ArtIsDeadish Yeah its a job and its important to point out their BS. In a way its like journalism but for entertainment. And yall are good at it. I was just sharing the opinion from, "Guy looking to watch something" POV. Like I don't need to watch the DNC or GOP convention to decode their messaging and BS...and like I said before I'm also a little hesitant on possible subliminal nonsense they have going on. Like when I saw some of that opening Olympic ceremony, my brain and intuition was just like "Nah Yo..." like we know whats going on or being attempted I dont need to be a theologian or historian to understand someone is "playing games" right now, trying to use this sporting event to push "some-thing". All I'm saying is careful sometimes, those people are very good at doing what they do, and some of their programming might be hidden beyond just the story line or who is funding the movie. As far as I know there are no regulatory bodies making sure there arent EXTRA sh!t going on in these movies. It might've been before your time, but I remember when I was kid there was pushback against "Subliminal messages" in commercials, movies ect. That has completely faded away, all I know is if I had kids I'd never let them watch any "Illumination" film. Sucks that saying that outloud sounds so Q'ish..."Where one goes we ALL go brutherrrrrr!" or wtf those dopes say.

@@ArtIsDeadish think I responded on the wrong video, but have yall ever seen or reviewed "Branded" ? That movie was pretty tripped out, and a sci fy tangent to this topic. I thought it was a classic, like Revolver but it got sh!t on by the reviewers and most people ignored it totally

have not heard of "branded" but maybe i check it out

is the branded movie from 2012? i wanna make sure i got the right one

hahaha

you could try something like "michael clayton" or "the constant gardner"... not truly about GMOs but has some ideas about big pharma

understandable but... can you imagine a worse movie?... i can... i can imagine a much worse movie thus i scored it a 6 and ill leave the 1's for those that truly deserve it

lol verbal typo

a friend recently recommended a video by gifted hater funny enough.... the content i make is honestly just honesty. i dislike these movies or shows because i truly think they suck or are not "masterpieces" (like the penguin which i heard it called a masterpiece several times, i still gave it an honest grade regardless of the obvious d-riding of it)... i guess my point is that i wont be forcing something to suck for the sake of content. whatever i think of something, is what i say

fair enough

lol dont blame you

appreciate it

that doesnt kill part of the russell crowe character in the first movie? like he was waiting to go to "heaven" to be with the girl he cheated on or the son he loved meanwhile he had a son living? damn maybe i need to rewatch and revise my grade for the first one

anymore critiques btw? im glad to answer them

lol im sorry dude... i see what i see... when i see something good it hits more right?

that tea kettle did a really good job tho lol

i honest to god dont remember if that was explicitly said or explained... i assume it wasnt

so when someone releases a movie right around the election and that movie is clearly trying to make trump look bad (probably worse than bad), it has nothing to do with the current political landscape?

@ first off the movie was never supposed to come out now. It was supposed to come out months ago. But it was delayed like almost everything in Hollywood now. And second, it doesn’t make Trump look bad at all. I despise Trump and everything he stands for and I actually thought this movie humanized him. It didn’t make me change my mind about him, but I understood him a little better. This movie has nothing to do with politics. It only has to do with his relationship with his mentor Roy Cohen. Who is a fascinating person in American history. I’m interested to see what part of this movie you thought made Trump look “ probably worse than bad”? Because there was no new information in it. Honestly, I loved the movie, I’ve already watched it three times. It has great 80s nostalgia, and the acting was incredible. and whether I like or not, it showed Trumps perseverance and strive for success and to make something of himself. I also thought the scenes with his older brother were extremely heartbreaking and moving. And I know that art is subjective, and you’re entitled to your opinion on the movie. I don’t want to take that from you. I just think labelling it a political hack job will put people off both on the left and on the right. And that would be a shame because it is a great movie! the cinematography, the acting, the vibe of New York in the 80s. And the soundtrack!! And I think the relationship shown between Roy Cohen and Donald Trump is fascinating. Trump’s older brother was an addict and his father didn’t believe in him (or anyone for that matter, his dad was an ass) and he found a replacement for that in Roy Cohen. It really gives a better understanding as to who Trump is today and some of the things he says and does. As somebody who dislikes Trump and everything he stands for, what this movie did for me was allow me to see him outside of the political field, and especially during an election cycle were the only thing we see about Donald Trump is politics. It brought me back to view him as a man with emotions and insecurities just like the rest of us.

so trump actually did "that" to his wife after she called him bald... like its a proven fact... like enough of a proven fact that the creators can guarantee that happened and portray it as reality in their cringy movie... i think youre either trolling, a weirdo or severely out of touch tbh

also lets be honest, regardless of release date the point is to affect peoples' perception of trump in an election year

@@ArtIsDeadish I promise you I’m not trolling. I edited my other post to kind of explain more at the bottom. But yes, his wife did accuse him of that in her book that came out in the 90s. It’s not new news. They collected information from around the time that the movie was set and used it. But just cause they showed it in the movie doesn’t make it factual. Everybody knows that movies take creative liberty. If you watch this movie and think that every single word uttered and action that took place is real, then you have to be naïve. That’s not how movies work.

????

???

hows that man?

@@ArtIsDeadish no offense sry. felt like you just rambling, no real grabbing of the issues of this movie as "a movie, as an artform" to quote you. felt like a biased rant. i havent seen it myself. but its not a review (at least the first 10-15 minutes)

well if i watched a political ad would you want me to focus on the "commmercial narrator guy" voice or the whats actually being said in the political ad? yea its a movie but it would actually be kinda dumb to consider this independent artists that are trying to portray some sort of "artistic, philisophical stance" btw i think i did capture the purpose of the movie pretty plainly but maybe you should go watch it yourself

respect the opinion

i disagree about the 2nd movie and havent seen 1st movie yet

thankie