Vida visible e invisible .vida anaeróbica y vida aeróbica.
@PabloCornejo-qc5du10 ай бұрын
Vida activa .muerte inerte
@rust9102 Жыл бұрын
No elegimos nada querido Mosterin
@roni3872 Жыл бұрын
GReat Words.
@AnaAna-zh8yc Жыл бұрын
Gracias por pensar y repensar con gran calidad humana en los pacientes
@user-uu3ik6mn4g Жыл бұрын
Excelente exposicion de Ultimas Voluntades.
@Josecarlos226 Жыл бұрын
Extraordinario el maestro Mosterín. Prolífica producción, ideas claras, defensor de los animales, destacó en todo lo que hizo. Siempre será recordado y leído
@d.walterbernabe849 Жыл бұрын
Marco Antonio Denegri y Jesus Mosterin personajes increibles de nuestras vidas. Ambos compaginaron y discutieron puntos cientificos, ideas y demas temas. Mentes brillantes caray como no recordarlos. Gracias maestros. 🏆
@miguelangelcuadrosescobar17483 ай бұрын
**Marco Aurelio Denegri**
@Reneux2 жыл бұрын
thomas WHAT
@tinkereyeskelly94372 жыл бұрын
Frankenstein
@charunsauniignacio49162 жыл бұрын
Mucha ignorancia sobre el tema.
@Josecarlos226 Жыл бұрын
Ignorancia de quién o quiénes?
@catsaresocute6502 жыл бұрын
Okay, but first of all men are if anything more, not less, emotional then woman altho they display those less, I think, but appart from that bs
@catsaresocute6502 жыл бұрын
Obviously you can combine those, you can't have them without each other, you need rights for the social change (altho I think it would happen without too, but slower) and then If everyones save to express their thoghts talk to woman and explain what why IS probably wrong and listen to them in turn. It's not, you can't take somones shakels away? So it's not really sensible
@vicentelopez35862 жыл бұрын
Un gran pensador y una gran persona, grande,grande
@diegoespinoza34922 жыл бұрын
Percy Brigman, min: 25:24
@lapatriotachilena10942 жыл бұрын
NI SIQUIERA DEBERÍA EXPERIMENTARSE CON ANIMALES... QUE SE CREEN? DIOSES?
@margaritavarju84662 жыл бұрын
El fenomeno placebo corrobora que el cuerpo humano tiene su propio laboratorio interno aùn mas eficas que cualquier farmaco con resultados sorprendentemente para sanar autonomamente. Siempre lo escuche.
@silviacolin96673 жыл бұрын
No se ven las imágenes proyectadas.
@vdevenegas44213 жыл бұрын
Y por qué está prohibido difundir su presentación si en la misma recalca que es parte de nuestros derechos a la información?
@styroyou3 жыл бұрын
There is no controversy...ALL "brain death" (resulting in the harvest of vital organs) is hideous premeditated medical murder (and without anesthesia).
@gusmesqui3 жыл бұрын
Magistral!!!! Fa reflexionar... I molt!!!
@marinajimenez74943 жыл бұрын
Tu eres el mismo que dice que hay que vacunar a niños en diversas cadenas de tv pues hasta ayer tenias publicaciones en instagram de peluches ahorcados en los arboles según tú "se ponen para mantenerlos a raya" entre otras cosas macabras y raras con niños...Que se enteren los que leen mi comentario que eres de Blanes, enfermo
@styroyou3 жыл бұрын
The consensus is a deliberate terrorist fraud (endorsed by the depopulating Harvard elite, in 1968)...
@jorgelafourcade77093 жыл бұрын
Totalmente de acuerdo con el Maestro Mosterín QEPD
@jturon91843 жыл бұрын
Peter Singer's views on human beings are abhorrent: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qarSoWpuetJomqc&ab_channel=Fundaci%C3%B3Gr%C3%ADfols
@taniapelagio59483 жыл бұрын
Un ejemplo por favor 🙏🏼
@wren31643 жыл бұрын
amazing thank you, Dr Carol!
@elizabethpribulsky45393 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@madramalou27063 жыл бұрын
To Fundacio Grifols: Why is there a cut in Gilligan's remarks at 50:56? Here is the omitted portion of her lecture: In the documentary film, "The Gatekeepers", six former heads of Shin Bet, Israel's internal security service, are interviewed about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the end, these hardened and tough.minded men see only one solution: talking with one's enemies. "I'd talk with anyone," the eldest says, "even Ahmadinejad". He isn't speaking about negotiating peace, but something more elemental. He means revealing one's humanity. I have told multiple stories, interweaving the diverse voices of combat veterans, girls and women, boys and men, Jane Eyre and Karenin. The tensions between cultures play out within cultures and also within ourselves. To paraphrase John Berger, never again will a single voice be heard as the only one. In discussions of ethics, we might ask: how can I listen for a voice that is held in silence. www.fundaciogrifols.org/documents/4662337/4689085/monograph30.pdf/f41cb4a7-ad7d-42d6-a820-2c71d2e56df5 p.32
@marioarotaype32174 жыл бұрын
CONFERENCIA EXCELENTE CUANTAS PERSONAS EN ESTADO TERMINAL ESTAN SUFRIENDO EN LOS HOSPITALES O EN SUS CASAS SIN PERMITIRLE DECIDIR EL TERMINO DE ESE SUFRIMIENTO LA EUTANASIA CUMPLIENDO CIERTOS PROTOCOLOS DEBERIA SER UN DERECHO DE UNA SOCIEDAD RACIONAL
@paperprincess10504 жыл бұрын
Do not interfere with nature
@Lafemminista4 жыл бұрын
"Feminism is a movement to free democracy from patriarchy." B R A V O !!! Great Carol Gilligan!! Fantastic presentation. Wise feminist philosopher!!! Gracias.
@InTuneFaceYoga5 жыл бұрын
There is no way to ethical kill a living being who does not want to die. No matter how nice their life was. They obviously do not want to die, probably especially if they have a nice life, you kill them against their will in a brutal way. No way to call this an ethical act. We have the ability to choose every day between death and compassion. Which decision is the ethical right one is pretty easy.
@johnwilkins114 жыл бұрын
I'm a vegan, although I don't actually think there's anything wrong with the act of killing itself. I don't see death as a bad thing, but the suffering that comes with it is the problem. Ultimately there is no possible way of a meat industry without causing suffering, so don't think I'm at all advocating for a "humane meat industry", but really the only possible issue with death is the potential happiness that is being removed, so, if you're opposed to that, I'd suggest you should also be against abortion (if you're going to be consistent).
@InTuneFaceYoga4 жыл бұрын
@@johnwilkins11 A baby begins to be conscious after the first breath is done. If abortion is done early, there is not much there, so I can not judge this in general. An animal is already an concious being which is experiencing life. And then you rub them this by killing it against its will. In society we never see killing as okay, when it is not for our benefit. Nobody says things like she got a dog from the shelter, got sick of him and shot him while he slept. That is fine because the dog did not suffer. Everybody would consider this as a cruel act. We are very inconsistent in our relationship to animals. And there is no scientific reason for this, nor do we need to kill anymore to survive. I do not see any reason to say it is okay to kill animals just because my taste is to me more important than a life. Because like you say, it rubs them of all the years and experiences they could have have.
@johnwilkins114 жыл бұрын
@@InTuneFaceYoga as I've said, I'm a vegan, so I do realise how hippocritical our society is in terms of dogs vs pigs (or any other farm animals), but I don't think it really would be wrong to kill the dog while it slept. Obviously I would never do it, as there's no reason to, but I don't think it's morally wrong. As for the abortion thing, I don't see how them currently being conscious makes a difference when, either way, you're taking away future life from them (which surely is the issue).
@InTuneFaceYoga4 жыл бұрын
@@johnwilkins11 Yes it is great that you are vegan. In my opinion killing is wrong in general. I do not have the right to take a life just for my own pleasure. I wouldn't be like to killed, no matter how "humane" this would be. And I don't really see the difference to an animal which would allow this. When it comes to abortion I think this is more of a question of at what time life begins. In the beginning of pregnancy there is just this little bunch of unconscious cells. I just don't think that this is the same as killing a 6 months old pig. But I totally respect if people have other opinions on abortion. If it comes to missed life experiences you could take this really far. Saying things like anti baby pills are wrong as every egg a woman produces is a chance for a life and so on. I think it is great that you are vegan, my whole family too and definitely everbody can have really different opinions on abortion and there are so many other issues out there. Being vegan is a good thing to do and I try to do as many other good things as I can. At the moment it doesn't matter so much what I think about abortion. I definitely wouldn't judge someone who did it and if done in the beginning of pregnancy from a biological standpoint I don't think I have an issue with that.
@jturon91843 жыл бұрын
How about killing a 'defective' (ie disabled) infant? Peter Singer believes parents have a right to kill 'defective' infant human beings.
@gamerbossac88085 жыл бұрын
Grande teacher Hernán. Adopte me
@swedensy5 жыл бұрын
40:00 Just because you can do something bad does not mean you have to. And do not compare human with a lion. We can reason and have lots others options to be healthy.
@mmc500511 ай бұрын
We can compare chimps with humans as we have the same ancester and they eat meat as well.
@louisacapell5 жыл бұрын
Im fascinated by this. He says there must be some sort of brain lesion present to show damage. That someone who overdoses and needs a ventilator, but an MRI shows the brain to be unremarkable , is not brain dead. He says that person should be in ICU somewhere. But, THIS HAPPENS ALL THE TIME. People are told their loved one is brain dead without so much as an exray. They are doing these tests for brain death while people are under propofol sedation! Obviously the criteria are being ignored!
@Sandsack23115 жыл бұрын
Do you have any source for your claim? I'd be interested. In any case, you have to differentiate strictly between a diagnosis of 'clinical death' and 'brain death'. These two do get mixed up all the time in popular media and even by rookie doctors. Clinical death is pretty acurate, but definitely not 100%. This is the type of death declaration which people can survive if the clinician was mistaken in his diagnosis. As a sidenote, this type of diagnosis is not used for purpose of organ transplant. Brain death on the other hand is probably the most accurate diagnosis you can ever hope to gain. There is no reported case up to date which was actually diagnosed brain dead and did not die without improvement. There are studies with up to 2000 participants declared brain dead, from which not one recovered in any way.
@yomeroyomer94815 жыл бұрын
QUE CONFERENCIA TAN MAS PENDEJA JAJAJAJA .-.-.-.-.- ES EN SERIO????? TANTO ESTUDIO PARA ESTAR COMO ESTE INDIVIDUO¿=??
@JpieRsMcHHReal5 жыл бұрын
Argumenta tu comentario, ¿porque piensas de esa forma?
@mainveraalvarez51375 жыл бұрын
Se quedo callado XD
@manueltdonoso5 жыл бұрын
Es uno de los mejores filósofos de España. ¿Por qué pendeja?
@blksknk3 жыл бұрын
Los que viven por y para la iglesia piensa que toda ciencia es una "pendejada"
@danicp0145 жыл бұрын
Like si vienes por Paulino
@yaelleem91196 жыл бұрын
This psycho is lecturing? seriuosly? This psycho believes in infanticide because in his view, babies are not "persons". And attempts to teach others on "moral" and ethics? lol....please!
@MitBoy_6 жыл бұрын
Tell that to ancient hunter-gatherers who, in order o survive as a tribe, had to kill babies all the time. Peter singer is a very good philosopher who has a pretty consistent moral system, which most people lack.
@tillybethell2994 жыл бұрын
How on earth have you arrived at this conclusion?
@alexmaceiro84136 жыл бұрын
Monster inc, omite quizá adrede, mencionar que tanto Seneca como Socrates no se suicidaron por voluntad, si no por condena. Extraña omisión.
@eddygarcia99535 жыл бұрын
Quizás sea porque Seneca prefirió suicidarse antes que ser ejecutado y pq Sócrates prefirió aceptar la muerte antes que dimitir, fugar o exciliarse.
@demseypinedoruiz184 жыл бұрын
CLARO Q COMO NO ERA UN CUALESQUIERA DISIMULADAMENTE LE DIJERON Q YA NO LO NECESITABAN Y TOMO DICHA DECISION PARA MI ACERTADA.
@regaetonbasura4 жыл бұрын
@@demseypinedoruiz18 si lo mencona, minuto 13 al final y 14 al inicio
@mansurtxafapapaias3517 Жыл бұрын
Prescripció
@Albenvenutti6 жыл бұрын
muy buena conferencia; de acuerdo con mosterin, se deberia legalizar el suicidio asistido. uno debe decidir el momento de su muerte.
@Philippebocanegra6 жыл бұрын
Cómo hubiera querido saber que logró morir sin sufrimiento. Ahora ya pertenece a ese universo que tanto admiraba. Siempre estará en la memoria de quienes apreciamos su prolífica claridad para hablar sobre las cosas. Gran filósofo!!
@nellyhernandez70874 жыл бұрын
Que fuerte y difícil es la vida...
@josegutemberperezrios99122 жыл бұрын
Fue mi maestro de filosofía.
@joorge23492 жыл бұрын
@@josegutemberperezrios9912 que afortunado eres !
@treedog46926 жыл бұрын
feminism is indeed cancer, i don't know why my professors keep pushing this shit on us
@nebojsag.58717 жыл бұрын
At a certain quality of life, an animal is better off alive than dead. Every added animal life above that line is an ethical positive. Destroying, and/or preventing the existance of such lives is an ethical negative. Therefore, if we can choose between drastically reducing the number of such animals(thusly erasing their descendants from existence as well), so that a small percentage of the same animals can have an even better/longer life, and keeping the number of animals (and the quality of their lives) as it is, we should choose to keep the number of animals as it is. We wouldn`t allow most of humanity to starve so that a tiny subset of us could live perfectly. Why do it to animals? It`s a fact that the vast majority of domesticated animals would starve and die if we didn`t use them for food. We should therefore maximize the number of their lives if it is not in contradiction with the aforementioned minimum of life quality, (and if it is economically viable, obviously.) We should maximize the length of their lives, if it is not in contradiction with the previous two principals. Also, hunting and fishing are probably less unethical under current circumstances.
@midiknight64046 жыл бұрын
'Destroying such lives is an ethical negative' This reasoning prohibits killing animals for food, a practice you're in favour of?
@nebojsag.58716 жыл бұрын
You don`t get what I`m saying: To allow animals to be killed for food is to call for animals to be killed (duh) Not to allow animals to be killed by humans IS NOT an abolition of violent/premature animal death, because now there is no incentive to feed them and keep said animals alive. Because farmers would kill them to preserve their crops, and how predators would eat them. I am saying that outlawing the killing and eating of animals under all circumstances is not necessarily, logically in accordance with the greatest number of animals getting to live a life that is worth living.
@midiknight64046 жыл бұрын
Niko Ništa You've discounted farm animal sanctuaries?
@nebojsag.58716 жыл бұрын
Keeping animals alive costs money. Money the public can`t be expected to pay for no reason, especially when it is also expected to denounce a big chunk of its diet to boot. Those farm animal sanctuaries could never feasibly hope to keep alive the number of animals well regulated and relatively humane farms could.
@bonobobanani38935 жыл бұрын
@@nebojsag.5871 What if we abolished the breeding of animals for food now, so no new lives will be added just to be killed. This way we could have a future in which we could use our recources more efficiently. We could feed more people if we were´t feeding so many animals. It would be better for the environment and it would reduce suffering.
@ericcm69367 жыл бұрын
how does Peter feel about animals eating animals
@danielgantley39446 жыл бұрын
eric cm I think he's concerned About the suffering it causes, however, there isn't really any way round this without destroying the ecosystem
@jordanv33233 жыл бұрын
Predators need to kill to survive and don’t have moral agency. Most people don’t need to kill or enslave animals for survival.
@davidsheriff92742 жыл бұрын
@@jordanv3323 very well said 👍
@solyvictor7 жыл бұрын
Muchas gracias por subirlo. ¿No disponen de traducción al español? Es una pena...
@fundaciogrifols7 жыл бұрын
No pero editaremos una publicación en español con las conferencias de todos los participantes de la jornada.