This is the most informative, conclusive understanding video I have found that really breaks it down with two examples. Thank you so much!!! More people need to see this video, compared to others that have been populating first.
@georgetteantwi5979Ай бұрын
Thank you for this : )
@Daniel-yq9zm2 ай бұрын
this is helping me with MBT. thank you
@acoveredmiracle3 ай бұрын
GAME CHANGER!
@David-sx5jt3 ай бұрын
oh yea, ive been looking for info like this
@Mehta-uv2em5 ай бұрын
terse. precise and helpful
@navrubalkaur30855 ай бұрын
helpful content !!! thank you
@LizardBec7 ай бұрын
I understand the example but can't help my skepticism of the example given because my car is push-start; therefore, the keys aren't in the ignition while I drive.
@r.p.89067 ай бұрын
impossible to enroll in your course. impossible. what and where do we enroll? The lsatadapt takes me to a page that is " not safe" an my computer does not allow me to proceed.
@r.p.89067 ай бұрын
brilliant. I'd like to ask if your course has only LR and RC. Thanks
@r.p.89067 ай бұрын
i was not able to enroll in the course. it's not available.
@rababshahzad8 ай бұрын
Amazing
@MaheenAli-s8u10 ай бұрын
Excellent
@athenaaminimd Жыл бұрын
where is the practice you've mentioned in the video?
@LDLCRSAL879 Жыл бұрын
Correct me if I'm wrong, I recall you saying 'the only' is a necessary condition indicator whereas this video states it's a direct sufficient condition indicator. Whether 'the only' is nec. condition or suff. condition, is that situational?
@alyssadonato8617 Жыл бұрын
Thank you SO much for this video. Very clear and helpful
@vageeshgour122 Жыл бұрын
so helpful, thanks man !
@deborahchitester9772 Жыл бұрын
thank you for this going to law school as a speech pathologist to help out in areas that have been in my life with huge influence with a big need. thank you
@belizarslan2725 Жыл бұрын
THIS IS SO HELPFUL THANK YOU!!!
@latoyiabesqupnext3593 Жыл бұрын
I have been struggling with necessary assumptions for 3 weeks and found your video! This helped so much!!!!
@shristi_rawat Жыл бұрын
Love from India ❤
@amneetdosanjh6558 Жыл бұрын
Hi this is an urgent question! At 12:22, you mention that the negation of 'none' can include 'some', 'most' and 'all'. Why can't it include many? Many is subjective, but it's still more than 'none' so would that not also be the negated form of 'none' ? Also, when tackling a question that requires you to negate 'none', would you negate none in all of its forms? How would that work?
@joshuat5202 жыл бұрын
🎊 p̶r̶o̶m̶o̶s̶m̶
@paulmiller66472 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much.
@mindblowtube2 жыл бұрын
This helped a lot!
@FrancoPhysique2 жыл бұрын
These videos have been so helpful thank you!
@jentallbot92273 жыл бұрын
At 5:00 you said all implies most, most implies many, many implies some and that you can’t go up the ladder. But then at 8:39 you said some implies most ? Please elaborate
@LSATAdapt3 жыл бұрын
Hi Jen! Definitely a confusing topic. At that point in the video (8:39) I'm actually trying to explain why you can't go from some to most to all on the ladder chain. This is mostly gonna show up in questions that deal heavily with structure like Parallel Flaw questions where the conclusion is based on some kind of overlap between groups. Just to clarify I thought I'd do a little breakdown of these: I have 'All' implying both 'Most' (51-100%) and Some (1-100%). That's because 'All' is encompassing. Most can imply Some, but not in reverse. When we say most, we mean that the amount is going to be at least 51% and at most 100%, and anywhere in between (I.e. 55, 73 etc). So Most will always fall in the range of Some (1-100%). The only thing that doesn't fall in the range of Some is 'none'. But going in reverse, Some cannot imply Most because we would have to make the assumption that whatever the amount Some is would be at least 51%. Which is not true. I hope this helps, and good luck with your studying, Alex
@mmamer012 жыл бұрын
@@LSATAdapt You said Most at 3:10 is 51% to 99% now your saying it is 51% to 100% - Plus doesn't most leave room for the some that isn't ??? Which is why we stop at 99% because some would be the remaining 1% if that.