Why in the beginning even say something so stupid western tanks can destroy several Soviet tanks before being destroyed ... See this is what I'm talking about this bullshit narrative right off the bat. Set the tone and the rest just nod. Soviet tanks were ahead of western designs really starting with IS-3 up until T-72 a lead of 40 years until Abrams finally showed up. Before then a single Soviet tank could eat several western tanks because of their design. T-64 prime example too expensive proved it was more then a match still used today you know it as T-80. In short once Abrams showed up Italians, French, German Brits etc they started similar projects and ended up being the standard while Soviets simple upgraded T-72 to meet the new designs. And don't try the whataboutism in the middle east conflict... I am talking about a proper trained army with its own tanks in its own hands. Russia is not like any other country. A t-72b3 took out an Abrams in Ukraine two months ago. Leopard was destroyed by a T-80bvm. Su-25 same thing...its devastating with experienced and good pilot and now the new Russian cockpits and sensors along with longer range weapons and deadlier at that too has easily surpassed the A-10. A-10 will always have the gun to its credit there's no doubt there but that's where su-25 just attaches ridiculous amounts of arms under its ten pylons

If carriers are supposed to be obsolete because of missile technology and hyper missile technology, why did China build three?🤔🤔🤔

they just opted for the cooler looking one imo

She's up and in the air mate..

Very interesting video, but l have just a little correction. You mentioned Akagi and Kaga, but they are converted from "battlecruisers" and "battleship", not "cruiser" you mentioned in 2:23

Les activistes qui supporte Assimi sans critiques sont bilant sont des probagandistes,,,,, La Russie va envoyer 1 Million de tonnes de Ble et 3 millions de litres de Gasoil... Le chemin de fer de Kaye,,,bases militaires Russes a Kidal 10.000 soldat Russes,, 30.000 Forces speciale de l. AES,,,ext..ext,,,ext,, Transformation de coton au Mali....construction de tramway,,,, La Russie va construire des Satelites de communication et militaires.. pour le Mali,,, Tout ca etais de la poudre au yeux des Maliens,,,,,,

The story of China's tofu aircraft carrier bought from Temu.🤣🤣🤣

Mega purchase with my tax money. lol.

😂china can’t copy US success there just not good enough 😂

USA 🇺🇸 propaganda

I’m a Chinese , such vessels can only be used to fish 😢

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩 2

Very nice 👍

133 veiws and i'm the only one to wright some bull youtube

The tomahawk obsolete???? The tomahawk makes every thing else 'Obsolete!!! '🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡

Not a lot you can do to up-armour these aerial turret tanks.

still better than bri'ish mentally challenged tank and craprams from us!

Because of reality check 😂

A very statistical and a pragmatic comparison but the Indian ships never asserted themselves as air defence destroyers rather they are designed in a mutli role domain

Easy opening pop top.

A major boost that comes too little and too late... Kinda-like Vlad believing/thinking Kiev would fall in the first three/four days of his 'special operation'. Nope. Just more Russian troops turned in Cargo 200...

Maybe the question should be why they weren't decommissioned earlier, Or even built in the first place, certainly not without better testing and certification that the designs and technologies included were actually fit for purpose..

Daarom rijden er geen westerse tanks meer in de Oekraïne. Omdat de Russische tanks zo slecht zijn😂😂😂😂😂

they still do the turret toss

Very accurate, video covers each and everything that's going wrong for the IAF

Ccp propaganda

Ugliest aircraft ever!!😢

VOTE BLUE FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY

Still, maybe USS Gerald R Ford doesn’t carry hypersonic missiles but it is accompanied with Ohio class submarines that do. So it is equalised here in missiles area 😊

Pathetic NAFO copium

اُڑتے تابوت

اُڑتے تابوت

Government delaying the tenders to acquire jets, Hopefully soon F21 jets will join IAF

How do you know?

The 57mm gun forward on the frigate seems very inadequate. Should be a minimum 105mm. I hope this frigate works out and is not another disappointment like the LCS'S and the Zumwalt destroyers.

The Type 004 (nuclear powered) carrier is being built right now 😸

And does this Airforce also have Buccanneers, Vulcans and Electric Lightnings? These are collector items, by now. The British can't afford even one, the ridiculous rich Americans can, can't they? If you can afford a Trump, please have an airworthy Vulcan or Buccaneer? Please? Sell the Trump?

Some updates (?) The mars-passat radar was a total flop. Barely worked. Soviet carriers had antiship missiles because they never had an attack aircraft like the A-6 or Buccaneer. That was their attack aircraft. Part of it was technical, part of it was operational, part of it was doctrine, part of it was financial. The navy didn't have the money to train or equip strike aircraft, didn't have the room either. Doctrine wise the soviets/Russians never really adopted the idea of long-range interdiction/strike by anything except bombers. Still haven't as we are seeing in Ukraine. They always viewed non bombers as close air support assets or tactical air superiority assets. The MiG, Yaks, and SUs on their carriers were for combat air patrol. Their navy never really adopted an expeditionary concept. For many reasons that are too many and complex to go into. The short version is they are a land power and they think like a land power. We always assumed their submarines intended to try to interdict the sea lanes. Turns out we were wrong. The Soviets looked at the German navy of WW2 and said "they couldn't do it, let's not even try." They intended to use their submarines, and surface ships, to protect their SSBN bastions and coast lines. In effect even at its height the Soviet navy was nothing more than a roided up coastal defense force.

Holy propaganda sh..t

Ouch!

Slow, ugly, badass.

Stupid best combat. Air craft in the world

What??? This video is contradictory, fake news. Praise from ground ttoops,but it fucking sucks at the same time? This is china getting data from our comments

Anyone who believes that you can replace and the A10 with a stand-off weapon is an idiot. This requires menu assumptions that belly the the reality that you must have flexibility on the ground. Any foot soldier will tell you that when you need close air support the A10 is BY FAR the BEST option...Stand off weapons be damned. Quit believing the eyes of the arrogant generals who simply want to increase their budgets with incredibly expensive assets to the demise of the footsoldier. The Air Force generals don't care about the Army foot soldiers... Sad but true! I can assure you that you Crane would take all of the a tens they can get... Why is this true if your arguments are so accurate? Because you are just plain wrong!

The Hog is by no means obsolete......They are fools to retire it

I want two

Id buy one.

The only problem I see is a lot of drones aren’t going fast enough to trigger the system or you definitely would have seen abrams have trophy to field test it

Chinese aircraft carriers suck every single one of them even their new is piece of junk.

It's a piece of junk are useless piece of junk. China's military sucks or navy is useless.