I worked at this world class lab for 42 years and loved every day!
@BertramBoswell-x7n17 күн бұрын
Harvey Mission
@NicholasVincent-ol1zkАй бұрын
Terpenes
@aTest-aiАй бұрын
!!!
@AlgoNudgerАй бұрын
😂
@lazulycreativАй бұрын
Gracias Dr. Morgan Burks por su maravilloso trabajo👍👏👏👏👏
@Iceland874Ай бұрын
Great video. My dad graduated from Cal and worked at the Livermore Lab with Dr. Teller. Thank you for the video.
@ChristianVega-x9eАй бұрын
Love!
@rustymundorf4672Ай бұрын
Did this model live in the Smithsonian American History Museum at one point? I remember one very similar when I visited as a child.
@mirabehn-stormysynapseАй бұрын
🍀!!!
@senweiliang63772 ай бұрын
cant't wait for the buffet, lol
@MadysonWinniford2 ай бұрын
my favorite time of year!
@3Blood2 ай бұрын
Thanks
@stevesimpson83383 ай бұрын
Isn't the simple answer to all of whining about energy efficiency in these buildings that they weren't designed for energy efficiency? And why would they be? Energy is cheap, and people are willing to pay for buildings that allow in tons of light and look good. Hence all the glass. If people want to pay for energy efficiency, they obviously can. But it's not obvious why they should. I own a house that was built in the 1980s. It's terrible from an energy efficiency standpoint, as most houses built in that era are. I have a heat pump. My electric bill is still less than $200/mo even during hot summers. If my house were built with modern energy efficient building science, it would have been much more expensive. So it's a simple trade off that the homeowner (or building owner) has every right to make. I get the jaded view of "green" on the commercial side, but it's easy to explain. Commercial building owners like to pretend to be "green," because there's a senseless, almost religious commitment to "green" today, without any consideration for cost and tradeoffs. Which is to say, there's no consideration for basic economics. What is the cost of "being green" versus the cost of not being "green?" And what do people prefer and at what cost? The problem with this lecture, and most modern attitudes among engineers and designers, is they don't care what the buyer wants or can afford. They don't care about the difficult tradeoffs and choices that homebuyers and the builders they hire must make in order for real humans (which is to say, middle class humans) need to make. This guy's irritating sarcasm just bleeds contempt for anyone on a budget who wants a house.
@JigilJigil3 ай бұрын
0:10!! after the Strider Technologies report on how over 154 Chinese scientists who worked on government-sponsored research at the U.S.’s Los Alamos National Laboratory over the last two decades have been recruited to do scientific work in China, I thought we would see a different approach towards admitting and hiring foreign scientists, it seems not.
@yoonjin8533 ай бұрын
💜
@ReOp143 ай бұрын
Awesome! Love to see robotics being combined with AI
@Thomas-hj7uc3 ай бұрын
Amazing Physicist! I saw him on Oppenheimer too. I just want to be like him, or like any other Physicist.
@JMJls3 ай бұрын
I want to take a class this week.. Thank a lot for this Video 🙏🏽❤️
@Bedonye3 ай бұрын
What is it?
@rafiamasrat6483 ай бұрын
Can you please tell me how and from where to download the CIF files of these MOFs in particular to Cu- MOF
@MichaelSkinner-e9j4 ай бұрын
You have to warn people of any kind of radiation. You can’t just sneak up on them or keep it quiet.
@PiiLLoO10004 ай бұрын
Hola. Se que este video ya es de varios años atrás ahora estamos en el 2024. Pero tengo un caso que me gustaría compartir con la doctora. Es acerca de el transplante de bacterias. Mi esposo tiene una diarrea crónica desde los 10 años de edad y en la actualidad ya tiene 52 años y está decayendo mucho. Espero alguien me pudiera dar su contacto. Espero llegue este mensaje a alguien que me pueda ayudar. Gracias. Saludos cordiales desde México
@Holiday2165 ай бұрын
Some good content, but not a very good teacher/lecturer
@Blackscorpion19636 ай бұрын
Science has come a long way since our friend the 'Bunsen burner'...
@robertoguerra53757 ай бұрын
Impressive :) in which year was this interview? Atomic power was just in Einstein imagination or was it discovered already?
@ParDiss-e4i7 ай бұрын
I love you 😢❤
@OCEREVXRB7 ай бұрын
i wasnt even born then, im still like 9 months away form living
@kevinpatrickcarey37418 ай бұрын
shes a hottie
@maria-giulianalatini17248 ай бұрын
Can you not coat pre-existing structures, such as river beds etc?
@cariocadenyc8 ай бұрын
This guy speaks the blunt truth about that GSA mess.
@SciHeartJourney8 ай бұрын
Josh Harnet portrayed Ernest Lawrence in the movie Oppenheimer. He was the one that built that giant apparatus that led to an experiment verifying nuclear fission was possible. They barely showed it. What a wasted opportunity that was. 🤦
@qk7x9 ай бұрын
Negawatt
@Douglas21409 ай бұрын
22:28 wild
@davidwheatcroft279711 ай бұрын
3 Nobel winners recently looked at the graph of storms/floods/droughts etc, and said, "The FLATTEST line I have ever seen!" Further, the IPCC itself admits, "There is NO increase in storms/floods/droughts." Hansen was admonished by the US Gov for not revealing hos method in arriving at World temperature, and for its OBSCURITY! Alarmists are mediocre; liars; cheats; bullies.
@bugrademiratan779911 ай бұрын
NEGAWAAAAAAT
@Allahu_Akbar_the_one11 ай бұрын
Berkeley really took a legend from University of Minnesota.
@bruhman8005 Жыл бұрын
On a real ass note 22:25 NEGAWATTTT???????????
@nihinivi5182 Жыл бұрын
WHAT THE FUCK
@GoldenRoseRecords11 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@urigeheadmot119611 ай бұрын
Negawatt ??????
@Tolu11 ай бұрын
negawatt??????
@mLK635 Жыл бұрын
Lee Eng lock’s Negawatt is revolutionary I can already feel it coming inside me!
@aegontan686 Жыл бұрын
Josh Hartnett did a great job
@John_667 Жыл бұрын
What is blud saying 💀
@суши-ц5н Жыл бұрын
Nega watt
@therealendexanni Жыл бұрын
Negawatt
@lainiwakura3741 Жыл бұрын
>the models showed some evidence of working I should write that in my thesis